C AHIERS DE
TOPOLOGIE ET GÉOMÉTRIE DIFFÉRENTIELLE CATÉGORIQUES
B RIAN J. D AY
Onto Gelfand maps : appendix
Cahiers de topologie et géométrie différentielle catégoriques, tome 30, n
o4 (1989), p. 345-347
<http://www.numdam.org/item?id=CTGDC_1989__30_4_345_0>
© Andrée C. Ehresmann et les auteurs, 1989, tous droits réservés.
L’accès aux archives de la revue « Cahiers de topologie et géométrie différentielle catégoriques » implique l’accord avec les conditions générales d’utilisation (http://www.numdam.org/conditions). Toute utilisation commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infraction pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit contenir la présente mention de copyright.
Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques
http://www.numdam.org/
345
ONTO GELFAND MAPS: APPENDIX
by
BrianJ.
DAYCAHIERS DE TOPOLOGIE ET GÉOMÉTRIE DIFFÉRENTIELLE
CA TLTG 0 R IQ UES
VOL. XXX-4 (1989)
ReSUMe.
Si X est un espacecompact,
toute fonctionellemultiplicative pr6servant
l’unit6 deC(X;K)
vers K est unprojecteur, lorsque
K est le corps r6el oucomplexe.
Cerésultat est 6tendu ici a d’autres
algèbres topologiques.
INTRODUCTION.
It is well known that if X is a
compact
Hausdorff space, then eachmultiplicative identity-preserving
functional from the spaceC(X;K)
to K is aprojection
map if K is either the real orcomplex
field. In this article this result is extended to include certain other realtopological algebras.
The
proof
is based on a combination of the fact (see[2, 3])
that metriccompact
Hausdorff spaces form a codense fullsubcategory
of thecategory
of allcompact
Hausdorff spaces and continuous maps and the final resultproved
in [I] on mul-tiplicative
functionals (non-commutative case - sameproof).
Fornotation and further
implications concerning
Gelfanddualities,
we refer the reader back to 111.
1. THE FIRST REDUCTION.
If A is any metric
topological ring
and the canonical eva-luation map ’
is a
homeomorphism
whenever M is acompact
Hausdorff metricspace, then s(X) is a
homeomorphism
whenever X is a compact Hausdorff space. In order to showthis,
we first consider thecodensity expression:
where
Lim(X,M)
denotes all the continuous maps from X toM,
and the brackets denote set-indexed powers.Then,
since346
is a
jointly surjective family
of continuous maps, we deduce that the canonical mapis an
injection
which is left inverseto E (X) ,
hence is a homeo-morphism
asrequired.
2. THE SECOND REDUCTION.
Now suppose that A denotes a real
topological algebra
(with
identity)
structure, with no smallsubspaces,
on the space of all continuous functions from a fixedcompact
Hausdorffspace into the real numbers. Since each metric space is sequen- tial it now follows from the Tietze extension Theorem
that,
for allM, s(M)
is ahomeomorphism
if E (N) is ahomeomorphism
where N is the
one-point compactification
of the discretepositi-
ve
integers. Then,
from the last result in[11,
we obtain:THEOREM. Let A be as above but with no central
idempotents.
and let X be any compact Hausdorff space. Then s(X) is a ho-
meomorphism.
For further
implications
in the case where the fixed com-pact
Hausdorff space for A isfinite,
see 111.Examples
of suchan
algebra
A include Weilalgebras
and certain convolution groupalgebras.
Note
that,
once aduality
has been established for a fini- te-dimensional realalgebra A,
there results a relative Stone- WeierstrassTheorem,
based on thisA,
which statesthat,
if B isa
left-right point-separating sub-A-algebra
of agiven exponent EX,AL,
where X is acompact
Hausdorff space, then the induced set mapis a
bijection
(see [1] Section 1).This,
in turn, allows"upgra- ding"
to Gelfanddualities,
withrespect
toA,
overLim-catego-
ries such as
bornological limitspaces, simplicial limitspaces,
"smooth"
limitspaces,
and so on (see [11 Theorem 2.2) via reduc- tion to thecompact
case.347 REFERENCES.
1. DAY B.J., Onto Gelfand
transformations,
CahiersTop.
etGéom. Diff. Cat. XXVIII-3
(1987),
227-234.2. GABRIEL P. & ULMER F., Lokal
präsentierbare Kategorien,
Lecture Notes in Math.
221, Springer
(1971).3. ISBELL J.,
Adequate subcategories,
IllinoisJ.
Math. 4-4(1960),
541-552.Department
of MathematicsMacquarie University
NORTH RYDE N.S.W. 2109 AUSTRALIA