• Aucun résultat trouvé

Save the Earth vs Destroy the Earth

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Save the Earth vs Destroy the Earth"

Copied!
7
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Save the Earth vs Destroy the Earth

fannidada (Fanni Iseppon and Davide Giaccone) Piazza Carducci 130, 10126, Turin, Italy

[email protected] http://www.fannidada.com

Abstract. Save the Earth VS Destroy the Earth is an interactive installation.

Two structures, built with the skeletons of old monitors, are holding two world globes, plus a sign indicating on one Save the Earth and on the other Destroy the Earth. The audience is invited to mime the action to save or destroy the Earth becoming a part of the artwork. Every action is monitored and photo- graphed, leading to the creation of an image dataset of save-the-earth vs de- stroy-the-earth actions. Such dataset can be interpreted as sort of sentiment dataset, where actors express a negative or positive sentiment about the "Save the Earth" topic.

Keywords: interactive installation, interaction game, street performance

1 Introduction

The installation "Save the Earth VS Destroy the Earth" was designed for the 4th edi- tion of Paratissima, which was held in 2008. Paratissima event [1], created to encour- age dialogue between artists and the public, is a contemporary art exhibition that showcases the work in public places, shops, courtyards, streets and squares of the city.

It takes place in Turin in conjunction with Artissima, the most important contempo- rary art fair in Italy every year at the beginning of November.

The 2008 edition of Paratissima took place for the first time in San Salvario, a dis- trict of Turin with many problems of integration between residents and immigrants coming mainly from Africa. The objective of the event was to promote a dialogue between the people with the help of art. For this reason, after numerous site inspec- tions, we chose to create an installation in the street that interacts directly with all the inhabitants of the district.

(2)

2 An Interactive Installation for ESSEM 2013

For interactive artworks, that require creative participation by the audience, an essential condition is the presence a large number of spectators. As the percentage of people willing to actively interact with the installation is minimal, estimated in the order of about 3-5%, only with a high number of visitors you can keep "alive" the work and trigger a phenomenon of creative imitation, even by the most timid. Also for this reason, the location chosen for the installation was Silvio Pellico Street, close to the Paratissima Info Point (see Fig. 1). Another significant element is the context in which the installation is proposed. The edition of Paratissima 2008 aimed to create an atmosphere of celebration and public involvement, essential conditions for the success of this work.

Fig. 1 Map of Paratissima 2008

(3)

2.1 The Artwork: Save the Earth vs Destroy the Earth

Fig. 2 Installation in Silvio Pellico Street

Two structures built with the skeletons of old monitors were holding two world globes; a sign under the first globe indicated 'Save the Earth', while a sign below the second one indicated 'Destroy the Earth' (see Fig. 2). The audience was invited to mime the action to save or destroy the Earth becoming a part of the artwork. Every action was photographed. During the three days of the event we shot 1,217 photo- graphs.

(4)

2.2 An Image Dataset of Save-the-Earth vs Destroy-the-Earth Human Actions

Fig. 3 Samples from the image dataset

The number of people involved was of 342. After a selection, were found to be 176 the actions of Destroy (see for instance Fig. 4-8,10-11, right side), Save 221 (see for instance Fig. 4-9 and 11, left side), and 8 Undecided (Fig. 9, right side; Fig. 10, left side). The sum of Save, Destroy and Undecided was higher than the total of the people involved because some of them performed both the Save and the Destroy actions.

(5)

Fig. 4 Sample pictures: a save-the-earth action (left); a destroy-the-earth action (right).

Fig. 5 Sample pictures: a save-the-earth action (left); a destroy-the-earth action (right).

Fig. 6 Sample pictures: a save-the-earth action (left); a destroy-the-earth action (right).

Fig. 7 Sample pictures: a save-the-earth action (left); a destroy-the-earth action (right)

(6)

Fig. 8 Sample pictures: a save-the-earth action (left); a destroy-the-earth action (right).

Fig. 9 Sample pictures: a save-the-earth action (left); an undecided action (right).

Fig. 10 Sample pictures: an undecided action (left); a destroy-the-earth action (right).

(7)

Fig. 11 Sample pictures: a save-the-earth action (left); a destroy-the-earth action (right).

3 Conclusion

This is an "unfinished" artwork, and requires outward participation to be accom- plished. Moreover, it is “unsettled” because the narration's development is virtually unbounded and casual.

References

1. Paratissima. http://www.paratissima.it

Références

Documents relatifs

The scope of this Research Topic encompasses evidence for (or against) stratification at the outer cores of Earth and other planets, and their dynamical consequences for core

Sylvia would ask him to think as quickly as he could of a topic for a short-story, giving no time for second thoughts, and Ted would say, for instance, that he saw himself

Typical examples of such properties are the Clausius inequality, the theorem of minimum entropy production in the linear range of irreversible processes

They comprise a population of energetic, elec- trically charged particles (electrons, protons and heavier atomic ions) stably trapped in the magnetic field of the

Direct commu- nication will be possible during the so-called AOS pe- riods ; in periods of no communication (LOS), HKTM data are recorded onboard whi le HRD data are

contextualize the visual description of the earth in the globe in a cultural context to discern which mode of representation is used... For Peer

— Les aimants permanents que l'on peut fabriquer à base d'alliages de terres rares ont des propriétés magnétiques qui dépassent notablement les valeurs obtenues auparavant avec

Nos données présentent un écart au modèle isotrope visible pour les stations des deux groupes A et B : une sous-estimation par le modèle du niveau d’énergie dans la fenêtre 2,