• Aucun résultat trouvé

Preface

N/A
N/A
Info
Télécharger
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Preface"

Copied!
5
0
0

Chargement.... (Voir le texte intégral maintenant)

Texte intégral

(1)

2

nd

Workshop on

Intelligent Support for Learning in Groups

Tuesday, July 9, 2013 Memphis TN

Rohit Kumar

Speech, Language and Multimedia Raytheon BBN Technologies

USA

Jihie Kim

Information Sciences Institute University of Southern California

USA

https://sites.google.com/site/islg2013/

(2)

Preface

Technological advances in the use of Artificial Intelligence for educational applications over the past two decades have enabled the development of highly effective, deployable learning technologies that support learners across a wide-range of domains and age-groups. Alongside, mass access and adoption of revolutionary communication technologies have made it possible to bridge learners and educators across spatio-temporal divides. On the other hand, research in collaborative learning has informed instructional principles that leverage the pedagogical benefits of learning in groups. Educational service providers including mainstream universities are deploying their courses to online learning platforms that allow students to share their learning experience with their peers. Large volumes of educational content including videos, presentations, books and games are accessible on mobile/tablet devices which enrich learning interactions by bringing students together.

Over the past few years, the AIEd research community has started investigating extension of fundamental techniques (such as student modeling, model-based tutors, integrated assessment, tutorial dialog, automated scaffolding, data mining, pedagogical agents) to support learning in groups. The goal of this series of workshops is to provide a focused forum for bringing this sub-community of AIEd researchers together to share recent advances in the field.

Building on its first instantiation in 2012, this workshop will comprise of presentations describing advances in state of the art AIEd techniques to improve the effectiveness of learning in groups. Five full length papers and six short papers were accepted for presentation this year. These eleven papers are organized into four interrelated areas that cover the breadth of the topics of interest. Additionally, two positions papers accepted to this workshop are included in these proceedings. Besides the paper presentations, the workshop will include a group discussion session. After the workshop, notes from this session, will be shared on the workshop website.

June, 2013 Rohit Kumar, Jihie Kim

(3)

Organizers

Jihie Kim University of Southern California, USA (jihie@isi.edu) Rohit Kumar Raytheon BBN Technologies, USA (rkumar@bbn.com)

Advisors

Arthur C. Graesser University of Memphis, USA Lewis W. Johnson Alelo Inc., USA

James C. Lester North Carolina State University, USA Carolyn P. Rosé Carnegie Mellon University, USA

Beverly P. Woolf University of Massachusetts Amherst, USA

Program Committee

Ari Bader-Natal Minerva Project, USA Ryan S.J.d Baker Columbia University, USA

Kristy Boyer North Carolina State University, USA Stavros N. Demetriadis Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece Toby Dragon Saarland University, Germany

Gahgene Gweon Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, S. Korea

Sharon I-Han Hsiao Columbia University, USA Charalampos University of Thessaly, Greece Karagiannidis

Judy Kay University of Sydney, Australia Fazel Keshtkar University of Memphis, USA Diane Litman University of Pittsburgh, USA Bruce M. McLaren Carnegie Mellon University, USA

Saarland University, Germany Elaine Raybourn Sandia National Labs, USA Oliver Scheuer Saarland University, Germany Erin Walker Arizona State University, USA

Additional Reviewers

Tiffany Barnes University of North Carolina at Charlotte, USA

(4)

Table of Contents

Tools & Techniques

Authoring Collaborative Intelligent Tutoring Systems 1 Jennifer Olsen, Daniel Belenky, Vincent Aleven, Nikol Rummel,

Jonathan Sewall and Michael Ringenberg

A Data Mining Approach to Construct Production Rules in an Educational Game 11 Fazel Keshtkar, Borhan Samei, Brent Morgan and Art Graesser

Modeling & Analysis

Modeling the Process of Online Q&A Discussions using a Dialogue State Model 15 Shitian Shen and Jihie Kim

Extending Collaborative Learning Modeling with Emotional Information 25 Olga C. Santos, Jesus G. Boticario, Raúl Cabestrero and Pilar Quirós

Analysis of Emotion and Engagement in a STEM Alternate Reality Game 29 Yu-Han Chang, Rajiv Maheswaran, Jihie Kim and Linwei Zhu

Visualization

A Dashboard for Visualizing Deliberative Dialogue in Online Learning 33 Tom Murray, Leah Wing and Beverly Park Woolf

Designing OLMs for Reflection about Group Brainstorming at Interactive 37 Tabletops

Andrew Clayphan, Roberto Martinez Maldonado and Judy Kay

Encouraging Online Student Reading with Social Visualization 47 Julio Guerra, Denis Parra and Peter Brusilovsky

Interactive Systems

Academically Productive Talk: One Size Does Not Fit All 51 David Adamson and Carolyn Rose

Towards Supporting ‘Learning To Learn Together’ in the Metafora platform 61 Manolis Mavrikis, Toby Dragon, Nikoleta Yiannoutsou and Bruce M. McLaren

Supporting Collaborative Learning in Virtual Worlds by Intelligent 73 Pedagogical Agents: Approach and Perspectives

Mohamed Soliman

(5)

Position Papers

Towards semantic descriptions of collaboration indicators to support 77 collaboration models transferability

Jesús L. Lobo, Olga C. Santos and Jesús G. Boticario

Scripting at the tabletop to improve collaboration 79

Andrew Clayphan

Références

Télécharger maintenant ( PDF - 5 Page - 126.22 KB )

Documents relatifs

university of

The purpose of this study. 1s to determine whether principals, department chairper-sons and teachers feel the supervisory functions, genezoally associated with the.

CARNEGIE-IVIELLON UNIVERSITY

To create a new border style you first of all create some patterns by collecting together several lines; then you collect the patterns together to create the border style.

Learning at the University - conceptions of university teachers

Purdie, Hattie & Douglas, 1996). Within the two macro categories of the learning conceptions, five categories were identified resulting from qualitative differences

John Fulcher, University of Wollongong, Australia

In this chapter, we present different SC paradigms involving an artificial neural network (Zurada, 1992) trained by using the scaled conjugate gradient algorithm (Moller, 1993),

of UNIVERSITY

They are involved in monotone dynamical systems, uniform persistence and coexistence states, basic reproduction ratios for compartmental epidemic models in periodic

(American University of Armenia)

Our findings suggest that better access to finance (such as having a credit card or a few credit lines), savings from monthly income and financial literacy (such as knowledge

School of Computer Science Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, PA 15213-3891

Tofte's idea is to employ a marking of type variables so as to maintain the invariant that if a type variable can occur in the type of a location in the store, then generalization

Separation and Information Hiding Peter W. O’Hearn Queen Mary, University of London Hongseok Yang Queen Mary, University of London John C. Reynolds Carnegie Mellon University

The purpose of this paper is to investigate proof rules for information hiding using separation logic, a formalism for reasoning about mutable data structures [Reynolds 2002]..