A NNALES DE L ’I. H. P., SECTION C
S USAN F RIEDLANDER
W ALTER S TRAUSS
M ISHA V ISHIK
Nonlinear instability in an ideal fluid
Annales de l’I. H. P., section C, tome 14, n
o2 (1997), p. 187-209
<http://www.numdam.org/item?id=AIHPC_1997__14_2_187_0>
© Gauthier-Villars, 1997, tous droits réservés.
L’accès aux archives de la revue « Annales de l’I. H. P., section C » (http://www.elsevier.com/locate/anihpc) implique l’accord avec les condi- tions générales d’utilisation (http://www.numdam.org/conditions). Toute uti- lisation commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infraction pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit conte- nir la présente mention de copyright.
Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques
http://www.numdam.org/
Nonlinear instability in
anideal fluid
Susan FRIEDLANDER Department of Mathematics,
University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60680.
Walter STRAUSS Department of Mathematics,
Brown University, Providence, RI 02912.
Misha VISHIK Department of Mathematics,
University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712.
Vol. 14, n° 2, 1997, p. 187-209 Analyse non linéaire
ABSTRACT. - Linearized
instability implies
nonlinearinstability
undercertain rather
general
conditions. This abstract theorem isapplied
to theEuler
equations governing
the motion of an inviscid fluid. Inparticular
thistheorem
applies
to all 2D spaceperiodic
flows withoutstagnation points
as well as 2D
space-periodic
shear flows.Key words: Euler equations, essential spectrum.
RESUME. - L’ instabilite linearisee
implique
1’ instabilite non lineaire souscertaines conditions assez
générales.
Ce theoreme abstraits’ applique
auxequations
d’Eulerqui gouvernent
le mouvement d’un fluide nonvisqueux.
En
particulier
ce theoremes’ applique
a tous les flotsperiodiques
dans leplan,
soit sanspoint
destagnation,
soit des ecoulements de cisaillement.INTRODUCTION
In this paper we prove a theorem which states
that,
underappropriate conditions,
linearinstability
of asteady
flow of an ideal fluidimplies
A.M.S. Classification: 76, 35.
Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré - Analyse non linéaire - 0294-1449 Vol. 14/97/02/$ 7.00/© Gauthier-Villars
nonlinear
instability.
Such a theorem is of course well known for ODE’s.For the
evolutionary
Navier-Stokesequations describing
a viscous flow(in
a bounded domain with classical
boundary conditions)
such a result wasproved by
V. Yudovich(see [Y]).
The case of the Eulerequations
addressedin the paper is
totally
different for at least two reasons.First,
in no senseis the
dynamics
of an ideal fluideffectively finite-dimensional,
as it is for the Navier-Stokesequations.
The second reason, which is related to the first one, is that thespectral problem
associated with the Eulerequations
isalways
adegenerate non-elliptic problem
with a continuousspectrum.
This also makes thequestion
of both linear and nonlinearinstability
very muchdependent
on theparticular
norm used.The crucial idea
underlying
theapproach
in this paper is to use two Ba- nach spaces: a"large"
space Z where thespectrum
of the linearizedoperator
is studied and a "small" space X ~ Z where a local existence theorem for the nonlinearequation
can beproved.
This idea has itsorigin
in therecent paper of Y. Guo and W. Strauss
[GS]
whoproved
a similar theorem for the Vlasov-Poissonsystem
which describes collisionlessplasmas.
The paper divides into two
parts.
The firstpart
is an abstracttheorem,
for which we
give
two variants(see
Theorems 2.1 and2.2).
The abstract theorem states, under certainconditions,
thatspectral instability
for thelinearized
operator
Limplies
nonlinearinstability.
It isapplicable
to a widevariety
of nonlinear PDEs where a local existence theorem is known. The maindifficulty
inapplying
either variant of the abstract theorem lies inproving
for aparticular
PDE that either(i) etL
satisfies aspectral
gap condition whichpermits projections
ontothe
subspaces
ofgrowing
anddecaying
modes(see
Theorem2.1)
(ii) etL
has aneigenvalue
with absolute valuesufficiently
close to thespectral
radius(see
Theorem2.2).
Any problem
for which the unstablespectrum
of thesemigroup
isnonempty
andpurely
discreteautomatically
satisfies both conditions. The secondpart
of the paper studies thespecific
case of the Eulerequation.
In section 1 we describe the
spectral
gap condition. In section 2 weprove Theorem 2.1 and we state the alternative
approach
of Theorem 2.2.The
proof
of Theorem 2.2 is an abstraction of theproof given
in Guo andStrauss
[GS]
for the Vlasov-Poissonsystem.
In section 3 we check that the conditions of Theorem 2.1 other than thespectral
gap condition are satisfied for anarbitrary
smooth Eulerequilibrium
and for usual functional spaces: Zbeing
the space of solenoidal squareintegrable
vectors, X =Xs
is a space of solenoidal vectors with
components
in the Sobolev spaceHS, s
>§
+ 1.Annnales de l’Institut
In section 4 we describe how a
dynamical system
can beemployed
todetermine the
growth
rate due to instabilities in the continuousspectrum
of the linearised Eulerequation.
In Vishik[V]
anexplicit
formula isproved
for the essential
spectral
radius as aLyapunov type exponent.
This result is used to prove that certainflows,
forexample
2D shear flows and 2D flows withoutstagnation points,
have no unstable continuousspectrum.
Hence the results of sections 1-3 prove that any such flow which can be shown to belinearly
unstable must benonlinearly
unstable inXs .
In section 5 we
give
anexample
of alinearly
unstable 2D shearflow, namely
the flow withvelocity profile
sin rny, for which all the conditions of Theorem 2.1(or 2.2)
are satisfied. We prove the existence of discrete unstablespectrum following
theapproach
used for the viscousproblem by
Meshalkin and Sinai[MS]
and Yudovich[Y],
which utilizes continued fractions to derive andanalyze
the characteristicequation.
It is demonstratedby
construction that for m > 1 this characteristicequation
has at least oneroot
corresponding
to a discrete unstableeigenvalue.
1. SPECTRAL GAP CONDITION
Let us fix a
pair
of Banach spaces X 2014~ Z with a denseembedding.
We
study
the evolutionequation
where L is a
generator
of aCo-group
ofoperators
in,C(Z), etL
leaves Xinvariant for t e
(~,
X CD(L),
Nbeing
a nonlinearoperator
N : X ~ Z.We will list
separately
ourassumptions
about L and N.(H 1)
The nonlinear term N satisfies theinequality
(H2) "Gap
condition".Suppose
that forany t
> 0 thespectrum a
ofetL
E,C(Z)
can berepresented
as follows:where
Vol. 14, n ° 2-1997.
and
We assume moreover that
No
assumptions
about thesign
of /1 are made. Thepartition
of a isillustrated
by Fig.
1. We denoteby P~
the Rieszprojection corresponding
to the
partition (1.3):
where the contours ~y~ surround
(see Fig. 1).
It is clear thatP~
does notdepend
on t > 0. We now introduce a new norm on Z. For any x E Z letFig. l. - Illustration of the partition of a spectrum that satisfies the spectral gap condition.
Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré -
LEMMA l.l. - The norm
~~I
.~II
isequivalent
toI~
. there exists C > 0such that
Proof -
The restriction ofetL
to theimage
ofPI
is astrongly
continuousgroup and
This
gives
for the second term in the RHS of(1.9)
forsufficiently
smalle > 0
since a- C
{z ~z~
forsufficiently
small E > 0. Thisyields
Likewise
taking negative
T we obtainfor
sufficiently
small E > 0. Hence as aboveFrom
(1.11)
and(1.12)
*. On the otherhand,
Integrating
withrespect
to Tyields
* Here and below A B means there exists a c > 0 such that A cB.
Vol. 14, n° 2-1997.
2. NONLINEAR INSTABILITY:
ABSTRACT SUFFICIENT CONDITION
We assume that there is a local existence theorem for the
equation (1.1).
This means that for any wo e X there exists a T > 0 and a
unique
which is a solution to
(1.1),
e.g., in thefollowing
sense: for any cp eD(0, T)
The initial condition is assumed in the sense of
strong
convergence in Z:Definition of nonlinear
stability. -
The trivial solution wo = 0 of theequation (1.1)
is callednonlinearly
stable in X(Lyapunov stable) if,
no matter how small c > 0
is,
there exists a 8 > 0 so thatC b implies a)
we can choose T = oo in(2.1),
and ~ for a.e.t E
[0,oo).
The trivial solution wo = 0 is callednonlinearly
unstable if it is not stable.Remark. -
By
this definition weregard
a"blowing up"
solution(i.e.,
thereexists a maximal
finite
T > 0 in(2.1))
as aparticular
case ofinstability.
THEOREM 2.1. - Let N
satisfy (H 1 )
and Lsatisfy
theinequalities ( 1.3)- (1.7) of the spectral
gap condition(H2).
Let theequation ( 1.1 )
admit a localexistence theorem in the sense described above. Then the trivial solution wo = 0 to the
equation ( 1.1 )
isnonlinearly
unstable.Proof - Suppose
thecontrary:
wo = 0 isnonlinearly
stable. Let c > 0 besufficiently
small: it will bespecified
later. Let t E~0, oc)
be aglobal
solution to
(1.1).
We know that such aglobal
solution existsb,
where 8 is constructed from Eusing
the definition of nonlinearstability.
Let for t > 0
Differentiating (2.3)
andusing (1.1)
we obtainAnnales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré - linéaire
From definition
(1.9)
and(2.3)
We
compute
theright
derivative ofF(t). Letting h
>0,
we haveWe
have,
because of thestrong continuity t
--~v(t)
inZ,
On the other
hand,
From
(2.4), (2.5)-(2.8)
we obtainVol. 14, n 2-1997.
But, because ])] . ]])
is a convexfunctional,
theright
derivative of~~~P+~~~(t)~~~
exists for all t > 0. From
(2.9)
and(1.10)
for any
tl
>t2
> 0. Likewise for the minuscomponent
Therefore,
where
We have for h > 0
As
above,
from thestrong continuity
in Z of t 2014~v(t),
Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré - Analyse linéaire
We have for the second term in the RHS of
(2.14)
From
(2.12)-(2.16)
and(2.4)
Integrating
both sides of(2.17)
fromt2
totl
wheretl
>t2 >
0 andusing (1.10)
we obtainSubtracting (2.18)
from(2.10) yields
We will use
inequality (2.19)
to prove nonlinearinstability
of the trivialsolution wo = 0 of
equation (1.1).
Letwo E X
be anarbitrary
vectorsatisfying
The condition
(2.20)
defines an open set in Z. Since X is dense in Z there has to be a solution dvo to(2.20).
Letw(t), t
e[0, oo)
be aglobal
solution to
(1.1)
withw(0)
= 03C90 = Since8
and because ofour
assumption
that the trivial solution isnonlinearly
stable in X we haveVol. 14, n° 2-1997.
Using (1.2), (1.10)
we obtain from(2.21)
Let 0
Ti
oo be defined asBecause of
(2.20)
andstrong continuity
of w :[0, oo)
-~ Z we haveTi
> 0.We now assert that
Ti
= oo.Indeed,
ifTi
oo, thenWe
apply (2.19) for tl
=Tl, t2
= 0 and concludeusing (2.23), (2.22)
and
(1.6)
thatbecause > for T E
[0, Tl ) by
definition ofTi.
Suppose é
is smallenough
so that cp),
then the RHS of(2.24)
ispositive
while the LHS isnegative (see (2.20)).
This contradiction proves thatTI
= oo.Applying (2.19) again
we haveprovided e p)
as above.Using
Gronwalls’inequality
weget
For
sufficiently large
t( 2 . 25 )
contradicts ourassumption
thatE. ll
Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré -
We now formulate the second abstract theorem
applicable
to the Eulerequation.
Wereplace
the conditions(HI), (H2) by
a different set ofconditions. Consider the
equation (1.1)
where L and N have all theproperties
stated at thebeginning of §1.
We assume thefollowing.
(HI’)
Thereexist ~
E(0,1],
co >0, p
> 0 so that(H2’)
LetAssume there exist
Ai
>+,~,
ci >0,
c2 > 0 and woEX,
0 so thatTHEOREM 2.2. - Let the conditions
(H 1’)
and(H2’)
besatisfied. Suppose
the
equation ( 1.1 )
admits a local existence theorem. Then the trivial solutionto the
equation ( 1.1 )
isnonlinearly
unstable.We omit the
proof
since theproof
of a similar resultappeared
in[GS].
3. THE EULER
EQUATION
Let SZ c Rn be a bounded domain with C~-smooth
boundary
~03A9 sothat SZ has a structure of an n-dimensional manifold with
boundary.
Letu0 be a C~-vector field on
SZ
which satisfies thesteady
Eulerequations
with classical
boundary
conditionswhere R is a C°°-smooth pressure. Here n denotes the unit outward normal vector on the
boundary Alternatively
letSZ = Tn = and
satisfies 3.1
(in
this case ~SZ =0).
We takearbitrary s > 2
+ 1 and denoteVol. 14, nO 2-1997.
In the case S2 = T n of course there is no
boundary
conditionimposed.
We define L as the
generator
of the group(linearized
Eulerequation)
which is
given by
Then
eLtwo
=w(t)
forwo e Z
wherew(t)
is the solution to the linearized Eulerequation,
We now define N : X ~ Z as follows
We note that for this choice of
L, N equation (1.1)
becomes the standard Eulerequation
PROPOSITION 3.1. - The operator N
satisfies
Proof - According
to theWeyl decomposition lemma,
We used the Sobolev
embedding
theorem on the laststep (s > 2
+1).
DAll the
general
conditions weimposed
on thepair
X ~ Z areclearly
satisfied
by (3.2), (3.3);
thespectral
gapcondition,
on thecontrary,
needsto be checked in each case
separately.
The local existence theorem for the Eulerequation
inXs
for s> 2
+ 1 is well known(for example,
see[T] ] following
earlier results in[L], [G], [W], [K]).
Remark. - To our
knowledge
a local existence theorem for the Eulerequation
is unknown inXs
+ 1.Annales de l ’lnstitut Henri Poincaré - Analyse linéaire
Remark. - As follows from
[BB]
the results of this section are valid also forThey
are also valid in Holder classes.We will indicate now that for
appropriate
choice ofX,
Z the condition(2.26)
is satisfied for the Eulerequation.
LEMMA 3.2. - Let s
> 2
+1,
X =Xs
as in(3.2),
Z isdefined by (3.3).
Then the
inequality (2.26) for
the nonlinear termN(w) defined by (3.6)
issatisfied for
p = oo,appropriate
co > 0 and r~= 2 -
> 0.Proof - Following
theproof
ofProposition
3.1 andchoosing
r =)(s + §
+I) > 2
+1,
On the last
step
we noticed that r =(1 - q)s
and used theinterpolation inequality
4. THE SPECTRUM OF THE EVOLUTION OPERATOR FOR THE LINEARIZED EULER
EQUATION
Here we
analyze 03C3(etL)
where L is defined as in(3.4).
Ingeneral
we donot have a
recipe
to check whether for agiven
smooth flow uo thespectral
gap condition
( 1.3)-( 1.7)
is satisfied. Little information is known ingeneral.
We first define the essential
spectrum (following
Browder[B]).
Forany Banach
space B
and anoperator
T e£(B)
we use thefollowing
classification of
spectral points.
A
point z
Ea(T)
is called apoint
of discrete spectrum if it satisfies thefollowing
conditions:1. z is an isolated
point in a(T).
2. z has finite
multiplicity;
thatis, ker ( z - T) r
= N is afinite-dimensional
subspace
in B.Vol. 14, n° 2-1997.
3. The range of z - T is
closed,
whichimplies
that there is acomplementary subspace Q
C B such that B =N ~ Q, T Q
cQ
and(z - T)
is invertible onQ.
On thecontrary,
if z does notsatisfy (1.3),
itis called a
point
of essential spectrum. Thusand the union in
(4.1)
isdisjoint.
We define for any T E~C(B), following
Nussbaum
[N],
We will use below the
following
theoremproved recently by
Vishik[V].
THEOREM 4.1. - Let n == Tn = and uo be a C°°
steady
solutionto the Euler
equation (uo,
+ =0,
div uo =0,
uo E(C°°(SZ))n,
po E
C°°(SZ).
Thenfor
any t >0,
where
Here(~, ~, b) satisfies
thefollowing
systemof
ODE’s(which
we call the bicharacteristicamplitude equations)
The
quantity
on the RHS of(4.4)
is theLyapunov exponent
of thecocycle
over the
dynamical system
in theprojectivization
of thecotangent
bundle definedby
theb-equation.
Thedynamical system
describes the evolution of apoint x
and a direction~~/ ( ~ ~
at thispoint.
It isgiven by
the firsttwo
equations (4.5).
This theorem
implies
inparticular
that any z ea(etL) with |z|
>e03C9t
is a
point
of discrete spectrum.Any
accumulationpoint
ofAnnales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré - linéaire
necessarily belongs
to Thus if n > thenthere exists a
partition
satisfying
the gap condition(1.3)-(1.7).
We note that for any flow 0(see [V])
and therefore M can be chosen to bepositive.
COROLLARY 4.2. - Assume the conditions
of
the Theorem 4.1.Suppose
there is a z
E a(etL) with |z| ]
> then theflow
u0 isnonlinearly
unstablein
X = Xs for
every s> 2
+ 1.Proof -
We combine either Theorem 2.1 or Theorem 2.2 with Theo-rem 4.1. D
The
Lyapunov exponent W
can beeffectively computed
in a number ofexamples [FV].
In[FV]
it isproved
thatexponential stretching (positivity
of the
Lyapunov exponent along
at least oneLagrangian trajectory) implies
that c,v > 0. In the
present
paper we show that cv = 0 for several classes of flows withoutexponential stretching.
Wepresent
here twoexamples
ofthis situation.
PROPOSITION 4.3. - Let SZ =
T~, uo as in
theformulation of
the theo-rem 4.1.
0 for
all x ET~.
Then cJ = 0 and hence = 1for t
> 0.Proof -
We firstpoint
to thefollowing general
feature of thesystem (4.5).
We claim that = 0implies
Indeed, differentiating
andusing (4.5)
We next assert that for n = 2
along
anytrajectory
of(4.5). Indeed,
But
( a~° ~ - ( a~° )T ~, ~)
= 0.Since, according
to(4.6) (b, ~)
=0,
it alsofollows that
a~° ~ - ( a~° )T ~ = c(t) b
for some functionc(t) .
Vol. 14, nO 2-1997.
Hence
since
div uo
= 0. Thus(4.7)
isproved.
Now we assert
that, given
thetrajectory x (t),
theequation for ~
can besolved
explicitly
for n = 2 and ~co nonvanishing
as follows. Let k be aunit vector in the directions x3. We may
decompose
Then
In order to prove this
identity
we differentiate theright
side of(4.10)
anduse
(4.5)
toget
We claim that the last factor k x
= - ( a~° )T ( 1~ x ~co ) . Indeed,
forevery ~ ~ R2
Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré - Analyse linéaire
since
~u0 ~x k
= 0 anddiv u0 =
0 as claimed. Thus in order to check that(4.11 )
times theright
side of(4.10),
we needonly
checkthe first three terms of
(4.11):
The left and
right
sides of(4.12)
have the same scalarproduct
with uo andk x ~co which proves
(4.12).
Thus(4.10)
follows.From
(4.9)
andusing
0 for all x ET2,
weget
for some constant C. Hence from
(4.10)
Changing t ~
-t we find alsoIndeed if we start at
point x(t)
andapply
theprevious argument
to -uo, then theequation for ~
has the same solutionjust
run in the reversedirection. Thus we obtain
~~(0)~ i (1+t)~~(t)~
as claimed. Thus from(4.7)
Hence,
from(4.4),
cJ = 0. DIn the
following proposition
we consider a verysimple
class of 2D shear flows that may vanish.PROPOSITION 4.4. - Let SZ =
T2, ~c(~1, ~2) _ (U(~2), 0).
Then cv = 0.Proof -
From(4.7) (we
were notmaking
use of theassumption
~co7~
0in
deriving (4.7))
because ~
is a function linear in t. Hence cv = 0.Vol. 14, nO 2-1997.
5. AN EXAMPLE OF A SHEAR FLOW THAT IS NONLINEARLY UNSTABLE
For the case of classical
boundary
conditions which are not addressed in thissection,
theRayleigh
criterion states that any shear flow without inflexionpoints
islinearly
stable. Of course forperiodic boundary
conditionthere must be an inflexion
point.
In this section we prove the existence of an unstable
eigenvalue
z E
~disc(~), ~ >
1 for aparticular
shear flow. In fact we will construct a C°°(even CW ) eigenfunction
of L with aneigenvalue
ofpositive
realpart.
According
toproposition
4.2 and theorem 4.1 thespectral
gap condition is satisfied for such a flow. Thusaccording
to Theorem 2.1 and the results of§3 showing
that all the other conditions(besides
thespectral
gapcondition)
of this theorem are
satisfied,
this flow isnonlinearly
unstable in sayX ~,
s > 2
(see (3.2)).
In this section n =
2, ~co
=(U(~), 0), R2
=(~, ~), T2
=1~2~2~r7~2.
We choose the flow
For
perturbations w satisfying ( 2~r ) -2
=0,
we may introducea stream
function ~ : T 2 -~ f~,
The
equation (3.5)
written for the streamfunction 03C8
instead of 03C9 isWe will construct a solution to
(5.3)
of the formThe coefficients cj
decay exponentially as j -~ ~ oc,
thus theeigenfunction
for L constructed
using (5.2)
is in( C‘‘ (T 2 ) ) 2 .
For fixed k oureigenvalue
problem
is describedby
theRayleigh equation
which follows from(5.3),
Here k E Z is fixed and we are
looking
for a solution X :T1 -~ ~
with Re a > 0.PROPOSITION 5.1. - Let m > 1 and
m2 ~ ml
+m22
where m1, m2 Em2 -I
0. Then there exists a realeigenvalue
aof
the operator L with a > 0 with a smooth(analytic) eigenfunction. Therefore
thisflow
isnonlinearly
unstable inXS
with s > 2.We follow the
approach
of[MS]
for the Navier-Stokesequations
whoinvestigated stability
of viscous shear flow with aprofile
like(5.1 ) using
the
techniques
of continued fractions. Theirelegant
paper was followedby [Yu]
andrecently by [Li].
To ourknowledge
noprevious proof
ofinstability
for the inviscid flow
(5.1)
appears in the literature. In 1935 Tollmien[To]
gave a heuristic demonstration of
instability
of an inviscid shear flowU(y)
=sin y
with theboundary
condition w2 = 0 in asufficiently
widechannel. This is a classical result
widely quoted
inengineering
literaturealthough
no mathematicalproof
has beengiven
to ourknowledge.
Proof -
The recurrence relationequivalent
to(5.5)
isWe assume 0 since otherwise
(5.5)
does not have nontrivial solutions with Re a > 0. We may moreover assume k > 0 since theequation (5.5)
remains valid under
X.
We assumedfor
simplicity
that thediophantine equation
does not have solutions with m1m2
~
0. We will construct below asolution with k rn. We define
Note that denominator in
(5.7)
is notvanishing.
LetThen
(5.6)-(5.8) imply
Vol. 14, n° 2-1997.
We shall construct a
sequence d~ ~ 0, j
E mZ. DefineIt follows from
(5.9), (5.10)
thatWe note that
We
define now dj
= 0for j ~ 0 (mod m)
anddefine
for p >1,
p EZ,
a real and
positive
Obviously
the continued fraction in the RHS of(5.14)
isconvergent.
Indeed the
partial
denominators growexponentially
because the elementsare
positive
and bounded away from zero.Likewise,
from(5.9), (5.11 )
We define for p >
0,
p EZ,
cr real andpositive
Again,
convergence of the continued fraction in the RHS of(5.15)
is evident.Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré - linéaire
It is easy to check that as p --~ 00
We see that
From
(5.9)-(5.11 )
we obtain the characteristicequation
Since =
(see (5.7)), (5.19)
isequivalent
toSuppose
there exists a real andpositive
such that(5.20)
is satisfied. ChooseThen this sequence satisfies
(5.9) by
construction and 0exponentially
because of(5.16)-(5.18).
We are now
going
tostudy
the characteristicequation (5.20).
The RHSF(a)
defined for a E(0, oo)
is a continuous function because the sequence ofpartial
fractions isuniformly convergent
on~~, oo j
for any e > 0(with exponential estimate).
Because the elements arepositive,
we haveFigure 2
shows thegraphs
of andf(a) together
with thegraph
ofA;~
- 2 _ ~
Here _
Vol. 14, n ° 2-1997.
As is obvious from
Figure
2equation (5.20)
isguaranteed
to have apositive
solution
provided
thatg’ (0) > - a°2~~ .
This condition iswhich is
guaranteed for,
say,Fig. 2. - Graphs of curves showing the existence of a solution to the characteristic equation (5.20).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
S. Friedlander
acknowledges support
from NSFgrants
DMS-9123946 and GER-9350069. M. Vishikacknowledges support
from NSFgrant
DSM-9301172. Their collaborative work is alsopartially supported by
DMS-9300752. W. Strauss
acknowledges support
from NSF DMS-9322116 and ARO DAAH 04-93-G0198. The authors thankMargaret
Combs for her excellenttyping
of themanuscript.
Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré - linéaire
REFERENCES
[BB] J. BOURGUIGNON and H. BREZIS, Remarks on the Euler equation, J. Funct. Anal., Vol. 15, 1974, 4, pp. 341-363.
[B] F. BROWDER, On the spectral theory of elliptic differential operators, I, Math. Annalen, Vol. 142, 1961, pp. 22-130.
[FV] S. FRIEDLANDER, and M. VISHIK, Instability criteria for steady flows of a perfect fluid, Chaos, Vol. 2, 1992, No. 3, pp. 455-460.
[G] N. GUNTHER, On the motion of fluid in a moving container, Isvestia Akad. Nauk SSSR. Ser.
Fiz.-Mat., Vol. 20, 1927, pp. 1323-1348, 1503-1532; Ibid. Vol. 21, 1927, pp. 521-556, 735-756; Vol. 22, 1928, pp. 9-30.
[GS] Y. Guo, and W. STRAUSS, Nonlinear instability of double-humped equilibria, Ann. IHP (An. NL) (to appear).
[K] T. KATO, On classical solutions of the two-dimensional non-stationary Euler equation,
Arch. Rat. Mech. Anal., Vol. 27, 1968, pp. 188-200.
[L] L. LICHTENSTEIN, Über einige Existenzprobleme der Hydrodynamik homogener unzu- sammendrückbarer, reibunglosser Flussikeiten und die Helmgoltzschen Wirbelsalte, Math. Zeit., Vol. 23, 1925, pp. 89-154; Ibid. Vol. 26, 1927, pp. 196-323, 387-415, 723; Vol. 32, 1930, pp. 608.
[Li] V. LIU, An example of instability for the Navier-Stokes equations on the 2-dimensional torus, Comm. in PDE’s, Vol. 17, 1992, 11-12, pp. 1995-2012.
[N] R. NUSSBAUM, The radius of the essential spectrum, Duke Math. J., Vol. 37, 1970, pp. 473-478.
[MS] L. MESHALKIN, and Y. SINAI, Investigation of stability for a system of equations describing plane motion of a viscous incompressible fluid, Applied Math. and Mech., Vol. 25, 1961, pp. 1140-1143.
[T] R. TEMAM, Local existence of C~ solutions of the Euler equations of incompressible perfect fluids, Lectures Notes in Math., 1976, Vol. 565, pp. 184-194.
[To] W. TOLLMIEN, Ein allgemeines Kriterium der Instabilitat laminar geschwindigkeits verteilungen, Nachr. Ges. Wiss. Gottingen, Math. Phys. Kl. Fachgruppe I, Vol. 1, 1935, pp. 79-114.
[Y] V. YUDOVICH, The Linearization Method in Hydrodynamical Stability Theory,
Translations of Math. Monographs, Vol. 74, 1989, AMS 170 pp.
[Yu] V. YUDOVICH, Example of secondary stationary flow or periodic flow appearing while a
laminar flow of a viscous incompressible fluid loses its stability, Applied Math. and Mech., Vol. 29, 1965, No. 3, pp. 453-467.
[V] M. VISHIK, Spectrum of small oscillations of an ideal fluid and Lyapunov exponents preprint.
[W] W. WOLIBNER, Un théorème sur l’existence du mouvement plan d’un fluide parfait, homogène, incompressible, pendant un temps infiniment long, Math. Z., Vol. 37,
1933, pp. 698-726.
(Manuscript received November 8, 1994;
revised January 30, 1996. )
Vol. 14, n 2-1997.