HAL Id: jpa-00208592
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/jpa-00208592
Submitted on 1 Jan 1977
HAL
is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.
L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire
HAL, estdestinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.
Effects of hydrostatic pressure on the magnetic
properties of disordered monosilicide FexCo1 - xSi alloys
J. Beille, D. Bloch, V. Jaccarino, J.H. Wernick, G.K. Wertheim
To cite this version:
J. Beille, D. Bloch, V. Jaccarino, J.H. Wernick, G.K. Wertheim. Effects of hydrostatic pressure on
the magnetic properties of disordered monosilicide FexCo1 - xSi alloys. Journal de Physique, 1977, 38
(3), pp.339-343. �10.1051/jphys:01977003803033900�. �jpa-00208592�
EFFECTS OF HYDROSTATIC PRESSURE ON THE MAGNETIC PROPERTIES OF DISORDERED MONOSILICIDE FexCo1 - xSi ALLOYS
J.
BEILLE,
D. BLOCHLaboratoire de
Magnétisme, C.N.R.S., 166X,
38042 GrenobleCedex,
France V. JACCARINOPhysics Dept., University
ofCalifornia,
SantaBarbara,
Calif.93106,
U.S.A.and
J. H.
WERNICK,
G. K. WERTHEIM BellLaboratories, Murray Hill,
N.Jersey 07974,
U.S.A.(Reçu
le19 juillet
1976, révisé le 23 novembre 1976,accepté
le 24 novembre1976
Résumé. 2014 Les
alliages
désordonnés FexCo1 - xSi sont ferromagnétiques pour une concentrationen fer x
supérieure
à 0,2. Nous avons mesuré leur aimantation sous champmagnétique
jusqu’à40 kOe à 4,2 K et sous pression
hydrostatique
jusqu’à 8 kbar, de même que leursusceptibilité
à la pression ordinaire sous champ magnétique de 150 kOe. Nous avons aussi déterminé les températuresde Curie d’échantillons
ferromagnétiques
souspression hydrostatique
jusqu’à 8 kbar àpartir
de lavariation thermique de la
susceptibilité
initiale. Nous avons déterminé une concentration critique xde l’ordre de 0,95 pour l’apparition du ferromagnétisme dans les alliages riches en FeSi. D’après nos résultats, le ferromagnétisme dans les
alliages
riches en CoSi semble apparaître de façon assez ho- mogène, alors que lesalliages
riches en FeSi présentent au contraire des effets locaux.Abstract. 2014 Disordered FexCo1 - xSi
alloys
are known to be ferromagnetic in an iron concentration range starting at x = 0.2. We have measured their magnetization in magnetic fields up to 40 kOe at 4.2 K and underhydrostatic
pressures up to 8 kbar, as well as their zero pressuresusceptibility
at 4.2 K in high magnetic fields of 150 kOe. We have also determined the Curie temperatures of the
ferromagnetic
samples under hydrostatic pressure up to 8 kbar from the temperature variation of the initial susceptibility. We determined a critical iron concentration of x ~ 0.95 forferromagnetism
in FeSi rich
alloys.
From some of our results, the ferromagnetism in the CoSi rich alloys seems toappear in a rather homogeneous way, whereas the FeSi rich alloys in contrast exhibit local effects.
Classification
Physics Abstracts
8.516 - 8.524
1. Introduction. - The
magnetic
andtransport properties
of the 3d group transition metal mono-silicides have been the
subject
of numerous investi-gations.
TheFexCo 1 - xSi alloys
form disorderedsolid solutions of cubic structure B20 at any concen- tration
[1].
CoSi isdiamagnetic.
FeSi isparamagnetic.
but there exists a concentration range where the
compounds Fe.,Col -.,Si
areferromagnetic [2-5].
Fromstudies of the Mossbauer effect
[6].
amagnetic
momenton Fe atoms greater than 0.05 JlB for 0 x 0.2 and
0.1,uB
forFeo. 5 Coo. 5 Si
has not been detected: The N.M.R.experiments [4. 7]
have beeninterpreted using
a model in whichonly
Co atoms with an Featom among their next nearest
neighbour
transitionatoms are
magnetic.
It should be noticed that if the value of thehyperfine
field at the atom nucleus is taken asproportional
to the atomic moment, then there is a moment on the Fe atom which is of the sameorder of
magnitude
as that on the Co. Recent nuclearorientation
experiments [8]
have beeninterpreted
as indicative of a
hyperfine
field at the57CO
nucleusof 310 ± 15 kOe for x = 0.13.
leading
to a value ofthe
magnetic
moment on a Co atom which islarge compared
to the values deduced fromprevious
N.M.R. measurements.
We decided to
perform magnetic
measurements underhigh
pressure in order toclarify
the mechanism of the appearance offerromagnetism
in thesealloys.
Article published online by EDP Sciences and available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/jphys:01977003803033900
340
2.
Experimental.
- Theexperimental
set up has beenalready
described[9]. Hydrostatic
pressure(up
to 8 kbar) isapplied by
means of helium gas to thesample
located in acopper-beryllium
pressure chamber. The temperature of the chamber can beregulated
between 4.2 and 300 K.Figure
1 representsour
experimental
chamber with the heaters forchang- ing
the pressure at low temperature. Themagneti-
FIG. 1. - High pressure chamber. A : capillary heater; B : chamber heater; C : capillary; D : seals; E : support; F : sample; G : ther-
mometer ; H : strain gauges.
zation is measured
by
an extraction method. Reso- lution is 2 x10-3
e.m.u. To determine the Curie temperature. we useprimary
andsecondary
coilslocated outside the pressure bomb. A two
phase/
vector lock-in
amplifier
model P.A.R. 129Agives
the
in-phase
orquadrature
component of the secon-dary signal,
from which the variation of the initialsusceptibility
of thesample
can be deduced. TheFexCol -xSi alloys
have beenprepared by
an inductionmelting [6].
3. Curie temperature,
spontaneous magnetization
and
high
fieldsusceptibility.
- We have determined the Curie temperatureTc
of theferromagnetic
alloys Feo.3Coo.7Si. Feo.SCoo.SSi. Feo.8CO0.2Si.
Feo.9Coo,lSi. measuring
the thermal variation of the initialsusceptibility (Fig.
2). Arrows show the inflec- tionpoints
of the curves, that we associate with theCurie temperatures. In table I. we list the
experimental
values of
T,.
of the spontaneousmagnetization Mo
and
high
fieldsusceptibility X
at 4.2 K (150 kOe).Mo
has been determined from H = 0extrapolation of M 2
versusH/M
Arrottplots (where
H is the magne- tic field and M themagnetization)
between 20 and 40k0e.The curves.
figure
3,give
the concentrationdepen-
dence of the Curie temperature. the spontaneous
magnetization
and thehigh
fieldmagnetic
suscep-FIG. 3. - Concentration dependence of the Curie temperature Tc (a), the spontaneous magnetization Mo (b), the 10 k0e (O),
30 k0e (D), 150 k0e (V) high field susceptibility (c).
TABLE I
Concentration
dependence of
the Curie temperature, spontaneousmagnetization
andsusceptibility
tibility
at 10. 30 and 150 k0e. The critical concen-tration for the appearance of
ferromagnetism
in theFeSi concentrated
alloys
is estimated at x ~ 0.95.where
Tc
andMo
vanish. The concentration of Co in FeSi necessary toproduce ferromagnetism
is fourtimes smaller than that of Fe in CoSi. This fact seems to be in favour of a much narrower d-band for the Co than for the Fe. This conclusion is in agreement with the narrower d band observed in CoSi from XPS spectra in
comparison
to that of FeSi(Fig.
4). Fromthe
conductivity
measurements[10].
the d-band of the Co atoms seems to be full in CoSi.supported by
its
diamagnetic
behaviour.Only
a small number of holes created in the d-band of the Co atoms which has ahigh density
of states would be necessary to render the Co atomsmagnetic.
The Feimpurity
introduces a hole in
FexCol-xSi [10].
The hole of anFe
impurity
is devided between the Fe atom and the six next nearestneighbour
Co atoms which thus havea very weak
magnetic
moment as indicatedby
theN.M.R.
experiments [7]. Conversely.
when a Coimpurity
is introduced in FeSi, the holes associated with the six next nearestneighbour
Fe atoms create alarger
moment on the Coimpurity.
Besides. one can
predict
thatferromagnetism
of theCoSi rich
alloys
is due to thecoupling
of extendedFIG. 4. - Electron density of states as a function of the binding
energy from XPS spectra for MnSi, FeSi and CoSi.
weakly ferromagnetic
groups of atomsleading
to arather
homogeneous
and weakferromagnetism.
Forthe FeSi rich
alloys.
on the contrary. alarge magnetic
moment is localized on the
impurity
and the ferro-magnetism
is thusexpected
to be more inhomo-geneous. In fact.
magnetic
measurements at low temperature[11]
favour a localdescription
for theappearance of
ferromagnetism
in the FeSi richalloys.
with a weak induced moment on
polarized
Fe atoms.We observe.
figure
3. that7c
varieslinearly
withMo
which is in agreement with an itinerant
description
of the
ferromagnetism
in thesealloys.
Furthermore.the
high
fieldsusceptibility
exhibits maxima near the two critical concentrations withlarge
enhancement factors.4. The
high
pressure behaviour. - The pressure derivative of the Curie temperature of the ferro-magnetic alloys
with Fe concentration x = 0.3. 0.5, 0.8 and 0.9 can be determined from the thermal variation of the initialsusceptibility
measured atconstant pressures
(Fig.
5).FIG. 5. - Thermal variation of the initial susceptibility of Feo.5Coo.5Si at various pressures.
The values of the
compressibility
have been inter-polated
between those of FeSi and CoSi[12].
Theexperimental
volume derivatives of the Curie tempe-rature and the spontaneous
magnetization
as wellas the
magnetization
under 30 k0e are listed. table II.The pressure derivatives of the Curie temperature and of the
magnetization
under various fields areplotted. figures
6 and 7. as a function of the iron concentration.TABLE 11
Experimental
valuesof d
LnTc/d
Ln V, d LnMo/d
Ln V, d LnM301d
LnV,
whereM30
is thehigh
field magnetization
at 30 kOe(*
from[5])
342
FIG. 6. - Concentration dependence of the Curie temperature Tc (a), and its pressure variation IIT,, dTe/dp (b).
FIG. 7. - Concentration dependence of the zero field (A), the
10 kOe (0) and 30 k0e (D) magnetization (a) and their pressure derivatives 1/M dM/dp (b).
For the
alloys
with an Fe concentration below 0.5.(i)
The pressure derivatives ofMo
andT,
exhibitlarge
values which favour aweakly ferromagnetic
model
[13].
(ii)
In addition. their maxima arenearly
of thesame order of
magnitude
and occur at the concen-tration at which the
high
fieldsusceptibility
is thelargest.
This maximum is about 26 ascompared,
for instance. with 29 for the
Nio.452PtO.548 alloy
with a Curie
temperature
of 54 K[13].
(iii) Conversely
we note that the pressure deri- vativesd7c/d/?
anddMo/dp
for x = 0.3 and x = 0.5are
proportional
toT.
andMo
which is characteristic of a localmagnetic
behaviour[14].
Theproportiona- lity
betweendTc/dp
andTc
is clear fromfigure
8.The
properties (i). (ii), (iii)
mayimply
that in this concentration range themagnetism
is due to thecoupling
of clusters with a weak and widespread magnetization.
In such a model themagnetization
FIG. 8. - Variation ofd7c/d/? as a function of T,.
would exhibit weak
spatial
fluctuations and wouldgive
mixed characteristics of weakhomogeneous
and local
magnetic
behaviour.The pressure effects decrease with
increasing
Feconcentration above 0.5
indicating
a more localizedbehaviour,
in line with the discussion of the last section. For Fe concentration above 0.8 we observean anomalous increase of the pressure effects. For
x = 0.8 to x = 0.9, the pressure derivative
dTc/dp
varies
roughly
asTc-l (Fig.
7). This may be due to astrong variation of the
exchange integral
betweenthe localized moments with pressure as well as to
electron transfer
[15. 16].
Following
Svechkarev and Panfilov[16].
we haveanalysed
the effects of the pressure on theshape
ofFIG. 9. - Variation of d Ln M3o/d Ln V(0) and d Ln M3 Oldqd (broken line) as a function of the dinerential filling of the d band
(see text).
the d-band and on its
filling
characterizedby
the yand p
parametersrespectively
in theequation :
Figure
8. the derivative of themagnetization
under30 k0e with respect to qd., the mean d-band
filling,
d Ln
M301dqd
isplotted
as a functionof qd-
In thesame
figure,
the volume derivative of thehigh
fieldmagnetization
is alsoplotted.
For 0 x 0.5,d Ln
M3o/d
Ln V isquite
constant and isindependent
of d Ln
M3o/dqa
in line with a very low value offl
and no electron transfer. This is in agreement with the
assumption
that the 3d-band of the CoSi richalloys
is full as
suggested by conductivity
measurements.Conversely
d LnM3 old
Ln V varieslinearly
withd Ln
M3o/dqd
and the electron transfer seems to beeffective for the FeSi rich
alloys
where many holes exist in the 3d band.5. Conclusion. - We have demonstrated that
ferromagnetism
occurs moreeasily
when Co atomsare introduced in FeSi than in CoSi rich
FexCol-xSi alloys
when Fe atoms are substituted for Co atoms.This difference occurs due to a more localized beha- viour of the Co atoms in FeSi rich
alloys
than in CoSi richFe.,Col -.,,Si alloys.
Thehigh
pressuremagnetic properties
in the x = 0.05 to x = 0.5 Fe concentration range are in agreement with a weak itinerant model but with some local characteristics. These become,according
to ourexperiments,
morepronounced
for
higher
Fe concentrations. For the most concen-trated
alloys
electronic transfer mayexplain
theobserved anomalous pressure variations.
References
[1] See WATANABE, H., YAMAMOTO, H. and ITO, K., J. Phys. Soc.
Japan 18 (1963) 995.
[2] SHINODA, D., Phys. Stat. Sol. 11a (1972) 129.
[3] WERNICK, J. H., WERTHEIM, G. K. and SHERWOOD, R. C., Mater. Res. Bull. 7 (1972) 1431.
[4] YASUOKA, H., SHERWOOD, R. C., WERNICK, J. H., Mater. Res.
Bull. 9 (1974) 223.
[5] BLOCH, D., VOIRON, J., JACCARINO, V. and WERNICK, J. H., Phys. Lett. 51A (1975) 362.
[6] WERTHEIM, G. K., WERNICK, J. H. and BUCHANAN, D. N. E., J. Appl. Phys. 37 (1966) 3333.
[7] KAWARAZAKI, S., YASUOKA, H. and NAKAMURA, Y., Solid State Commun. 10 (1972) 919 ; 11 (1972) 81.
[8] MONTANO, P. A., SHANFIELD, Z. and BARRETT, P. H., Phys.
Rev. B 11 (1975) 3302.
[9] BEILLE, J., ALBERTS, H. L., BARTHOLIN, H., BLOCH, D. and VETTIER, C., C. R. Hebd. Séan. Acad. Sci. 275 (1972) 719.
[10] ASANABE, S., SHINODA, D. and SASAKI, Y., Phys. Rev. 134 (1964) A 774.
[11] To be published.
[12] ZINOVEVA, G. P., ANDREEVA, L. P. and GELD, P. V., Phys.
Stat. Sol. 23 (1974) 711.
[13] ALBERTS, H. L., BEILLE, J., BLOCH, D. and WOHLFARTH, E. P., Phys. Rev. B 9 (1974) 2233.
[14] See BEILLE, J. and TOURNIER, R., J. Phys. F : Metal Phys. 6
(1976) 621.
[15] FUJIWARA, H., KADOMATSU, H. and OLISHI, K., Rev. Phys.
Chem. Japan (1975) 275.
[16] See SVECHKAREV, I. V. and PANFILOV, A. S., Phys. Stat. Sol. (b)
63 (1974) 11.