• Aucun résultat trouvé

Use of chronic disease management tools

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Use of chronic disease management tools"

Copied!
1
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Vol 57: DECEMBER • DÉCEMBRE 2011

|

Canadian Family PhysicianLe Médecin de famille canadien

1423

Fast Facts

C

hronic diseases continue to emerge as consider- able challenges to health care systems worldwide.1 Canada is no exception, as the results from the 2010 National Physician Survey (NPS) show that chronic dis- eases substantially contribute to the increased demands on physicians’ time. Increased complexity of their patient case loads is the most frequently cited factor (reported by 76% of FPs), followed by management of

patients with chronic conditions (73%).

A variety of tools have been developed to help pri- mary care providers manage chronic conditions.

According to the 2010 NPS, more than a quarter of FPs have summary information on chronic condition prev- alence for their patient population. Flow sheets and checklists are used by 46% of FPs. More than half of the physicians who do not have or use flow sheets and checklists indicate that these tools would be beneficial to their practices (Figure 1).

In addition to these tools, FPs report that they pro- vide written instructions for patients with chronic dis- eases, explaining how patients can manage their own

care at home: 20% of FPs do so routinely, and 45%

provide written instructions occasionally. Among the electronic tools used by FPs in managing patients with chronic diseases, electronic medical records are the most popular (used by 27% of FPs), followed by web- sites (17%), online chronic disease management forms (7%), and e-mail (3%). It is reasonable to expect that as electronic tools become more commonplace, the prevalence of their use in chronic disease care will rise accordingly.

The NPS is a collaborative project of the College of Family Physicians of Canada, the Canadian Medical Association, and the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Additional results are available at www.nationalphysiciansurvey.ca. If you would like the opportunity to develop and write a future Fast Fact using the NPS results, please contact Artem Safarov, National Physician Survey Project Manager, at 800 387- 6197, extension 242, or artem@cfpc.ca.

Reference

1. Dorland J, McColl MA, editors. Emerging approaches to chronic disease man- agement in primary health care. Montreal, QC: McGill-Queen’s Press; 2007.

Use of chronic disease management tools

Figure 1. Use of CDM tools: A) Percentage of FPs’ responses to questions about having summary information on their patient population with chronic diseases; B) Percentage of FPs’ responses to questions about their use of flow sheets or checklists.

CDM—chronic disease management.

Flow sheets or checklists for chronic diseases Summary information on patient

population with chronic diseases

FP RESPONSES, % FP RESPONSES, %

Do you have it?

If you do not have it, would you find it

helpful? Do you use them?

If you do not use them, would you find

them helpful?

No response No

Yes

9%

66%

26%

14%

25%

41%

9%

45%

46%

18%

31%

52%

A) B)

Références

Documents relatifs

The NPS is a collaborative project of the College of Family Physicians of Canada, the Canadian Medical Association, and the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of

I will take this theme of responding to patient needs a bit  further with another quote from Dr Johnston: “Adaptation  is  the  juice  of  family  medicine—the 

These  issues  and  the  resources  required  to  provide  such  support  will  be  reviewed  carefully.  Does  the  area  of  focused  practice  meet  a 

The College of Family Physicians of Canada Le Collège des médecins de famillle du Canada Canadian Medical Association • Association médicale canadienne. The Royal

“Maybe home palliative care is too important to be left in the hands of family physicians.” 1 The question is still valid today, as Canadians demand that physicians

The 2004 NPS is a unique collaborative project of the College of Family Physicians of Canada, the Canadian Medical Association, and the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons

Respondents were asked to report how fre- quently they prescribed ChIs for treatment of AD, their opinions about the eff ectiveness of ChIs and the most appropriate time

Goals for the next 2 years include: completion of recommendations for implementing SMHC in underserviced areas; development of a national research strategy; broadening of