• Aucun résultat trouvé

With all this interest, it is unsurprising that numerous proofs of the theorem have been discovered


Academic year: 2022

Partager "With all this interest, it is unsurprising that numerous proofs of the theorem have been discovered"

En savoir plus ( Page)

Texte intégral




1. Introduction

Theorem 1.1. Every non-constant polynomial with complex coefficients has at least one root in the field of complex numbers.

The above theorem is known as the Fundamental Theorem of Algebra. It is a theorem which has garnered the contributions of some of the greatest names in mathematics such as Gauss, Cauchy, Liouville and Laplace. With all this interest, it is unsurprising that numerous proofs of the theorem have been discovered. The proof in this report is an elegant and comparably short argument which appears in [1, Chapter 19]. There is also a discussion of a topological approach to proving the theorem, as given by Peter Phelan during his talk.

2. Important Preliminary Facts

First we shall establish some important facts necessary to complete the proof.

They are generally covered in a first-year analysis course and so the proofs are omitted.

(1) Polynomials are continuous functions.

(2) Let z ∈ C have absolute value 1. Then for any positive integer m there existsζ∈Cwithζm=z. ζ is called them-th root of unity ofz.

(3) A continuous function f on a compact set S attains a minimum inS.

Now we proceed to the first step of our argument, a proof of what is commonly known as d’Alembert’s Lemma.

3. d’Alembert’s Lemma Letp(z) =Pn

k=0ckzk be a complex polynomial of degreen≥1.

Lemma 3.1 (d’Alembert). If p(a) 6= 0 then every disk D around a contains an interior point b with|p(b)|<|p(a)|.

Proof. Suppose the diskD has radius R. Therefore all points in the interior ofD are of the forma+wwith|w|< R. First we shall demonstrate the following (1) p(a+w) =p(a) +cwm(1 +r(w)),

where c is a nonzero complex number, 1 ≤ m ≤ n, and r(w) is a polynomial of degreen−mwithout constant term.




Using the binomial theorem, we get p(a+w) =




ck(a+w)k =








k i










k i

ckak−i)wi (Rewriting the double summation)













k i

ckak−i)wi (Taking out thei= 0 part)

=p(a) +





Letm= min{i≥1 :di6= 0}, setc=dm and factorcwm out to get p(a+w) =p(a) +cwm(1 +r(w))

The next step is to bound|cwm| and|r(w)|from above.

Letρ1:= mp

|p(a)/c, so if |w|< ρ1then|cwm|<|p(a)|.

Also sincer(w) is continuous andr(0) = 0, we know that there existsρ2such that

|r(w)|<1 whenever|w|< ρ2.

Hence for|w|less thanρ= min(ρ1, ρ2) we have

(2) |cwm|<|p(a)|

⇒ |cwm|

|p(a)| <1

(3) |r(w)|<1

Now consider the quantity−|p(a)/c|p(a)/c . Clearly it has absolute value 1, so there exists ζ∈Cwithζm=−|p(a)/c|p(a)/c.

Let∈Rsatisfy 0< <min(ρ, R). Settingw0=ζ, consider the pointb=a+w0. The pointbis inD since|w0|= < R, and we claim that it satisfies|p(b)|<|p(a)|.

By (1) we have,

(4) |p(b)|=|p(a+w0)|=|p(a) +cwm0 (1 +r(w0))|, Now define a factorδ by

cwm0 =cmζm=− m

|p(a)/c|p(a) =−δp(a), by (2) ourδ satisfies

0< δ=m |c|

|p(a)| <1 , since < ρ

Using the triangle inequality we get for the right-hand term of (4)

|p(a) +cwm0(1 +r(w0))|=|p(a)−δp(a)(1 +r(w0))|






where we have used (3) to get the strict inequality. Thus we have arrived at the desired result


4. Proof of the Fundamental Theorem

Now that we have established the validity of d’Alembert’s Lemma, the proof of the theorem follows quite quickly. First we note that|p(z)|goes to

infinity as |z| → ∞. Clearly, p(z)z−n = Pn

k=0ckzk−n approaches the leading coefficientcn as |z| → ∞. Therefore|p(z)|must go to infinity as|z| → ∞.

Consequently, there exists R >0 such that |p(z)|> |p(0)| for all points z on the circle {z : |z| =R}. Since p(z) is continuous and the disk D = {z : |z| ≤R} is compact,|p(z)| attains a minimum value at somez0∈D. Because |p(z)|>|p(0)|

for all z on the boundary of D, z0 must lie in the interior. But by d’Alembert’s Lemma we know that in any disk around z0 ∈ Do we can find a point z1 with

|p(z1)| < |p(z0)|, so long as |p(z0)| 6= 0. This would be a contradiction to the minimality of|p(z0)|, so we must have thatp(z0) = 0.

5. A topological argument

The following argument was outlined at the end of Peter Phelan’s talk, and draws on elements from topology.

First, we need to introduce the concept of the winding number of a closed curve.

The winding number of a closed curve around a given point is an integer representing the total number of times that curve travels anti-clockwise around the point. The sign of the number depends on the orientation of the curve, it is negative if the curve travels clockwise around the point. For example, the winding number of z(t) =eit,0 ≤t ≤2πis 1 while the winding number of z(t) =e−it,0≤t≤4π is -2.

Now suppose that the polynomialp(z) has no roots,p(z)6= 0 for allz∈C. We will think ofp(z) as a map from the complex plane to the complex plane. It maps any circleC={z∈C:|z|=R}to a closed curveγR.

Figure 1. A circle mapped to a closed curve inC

What happens to the winding number of γR when R is very large and when R= 0? WhenRis sufficiently large, the leading termzn dominates all other terms in p(z). The curve z(θ) =Re (0 ≤θ ≤2π) revolves once anti-clockwise around



the origin, so it has a winding number of 1 around (0,0). Thereforez(θ)n=Reinθ revolvesntimes anti-clockwise around the origin, so it has a winding number ofn around (0,0). For sufficiently largeR,γR also windsntimes around the origin, as the leading term dominates all other terms. If|z|= 0, thenγ0 is simply the point p(0), which we assumed is nonzero. Therefore the winding number ofγ0around the origin is 0. If we changeRcontinuously thenγRwill deform continuously. However we know that at someR the winding number must change, which only happens if the curveγR includes the origin (0,0). But then for somez0 on the circle|z|=R we have p(z0) = 0. This contradicts our assumption thatp(z) has no roots, so it must have at least one.


[1] Martin Aigner and Gunter M. Ziegler. Proofs from The Book. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, fifth edition, 2014. Including illustrations by Karl H. Hofmann.


Documents relatifs

Then U is factorial by Theorem 1, be- cause it is factorial if the points of Sing(R) impose independent linear conditions on homogeneous forms of degree 3r + d − 5 (see [8])...

The idea of DT/PT correspondence discussed by Pandharipande- Thomas [37] is to use the wall-crossing formula of DT type invari- ants in the space of Bridgeland’s stability

Write the previous rotation transformation from (x,y) into (x’,y’) in matrix form. Solve the preceding three equations by Cramer’s rule.

Note that since real numbers are constant real polynomials, this construction makes sense also for polynomials in R[X, Y ], in this case the function ν is constant and the subdivision

rotation number should be related to the topological notion of index, at any rate for normal curves.. The object of the

These criteria assume that an organization which meets this profile will continue to grow and that assigning a Class B network number to them will permit network growth

The IR or the registry to whom the IR has delegated the registration function will determine the number of Class C network numbers to assign to a network subscriber based on

Once the identity of the VPIM directory server is known, the email address, capabilities, and spoken name confirmation information can be retrieved.. This query is expected to

Once this constraint is lifted by the deployment of IPv6, and in the absence of a scalable routing strategy, the rapid DFZ RIB size growth problem today can potentially

RFC 3323, A Privacy Mechanism for the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) (S): [RFC3323] defines the Privacy header field, used by clients to request anonymity for

While the IPv6 protocols are well-known for years, not every host uses IPv6 (at least in March 2009), and most network users are not aware of what IPv6 is or are even afraid

Potential action items for the W3C included investigating the formation of a privacy interest group and formulating guidance about fingerprinting, referrer headers,

The first was that the Internet Architecture Board should review and consider that document in the context of evaluating Birds of a Feather (BoF) session proposals at the

When talking about users, we also need to distinguish the end user (who we typically think about when we talk about UI) from the server administrators and other technical

[AllJoynExplorer] can be used to browse and interact with any resource exposed by an AllJoyn device, including both standard and vendor-defined data models, by retrieving

The fact that all fields have class number one is enough for the discussion of quadratic rings in §5; for the statements of descent in §6 concerning minimal fields of definition

forces are associated with as large a moment arm as possible about the centre of rigidity. In build- ings with complete diaphragms such as complete reinforced concrete floor

Abstract: Starting with a locally Lipschitz (patchy) Lyapunov function for a given switched system, we provide the construction of a continuously differentiable (smooth)

Key words: resonances, dynamical spin, strong interactions, Poincar´e group, hadronic vacuum, virtual

the one developed in [2, 3, 1] uses R -filtrations to interpret the arithmetic volume function as the integral of certain level function on the geometric Okounkov body of the

In this case the two positive integers |y| and |y − 1| are consecutive, therefore they are relatively prime. If the product of two relatively prime integers is a square, then each

We define a partition of the set of integers k in the range [1, m−1] prime to m into two or three subsets, where one subset consists of those integers k which are &lt; m/2,

Given a pencil of algebraic plane curves such that a general element is irreducible, the purpose of this paper is to give a sharp upper bound for the number of reducible curves in