C OMPOSITIO M ATHEMATICA
H. L. C HOW
Probability measures on compact semitopological semigroups
Compositio Mathematica, tome 28, n
o2 (1974), p. 209-212
<http://www.numdam.org/item?id=CM_1974__28_2_209_0>
© Foundation Compositio Mathematica, 1974, tous droits réservés.
L’accès aux archives de la revue « Compositio Mathematica » (http:
//http://www.compositio.nl/) implique l’accord avec les conditions géné- rales d’utilisation (http://www.numdam.org/conditions). Toute utilisation commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infrac- tion pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit contenir la présente mention de copyright.
Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques
http://www.numdam.org/
209
PROBABILITY MEASURES ON COMPACT SEMITOPOLOGICAL SEMIGROUPS
H. L. Chow
Noordhoff International Publishing
Printed in the Netherlands
1. Introduction
In what follows S is
always
a compactsemitopological semigroup
i.e.the
multiplication
isseparately
continuous. It is well known that the setP(S) of probability
measures on S is a compactsemitopological semigroup
under convolution and the weak*
topology, [4].
In case S isjointly
con-tinuous,
Collins[2]
hasgiven
necessary and sufficient conditions that ameasure y E
P(S)
isidempotent.
Moreprecisely,
it is shown in[2] that, for p
eP(S)
with supportF,
thefollowing
areequivalent:
1) Jll
= Jl.2) (i)
F is asimple semigroup
i.e. F has no proper ideal.(ii) f e C(S)(the
set of continuous functions onS) implies f’
isconstant on each minimal left ideal of F where
3) (i) Jll
= y on the F-translate space i.e.03BC2(fx) = 03BC(fx) for f ~ C(S)
and x E F.
(ii) 3
= y.One of the above conditions was
improved substantially
in([1] ] Prop-
osition
3).
The other conditions will be extendedhere, concerning only
the
separately
continuous situation.The author is indebted to Dr Gavin Brown for his generous
help.
This work was done in the
University
ofLiverpool, supported by
theAssociation of Commonwealth Universities.
2.
Probability
measures of finite orderIn this section we denote
by p
aprobability
measure of finite order onS,
i.e.Jln + 1
= y for somepositive integer n,
and F its support. Whenn =
1,
it is known[6]
that F is atopologically simple subsemigroup
of S210
(a semigroup
is calledtopologically simple
if every ideal isdense).
Ingeneral,
we consider the closedsemigroup S(F) generated by
F; it is clear thatwhere the bar denotes closure.
PROPOSITION
(1): S(F)
and F" are compact,topologically simple
sub-semigroups having
the sameidempotents. Consequently S(F)
is a groupif
and
only if
F" is.PROOF: Since
S(F)
and F" are supports ofidempotent
measures1/n(03BC+ ··· + ,un)
and,un, they
aretopologically simple semigroups by ([6]
Lemma2(iii)).
Next take anyidempotent e e S(F)
and supposee e
F’,
say, for some i =1, ···, n.
Since e = en e(F’ )n c (F’)n
=F",
wesee that
S(F)
and F nhave the sameidempotents. Finally,
ifS(F)
is agroup,
S(F)
has aunique idempotent.
It follows that F" has aunique idempotent
and so iseasily
seen to be a groupby
Theorem 2.3 and Corol-lary
2.5 of[3]. (The semitopological semigroups
discussed in[3]
haveidentity elements,
but the arguments are still valid for the presentcase.)
The converse can be
proved similarly.
We may obtain the
following
results as in thejointly
continuoussituation
(see [1])
and therefore omit theproofs.
PROPOSITION
(2): If y E P(S)
whose support is contained in FIfor
somej = 1, w,
n, thenPROPOSITION
(3):
For i,j
=1, ···,
n,if
F’n Fi :0 ~,
then03BCi
=p/.
Hence, if F is
asemigroup,
then Jl isidempotent.
REMARK:
By Proposition 3,
we seethat y
isidempotent
if F = F".This property can be extended in the
following
sense. Consider twoprobability
measures v and v’ on alocally
compactsemitopological semigroup
with the samesupport H
such that vv’ = v’v = v. ThenV(BX-1y-1)
=v(Bx-1)
for every Borel set B cS,
x, y E H whereBx -1 = {t :
tx EB} (see
Lemma 3 of[5],
theproof of which
alsoapplies
to the
separately
continuouscase).
ThusThis
together
with the facts that vv’ = v andv2v’ =
v’gives v(B) = v2(B),
i.e. v isidempotent.
Theparticular
case inProposition
3 followsby taking
v’ = v".The author wishes to thank the referee for
suggesting
this remark.COROLLARY
(4): Jl
isidempotent if S(F)
is connected.Suppose
e is anidempotent
in the minimal ideal of F n. Let X and Y be the sets ofidempotents
in Fne andeF n, respectively,
and let G = eF n e.Then X and Y are
compact semigroups
and G is a compact group so thatJln = (03BCn)X(03BCn)G(03BCn)Y
where the measures(03BCn)X, (03BCn)Y
areprojections
of03BC on
X, Y respectively,
and(03BCn)G
is the Haar measure ofG;
see[6].
PROPOSITION
(5):
Jl =(03BCn)X03B4(e)03BC03B4(e)(03BCn)Y,
where03B4(e)
is the unitpoint
mass at e.
3.
Extending
Collins’ resultsIt is a direct consequence of
Proposition
3 that aprobability
measureof finite order on S is
idempotent
if andonly
if its support is asemigroup.
In order to establish other characterizations of
idempotent probability
measures, we need the lemma below which extends Theorem 2 of
[2].
The
proof
is omitted since itparallels
that in[2].
LEMMA
(6): Suppose
Jl EP(S)
with support F such that F n,, =F for
some
positive integer
n. LetS(F)
be the closedsemigroup generated by
F. Then
the following
areequivalent:
1) 03BC2
= y on theS(F)-translate
space.2)
The setM(f) = {x
ES(F) : f’(x)
= maxf’(S(F))}
is aleft
ideal
of S(F) for
eachf E CR(S)(the
setof
real-valued continuousfunctions
onS).
3) (i) S(F)
istopologically simple.
(ii) f’
is constant on eachminimal left
idealof S(F).
THEOREM
(7): Suppose 03BC
eP(S)
with support F. Then thefollowing
areequivalent:
1) 03BC
isidempotent.
2) f’
is constant on each minimalleft
idealof S(F)
and03BCn+1
= Jlfor
some
positive integer
n.3) 03BCn = 03BC
on the F-translate space and03BCn+1
= 03BC.PROOF : That
(1) implies (2)
and(2) implies (3)
are immediate from thepreceding
lemma. As for(3) implies (1),
it isenough, by Proposition 3,
to show that F n F n :0
q5. Suppose
F n F n =~.
Then there existsf e CR(S)
suchthat f ~ 0, f(F)
= 0and f(F n)
> 0. Take any c c- F" andconsider fc.
It follows that03BC(fc) = f f(tc)dp(t)
= 0. On the otherhand,
let c = ab where a E F and b E
Fn-1,
and letg(x)
=f(xb)
for x ~ S.Then
fC
=g",
i.e.fc
is an F-translate so thatJl(fC) = 03BCn(fc) =
J f(tc )dJln(t)
> 0. This contradiction proves the theorem.212
REFERENCES
[1] H. L. CHOW: Probability measures of finite order. J. London Math. Soc. (to appear).
[2] H. S. COLLINS: Idempotent measures on compact semigroups. Proc. Amer. Math.
Soc. 13 (1962) 442-446.
[3] K. DELEEUW and I. GLICKSBERG: Applications of almost periodic compactifica- tions. Acta Math. 105 (1961) 63-97.
[4] I. GLICKSBERG: Weak compactness and separate continuity. Pacific J. Math.
11 (1961) 205-214.
[5] A. MUKHERJEA: On the convolution equation P = P*Q of Choquet and Deny for probability measures on semigroups. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 32 (1972) 457-463.
[6] J. S. PYM: Idempotent probability measures on compact semitopological semi-
groups. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 21 (1969) 499-501.
(Oblatum 2-VII-1973 & 2-1-1974) Mathematics Department, Chung Chi College,
The Chinese University of Hong Kong.