• Aucun résultat trouvé

Assessing the Impact of Differential Genotyping Errors on Rare Variant Tests of Association

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Assessing the Impact of Differential Genotyping Errors on Rare Variant Tests of Association"

Copied!
11
0
0

Texte intégral

Loading

Figure

Figure 1. Type I error rate when error rate in controls is 0.10%. The observed type I error rate, averaged across all simulation settings, for each of the five rare variant tests (CMC, WS, PR, CMAT and SKAT)
Figure 2. Type I error rate when error rate in controls is 1%. The observed type I error rate, averaged across all simulation settings, for each of the five rare variant tests (CMC, WS, PR, CMAT and SKAT)
Figure 5. Type I error rate variability by error model for a gene with 8 SNVs. Figure 5 considers a gene containing 8 rare variants
Figure 7. Type I error rate variability across additional error models: a gene with 8 SNVs
+2

Références

Documents relatifs

HmmCleaner with the default scoring matrix (for nt MSA, low similarity segments were detected on the cor- responding protein MSAs and then reported), (3) HMM-L: HmmCleaner with

Our work includes the development of non-mannosylated and mannosylated NLCs for the pulmonary delivery of anti-TB drugs, and the assessment of their cellular uptake in a 3D model of

The RA-index is a simple and rapid tool for assessing the alteration state of a body, based on analysis of seven selected sites that are easy to identify even for an untrained

In this article we study the wind-storage system of figure 1 which combines wind power generation with an energy storage system and day-ahead wind power forecasts to fulfill

Multiplication with unit vectors in along- track, cross-track and radial

This paper discusses a data assimilation method that simultaneously estimates motion from image data and the inaccuracy in the evolution equation used to model the dynamics of

A maximum voltage of 1.5 V was achieved in the neutral electrolyte, resulting in a signi ficant high energy density, i.e., 16.7 Wh ∙kg 1 at 30 W kg 1 of the speci fic power for ECs

Si on répète un grand nombre de fois cette expérience, la fréquence d'apparition d'une boule verte devrait être proche de 0,6.. La probabilité de tirer une boule rouge est