A NNALES DE L ’I. H. P., SECTION A
P. D E M OTTONI E. S ALUSTI
On a differential equation approach to quantum field theory : causality property for the solutions of Thirring’s model
Annales de l’I. H. P., section A, tome 15, n
o4 (1971), p. 351-360
<http://www.numdam.org/item?id=AIHPA_1971__15_4_351_0>
© Gauthier-Villars, 1971, tous droits réservés.
L’accès aux archives de la revue « Annales de l’I. H. P., section A » implique l’accord avec les conditions générales d’utilisation (http://www.numdam.
org/conditions). Toute utilisation commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infraction pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit contenir la présente mention de copyright.
Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques
http://www.numdam.org/
p. 351
On
adifferential equation approach to quantum field theory:
causality property
for the solutions of Thirring’s model
P. de MOTTONI
E. SALUSTI
Istituto per le Applicazioni del Calcolo, C. N. R., Roma,
Istituto di Fisica dctl’Univcrsita, Roma.
Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Roma.
Ann. Inst. Hertri Poincaré, Vol. XV, no 4, 1971,
Section A : Physique théorique.
ABSTRACT. - A
causality property
is established for the solutions ofThirring’s model,
where the fields are operator valued functions of the space time variables. Thisproperty
isjust
that oneexpects
for the convo- lution of aWightman
field with acompactely supported
function.- On établit une
propriété
de causalité pour les solutions d’un modèle deThirring
ou leschamps
sont des fonctions des variablesd’espace-
temps à valeurs
opérateurs.
Cettepropriété
est bien cellequi
convientpour un
champ
deWightman
convolué avec une fonction de classe C°°a
support compact.
1. - INTRODUCTION
The
opportunity
ofconnecting
thetheory
of non linear differentialequations
to quantum fieldtheory
has beenrepeatedly
stressed[1],
andrecently
some results in this direction have beenobtained, by applying
nonlinear
semigroup theory
to theanalysis
of some field theoretical models[2].
According
to this treatment, thephysical
model was definedby
aCauchy problem
of the first order in the time variable t for aquantity x)
definedfor any
positive
time t and any spacepoint
x : morespecifically, x)
was
supposed
tobe,
for any t > 0 and x E a bounded operatoracting
in the Hilbert
space Je
of thephysical
states. Norequirement
was madeabout the commutators or anticommutators of 03A6 taken at different space- time
points.
Within thisframework,
the existence anduniqueness
ofO(t, x)
wasproved
for theThirring
and the Federbush models.To suppose the
x)’s
to be operator valuedfunctions
is of course a verysevere
restriction,
as it forbids ~ to be a field inWightman’s
sense[3] [4].
However,
if we take aspin 1/2 Wightman
fieldA,
and afunction f E D(R
x[RS)
the
quantity
defines an
operator
valued functionof t,
x, which is of course not covariantnor
local,
still shares manyproperties
with the above introduced 0. Thuswe may
hope
toapproximate,
in a sense to befurtherly specified,
a « true »Wightman
fieldby
a sequence of functions like 0. As a first step in thisdirection,
one should try to establish on arigorous ground
the identification between B and D. Fordoing that,
further conditions are needed for 0:namely,
if d is the size of the supportof fin R
x the local(anti-)commu- tativity
of A entails :if
therefore the same must be valid for C.
The aim of the present paper is to show
that,
in the case of theThirring model,
the conditionif
can
actually
beimposed,
and it iscompatible
with theequation W(t, x) obeys.
Morespecifically,
we shall show that if the initial datax(x) satisfy
then
353
ON A DIFFERENTIAL EQUATION APPROACH TO QUANTUM FIELD THEORY
if
and,
inparticular,
if2. - FO RMULATIO N OF THE PROBLEM
If the fields are
regarded
as functions of the time0)
and of the space variable x ==(xi ... xs),
whose values are bounded operators in the Hilbert space ofphysical
states,they
are realized asmappings
from the spacealgebra
X. Wefurtherly
make a definite assump- tion about thedependence
on x: wenamely
suppose that for any t, the field is a continuous function of x,vanishing
atinfinity (our
framework shouldallow, however,
even a moregeneral dependence
onx).
Thusa j-component
field may be viewed as a function from R to the space Y =
0153 J Yb
whereeach
Y
is the spaceX) :
,
i=1
By introducing
inY
and Y the norms(j’ Ix being
the norm ofX),
~- 1
each
Yt
is turned into aC*-algebra
for theproduct
and Y into a Banach space.
The
equations
we shall consider are of the formwhere
(t
5=0),
x, are elements ofY,
L is a linear closed operator ih Ygenerating
asemigroup So(t);
and T is a non linear operator defined on the whole of Y. A moregeneral equation
iswhich is
equivalent
to(2.1)
if themapping ~)2014~~)
is differentiable.Solutions of
(2.2)
which do not need to be differentiable are called mild solutions of(2.1) [5].
The
equations
of theThirring
model[6]
may be written
(without
anyassumption
about C. A.R.)
asand therefore are of the form
(2 .1 ) with j
=2, s
= 1:In Ref.
[2]
it was shownthat: i)
L generates asemigroup
of(linear) contractions, ii)
T islocally Lipshitz continuous,
i. e.,for
~
’If’ EY, j (*) and, iii) T
satisfies the « condition M n:Vr>0,
3A>0 suchthat VTeY,
and
À. As a consequence[7],
aunique
mild solution of(2. 3) (i.
e.(2.1)
with
(2.4)),
exists and it isgenerated by
a non linearsemigroup S(t) :
(*) The constant K(r) is called the r-Lipschitz norm of T, and in our case
355
ON A DIFFERENTIAL EQUATION APPROACH TO QUANTUM FIELD THEORY
where
S(t)
satisfiesfor any
’P, ’P’
EY, T Iv f ’P’
r.We want now to
impose
a further condition on ourequation (2.3), namely
werequire
that the initial data anticommutebeyond
agiven
dis-tance d:
From the
explicit
action ofSo(t) :
we deduce that the free solution =
So(t)x
satisfiesIn
particular,
The aim of the present paper is to show that the solution
B(~)
of(2.3)
has anticommutation relations like
(2.9),
which expresses thecausality
for a « delocalized » field like B.
3. - ITERATING PROCEDURE
It is convenient to introduce a sequence of recursive solutions of the
integral equation (2.2):
ANN. INST. POINCAR~, A-X V-4
and we ask about the convergence of towards
(t)
as k goes to infi-nity.
We then have :LEMMA 1. - Let be the solution of
(2.1)-(2.4)
for the initial data x.Then there is a
positive
number l’depending on x Iv
such thatProof.
- Let uscompute y. Putting
p= 1 X Y,
wehave,
as ther-Lipschitz
norm of T is61 g r 2,
00
where
oc=2~’6~)~.
If we choose ee1/2,
we have 1 +x~ 1 +.~ x~=2;
j=l
therefore
and
repeating
the same argument it iseasily
seen thatFurthermore,
it is easy to check thatwhich converges to zero as A:-~ oo,
always provided
a1/2.
Thus thelimit of
0~)(~) exists,
and as it must be a solution of(2.1)
with the initial data x, theuniqueness
of the solution shows that lim{J)(k)(t) =
The condition a
1/2 reads,
in termsof t,
Thus the Lemma is
proved
with r(48 [ g [ C 1~)-1.
Because of the
semigroup
character ofS(t),
we maywrite,
for t > t’ a 0:ON A DIFFERENTIAL EQUATION APPROACH TO QUANTUM FIELD THEORY 357
This defines another
iterating procedure :
Then it is easy to prove :
LEMMA 2. - Let T be the
positive quantity
determined in Lemma 1.Then
for any t : such that t 2014 ~ ~ T.
Proof - Repeating
the argument of Lemma lone finds thatfor any t such that
Thus,
if t - t’ T =(48 I~) - 1, applying (2.6),
it is evident thatt 2014 ~ ~
T’,
which proves our result.4. - ANTICOMMUTATION RELATIONS
The results of section 3 are
completely independent
of thehypothesis (2.8),
and hold in a more
general
context. We now introduce(2.8),
thus even(2 . 9)
is valid. We shall prove :LEMMA 3. -
~)(~)
satisfies thefollowing
anticommutation relations for any k :Then if
where
1/1 #,
denotesboth #
and~*.
Remark. The
region ~d
contains theregion c~d
whosepoints (x, x’,
t,t’»
are such that
Proof -
If k =0, (4.1)
is aparticular
case of(2.9),.
Let us nextsuppose
(4.1)
to be valid for k h : we will show that the same holds for k = h + 1.Take for instance
One can
easily
show that the anticommutator between any one of the termsand any one of the terms
vanishes for
(x, x’, t, t’)
Eé) d.
As anexample,
takewhich vanishes for
(x, x’, t, t’) belonging
toi. e. for
(x, x’,
t,t’)
E0~.
ON A DIFFERENTIAL EQUATION APPROACH TO QUANTUM FIELD THEORY 359
Thus,
anticommutators betweenx)
and~p~h + 1 ~,,~(t’, x’)
allvanish for
(x, x’, t, t’)
E and the result for followsby induction, q. e. d.
Then it is easy to establish our main theorem : THEOREM 4.
if
Proof. - For t, t’
r, where T isgiven by
Lemma1,
the assertion of the theorem is true because of Lemmas 1 and 3. Then suppose the same to holdfor t, t’ ~
nz. Then we may consider thesequence { 0~) }: repeating
the argument of Lemma 3 each term
~~k~(t)
can be shown tosatisfy
if
and because of Lemma
2,
the assertion of the theorem is established forany t, t’ (n
+ The result then followsby
induction on n, q. e. d.Remarks. Theorem 1 shows that the anticommutators of the « field » vanish in a
region Od
which islarger
then(see fig. 1).
Thisdepends essentially
on the « massless » character of the operatorL;
and may be related to the fact thatx)
has support in the whole forward cone for m #0,
whereasx)
has supportonly
on the surface of the forwardcone
[8].
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
One of us
(P.
d.M.)
expresses hisgratitude
to Dr. Dimitri FonADiand to all the Centre de
Physique Théorique
deFEcole Polytechnique,
Paris,
where part of this work wasdone,
for the warmhospitality
extendedto him and for many
interesting
and fruitful discussions. We also thank Prof. G. JONA-LASINIO and L. E. PICASSO and Dr. M. IANNELLI for useful comments.[1] I. E. SEGAL, Non-linear semigroups, Annals of Mathematics, t. 78, 1963, p. 339-364.
I. E. SEGAL, Non-linear partial differential equations in quantum field theory, Symp.
Appl. Math., t. XVII, 1965, p. 210-226.
I. E. SEGAL, Notes towards the construction of non-linear relativistic quantum fields, I, Proc. N. A. S., U. S. A., t. 57, 1967, p. 1178-1183.
[2] E. SALUSTI and A. TESEI, On a semigroup approach to quantum field equations,
Nuovo Cimento, Série 11, Vol. 2A, p. 122-138.
[3] R. F. STREATER and A. S. WIGHTMAN, PCT, spin, statistic and all that, Benjamin,
New York, 1964.
[4] A. S. WIGHTMAN, La théorie quantique locale et la théorie quantique des champs, Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré, t. A 1, 1964, p. 403-420.
[5] F. E. BROWDER, Non-linear equations of evolution, Ann. of Math., t. 80, 1964, p. 485- 523.
[6] A. S. WIGHTMAN, Introduction to some aspects of the relativistic dynamics of quan- tized fields, Cargèse lectures, 1964, Gordon and Breach, 1965.
[7] M. IANNELLI, A note on some non-linear non-contraction semigroups, Boll. U. M.I.,
t. 6, 1970, p. 1015-1025.
[8] N. N. BOGOLIUBOV and D. SHIRKOV, Introduction to the theory of quantized fields, Interscience, New York, 1959.
(Manuscrit reçu le 12 mai 1971 ).