• Aucun résultat trouvé

Measurement of sexual selection in plants made easier

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Measurement of sexual selection in plants made easier"

Copied!
3
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: hal-01501563

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01501563

Submitted on 4 Apr 2017

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

Measurement of sexual selection in plants made easier

Emmanuelle Porcher, Mathilde Dufay

To cite this version:

Emmanuelle Porcher, Mathilde Dufay. Measurement of sexual selection in plants made easier. 2017, pp.100018. �10.24072/pci.evolbiol.100018�. �hal-01501563�

(2)

PEER COMMUNITY IN EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY | DOI: 10.24072/pci.evolbiol.100018 1

Measurement of sexual

selection in plants made easier

Emmanuelle Porcher1 and Mathilde Dufay2

1 CESCO, MNHN -- Paris, France 2 EEP, Université de Lille -- Lille, France

Correspondence to Emmanuelle Porcher (porcher@mnhn.fr) doi: 10.24072/pci.evolbiol.100018

Cite as: Porcher E and Dufay M. 2017. Measurement of sexual selection in plants made easier. PPeeeerr CCoommmmuunniittyy iinn EEvvoolluuttiioonnaarryy BBiioollooggyy. 100018. doi: 10.24072/pci.evolbiol.100018

A

A rreeccoommmmeennddaattiioonn ooff

Dorken ME, Perry LE. 2017. Correlated paternity measures mate monopolization and scales with the magnitude of sexual selection. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 30: 377-387. doi:

10.1111/jeb.13013

S

exual selection occurs in flowering plants too. However it tends to be understudied in comparison to animal sexual selection, in part because the minuscule size and long dispersal distances of the individuals producing male gametes (pollen grains) seriously complicate the estimation of male siring success and thereby the measurement of sexual selection. Dorken and Perry [1] introduce a novel and clever approach to estimate sexual selection in plants, which bypasses the need for a direct quantification of absolute male mating success. This approach builds on the fact that the strength of sexual selection is directly related to the ability of individuals to monopolize mates [2]. In plants, mate monopolization can be assessed by examining the proportion of seeds produced by a given plant that are full-sibs, i.e. that share the same father. A nice feature of this proportion of full-sib seeds per maternal parent is it equals the coefficient of correlated paternity of Ritland [3], which can be readily obtained from the hundreds of plant mating system studies using genetic markers. A less desirable feature of the proportion of full sibs per maternal plant is that it is inversely related to population size, an effect that should be corrected for. The resulting index of mate monopolization is a simple product:

(coefficient of correlated paternity) x (population size – 1).

The authors test whether their index of mate monopolization is a good correlate of sexual selection, measured more traditionally as the selection differential on a trait influencing mating success, using a combination of theoretical and experimental approaches. Both approaches confirm that the two quantities are positively correlated, which suggests that the index of mate monopolization could

Open Access

Published: 16 March 2017

Copyright: This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://

creativecommons.org/licenses/by- nd/4.0/

(3)

PEER COMMUNITY IN EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY | DOI: 10.24072/pci.evolbiol.100018 2 be a convenient way to estimate the relative strength of sexual selection in flowering plants. These results call for further investigation, e.g. to verify that the effect of population size is well controlled for, or to assess the effects of non-random mating and inbreeding depression; however, this work paves the way for an expansion of sexual selection studies in flowering plants.

References

[1] Dorken ME, Perry LE. 2017. Correlated paternity measures mate monopolization and scales with the magnitude of sexual selection. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 30: 377-387. doi: 10.1111/jeb.13013

[2] Klug H, Heuschele J, Jennions M and Kokko H. 2010. The mismeasurement of sexual selection. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 23:447-462. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2009.01921.x

[3] Ritland K. 1989. Correlated matings in the partial selfer Mimulus guttatus. Evolution 43:848-859. doi: 10.2307/2409312

Références

Documents relatifs

choice, has influenced the evolution of primate reproductive systems and sperm

Heureusement, vers la fin de sa vie, Darwin peut savourer le plaisir de voir sa théorie acceptée et il est encore aujourd’hui considéré comme le père de l’évolution. Ce

The evolutionary pressures maintaining the ornament at that intermediate stage may be diverse and non-mutually exclusive (mutual mate choice, genetic correlation,

This implies that males too would prefer not to mate if they believe that a female they have met is of sufficiently low quality; for example, the benefit of mating to a male could

Genotypic allocation among purebreeding, crossing and culling in mate selection and index selection with an over-dominant QTL (IAF = 0.5 and RRD = 5): (a) animals for purebreeding

explicit focus can be placed upon skill training — via the use of modeling, role playing, and social reinforcement — to enhance patient autonomy, assertiveness, internal

which limited access to opposite sex may lead to variations of both mating success (number of partners) and therefore reproductive success (number of offspring

Keywords Variational image registration · Separable filter approximation · Nonstationary filtering · Gaussian process regression..