• Aucun résultat trouvé

3D Computer Vision Syllabus

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "3D Computer Vision Syllabus"

Copied!
9
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

3D Computer Vision Syllabus

Pascal Monasse [email protected]

IMAGINE, École des Ponts ParisTech

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

(2)

Structure from Motion

We will cover the rst part of this Stereo pipeline, MVG, and rst part of MVS but only with two views.

I Output of MVG: point cloud and camera positions and orientations

I Output of MVS: a mesh surface with colors

(3)

Bundle Adjustment

I Observed points in images are central projections of unknown 3D points.

I Each image provides abundle of half-lines containing the 3D points.

I We must orient the bundles so that the lines intersect.

Source: Manolis Lourakis

(4)

One equation to rule them all

arg min

{Ri},{Ti},{Xj}

X

i,j

ij d(xiji(RiXj +Ti))2.

I xij: point numberj (amongn) in viewi (amongm), pixel coordinates.

I ij ∈ {0,1}: visibility of pointj in viewi. I d: Euclidean distance in image.

I Πi: 2D projection operator in viewi from 3D.

Unknowns:

I Xj: 3D point in a xed coordinate frame.

I Ri: rotation matrix of coordinate frame wrt viewi. I Ti: position of origin O of coordinate frame wrt viewi.

(5)

Session 1

arg min

{Ri},{Ti},{Xj}

X

i,j

ij d(xiji(RiXj +Ti))2.

I Expression of projection model Πi (i.e.,camera model) I Casem=2,TL=TR =0 or allXj on a single plane:

∀i ∈ {L,R},∀j, d(xiji(RiXj +0)) =0. Then xRj =HΠR,RR(xLj), and the homographyH can be determined from four pairs {xLj,xRj}. Application: panorama.

I Casem=1, 6 (or more) pairs (xj,Xj), recover all info about the camera (camera calibration from 3D rig):

arg min

Π,R,T

X

j

d(xij,Π(RXj +T))2.

I Casem≥3, single camera Π, 4 (or more) pairs(xj,Xj), all Xj

on a common plane (camera calibration from 2D rig):

arg min

Π,{Ri},{Ti}

X

ij

d(xij,Π(RiXj +Ti))2.

(6)

Session 2

arg min

{Ri},{Ti},{Xj}

X

i,j

ij d(xiji(RiXj +Ti))2. Casem=2 views.

I From j ≥5 pairs{xLj,xRj} and knownΠLR, deduce a bilinear constraint ∀j,ERR,TR(xLj,xRj) =0 (essential matrix).

Recover (RR,TR) fromE. arg min

{Ri},{Ti},{Xj}

X

i∈{L,R},j

ij d(xiji(RiXj +Ti))2.

I From j ≥7 pairs{xLj,xRj} and unknownΠLR, deduce a bilinear constraint ∀j,F(xLj,xRj) =0 (fundamental matrix).

I From n pairs{xLj,xRj}, maximize the number of matching pairs up to tolerance τ ≥0 (RANSAC algorithm)

max X

i∈{L,R},j

ij

s.t. ∃ΠLR,{Ri},{Ti},{Xj},d(xiji(RiXj +Ti))≤τ.

(7)

Sessions 3&4

arg min

{Ri},{Ti},{Xj}

X

i,j

ij d(xiji(RiXj +Ti))2.

Casem=2 views,RL=RR =I,TL=0,TR =Be1 (rectied pair).

I Go from generic poses to rectied pair with fundamental matrix F.

I For all xLj,j ∈ {pixels of left image}, nd corresponding pixel xRj, hence Xj by triangulation.

(8)

Session 5

arg min

{Ri},{Ti},{Xj}

X

i,j

ij d(xiji(RiXj +Ti))2.

Casem=2 views, ndinterest points{pLk} and{pRk0}. Deduce pairsj = (k,k0) of matching points(xLj,xRj) with xLj =pLk and xRj =pRk0.

(9)

Session 6

arg min

{Ri},{Ti},{Xj}

X

i,j

ij d(xiji(RiXj +Ti))2.

Casem≥3, multi-view stereovision.

I For m=3, trilinear constraints T(x1j,x2j,x3j) =0. Recovery of tensor T.

I Recover Rm+1 andTm+1 from known pairs (xm+1j,Xj) (resection,PnP Perspective from n Points):

arg min

Rm+1,Tm+1

X

j

m+1j d(xijm+1(Rm+1Xj +Tm+1))2.

⇒ incremental multi-view pipeline.

I Special caseTi =Biv withv a xed vector and known Bi: arg min

{Ri},{Xj}

X

i,j

ij d(xiji(RiXj +Biv))2.

⇒ Light eld imagery, epipolar plane imagery

Références

Documents relatifs

Here we report (1) a systematic proteomic study of the CSF with a thorough characterization of the synaptic composition (discovery), (2) development of Tier 2 SRM assays for a set

This image is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 2.0 Generic license. Image 4, Copper

The result of this effort was the Open Data Commons Public Domain Dedication and License [11], itself a fusion of ideas from the Talis Community License, an initial

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International

Because air mass factors (AMFs) vary significantly with wavelength as a result of significant vari- ation of O 3 absorption, the wavelength- and surface-albedo- dependent AMF, which

(10) include a smoothing error component and should not be used to calculate the error budget because the data user might not be aware of related problems and might, when

Copyright: This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit

In the GPA strain map, recorded in the out-of-plane direction (Fig. 5d), the lm and substrate have large lattice difference resulting in splitting of diffraction spots compared to