C OMPOSITIO M ATHEMATICA
M. L EMA ´ NCZYK
Ergodic Z
2-extensions over rational pure point spectrum, category and homomorphisms
Compositio Mathematica, tome 63, n
o1 (1987), p. 63-81
<http://www.numdam.org/item?id=CM_1987__63_1_63_0>
© Foundation Compositio Mathematica, 1987, tous droits réservés.
L’accès aux archives de la revue « Compositio Mathematica » (http:
//http://www.compositio.nl/) implique l’accord avec les conditions gé- nérales d’utilisation (http://www.numdam.org/conditions). Toute utilisa- tion commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une in- fraction pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit conte- nir la présente mention de copyright.
Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques
http://www.numdam.org/
63
Ergodic Z2-extensions
overrational pure point spectrum, category and homomorphisms
M.
LEMA0143CZYK
Instytut Matematyki, Uniwersytet M. Kopernika, ul. Chopina 12/18, 87-100 Torun, Poland Received 12 July 1985; accepted in revised form 3 December 1986
Abstract. Let w be the space of all Z2 -extensions over a fixed automorphism with a rational
pure point spectrum, endowed with the uniform topology. We prove that a set of "typical"
points of *’ coincides with the class of those Z2-extensions which are measure-theoretically isomorphic to Morse sequences. The factor problem is studied.
Compositio
© Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht - Printed in the Netherlands
Introduction
Skew
products
were introduced toergodic theory by
Anzai[2]
in connectionwith the
problem
ofisomorphism.
It was shown in[1]
that anyergodic automorphism
can berepresented
as a skewproduct
of one of its factor-automorphisms
with afamily
ofautomorphisms.
However,
up to now, agreat
deal of the attention has been devoted to thestudy
of somesimpler
forms of skewproducts, namely
to the so calledG-extensions over
automorphisms
with purepoint spectra (for
instance[2], [10], [11], [19], [21]).
In the
present
paper we deal withZ2-extensions
overautomorphisms
withrational pure
point spectra.
Recall some well-knownexamples
of them:generalized
Morse sequences[12],
continuous substitutions on twosymbols [4],
Mathew-Nadkarni’sexamples [18]
withpartly
continuousLebesgue spectrum
ofmultiplicity
two,Helson-Parry’s
constructions[8].
Morse sequences are very useful for
constructing counterexamples
inergodic theory (for
further details see[16]).
Wehope
that ourpresent
paperemphasizes
once more thepeculiar
role of the class of Morsedynamic systems
inergodic theory.
Our main result here seems to confirm that the combinatorialapproach
toergodic theory (in
Jacob’s sense[9])
is of a rathergeneral
nature. In 1981 J. Kwiatkowskiposed
thequestion
whether any"typical" Z2-extension
over a rational purepoint
spectrum is a Morse sequence. The firstpart
of the paperpositively
answers thisquestion.
Weprove that in the space of
Z2-extensions
of a fixedergodic automorphism
with rational pure
point spectrum,
the set of extensionsisomorphic
toMorse sequences is of the second
category (in
the weaktopology).
To provethis we use
Katok-Stepin’s theory
of oddapproximation
ofZ2 -extensions [11].
But what seems mostimportant
is thatby analyzing
theproof one
canobserve that in fact we show more: if an
ergodic Z2 -extension
over T isoddly approximated
withspeed o(1/n2)
then it ismeasure-theoretically isomorphic
to a Morse sequence. So in this case,
Katok-Stepin’s theory
hasquite
acombinatorial nature.
In the second
part
of the paper we treat the factorproblem.
It is not hardto see that the class of
ergodic Z2 -extensions
ofautomorphisms
with purepoint spectra
is closed undertaking
factors. It turns out thatif Sp(T())
is thegroup of
all pk-roots
ofunity, k 1, and p is
aprime number,
then theonly
factors of
To
are those with discretespectrum.
The main result of the sections states thatif x = b0 b1 ... is a regular
Morse sequence and the set of blocks{b0, b1, ...}
is finite then theonly
proper factors of x are those with discretespectrum.
Inparticular
all continuous substitutions on twosymbols enjoy
thisproperty.
I. Définitions and remarks
Let
(X, -4, Ji)
be aLebesgue
space and T:(X, -4, p))
be anautomorphism.
By Sp (T)
we denote the group of alleigenvalues
ofT,
i.e. 03BB ESp (T )
ifff T
=03BBf for
some 0 ~f E L2 (X, 03BC).
We recall here the result of[3] stating
that exp
(203C0i/m)
ESp (T)
iff there is a T-stack ofheight
m which is a par- titionof X,
i.e. there is apartition
of X of the form{A, TA,
...,Tm-1A},
for some A E é3.
Obviously
theergodicity
of Timplies
that there isonly
oneT-stack
of height m filling up X (recordering
its elementsif necessary).
Wewill denote it
by
Dm =(Dô , ... , Dmm-1). Moreover, if k 1 m
thenDk Dm,
i.e. Dm is finer thanDk .
Let {nt : t 0} be a sequence of natural numbers such that nt|nt+1 , t
0and
03BBt+1 = nt+llnt, t
=0, 1, ... , Ào
=no a
2. Denoteby G{nt: t 01
the group of all roots of
unity generated by {exp (203C0i/nt): t 01 (every
infinite group of roots of
unity
can be obtained in thisway).
DEFINITION 1. An
ergodic automorphism
T with discretespectrum
hasrational pure
point
spectrum ifSp (T) = G {nt :
t01.
These
automorphisms
were characterized in[17]
as followsLEMMA 1. T has rational pure
point
spectrum withSp (T) = G {nt :
t01 iff
there is a sequence
of partitions {Dnt of X,
where Dn’ are T-stacksof heights
nt resp. and Dnt ? E.
By Z2 = {0, 1}
we mean the group of allintegers
mod 2equipped
withHaar measure
m(0) = m(1)
=1/2.
Let 0: X -
Z2
be any measurable map.Let 03BC
be theproduct
measure03BC m on Y = X Z2.
DEFINITION 2.
By Z2-extension of
T with respect to 0 we mean the auto-morphism To : YD
definedby
the formulaFollowing [11], [19], To
isergodic
iff there is no measurable functionf:
X - K(K
denotes the unitcircle)
such thatLet :
y), a(x, i )
=(x, i
+1)
for each(x, i )
E Y. Then u is a03BC-preserving automorphism
and03C3T03B8 = T03B803C3.
It is not hard to see that
where -9
= {f~L2(Y,03BC):f03C3 =f}
=L2(X, 03BC), L = D~ = {f ~ L2(Y,03BC):
f03C3 = -f}.
From now on Twill be an
ergodic automorphism
with rational purepoint spectrum, Sp (T) = G{nt : t 01,
andTo
be aZ2 -extension
of T.REMARK 1. If
To
isergodic
and has anypoint spectrum on W,
thenTo
hasdiscrete
spectrum.
Proof.
Let H zL2(Y, fi)
be the spacegenerated by
alleigenfunctions
ofTo.
Then
H is a
unitary subring [23]. (4)
Consider the
partition
ofY,
whereThen 1
isTo -invariant
and measurable and thecorresponding
factor-automorphism To /1
isisomorphic
to T.Moreover,
theunitary subring corresponding to 1
is contained inH,
sothat 03BE
is thepartition corresponding
to H
[23],
thenT0/03BE
has discretespectrum [23]. (7)
But the
ergodicity
ofTo implies
that the numberof
elements in any atom of03BE
is constant and common for a.e. atom of03BE.
Therefore from(3), (5)
and(6)
it follows
that ç =
e. Thusby (7) To
has discretespectrum.
Note that Remark 1 may be reformulated as follows: if
To
isergodic,
thenTo
haspartly
continuous spectrumiff’ Sp (To) = Sp (T). (8)
If this is the case, we call
To
a continuousZ2 -extension.
Let us consider a class of well-known
examples of ergodic Z2 -extensions usually
calledgeneralized
Morse sequences[12].
Webriefly
recall their definitionreferring
for furtherproperties
to[12], [14], [16].
Let B =
(bo,..., bn-1), C = (co,..., Cm-1)
be blocks(finite
sequences of 0 and1)
withlengths IBI
= nand |C|
- m.By
B x C we mean thejuxtaposition
of blocks B x C = B" ...Bcm-1, where B0 = B, B1 = B =
(bo
+1,
... ,bn-1
+1). By
fr(B, C )
we denote thecardinality
of the set{i:
0 1 xICI - IBI, B = C[i,
i +IBI - 1]},
whereC[r, s]
=(cr,
Cr+1, > ...,
c,). If 1 BC |
= n, thend(B, C) = card {i : 0
i n -1, B[i] =1 C[i]/n.
Now,
letbo, b’ , b2 ,
... be blocksstarting
withzero, |bi|
=03BBi
2 and letx
= b°
x b’ xb2
x ....DEFINITION 3. x is said to be a Morse sequence if
i) infinitely
many of the b"s are different from 0... 0, ii) infinitely
many of the bi’s are different from 01 ...010, iii) 03A3i0 ri
= 00, ri = min(1/03BBi
fr(0, b’), 1/03BBi
fr(1, bi)),
i 0.We extend x to two-sided sequence W E
{0, 1}Z [12] preserving
the almostperiodicity
condition.Let Ox = {03C4i03C9:i
EZlc’,
where the closure is taken in{0, 1}Z
and r is the shift transformation. It is known[12]
that«9x, i)
isstrictly ergodic.
Theunique (ergodic)
T-invariant measure we denoteby
03BCx . Let P =(P° , Pl) be
the zero-timepartition, Pi = {y
E(9x: y[0]
=il .
ThenP is a generator of i on
(9x.
Let J be the mirror map on(9x,
i.e.J( y) = ,
y[i] ] = y[i] .
Then J is anautomorphism
of«9x, Mx)
ar = 03C403C3. Letct
= b°
x... xbt , nt = |ct| = Ào
x ’ ’ ’ x03BBt, t
0 and let(T, X, p)
be an
ergodic automorphism
with discretespectrum
andSp (T) = G {nt : t 0}.
REMARK 2
[14].
For every Morse sequence x =b°
x ... there is a measur-able 0: X -
Z2
such that x isisomorphic
toTo (more precisely,
the iassociated with x is
isomorphic
toT03B8).
If no confusion can arise we willspeak
aboutproperties
of x instead ofproperties
of«9x,
T,/lx).
A Morse sequence
x = bO
x b’ x ... is called continuous ifSp (x) =
REMARK 3
[12]. x
is continuous iff eithera) infinitely
many of theîi’s
are even, orb) 03A3t0 03C9(bt) =
oo.Notice that
a)
can bestrengthened
as follows:if infinitely
many of the03BBi’s
are even, then every
ergodic Z2 -extension
is continuous(see [12]
p.348).
Let us observe that any constant Morse sequence x = b x b x ... is continuous. The class of all continuous substitutions on two
symbols [4]
coincides with the class of all constant Morse sequences. A
larger
subclassof continuous Morse sequences is the class
of regular
Morse sequences[ 14],
where x
= b° x bl
x ... isregular provided
that there is o > 0 such that2 - o
> max(/lXt (00), 03BCxt(01))
> Q;t 0, (9) where xt - bt
xbt+1
1 x ....II. Theorem on
category
In the class 11/’ of all
Z2 -extensions
of T we introduce sometopology.
Namely
Simultaneously,
we have the uniformtopology
It is clear that these
topologies
coincide. The class w iscompletely
metriz-able in the uniform
topology because Q
is acomplete
metric. In other words w is a closedsubspace
of the class of allautomorphisms of ( Y, 03BC)
endowedwith the uniform
topology,
so it has Baireproperty.
Our
goal
is to prove thefollowing:
THEOREM 1. The class
of all Z2-extensions
which areisomorphic
to Morsesequences is
of
the second category in ifÎ.Notice that from Theorem 1 it follows that the class of all
ergodic Z2-
extensions is residual in 11/
(cf. [20]).
The
proof
of Theorem 1 goesby steps.
Step
1. Theconcept
of oddapproximation [11].
We say F z
X isoddly approximated
withrespect
toDnt ?
e with aspeed o(g(n))
if for somesubsequence {ntk}
there exist setsFk consisting
of an oddnumber of atoms of
D k
such that(we
recall herethat ntk
is the number of atoms of the T-stackDn/k
ofheight
ntk ).
It is known
[11] that
the collection of all measurable functions 0 : X ~Z2
such that
03B8-1(1)
isoddly approximated
with a fixedspeed
contains a denseGô-set.
Therefore the set of allergodic Z2 -extensions
is residual since if0 isoddly approximated
withspeed o(1/n),
then it hassimple spectrum [11].
REMARK. The
proof of density of ergodic
G-extensions can also be found in[10]
for a moregeneral
situation.We would like to
briefly explain
the notion of oddapproximation
with’sufficiently high speed’
in our situation.Fig. 1 Fig. 2
If the
speed
ofapproximation
issufficiently high
then on each levelD7t
of D"the function 0 is constant
apart
from a set of a small measure(Fig. 1).
Thusfor
To,
twoTo -stacks
arise(one
of them is denotedby
fat dashes onFig. 2).
If we want to assure that
To
admits acyclic approximation,
we must showthat the
top
of the firstTo -stack
is carriedby To
on the base of the secondone. To show this we must show that there is an odd number of l’s on
Fig.
1.69
Step
2. Let 0: X ~Z2
be measurable andoddly approximated (i.e. 0-’(1)
isoddly approximated)
withspeed o(1/n2).
Then there is a sequence of twoTo-
stacks
Cnt(0)
andCnt(1), Cnt(j)
=(CJ’: 1
=0, 1,
..., nt -1}, j = 0,
1such that
Cnt - £ (not necessarily monotonically). (14) Indeed,
letEi
be the subset ofDnti consisting
of all x EDnti
such that03BC(Enti)
>1/2
and03B8|Enti
is constant. Consider the setThus Et ~ Dnt0
andFrom our
assumption
-In
particular (16) implies
From
(15)
and(17)
it follows thatSo,
the sets(Dnt0BEt)
x{i}, i
=0,
1 can be taken as the bases of twoTo-stacks of heights
nt .Putting Cnt0(i)
=(Dnt0BEt)
x{i} ~ Et
x{i}, i
=0, 1,
we obtain twoTo-stacks
with theproperty (13).
It is clear that(18)
implies
theproperty (14)
because thepartitions
generate
all measurable sets in Y.REMARK. For
simplicity
we have assumed in theproof
above that thesubsequence {ntk}
from(12)
isequal
to the sequence{nt}.
By C’-’
we will mean two stacks ofheight 1,
Step
3. For 0 as inStep
2 there is a sequence of twoT03B8-stacks Cnti(j),
i =
0, ... , nt - 1, t = - 1, 0, 1,
... such thatThe
proof
ofStep
3 is in some sense a modification of Goodson’s consider- ations from[6] (Theorem 3). Indeed, (20)
followsdirectly
from that theorem.Now, fix t
0 and consider all2-To-stacks
C Int(i.e.
C Int is adisjoint
unionof
C’nt(0)
andC’nt(1)
whereClnt(i) = {C’nt0(i),
... ,C’ntnt- 1(i)},
i =0,
1 areTo-stacks) satisfying C’nt Cnt+l.
Then it is not hard to see that ifC,,n,
realizes the minimum of the setthen 03C3C’nti(0) = C’nti(1)
and therefore(19)
holds.REMARK 4. Our considerations are restricted
by
the conditions:This last condition may be obtained
by passing
to asubsequence if necessary.
Observe also that the condition
Cnti(0) ~ Cnti(1)
=D;t
allows us to assumeCnt+10(i) ~ Cnt0(i), t 0, i
=0,
1.Step
4. Let 0 be as inStep
2. DenoteQi = Cn-1(i),
i =0,
1. Then there isa sequence x
= b°
xb’
x ... such thatQ-s-names
of a.e. z E Y are sectorsof x.
From the
preceding step
we haveWe define a sequence of blocks
b°, b’ , b2, ... satisfying bi[0]
=0, 1 b’l = Ài
=ni+l/ni,
as followsDEFINITION OF b° . We
divide Qi
into03BB0 pieces Cn0j(k)
of measure1 /2n° using
the condition
Q
Cno(Fig. 3).
Fig. 3
We look at the
trajectory
ofCn00(0)
andput b0[i] ]
=b0[i
+1] iff T03B8(Cn00(0))
and
Cino (0)
are contained in the same atomQs,
s =0,
1.Let us suppose
b°, ..., b‘
arealready
defined.DEFINITION OF
bt+
1bt+1
= 0011Fig. 4
We divide
Cnt0(i)
into03BBt+1 pieces Cnt+1jnt(kj),j
=0, 1, ... , 03BBt+1 -
1 and welook at the
trajectory
ofCnt+10(0) (Fig. 4).
Weput bt+1[i]
=bt+1[i
+1] iff
Tnt03B8(Cnt+1int(0))
andCnt+1int(0)
are contained in the same atomC;t(s),
s =0,
1.From
thedéfinition
of x = b° x bl x ... it follows that-
Q-n°-name of y
fromCn00(O)
isequal
tob°,
-
Q-n1-name of y
fromCon’(0)
isequal to b°
x bl - ci ,-
Q-nt-name
of y fromCnt0(0)
isequal
tohO
xbl
x ... x bt = ct, t 0.Moreover, since uQo = QI, Q-n-name
of uy =(Q-n-name
ofy)-,
n 0.This
implies
thatQ-n-names
of a.e. y E Y are sectors of x= b°
xbl
x ... , unless bt = 0 ...0, t
to. But this situation is excluded sinceTo
isergodic (if b’
= 0 ...0,
t to, thenCnt00(0) ~
... uCnt0nt0-1 (0)
is
To -invariant).
Step
5. Either bt = 01... 010,
t to or x =hO
xbl
x ... is a Morse sequence(continuous
ornot).
Indeed,
supposeinfinitely
many of the b"s are different from 01 ... 010(and
0 ... 0by Step 4).
All we have to show is that03A3rt
= oo(see
Definition3).
Let us observe that for the
sequence {Cnt} we
have defined inStep 3,
holds
(see
theproof
of Theorem 3 in[6]).
Hencesince
ënt
and Cnt are2-To-stacks. Moreover, {Cnt}
has theproperty
Since
and
we have
Now,
we show thatIndeed,
ifbt+1[i]
=bt+1[i
+1],
thenTnt03B8(Cnt+1int(j)) ~ Cnt0(j), j = 0,
1.With any such a
pair (i,
i +1)
we canassign
the levelCnt+1int(0)
withthe measure
equal
to1/2nt
andCnt+1int(0)~Tnt03B8(Cnt0(0))0394Cnt0(1). So,
1/2nt+1(fr (00, bt+1)
+ fr(11, bt+1)) 03BC(Tnt03B8(Cnt0(0))
ACnt0(1)).
From
(25)
and(26)
it follows thatand therefore x is a Morse sequence.
Step
6.Q
is agenerator
forTe
as soon as x is a Morse sequence.We will show that for a.e.
y, y’
E Y there is an n E N such thatQ-n-names of y and y’
are different.Indeed,
supposethat y, y’
have theproperty
fromStep 4,
i.e. theirQ-n-names
are sectors of x. MoreoverNow,
let us take(9,,.
Then we have also a sequence of two r-stacksEnt(j),
and the
corresponding partitions
Ent ? e[14].
Let z =~t0 Entit(jt)
andz’ =
~t0 Enti’t(j’t). Since y ~ y’,
there is t such that(it , jt) ~ (i’t, j’t)
andtherefore z ~ z’.
Moreover,
anyQ-n-name of y (y’)
isequal
to P-n-name ofz
(z’).
But P is agenerator
of 1:, so P-n-names of z and z’ are different forsome n and therefore for
that n,
theQ-n-names of y and y’
are different.Step
7. If x= b°
xbl
x... determined by
the 0is a Morse sequence thenTB
and x areisomorphic
asdynamical systems.
By Step
4 and 6 we can find apoint y
E Y which isgeneric
forTB
andQ-s-name of y
isalways
a sectorof x, s
0.Next,
we select zc- (9x
such that1:-P-s-name of z is
equal
toQ-s-name
ofy, s
0.Hence,
there are twogeneric points y
forTo
and z for x such thatQ- oo -name of y =
P- oo -name of z. SinceQ
and P aregenerators, To
and x must beisomorphic.
Step 8, proof of
Theorem 1. As we have seen inStep
5 it ispossible x = bO x bl
x ...,b’ =
01 ... 010 t tl . If this is the case we see thatTnt0(Cnt0(0)) = Cnt0(1)
and therefore we can define aTo -stack of height 2nt ,
soexp
(203C0i/2nt)
ESp (T03B8), t
tl.Thus,
from Remark1, To
has purepoint spectrum
andSp (T0) = G{n’t: t 01
wherenr -
n, for tto, n; = 2n, for t
to,where to
is the smallest natural number such that03BBt0
is odd.It is a consequence of the fact that if exp
(2nil2n,)
eSp (To)
thenexp
(203C0i/2nt-1)
- exp(203C0i03BBt /2nt)
eSp (To ).
Let y = po
xpl
x ... be a Morsesequence |03B2i| ( = |bi|,
i 0 and03A3i0 03C9(03B2i)
oo(see
Remark3). Then y
has a discretespectrum
andSp (y) = Sp (To).
Therefore we can"replace" x by
some Morse sequence.Now,
ourproof
iscomplete by Step 1, Step
5 andStep
7.III. On the factor
problem
forZ2 -extensions
A motivation to
study
the factorsproblem
lies in thefollowing:
PROPOSITION 1. Let
To
be a continuous,ergodic Z2 -extension
and let U:(Y’, 03BC’)
be afactor of
it withpartly
continuous spectrum. Then there areT’:
(X’, 03BC’)
with discrete spectrum and e’: X’ ~Z2 measurable,
such that Uis
isomorphic
toTo,.
Proof.
We will use Pickel’s and Kushnirenko’s theorems[13, 22]
concern-ing
sequenceentropy.
IfTo
is acontinuous, ergodic Z2 -extension,
thensupA~N hA(T03B8) = log 2[22]. Furthermore, supA~N hA(U)
SUPA~NhA(To).
But if U does not have discrete
spectrum
then supA~NhA(U)
> 0[13] .
Sousing
Pitskel’s result once more we obtain supA~NhA (U) = log
2. We recallthat 2 is then the number of elements in
~-1(x’) (a.e. x’)
where 9:( Y, To, 03BC) ~ (X’, T’, y’)
establishes ahomomorphism
betweenTo
and itsmaximal factor with discrete
spectrum.
Now,
letTo
be a continuousZ2 -extension and q
be thepartition
describedby (5). Then q
isTo -invariant
and measurable andTo/11
isisomorphic
to T.This factor
(and
all the factors which are determinedby subgroups
ofSp (T))
has discretespectrum.
In the
sequel
we consider proper factors of agiven Z2 -extension.
It was observed in
[16]
that some Morse sequences have theonly
factorswith discrete
spectra.
This can begeneralized
as follows.PROPOSITION 2.
Let p be a fixed prime number and let Sp (T) = G{nt : t 01
have the property
03BBt
=pkt, kt 1,
t 0. Then everyergodic continuous Z2-extension
has nofactors
withpartly
continuous spectrum.Proof. First,
let us observe that if U is a factor withpartly
continuousspectrum (via cp)
ofTo,
thenSp (U)
is an infinitesubgroup
ofSp (T).
Indeed,
otherwise U would be aZ2-extension
of someergodic
transformation defined on a finite space. But there is noergodic
transformation withpartly
continuous
spectrum
on a finite space.So,
we may assumeSp (U) = Sp (T)
since no other infinite
subgroup
ofSp (T)
exists.Now let
{Dnt}
be a sequence of U-stacksof heights nt corresponding
toSp ( U).
Then~-1(Dnt) is again
aTa-stack of height
nt , so it isequal
toDnt,
t 0. Therefore
a-algebra generated by {~-1(Dnt)}t0
contains a6-algebra
of
~-measurable
sets, because the lattera-algebra
isgenerated by {Dnt}t0.
As a conclusion we
have ~ 03BE, where 03BE
isTe -invariant
measurablepartition corresponding
to the factor U.Hence, either 03BE =
q, a contradiction tocontinuity
ofU, or 03BE =
e, and U is thenisomorphic
toTo.
The above
investigations might suggest
that thecase Ât
=pkt , t
0 is theonly
case where all factors ofTo
have discretespectra. However,
this is nottrue as the
following
theorem shows.THEOREM 2.
If x = b° x bl
x ... is aregular
Morse sequence andÀi
r,i
0,
thenallfactors of
x have discrete spectrum.Before the
proof
we establish someauxiliary
facts.Let x
= b° x b’
x ... be a continuous Morse sequence.By ~x
we meanthe measurable
partition (r-invariant) corresponding
to the maximal factor with discretespectrum.
HenceA ~ ~x iff A
={Z, Z},
Z E(9x. (27)
Then
by Proposition 1,
any proper factor of x withpartly
continuousspectrum
is also aZ2 -extension.
Thus it is of the formT03B8 : (X
xZ2, 03BC),
where T:
(X, 03BC)
has discretespectrum
with an infinite groupof eigenvalues
and
Sp (T) G {nt : t 0}.
Consider now the factor ofTo generated by
thepartition Q = (X
x{0},
X{1}) (i.e.
thea-algebra corresponding
toV
+~-~ (T03B8-iQ).
We assert that this factor haspartly
continuousspectrum.
Indeed,
otherwiseV +~-~ T03B8-iQ ~ (see (5))
since any factor with discretespectrum
is canonical[19] and il
determines the maximal factor ofTo with
discrete
spectrum. But,
then X{0},
X{1}
would be~-measurable,
i.e.Q(X
x{i})
= X x{i}, a
contradiction. The factorgenerated by Q
isisomorphic
to a shiftdynamical system (W,
i,v),
whereMoreover
if 03BE
is thepartition
of Wgiven by
then 03BE
ismeasurable,
T-invariant and thecorresponding factor-automorphism 03C4/03BE
has discretespectrum. Furthermore,
sinceTo
is a proper factor of x, sois(W,03C4,v).
Now,
suppose that03C8: (Ox, 03C4, tix)
~(W,
T,v)
establishes ahomomorphism.
Then
since tf¡-I ç
induces a factor of x with discretespectrum
and this factor is canonical.The condition that
(W,
i,v)
haspartly
continuousspectrum implies
cannot
identify
anypair (z, z)
E(9x,
because the set{z e (9x: 03C8z
=03C8z}
isi-invariant. So
This
implies
Indeed,
from(29)
and(30)
it follows that for a.e.pair {z, z) ~ Ox
there isa
pair {y, J) z
W such that{z, z} ~ 03C8-1{
y,y}. Now, (32)
followsdirectly
from
(31).
Let us fix ô > 0. Then from the Birkhoff theorem there exists a code çô :
Ox ~ {0, Il’ (i.e.
çô is measurable çôi = 03C4~03B4,z [ - k, k] = z’[ - k, k] implies (~03B4z)[0]
=(~03B4z’)[0]
a.e. z, z’ EOx,
k is thelength
of thecode)
such thatwhere
d(z, z’)
=lim,, d(z[ - m, m], z’[ - m, m])
if the limit exists.In view of
(32)
and(33)
we havelim inf
d((~03B4z)[
- m,m], (qJc)Z) [
- m,m])
> 1 - 203B4.(34)
m
The second kind of
argument
we use in theproof of Theorem
2 is connected with aproperty of (9,
which holds for anyregular
Morse sequence of the form: x= b° x b
1 x... , 03BBi r, 1 a
0.Namely
There is 5
> 0 such thatfor
every y,y’
E(9, (35) y ~ y’ implies lim inf d (y[-m,m],y’[-m,m]) 03B4
m
This fact is an obvious consequence of
Proposition
1 in[15].
Proof of Theorem
2. Let b > 0 be fixed. Denote the code of c, andè, (via qJb) by dt
anddt , nt
> 2k - 1. Of course we cannotassume à,
-dt.
From
(34)
it follows thatfor t
large enough. (36)
Since
( W,
T,v)
is a properfactor, 03C8
is not one-to-one. LetHence from
(33)
lim sup
d((~03B4z)[-m, m], (~03B4z’)[-m, m]) d(~03B4z, 03C8z)
+d(~03B4z’, 03C8z’)
2b.m
(38)
Notice that we may assume
03C8z ~ 03C803C4sz
a.e. z EOx,, s
EZ,
because otherwisea.e.
point
of W would beperiodic,
and this is a contradiction since(W,
i,v)
has
partly
continuousspectrum.
Consequently
we haveNow,
fix tsatisfying (36)
andWe divide gôz and
çôz’
intoa juxtaposition of dt , dt
and some "holes" oflength
2k(see Fig. 5).
Fig. 5
We obtain a
partition of dt (dt)
on ~03B4z into three blocksA, B,
C(Â, Ê, C)
and
also d, (dt)
on~03B4z’ into
three blocksA’, B’,
C’(Â’, ÎJI, Û")
where|B|
=IB’I
=2k, |A| = JÂJ = |C’| = |C’|, ICI = lêl
=|A’|
=|Â’|. Then,
from(40)
either|A| nt/4
or|C| n,14.
We will consider the case|A| n,14.
Thus,
from(36)
it follows thatFig. 6 We have either
since
d(A, C’)
+d(Â, C’) d(A, Â)
and(41)
hold.Combining (42)
with(38)
we see that if for instance situation 1(Fig. 6)
appears on ~03B4z and
~03B4z’
then situation II isnearly
"excluded". Since thefrequency ct and è,
on z(z’)
are within ôprovided
that we consider theplaces
of the
form it + snt (i;
+snt), s
EZ,
weget
thefollowing:
if the
situation 1 appears(and
situation II isnearly "excluded")
then situationIII appears
(and
situation IV isnearly "excluded").
Let us turn back to z and z’ and take into consideration
t-(it-i’t) z
and z’.If situations 1 and III appear, then it follows that below the
ct’s (è/s)
of!-(it -in z
there arec/s (è/s)
of z’nearly always
If situations II and IV appear then it means that below the
c/s (è/s)
of03C4-(it-i’t)z
there areè/s (c/s)
of z’nearly "always",
i.e. in the first caselim inf
d(03C4-(it-i’t)z[-m, m], z’[-m, m])
100ôm
and in the second
lim inf
d(03C4-(it-i’t)z[-m, m], 2"[-M, m])
10003B4.m
Therefore
(31), (35)
and(39) give
a contradiction for a suitable choice of b > o..COROLLARY 1. For any continuous substitution on two
symbols
theonly factors
are those with discrete spectrum.We finish our considerations
by giving
a clâss ofergodic Z2 -extensions having
somepartly
continuous factors.Assume
G{nt :
t01
has theproperty
that theît’s
areodd,
t 0 and in addition03B8-1(1)
isoddly approximated
withspeed o( 1 /n)
in such a way thatTo
haspartly
continuousspectrum.
REMARK. Such a
To
exists. Forinstance,
if weput
then x = bO
x bl x ... is a continuous Morse sequence and admits anodd
approximation
with aspeed depending
upon how fast the sequence{03BBi}
tends to
infinity.
Let T’:
(X’, 03BC’)
be anergodic dynamical system
with discretespectrum
andSp (T’) = G{n’t: t 01, n, = 3nt, t
0. There is 9: X’ -X,
T~ = çT’, p
=M’(p-1.
Now define 0’: X’ ~Z2 putting
We assert
03B8’-1(1)
isoddly approximated
with thespeed o(1/n).
IndeedBut
~-1 Dnt
is a T’-stackof height nt
and~-1Dnt D,n;
becausent|n’t and
moreover any level
~-1Dntjr
is a union of three levels ofD,n;,
soWe
get 03B8’-1(1) is oddly approximated
with therequired speed.
Inparticular, T’03B8’
isergodic
and haspartly
continuousspectrum. Using (43)
it is notdifhcult to
verify
that 9 x id : X’ xZ2 ~
X xZ2
establishes a homo-morphism
fromT’03B8
toTo.
Finally,
note that if we assume03B8-1(1)
isoddly approximated
withspeed o(1/n2),
then we can obtain ahomomorphism
between some continuousMorse sequences.
REMARK. It would be
interesting
to characterize allZ2 -extensions having
afactor with
partly
continuousspectrum.
References
1. L.M. Abramov and V.A. Rokhlin: The entropy of a skew product of a measure-preserving
transformations. Vest. Len. Univ. 7 (1962) 5-17 (in Russian).
2. H. Anzai: Ergodic skew product transformations on the torus. Osaka J. Math. 3 (1951)
83-99.
3. J.R. Blum and N. Friedmann: Commuting point transformations and roots. Proc. Amer.
Math. Soc. 7 (1966) 1370-1374.
4. E. Coven and M. Keane: The structure of substitution minimal sets. Trans. Amer. Math.
Soc. 62 (1971) 89-102.
5. H. Fürstenberg: Disjointness in ergodic theory, minimal sets and a problem in Diophantine approximation. Math. Syst. Th. 1 (1967) 1-49.
6. G.R. Goodson: Simple approximation and skew products. J. Lon. Math. Soc. (2) 7 (1973) 147-156.
7. P.R. Halmos: Lectures in Ergodic Theory. Moscou (1959) (in Russian).
8. H. Helson and W. Parry: Cocycles and spectra. Arkiv för Mat. 16 (1978) 195-205.
9. K. Jacobs: Ergodic theory and combinatorics. Contemp. Math. 26 (1984) 171-187.
10. R. Jones and W. Parry: Compact abelian group extensions of dynamical systems II.
Comp. Math. 25 (1972) 135-147.
11. A.B. Katok and A.M. Stepin: Approximation in ergodic theory. Usp. Mat. Nauk 22, 5 (137) (1967) 81-105 (in Russian).
12. M. Keane: Generalized Morse sequences. Z. Wahr. Verw. Geb. 10 (1968) 335-353.
13. A.G. Kushnirenko: On metric invariant of entropy type. Usp. Mat. Nauk 22, 5 (137) (1967) 53-61 (in Russian).
14. J. Kwiatkowski: Isomorphism of regular Morse dynamical systems. Studia Math. 62 (1982) 59-89.
15. M. Lema0144czyk: The rank of regular Morse dynamical systems. Z. Wahr. Verw. Geb. 70
(1985) 33-48.
16. M. Lema0144czyk: Ergodic properties of Morse sequences. Diss. (1985).
17. M. Lema0144czyk and M.K. Mentzen: Generalized Morse sequences on n-symbols and m-symbols are not isomorphic. Bull. Pol. Ac. Sc. 33 no 5-6 (1985) 239-245.
18. J. Mathew and M.G. Nadkarni: A measure-preserving transformation whose spectrum has Lebesgue component of multiplicity two. Bull. Lon. Math. Soc. 16 no 4 (1984)
402-406.
19. D. Newton: On canonical factors of ergodic dynamical systems. J. Lon. Math. Soc. (2) 19 (1979) 129-136.
20. K. Parczyk: Strong topology on the automorphism group of the Lebesgue space. Ann.
Soc. Math. Pol. Comm. Math. 23 (1983) 91-95.
21. W. Parry: Compact abelian group extensions of discrete dynamical systems. Z. Wahr.
Verw. Geb. 13 (1969) 95-113.
22. E.S. Pitskel’: Some properties of A-entropy. Mat. Zam. 5 (1969) 327-334 (in Russian).
23. V.A. Rokhlin: Unitary rings. Dokl. AN SSSR 5 LIX no 4 (1948) 643-646 (in Russian).
24. T. Rojek: On a metric isomorphism of Morse dynamical system. Studia Math. (to appear).