• Aucun résultat trouvé

Rapport annuel 2015

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Rapport annuel 2015"

Copied!
66
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

2015 ANNUAL REPORT

(2)
(3)

PRODUCTION

Writing coordination Luc Doray

Writing collaboration Brunelle-Amélie Bourque Louis-Alexandre Cazal Luc Doray

Lizon Levesque Jimmy Paquet-Cormier Anik Pouliot

Gilles Vézina Revision Lizon Levesque Translation Joanne Gibbs Photographs Lucie Bataille Frédéric Tougas Design

Elisabeth Doyon

Legal deposit - Bibliothèque et archives nationales du Québec, 2016 Legal deposit – Library and Archives Canada, 2016

ISBN 978-2-924002-81-0 (Print) ISBN 978-2-924002-82-7 (PDF)

Electronic version available at : www.ocpm.qc.ca

Version française papier disponible sur demande Version française PDF disponible sur le site Internet

(4)
(5)

May 1, 2016 Mr. Frantz Benjamin President of the City Council Ville de Montréal

Montréal (Québec) Mr. President:

In keeping with the Charter of Ville de Montréal (R.S.Q., c. C-11.4), I am pleased to enclose the 2015 annual report of the Offi ce de consultation publique de Montréal.

The report outlines the activities of the Offi ce for the period of January 1 to December 31, 2015.

Please do not hesitate to contact me should you require further information.

Yours sincerely,

Dominique Ollivier,

President of the Offi ce de consultation publique de Montréal

(6)

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The Offi ce de consultation publique de Montréal (OCPM) would like to thank all of its collaborators who contributed to the promotion of Offi ce activities in 2015.

The OCPM would also like to take this opportunity to thank the groups, organizations, citizens, civil servants and developers who participated in the various public consultations.

The Offi ce owes the success of its public consultations to the involvement of borough and central department employees, professionals, management personnel and elected offi cials, who gave their help and expertise to help citizens and commissioners to understand the projects and issues involved.

Without everyone’s good will and co-operation, the OCPM’s public

consultations would not have achieved their primary goal of providing

Montrealers with pertinent information and data on the various projects,

with a view to gathering their opinions and comments.

(7)

TABLE DES MATIÈRES

President’s message Mission and mandate Activities

Communications overview New technologies

External relations Budget

Appendix I

Biographical notes on the president and commissioners in 2015 Appendix II

Excerpts from the Charter of Ville de Montréal Appendix III

Organization, practices and Code of Professional Conduct Appendix IV

List of employees and collaborators in 2015

8 10 13 25 29 33 37

41

54

58

63

(8)

PRESIDENT’S MESSAGE

It is with great enthusiasm and pride that the Office de consultation publique de Montréal presents its report for 2015, a year marked by revitalization and renewal.

Over the course of the year, the executive committee and city council entrusted us with five mandates to consult Montrealers: a special planning program (SPP) for the Quartier des gares; two real estate projects in the boroughs of Ville-Marie and LaSalle;

a statement ensuring consistency between the Montréal Master Plan and the development plan adopted in the spring by the agglomeration council;

and, last but not least, a mandate on reducing Montrealers’ dependence on fossil energies.

The projects provided opportunities to try out new approaches, such as auto-organized activities and citizens’ debates, to reach a greater number of participants. We used various tools to support those innovations, including online questionnaires, 3D viewing and an online participation platform.

Combining those various methods generated major successes in citizen participation, particularly with respect to the first consultation phase on reducing dependence on fossil energies, where more than 1000 people expressed their opinions on the subject.

It is important to note that those methods are not intended to replace traditional Office methodology.

Rather, they are complementary steps that allow an increasing number of citizens to become informed, and to debate and participate. After more than 13 years in existence, we believe that it is essential to make our processes even more accessible and easier to use. In parallel with existing tools, we are seeking to diversify our methods in order to include groups that are harder to reach, such as immigrant citizens and vulnerable people, less comfortable with the written word or living in precarious situations. We seek to ensure that diverse points of

view are always heard from all parties concerned to make our discussions more inclusive, participatory, fair and enlightening, with a view to facilitating the decision-making process of elected officials.

Sharing experiences: the main focus of our work plan

Over the years, we have both witnessed and taken part in the evolution of democratic life and, more particularly, in the transformation of consultation practices in Montréal. The expertise and credibility of the Office now extends far beyond the cases prescribed in the Charter. We have sought to share our expertise, largely through the organization of various events. The sharing of good practices, constant discussion and subsequent networking allow us to properly fulfil our role of accompanying and supporting Montréal officials who organize consultation activities that fall to us under section 83 of the Charter.

As modes of interaction are evolving, in 2015 we paid particular attention to documenting our practices and analyzing them with a single purpose in mind: to guarantee the mechanisms’ credibility and shape them into inclusive debating tools.

To that end, we developed, with the Bureau de la Présidence du Conseil, training sessions for elected officials and municipal bodies responsible for consultations at various levels. Those activities, in which more than one-third of city council members participated, were a huge success.

The discussion day Consultation, concertation et

co-design : L’art de planifier avec les communautés

locales [Consultation, consensus-building and

co-construction: The art of planning with local

communities], held before a packed hall last April, is

another good example of the spirit that drives us. The

ensuing findings speak volumes: the articulation of

(9)

OCPM ANNUAL REPORT 2015 I PRESIDENT’S MESSAGE 9

what constitutes the general interest, the common good, calls for it to be increasingly determined with the population, and no longer only in its name. Cases are becoming more complex. The means of bringing forth and confronting ideas, contributions and demands are constantly multiplying and reinventing themselves. In that sense, it is important that the Offi ce keep abreast of best practices to ensure that new methods do not generate new social fractures.

Feedback: an essential element of the consultation cycle

In a city where debates are enlivened by the number of citizens taking part in them and by the quality of their contributions, it is important to periodically evaluate and review the uses made of public consultation and the means allocated to it in order to ensure and promote its continuity.

In preparing the report on citizen participation and questions posed to the Offi ce, we came to realize that it was no longer enough for us to merely enlist the participation of citizens and to report our fi ndings.

In order to restore the citizens’ confi dence in their democratic bodies, they must be informed of how their opinions are used and what recommendations are made as a result of them.

We are pleased to note that an ever increasing number of boroughs are spontaneously providing us with information pertaining to follow-up on Offi ce recommendations, which we post online and would henceforth hope to consider an intrinsic part of the consultation fi le. In addition to ensuring the mechanism’s credibility, such practices allow prolonged dialogue between citizens and decision makers.

In many respects, Montréal may be considered exemplary owing to the diversity of participatory democracy and the importance accorded to it.

However, while tools are multiplying and subjects becoming more complex, the Offi ce’s expertise could and should be increasingly drawn upon, both to support upstream and major-project-development mandates, policy revisions, and innovative decision- building activities, and to update documents such as Montréal’s Public Consultation and Participation Policy and the Montréal Charter of Rights and

Responsibilities, which are the cornerstones of our participatory model. There will be no shortage of opportunities over the next few years, and we will happily continue to help to make our metropolis a living laboratory of participation placing citizens at the heart of its processes.

Dominique Ollivier

President

(10)

Mission

The mission of the Offi ce de consultation publique de Montréal, created under section 75 of the Charter of Ville de Montréal, is to carry out public consultation mandates with regard to land-use planning and development matters under municipal jurisdiction, and on all projects designated by the city council or executive committee.

Mandate

The Offi ce de consultation publique de Montréal, in operation since September 2002, is an independent organization whose members are neither elected offi cials nor municipal employees. It receives its mandates from the city council or executive committee.

MISSION AND MANDATE

(11)

OCPM ANNUAL REPORT 2015 I MISSION AND MANDATE 11 1° to propose a regulatory framework for the public

consultations carried out by the official of the city in charge of such consultations pursuant to any applicable provision so as to ensure the establishment of credible, transparent and effective consultation mechanisms;

2° to hold a public consultation on any draft by-law revising the city’s planning program;

2.1° to hold a public consultation on any draft by-law amending the city’s planning program, except those adopted by a borough council;

3° to hold public hearings in the territory of the city, at the request of the city council or the executive committee, on any project designated by the council or the committee.

On December 7, 2005, the government adopted decree 1213-2005 amending the Charter of Ville de Montréal. This decree allows the agglomeration council, under the Act respecting the exercise of certain municipal powers in certain urban agglomerations, (R.S.Q., c. E-20.001), to authorize projects related to its jurisdiction anywhere within its territory, and to entrust the ensuing public consultation process to the Office de consultation publique de Montréal. This provision came into force on January 1, 2006.

On June 12, 2008, draft By-law 82 was enacted, amending section 89.1 of the City Charter so that, for purposes of the approval by referendum process pursuant to subparagraph 4 of the section, the territory of reference would be the borough or boroughs in which the project is planned. It is important to note that this modification applies only to projects located wholly or in part in the historic borough of Old Montréal.

On June 20, 2008, draft By-law 22 was enacted, returning to city council the power, concurrently with the borough councils, to take the initiative for an amendment to the planning program in respect of an object to which a draft amendment adopted by the city council pertains. Following this amendment, the functions of the Office were modified, giving it responsibility for public consultations on any amendment to the planning program initiated by city council.

On June 15, 2012, draft By-law 69 was enacted. Among other things, it redefined the criteria under which mandates could be given to the Office pursuant to section 89 of the Charter of Ville de Montréal. The draft By-law replaced, in sub-paragraph 1 of the first paragraph of the section, the words “university, college” with the words “public educational institution, college- or university-level educational institution.” The purport of this amendment is to allow the application of the provisions of that section to secondary and primary schools.

The same draft By-law, under its section 25, allows Montréal to amend, with a by-law and without any other formality, certain provisions of the “Règlement sur la construction, la transformation et l’occupation du Centre universitaire de santé McGill, sur un emplacement situé à l’est du boulevard Décarie, entre la rue Saint-Jacques et la voie ferrée du Canadien Pacifique,”

despite section 89.1 of the Charter of Ville de Montréal.

THE CHARTER OF VILLE DE MONTRÉAL DEFINES THE MANDATE OF THE OCPM AS FOLLOWS:

Sections 89 and 89.1 also provide that the OCPM must hold public consultations on all by-laws to be adopted by city council respecting projects that involve:

> Shared or institutional equipment, such as cultural equipment, a hospital, university, college, convention centre, house of detention, cemetery, regional park or botanical garden;

> Major infrastructures, such as an airport, port, station, yard or shunting yard or a water treatment, filtration or purification facility;

> A residential, commercial or industrial establishment situated in the business district, or if situated outside the business district, such an establishment the floor area of which is greater than 25,000 m2;

> Cultural property recognized or classified or a historic monument designated under the Cultural Property Act (R.S.Q., c. B-4) or where the planned site of the project is a historic or natural district or heritage site within the meaning of that Act.

(12)
(13)

ACTIVITIES

The work of the Office de

consultation publique de Montréal

is carried out in light of two sections

of the Charter of Ville de Montréal,

sections 83 and 89. They provide that

the Offi ce must hold consultations

on mandates it receives according

to criteria provided for under the

Charter. They also stipulate that the

Office must promote best public

consultation practices, notably with

Montréal authorities.

(14)

In 2015, the Offi ce de consultation publique de Montréal completed consultations initiated in 2014, and undertook and carried out other mandates, including consultation projects to be continued in 2016.

Firstly, we completed two ongoing projects. One involved

the establishment of a closed-building composting facility in the borough of Rivière-des- Prairies–Pointe-aux-Trembles. The new site in

question is located north-east of the intersection of Saint-Jean-Baptiste Boulevard and the Metropolitan Boulevard (Highway 40), in an industrial sector.

The consultation became necessary following the Montréal administration’s decision to withdraw its approval for the establishment of a composting centre on the site of the Saint-Michel environmental complex, located in the northern sector. It was therefore proposed that it be relocated to the eastern sector, on the territory of the borough of Rivière-des- Prairies–Pointe-aux-Trembles.

Although the overall project involving the treatment of organic material on an agglomeration-wide scale was well received by the majority, and despite the fact that the chosen site meets the technical criteria for the establishment of that type of infrastructure,

the project examined during the consultation was, in general, not welcomed by residents and owners of businesses surrounding the site. The main reasons given were the non-respect of the territorial equity principle, the nuisances associated with the operation of the centre, and its economic repercussions in the host sector, notably owing to the new use restrictions allowed within the 500-metre protection radius of such a centre.

Nonetheless, the commission recommends that the project proceed. However, taking into account the reservations expressed by neighbouring citizens and business owners, and the large number of elements of the project that are not well documented, its recommendation must be guided by two major objectives: minimizing the risks of the project and maximizing its benefi ts for the community.

Consequently, it sets out a number of conditions required to make the project acceptable.

The second fi le has to do with

the development and renewal of the Plateau Est employment sector. The Plateau Est had developed in the past

around the operations of the Angus workshops,

the east end slaughterhouses, the manufacturing

industry and the Cadbury Company, in connection

with the presence of the Canadian Pacifi c railway

(15)

OCPM ANNUAL REPORT 2015 I ACTIVITIES 15

tracks. Over the years, the sector changed. Many companies closed, some moved, and some of the buildings were repurposed. Running along the railway tracks, the area now comprises more than 300 companies providing almost 4500 jobs, mostly in the service industry. It also includes residential zones.

It should be noted that the consultation was held at the request of the Plateau-Mont-Royal borough, with a view to undertaking a participatory process aimed at developing a special planning program (SPP) for the area.

The area in question has numerous assets making it a site of exceptional economic vocation on a Montréal-wide scale. Its location, the nature of the proposed rental spaces, the complementarity of some of the businesses established there and the stability of existing institutional jobs are seen, both by citizens and the commission, as important assets to build on.

Despite those advantages, one of the issues permeating the consultation involved providing the neighbourhood with its own identity, marked by structuring architectural elements, original developments of public property, and originality in terms of how to live and travel within it.

The individuals consulted all subscribe to the idea of having the sector emerge, in time, as a “complete neighbourhood,” a notion referring to a spatial organization fostering a mix of functions, where employment-generating, residential, commercial, recreational and educational activities harmoniously interweave.

To that end, and taking into account the physical and psychological barriers existing in the neighbourhood, the commission suggests that the area’s layout be reviewed to create three distinct zones: an industrial zone running along the railway tracks; a buffer zone comprising a variety of uses; and a residential zone in continuity with the existing one. Under this hierarchy of functions, jobs and current and potential nuisances would be concentrated in the east end, and residences in the west.

Two other files were undertaken and completed in 2015. The first involved the realization of the Carré

des Arts, a real estate project north of the old Saint-

Jacques market, for which the consultation was held last spring.

The project consisted in expanding the old church, built in 1924 and located to the north of the Saint- Jacques market, in the Centre-Sud neighbourhood.

The building, converted into commercial spaces in the mid-20th century, would comprise, once expanded, some 33 housing units as well as commercial premises on five floors. Fifteen underground parking spaces would be constructed.

Element of the old church would also be preserved and integrated into the new building, whose main entrance would be located on Square-Amherst Street.

After examining the project, the commission found that the Carré des Arts project could play a significant role in consolidating and developing an urban core around the Saint-Jacques market.

However, to ensure the harmonious integration of any new project within the area, it believes that it is important to respect the principle of the market’s predominance over its immediate environment and to ensure the preservation of views of the market.

Following the consultation, the commission

considers the predominance of the Saint-Jacques

market to be adequately ensured from a regulation

standpoint, and therefore recommends the

requested height increase. Nevertheless, to counter

(16)

some of the nuisances associated with the Carré des Arts project, such as the loss of mature trees, sunshine and views, it makes various recommendations to lessen the impact of those nuisances, increase the acceptability of the project, and improve the living environment of the neighbourhood’s residents. The recommendations include the possibility of redeveloping Square- Amherst Street into a shared street, thereby evoking the public square located there at the beginning of the 20

th

century, which enlivened the Saint-Jacques market established on its southern flank.

The second file relates to a broader planning exercise:

the special planning program (SPP) for the Quartier des gares. The project involves

an urban requalification process, comprising 11 strategic objectives. Five of those objectives pertain to the redevelopment of public property, and three to the development and quality of private real estate projects. The last three objectives concern the improvement of public transit as a lever to ensuring a better quality of life for the neighbourhood’s residents, workers, students and visitors.

The commission found the special planning program proposed by the borough to be a timely

and important gesture that was received rather favourably by consultation participants. The proposed redevelopment of public property that is the basis for the submitted project is in line with citizens’ expectations and should have visible and positive spinoffs in the neighbourhood in the very short term. The commission believes that the draft SPP meets a need and should be adopted quickly, taking into account certain recommendations.

However, it would like some aspects of the SPP to be revised, including:

The structuring of real estate projects.

The commission is well aware of the importance of major downtown real estate projects for Montréal.

It also thinks that the developers’ calls for greater flexibility in terms of planning their projects are to be expected in a development dynamic.

The draft SPP proposes a change to the Master Plan’s heights map, raising the maximum height from 120 metres to 210 metres on a specific quadrangle, without examining the question of heights from a more global perspective. The issue raised controversy. Several participants asked for an expansion of the proposed area, while others were opposed to it for various reasons.

In the commission’s opinion, it is not a good idea

(17)

OCPM ANNUAL REPORT 2015 I ACTIVITIES 17

to repeatedly make changes to the heights map on a case-by-case basis; it would be preferable to examine the area in question as a whole.

Consequently, it recommends that the proposed modification to the heights map be withdrawn from the draft SPP and that a comprehensive exercise be diligently undertaken to examine heights, densities and sitings for the entire Quartier des gares.

The Parc Ville-Marie. The SPP calls for the creation

of a new park on the right-of-way of the Ville-Marie expressway. The commission recommends that the borough conduct a thorough review of the development plan for Parc Ville-Marie with a view to incorporating the existing community gardens and dog run. Moreover, in a context of urban agriculture in full expansion, the borough should also ensure that there is no net loss of community gardens in the area.

Affordable housing and social housing.

The commission believes that there is no valid reason for not fully applying the affordable housing inclusion strategy for new residential projects in the Quartier des gares. It recommends that the borough adopt a vigorous proactive approach in that respect and an action plan based on quantitative objectives, as well as follow-up indicators for the implementation of the affordable housing inclusion strategy.

The commission also made a series of other recommendations, notably on the issues of travel, living environment, heritage, safety, cleanliness and the implementation of the SPP.

Lastly, the Office undertook the examination of three projects that will be concluded in 2016. The first relates to a draft by-law amending the Master

Plan to bring it into conformity with the Schéma d’aménagement de l’agglomération de Montréal.

The Montréal agglomeration council adopted its development plan last spring, and the Act respecting land use planning and development provides that the agglomeration’s municipalities must ensure that their master plans are in conformity with it.

The legal necessity of bringing the Montréal Master Plan into conformity with the agglomeration’s development plan is the basis for this consultation.

It is therefore not an exercise aimed at examining amendments as such to the Master Plan. The comprehensive revision of the Master Plan, which will also be submitted to the Office, should take place next year.

The second file concerns

a real estate project for the Wanklyn block in the borough of LaSalle.

(18)

The project requires variances to the Zoning By- law of the LaSalle borough, notably with respect to the construction and occupation of a residential complex and the development of a park. The By-law is not subject to approval by referendum.

Located on a former industrial lot that has been vacant for many years, in the future neighbourhood of the LaSalle borough station, the Wanklyn block project involves the construction of 786 housing units, including 119 community housing units, 230 condo units associated with the access to property program, and 437 rental or joint-ownership units.

The proposed buildings would be spread out around a central park and comprise between three and eight storeys. The project also includes 727 underground parking spaces.

The commission recommended that the by-law allowing the construction of the project not be adopted in its current form. The conclusions of the consultation brought to light the fact that the assumption of the existence of a TOD (Transit Oriented Development) neighbourhood was unfounded. Moreover, the project was based on a much greater density than is found in the present environment and, furthermore, the draft by-law in question allowed the eventual construction of a project of even greater density and height.

Lastly, the third file concerns a very important issue:

Reducing Montrealers’ dependence on fossil energies. On that occasion, the Office proposed

to Montrealers an innovative process combining traditional consultation methods and collaborative technologies.

It was in the wake of requests by a coalition of committed citizens seeking to take advantage of the attention surrounding the United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP21), scheduled for the end of November in Paris, that the City asked the OCPM to hold a public consultation on the problem.

The Office then began a process offering everyone user-friendly means to examine their individual and collective choices. Under the theme “Let’s fill up on new energies!” the OCPM relied on the community’s intelligence to identify solutions for Montréal with respect to those issues.

The Office therefore offered consultation activities in the spirit of crowdsourcing. For the first time, the Office also proposed the testing of an online

consultation platform allowing multidirectional discussions among citizens. The online consultation was launched during the information session on October 29, and the exercise would continue until the end of public activities in March 2016.

Moreover, citizens’ contributory activities, organized in partnership with groups, citizens and institutions, were held in November. They culminated in a major citizens’ activity held by the Office on November 21. The citizens’ contributory activities were made possible by a “ready-to-consult” kit produced by the Office. At the end of 2015, the two means had allowed more than 1 150 players (experts, companies, groups, citizens, etc.) to present initiatives, hold discussions, enrich points of view and enlighten us about their expectations and solution paths.

A summary of citizens’ ideas was submitted to the mayor of Montréal prior to his departure for the United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP21) in Paris, which was held in early December and attended by more than 1000 mayors from all over the world.

Along the same vein, it is important to note the

one-day consultation on climate changes, which

took place on June 6. The day was held within the

framework of a global event, “World Wide Views on

(19)

OCPM ANNUAL REPORT 2015 I ACTIVITIES 19

Climate and Energy,” where 100 citizens in each of 100 different countries from all corners of the world discussed the issue, addressing the same themes and having their views heard by the negotiators preparing the Climate Change Conference in Paris.

The Offi ce was responsible for the Montréal portion of the exercise, which was a great success.

Throughout the winter of 2016, other public events will be held, including a creative marathon in February, during which the Offi ce will call on technology and environment buffs to identify solutions. After the hearing of opinions sessions in March, the commission will analyze the proposals, opinions and references provided. It will then submit a report and its recommendations to elected offi cials to be used in their decision-making process.

The year 2015 also saw the realization of activities aimed at promoting best practices, which is part of the mandate of the OCPM. Among those, it is important to mention our training activities. A fi rst, addressed to Offi ce commissioners, focused on Special Planning Programs (SPP). However, the most comprehensive was public consultation training for municipal elected offi cials. In partnership

with the Bureau de la Présidence du Conseil, the Offi ce offered, in the spring, a training program on public participation and consultation for Montréal elected offi cials. The goals of the program were to improve conditions for discussions between elected offi cials and citizens, to strengthen the skills required for elected offi cials in that area, to promote the appropriation of consultation tools at their disposal, and the recognition of the value of the role of elected offi cials in the practice of participatory democracy.

Moreover, the training provided an opportunity to better acquaint elected offi cials with the principal tools for citizen participation in Montréal, for example, the Public Consultation and Participation Policy, the Charter of Rights and Responsibilities, the right of initiative, the council committees and, of course, the Offi ce de consultation publique de Montréal.

The program comprised three half-day segments:

From information to consensus-building: the role of elected offi cials in participatory democracy, Strategic analysis of situations leading to consultations, and The process of a successful consultation.

(20)

Still on the subject of the promotion of best practices, the Offi ce held, on April 28, within the context of the 100

th

anniversary of Montréal-Nord, a one-day reflection seminar under the theme,

“Consultation, consensus-building and codesign:

The art of planning with local communities.”

Various reflection and training workshops were held over the course of the day. We also relied on the contributions and statements of the mayor of Lac-Mégantic, Mrs. Colette Roy Laroche, who spoke about citizen participation in terms of the reconstruction of her city’s devastated downtown area, and of Mr. Pierre Houssais, Directeur de la Prospective et du Dialogue Public du Grand Lyon, who reported on the thought processes taking place in this major French city on that theme. More than 100 citizens and group representatives from Montréal-Nord, and from all areas of the city, took part in the activity.

A webcast of the activity is available on the Offi ce Web site and provides an account of the discussions

that took place on that occasion in addition to offering path-breaking content.

In closing, it is important to mention the two mandates that are still pending. The fi rst involves the planned light rail transit system (LRT) that may be established as part of the construction of the new Champlain Bridge. The second pertains to a consultation on the interministerial committee’s report on the use of the redundant buildings of the university hospitals of the Université de Montréal (CHUM) and McGill University (MUHC). In the absence of the report that is to be the object of the consultation, no action has been taken regarding that mandate.

Again this year, thousands of Montrealers

participated in Offi ce activities, either by attending

consultations, asking questions, fi ling briefs, or

participating through the digital tools increasingly

used by the Offi ce.

(21)

OCPM ANNUAL REPORT 2015 I ACTIVITIES 21

(22)

2015 EN CHIFFRES

35 98

COMMUNIQUÉS

ET AVIS AUX MÉDIAS

OPINIONS ORALES OU ÉCRITES ONT ÉTÉ

PRÉSENTÉES LORS DES SÉANCES D’AUDITION

2015 IN NUMBERS

35

98

6 110

PRESS RELEASES

AND MEDIA NOTICES

ORAL OR WRITTEN

OPINIONS WERE PRESENTED DURING HEARINGS

FLYERS WERE DISTRIBUTED IN AREAS NEIGHBOURING PROJECTS

38,000

(23)

OCPM ANNUAL REPORT 2015 I ACTIVITIES 23

38 000 35 DÉPLIANTS ONT ÉTÉ DISTRIBUÉS DANS LES SECTEURS VOISINS

DES PROJETS COMMUNIQUÉS

ET AVIS AUX MÉDIAS

12 24

6 110

144

49,250

PUBLIC

SESSIONS CITIZENS’

CONTRIBUTORY ACTIVITIES

LIKES FOR OUR FACEBOOK PAGE (AS AT DEC. 31)

VIDEOS AVAILABLE ON OUR YOUTUBE CHANNEL (AS AT DEC. 31)

VISITS ON OCPM.QC.CA

MONTREALERS PARTICIPATED IN OFFICE CONSULTATIONS

2 331

+

(24)
(25)

OCPM ANNUAL REPORT 2015 I ACTIVITIES 25

COMMUNICATIONS OVERVIEW

The OCPM informs citizens of any

upcoming public consultations. It begins

by publishing a public notice in a daily

newspaper at least 15 days before the

meeting. The notice is also posted on the

Offi ce Web site.

(26)

In 2015, the Offi ce published 8 public notices and advertisements in daily and weekly newspapers and issued 35 press releases and media invitations. Five advertising campaigns on Facebook as well as one radio and one television advertising campaign were also conducted. In some cases, in addition to the notices, the Offi ce also sends special invitations to citizens and organizations directly concerned by the ongoing consultation project.

Usually, the Offi ce distributes information flyers announcing the consultation to citizens that will be affected by a given project. Depending on the consultation, the distribution may cover between 1500 and 40,000 homes. Last year, some 38,000 flyers were distributed in sectors neighbouring projects that were the subject of consultations.

Flyers and posters were also distributed to

concerned organizations and in Ville de Montréal service points.

The OCPM Web site continues to regularly

inform citizens and groups interested in public

consultations. In 2015, almost 29,500 people visited

Web pages on our site, for a total of almost 49,250

visits. The year 2015 was a year of reflection and

work for the Offi ce in terms of the future of our

Web site. Test groups were organized with site

users and citizens who had never visited us in

order to determine needs and priorities with a view

to redesigning the Web site in early 2016. Those

activities established the necessity of offering

a more accessible and user-friendly site, better

adapted to the new realities of users visiting the

site from a mobile device (telephone or tablet), who

account for 20% of visits to the site.

(27)

OCPM ANNUAL REPORT 2015 I COMMUNICATIONS OVERVIEW 27

The social networks are playing an ever greater role in terms of traffi c on the Offi ce Web site and now represent 15%, more than double the 2014 fi gure of 6%. Facebook is still the majority player, ahead of Twitter and LinkedIn, increasing its share to 90% of the traffi c coming from social networks.

The Offi ce is increasingly using social networks to promote its activities with Montrealers. We regularly use Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube and Flickr.

However, Facebook is the one that stands out, owing to its popularity and the effectiveness of our interactions with the community on that network.

The number of subscribers to our page has grown by more than 1000 people this year, reaching 6 110 by the end of 2015. Over 20,000 people have interacted with our page, while the total reach of our publications is approximately 1.5M for 2015, i.e.

the number of people who saw any type of content associated with our page (the last two statistics compile unique users/day).

In April 2015, we proposed a new teaching tool: THE Guide to the MASTER PLAN, which was very well

received on our social networks with a number of Likes and Shares unprecedented for that type of publication. The English and French versions are available at ocpm.qc.ca/publications. The guide is also available in print.

Wishing to remain at the forefront of the citizen

consultation experience, in 2015, for the fi rst

time, the Offi ce tried out a real online consultation

platform with vertMtl.org, as part of the consultation

on reducing Montreal’s dependence on fossil

energies. The digital tool, a veritable opinion hub,

allowed citizens to interact around the proposals, to

affi rm their agreement or disagreement, to support

arguments and to provide references. It received

almost 4000 unique visitors in 2015. Launched

on October 29, the online consultation received

more than 4000 interventions (new proposals and

support for listed proposals) before the end of the

year. The consultation continues in 2016.

(28)
(29)

OCPM ANNUAL REPORT 2015 I NEW TECHNOLOGIES 29

TECHNOLOGIES NEW

In 2015, innovation initiatives at

the Office focused on access to

technologies suggested during

public consultations. Furthermore,

within the framework of the mandate

on fossil energies, an innovative

methodology and tools adapted

to various types of publics were

established in order to link activities

in real time and online.

(30)

Online consultation

As part of the consultation on reducing Montreal’s dependence on fossil energies, an online consultation platform allowing discussions was used for the first time at the OCPM to gather suggestions from a broader public on ways of reducing our dependence on fossil energies.

At the same time, kits allowing auto-organized consultation workshops were designed and made available. The new tool aims to reduce obstacles to participation. Thus, groups of all sizes can discuss the themes of the consultation from their own activity centres. The results are then integrated into the online consultation platform.

Modèles 3D

As part of the consultations on the Carré des Arts and Quartier des gares SPP projects, models of 3D environments were created to allow participants to visualize the proposed changes. For the first time, the 3D models were presented at the information sessions. For the project involving the SPP for the Quartier des gares, the 3D models made it possible to view the numerous height and density changes authorized for the sector, while for the Carré des Arts project, they showed the impacts of the proposed project on surrounding residences.

Innovative consultation techniques using 3D models and augmented reality were also employed during the

consultation on the Plateau Est employment sector for the public activities held in 2014 (please see the 2014

annual report for more information).

(31)

OCPM ANNUAL REPORT 2015 I NEW TECHNOLOGIES 31

(32)
(33)

OCPM ANNUAL REPORT 2015 I EXTERNAL RELATIONS 33

EXTERNAL RELATIONS

Since its establishment in 2002, the Offi ce has developed a network of contacts in organizations with missions similar to its own, contacts that have helped to improve the OCPM’s methods of operation.

The external activities of the

Offi ce promote skill dissemination,

development, and the sharing of

Montrealers’ experiences.

(34)

Firstly, let us mention the interactions of the Office with the City of Gatineau. OCPM Secretary General Luc Doray continued his meetings with elected official and citizens of that city with a view to creating within it an organization inspired by the activities of the OCPM.

The Office was also present at the annual meeting of the International Observatory on Participatory Democracy (IOPD) in Madrid. On that occasion, Office President Dominique Ollivier presented the consultation model of the Office and, more specifically, advances involving the use of new technologies in our consultation practices. The IOPD is one of the only international networks bringing together municipal players involved in citizen participation. OCPM executives have actively participated in the annual conferences for a number of years.

In 2014, the Office rejoined the ranks of the International Association for Public Participation (IAP2). The network primarily establishes contacts among public participation practitioners active in public, private or institutional communities.

The OCPM had already been a member of the association during its first years of operation. Its return was materialized through its participation in the 2015 conference in Portland, Oregon. On

that occasion, the president, accompanied by Mr.

Jimmy Paquet-Cormier, a consultant in innovation, new technologies and communications for the Office, made a presentation on the theme “The art of combining physical and digital public participation.”

The central theme of that presentation was the articulation of consultation methods in meeting halls and online. Were also presented the traditional methods and their digital evolution, as well as case studies, notably the Wikicité event organized by the Office in February 2014.

In the month of March, Ms. Ollivier made a short trip to Paris and Strasbourg to meet with various stakeholders. The mission enabled her to renew ties with the Commission nationale du débat public (CNDP) and its president, Mr. Christian Leyrit. The discussions between the CNDP and the Office enabled the OCPM to be given the mandate to organize Montréal’s participation in the World Wide Views on Climate and Energy event, held on June 6, in preparation for the Paris Climate Change Conference (COP21) that took place in December.

Her visit to Paris also provided the president with

an opportunity to meet the directors of “Décider

ensemble,” an association for reflection on citizen

participation, headed by Mr. Bertrand Pancher,

elected member for Meuse. It should be noted that

(35)

OCPM ANNUAL REPORT 2015 I EXTERNAL RELATIONS 35

the association had included the creation of public consultation bureaus based on the Montréal model in its questions submitted to candidates in France’s last presidential elections.

Links were also established with the people responsible for the department of local and regional democracy and good governance at the European Council in Strasbourg. Lastly, Ms. Ollivier ended her sojourn by participating in the Journée internationale de la Francophonie at the city hall in Paris.

In September, Ms. Ollivier also traveled to Washington to meet new partners with whom the Office had had little previous contact.

Several promising meetings were held, including discussions with representatives of the World Bank, the State Department, and the Government of the District of Columbia. In the latter case, the meetings gave Ms. Ollivier the opportunity to discuss the consultation processes that take place in the District of Columbia, notably from the standpoint of the use of technology serving citizen participation.

Similarly, contacts were re-established with the Association internationale des maires francophones and its permanent secretary, Mr. Pierre Baillet. It was agreed that the public consultation training activities that the Office had led in 2011 with Senegalese cities members of the AIMF would be reactivated. In that context, the secretary general of the Office participated in the association’s conference and general assembly in Tunis in October.

Among the numerous other meetings, it is important to note the one with the executive director of the National League of Cities, a major organization linking American cities, and the one with the leaders of the National Democratic Institute, an organization whose mandate is, notably, to promote good governance practices in emerging countries or the developing world. Possibilities for co-operation with that organization were brought up during the discussions.

Lastly, the Office was one of the partners involved in the 6

th

meetings of the Réseau Villes Régions Monde (VRM), held at the Office premises and dealing with the professionalization of public participation, a subject of high interest for the OCPM.

Throughout the year, the Office is also invited to present its role and activities to various groups.

Firstly, to the committee of the Présidence du

conseil municipal, before which the Office president

presents the report of activities and discusses the

work of the OCPM and its future orientations with

members of the committee. Meetings are also

held with a variety of groups: students and groups

of citizens interested in public consultation, in

several boroughs, and external groups. It is in that

context that the secretary general met with a group

of representative of U.S. cities, who were visiting

Montréal under the aegis of the Urban Land Institute

and its research centre. He had the opportunity

to discuss the mandate and practices of the

Office with them.

(36)
(37)

OCPM ANNUAL REPORT 2015 I BUDGET 37

BUDGET

In compliance with the Charter of Ville de Montréal, the city council provides the Offi ce with the funds required to carry out its mandate.

Under sections 83 and 89 of the Charter, the Office must hold all consultations requested by the executive committee or city council.

The financial statements of the

OCPM are audited by the auditor

of the city and presented to city

council.

(38)

In 2015, the Offi ce was allocated a budget of

$1.8 million, an amount that has remained unchanged since 2003. This amount is meant to cover all budgetary items: the remuneration of commissioners and permanent staff; the fees of analysts/researchers and other professional resources required to hold public consultations;

the publication of public notices; the printing of commission reports; rent for the offi ces; and general administrative expenses.

The amount was suffi cient to carry out all of the mandates and activities of the Offi ce in 2015.

That was only possible because the Offi ce’s rent for 2015, as in 2014, was paid by the central city, a contribution amounting to $232,000. That will no longer be the case in 2016. The funds allocated to the Offi ce have therefore been adjusted accordingly.

REMUNERATION EMPLOYEE BENEFITS

TRANSPORTATION AND COMMUNICATIONS PROFESSIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES RENT AND MAINTENANCE

NON-DURABLE GOODS TOTAL

$732,000

$118,000

$159,000

$725,000

$268 000

$28,000 __________

$2,030,000

OFFICE BUDGET FOR 2015

(39)

OCPM ANNUAL REPORT 2015 I BUDGET 39

(40)

APPENDIX

(41)

OCPM ANNUAL REPORT 2015 I APPENDIX I 41

APPENDIX I

DOMINIQUE OLLIVIER

PRESIDENT

Dominique Ollivier studied engineering and has a Master’s in Public Administration from the École nationale d’administration publique. She has over 25 years of project, organizational and communications management experience.

She also held various positions in social organizations and Québec ministers’ offices (1995-2001), and with the office of the Bloc québécois leader in Ottawa (2001-2006), before assuming the general management of the Institut de coopération pour l’éducation des adultes (ICEA), from 2006 to 2011.

Armed with this varied experience, Ms. Ollivier founded, in March 2011, the consulting firm Ki3, specializing in strategic communication, research and evaluation, notably in the areas of social transformation and open government.

Ms. Ollivier’s career is also marked with volunteer work in numerous national and international community organizations, and frequent participation on social development and cultural juries.

She has written many texts and memoranda dealing with issues of cultural diversity, civic participation and adult education, as well as numerous articles published in various magazines and newspapers.

She was an ad hoc commissioner with the OCPM from February 2009 until September 15, 2014, when she was appointed as its president.

BIOGRAPHICAL NOTES

ON THE PRESIDENT AND COMMISSIONERS IN 2015

« Every consultation held by the OCPM is an important exercise in value communication. Projects are

improved when citizens become informed and express their opinions

and decision-makers take those

opinions into account. »

(42)

Maryse Alcindor holds a Bachelor’s degree in Education (1966) from the Université de Montréal and a Master’s in History (1978) from the UQAM, as well as a Licence in Law (1980) from the Université de Montréal. She was admitted to the Barreau du Québec in 1981, and awarded the Ordre National du Québec for her exceptional contribution to Québec society in 2010.

Her rich and diverse background brought her from practising law to the senior public service, where she was the fi rst

black woman to occupy the position of Deputy Minister. Her time as director of education at the Commission des droits de la personne du Québec led her to develop a keen interest in training and consultation, notably with respect to the promotion and defense of women’s rights. Having retired from Québec public service in 2012, she remains active in several Montréal social organizations and in organizations dedicated to international cooperation.

MARYSE ALCINDOR

COMMISSIONER

Isabelle Beaulieu has a Doctorate in Political Science from the Université de Montréal, as well as many years’

experience in strategic consulting and conducting studies.

Her professional and academic career is rich and varied:

author, professor, lecturer and director of studies, she taught at the political science department of the Université de Montréal from 2001 to 2006. She was also a member of Québec’s Conseil supérieur de la langue française from 2002 to 2007.

Ms. Beaulieu has solid professional experience at the international level; from 1995 to 1999, she was director of studies for the fi rm of Taylor Nelson Sofres, in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. More recently, she worked in the United

States where she was Director of the Québec Bureau in Washington.

Over the course of her career, she has carried out research projects for various organizations, including the Conseil interprofessionnel du Québec and the Institut de Coopération pour l’éducation des adultes. She successfully conducted a number of consultations and studies on economic development in Montréal, access to employment for minority groups, and social-economy challenges in Montréal, among other things. She is actively involved in the production of teaching and communication tools aimed at various publics, and with the citizen, political and social participation of groups at risk of exclusion.

ISABELLE BEAULIEU

COMMISSIONER

Bruno Bergeron has been a member of the Ordre des urbanistes du Québec (OUQ) since 1980, and holds a Bachelor’s degree in Environmental Design as well as a Master’s in Urban Analysis and Management. He has extensive experience in the field of municipal urban planning and, owing to his interest in conciliation and mediation with large groups in matters pertaining to urban planning and the environment, he recently pursued graduate studies in dispute prevention and resolution at the Université de Sherbrooke faculty of law.

Several of his projects have been recognized with awards, including: the Espace maskoutain in Saint-Hyacinthe, by the Ordre des architectes du Québec; the Parc Vincent d’Indy in Boucherville, by the Institut de Design Montréal; and the spawning ground of the Rivière aux Pins in Boucherville, by the North American Waterfowl Management Plan.

His professional planning practice is geared to an integrated approach, bringing together the various players involved in shaping the municipal landscape. He is also known for his ability to propose solutions in mediation and problem- resolution activities surrounding urban repurposing. He is a member of the Institut de médiation et d’arbitrage du Québec, and has been a commissioner with the Offi ce de consultation publique de Montréal since April 2008.

Mr. Bergeron has served as president of the Association des coordonnateurs municipaux en rénovation urbaine and of the OUQ, and as vice-president of the Association des urbanistes municipaux du Québec. He was awarded the OUQ’s Médaille du mérite, as well as the merit award of the Conseil Interprofessionnel du Québec.

BRUNO BERGERON

COMMISSIONER

PART-TIME OR AD HOC COMMISSIONERS IN 2015

(43)

OCPM ANNUAL REPORT 2015 I APPENDIX I 43 Nicole Brodeur holds a Bachelor of Arts and obtained a

Master’s in Linguistics from the Université de Paris-X- Nanterre. For most of her career, she has worked in public administration, holding numerous management positions.

After teaching at the Cégep Édouard-Montpetit, she held various executive positions before becoming director general of the Cégep Lionel-Groulx de Sainte-Thérèse. Her career path then led her to the ministère de l’Éducation, where she was in charge of the Direction générale de l’enseignement collégial. Later, she joined the ministère du Conseil exécutif as associate secretary general with the Secrétariat à la condition féminine.

She then worked for approximately ten years at the ministère des Relations avec les citoyens et de l’Immigration, fi rst as associate deputy minister, and later as deputy minister. She actively participated in setting up

this new ministry, which at the time was just replacing the ministère de l’Immigration et des Communautés culturelles.

She held the position of associate secretary general at the Secrétariat à la réforme administrative, and later acted as president-director general of the Centre de référence des directeurs généraux et des cadres du réseau de la santé et des services sociaux.

Over the years, she has sat on a number of boards of directors, notably at the Régie des rentes du Québec, the École nationale d’administration publique, the Conseil des universités du Québec, and Regina Assumpta College. She now works as a consultant.

She was appointed ad hoc commissioner with the OCPM in February 2009.

NICOLE BRODEUR

COMMISSIONER

Nicole Boily has enjoyed a rewarding career in the areas of higher education, public administration, and community involvement.

Among her numerous functions, she was responsible for the programs of the Service de l’Éducation permanente at the Université de Montréal, where she was involved in research and development of teaching formulas for adults.

She held the position of director general of the Fédération des femmes du Québec for four years. In that capacity, she was responsible for the planning and coordination of all Fédération activities, including the organization’s presence at parliamentary commissions, the organization of conventions and seminars, and the writing of memoranda in the name of the Fédération.

She later became chief of staff of the Ministre de la Condition féminine and vice-president of the Conseil du trésor, where she was responsible for coordinating all ministerial activities. She then returned to the institutional

arena as director general of the Institut canadien d’éducation des adultes.

Her career path also led her to public administration, fi rst with the City of Montréal, notably as assistant director of the Service des sports, loisirs et du développement social, and then with the Québec Government, as assistant deputy minister and president of the Conseil de la Famille et de l’Enfance, to then return to Montréal as president of the Conseil des Montréalaises from 2004 to 2008.

Nicole Boily is currently working as a professional consultant with public and community organizations. She has written numerous articles that have been published in various magazines and newspapers.

She was appointed ad hoc commissioner with the OCPM in February 2009.

NICOLE BOILY

COMMISSIONER

(44)

Jean Burton holds a Ph.D. in biological science from the Université de Montréal, and has vast environmental experience as a scientifi c consultant and planner.

From December 2003 to June 2007, he worked for the Canadian International Development Agency (in detachment) as Canadian consultant to an initiative in the Niger river basin. From 1989 to 2003, he acted as scientific consultant, planner and coordinator, and assistant to the director of the Environment Canada St.

Lawrence Centre, where he was co-chair of the State of the St. Lawrence Monitoring Advisory Committee. In 1999, he was responsible for Canadian participation in the Citizen’s House, at the Second World Water Forum in The Hague. Mr.

Burton also worked as vice-president of communications and human resources at the SOQUEM. He began his career as a visiting professor at the Université de Montréal’s Département de Sciences biologiques, and as a research

associate for the Centre de recherches écologiques de Montréal, from May 1974 to June 1982.

Mr. Burton has received several awards and mentions of excellence over the course of his career, notably for his participation in Americana 2001 and for the coordination of work on the environmental assessment of the St. Lawrence River.

Since 2007, he has been an ad hoc commissioner with the Offi ce de consultation publique de Montréal (OCPM) and a member of the board of directors of the Corporation d’aménagement pour le développement de la rivière L’Assomption (CARA).

JEAN BURTON

COMMISSIONER

Jean Caouette, a Québec City native, studied philosophy at the Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières (UQTR) before completing a Bachelor of Arts in Architecture at the Université Laval. He also holds an MBA from the École des Hautes études commerciales.

Mr. Caouette’s career as an architect began with various fi rms in Montréal, Québec City and Toronto. He then held the position of director of real estate services for a large company, before founding his own firm of architects in 1992. Many of his mandates involved the rehabilitation/

conversion of existing buildings and construction or expansion of factories, as well as the rehabilitation of school buildings. His work has taken him to the United States and Algeria, among other places.

In terms of community involvement, he served on the board of directors of the Hôpital Jean-Talon and the CDEC Rosemont Petite-Patrie, the urban planning advisory committee of Rosemont Petite-Patrie, and the Fonds d’assurance responsabilité of the Ordre des architectes du Québec.

JEAN CAOUETTE

COMMISSIONER

Pierre-Constantin Charles is educated in social work and holds an MBA from the UQAM’s school of sciences and management (ESG). He has worked in the field of community and social action for over 30 years, in managing organizations for new immigrants and in management consulting for diversity and philanthropic activities.

Issues of territorial and human development are the focus

of his professional work. His current duties as a planning consultant and person responsible for community relations with Centraide du grand Montréal have allowed him to develop a specifi c expertise in social and territorial analysis, project evaluation and consensus-building.

PIERRE-CONSTANTIN CHARLES

COMMISSIONER

(45)

OCPM ANNUAL REPORT 2015 I APPENDIX I 45 Viateur Chénard studied political science, and is a law

graduate of the Université de Montréal. He has been a member of the Barreau du Québec since 1977.

After articling in tax law at Department of Justice Canada, he began his career in private practice, which led him to the firm of Desjardins, Ducharme, Desjardins et Bourque, and to Hudon, Gendron, Harris, Thomas, where he became partner.

In 1992, he joined the firm of Stikeman Elliott as an associate, where he developed a real estate law practice in the Montréal offi ce. He would remain there until 2008, coordinating the real estate law group. His responsibilities included advising clients in all areas of real estate investment: acquisition, fi nancing, debt restructuring, and various problems related to insolvency, estate disposal, and the setting up and structuring of Canadian and foreign investment consortiums.

His practice covered all types of real estate assets, including offices, shopping centres, hotels, seniors’ residences, other types of residences, dams, and telecommunications networks, among others.

He was also involved in numerous projects abroad, and assisted authorities in the Republic of Guinea with a project to reform national mining law. He has given numerous conferences, and participated in training workshops for the UQAM MBA program specializing in real estate. He also taught at the École du Barreau and at the HEC in Montréal.

Since 2009, his practice has focused primarily on real estate investment and development law. He was appointed ad hoc commissioner with the OCPM in February 2009.

.

VIATEUR CHÉNARD

COMMISSIONER

Irène Cinq-Mars is retired from the École d’Architecture de paysage of the Faculté de l’aménagement at the Université de Montréal, where she worked as a professor. She holds a Bachelor’s in landscape architecture and a Master’s in planning. Her 34 years of experience have been divided among her teaching and research responsibilities as a professor, and those stemming from academic mandates.

Being active on a number of institutional committees responsible for the development of studies, strategic planning and the promotion of women, she was also the Université’s fi rst female professor to be appointed vice- rector of studies in the 1990s, and then dean of the Faculté de l’aménagement, from 2000 to 2006.

In her duties as a research professor, she participated in a number of local, national and international scientifi c and professional events, both as a speaker and guest expert.

She has been a visiting professor at the University of British

Columbia, a member of the International Organization of the Francophonie (IOF) steering committee for the evaluation of Senghor University in Alexandria, and a visiting professor at the Hanoi University of Architecture.

More recently (2000 to 2004), she sat on the advisory committee on the Montréal Master Plan, and on the Montréal ad hoc committee on architecture and urban planning (2002 to 2006).

She is the author and co-author of numerous scientifi c and professional publications, her fi elds of expertise being the methodology and ethics of landscape development, the socio-cultural function of free spaces, recreational layouts and therapeutic environments, and gender and urban management in developing countries.

IRÈNE CINQ-MARS

COMMISSIONER

Références

Documents relatifs

Created pursuant to section 75 of the Charter of Ville de Montréal, the mission of the Office de consultation publique de Montréal (OCPM) is to hold public consultations relating

Élaboré au cours de l’année 2005, le projet de mise en valeur du site des ateliers municipaux Rosemont est le fruit d’une démarche de collaboration entre les élus et les services

The mission of the Office de consultation publique de Montréal, created under section 75 of the Charter of Ville de Montréal, is to carry out public consultation mandates with

The mission of the Office de consultation publique de Montréal, created under section 75 of the Charter of Ville de Montréal, is to carry out public consultation mandates with

The mission of the Office de consultation publique de Montréal, created under section 75 of the Charter of Ville de Montréal, is to carry out public consultation mandates with regard

Si tous les quartiers du centre-ville sont habités, certains sont plus denses que d’autres, comme le secteur Milton-Parc et le Quartier des grands jardins (plus de 150 logements/ha),

Cette version du cadre de référence Montréal, ville avec enfants est le résultat d’un échange avec toutes les parties activement engagées dans l’élaboration d’un Plan

Ce plan d’action s’adresse à toutes les familles montréa- laises: celles qui ont fait le choix de Montréal et celles qui auront bientôt à faire un choix; il com- porte des