• Aucun résultat trouvé

Serological evidence of human granulocytic ehrlichiosis in Switzerland

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Serological evidence of human granulocytic ehrlichiosis in Switzerland"

Copied!
3
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis (1998) 17:207-209 9 Springer-Verlag 1998

Note

Serological Evidence of Human Granulocytic Ehrlichiosis

in Switzerland

N. Pusterla, R. Weber, C. Wolfensberger, G. Schfir, R. Zbinden, W. Fierz,

J. E. Madigan, J. S. Dumler, H. Lutz

Abstract T o investigate whether h u m a n granulocytic

ehrlichiosis ( H G E ) is p r e v a l e n t in Switzerland, 1515 h u m a n s e r u m samples f r o m individuals with different risks for tick e x p o s u r e were tested for antibodies to Ehrlichia phagocytophila, a surrogate m a r k e r of the agent of H G E . T h e distribution of titres showed m a r k e d differences b e t w e e n sera of individuals with no or low risk for tick e x p o s u r e and those with a high risk. T h e results of serological testing p r o v i d e d evidence of H G E in Switzerland as well as evidence of two types of coinfections: those with the agent of H G E and BorreIia burgdorferi, and those with the agent of H G E and the central E u r o p e a n t i c k b o r n e encephalitis virus.

K e y words H u m a n granulocytic ehrlichiosis 9 Indirect i m m u n o f l u o r e s c e n t a n t i b o d y test 9 P r e v a l e n c e 9 Switzerland

N. Pusterla ([]), C. Wolfensberger, H. Lutz

Department of Veterinary Internal Medicine, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 260, CH-8057 Zurich, Switzerland R. Weber

Division of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Zurich, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland

G. Sch~ir, R. Zbinden

Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Zurich, CH-8028 Zurich, Switzerland

W. Fierz

Institute of Clinical Microbiology and Immunology, CH-9000 St. Gallen, Switzerland

J. E. Madigan

School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, California 95616, USA

J. S. Dumler

Department of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21287, USA

Introduction

H u m a n granulocytic ehrlichiosis ( H G E ) is an acute, fe- brile disease with nonspecific s y m p t o m s , often accom- panied by leukopenia, t h r o m b o c y t o p e n i a , anaemia, and a mild elevation of the t r a n s a m i n a s e s [1]. Ticks of the genus Ixodes, which transmit BorreIia burgdorferi and the central E u r o p e a n tickborne encephalitis virus, are also the likely vector of the agent of H G E . I n f o r m a t i o n concerning the agent responsible for H G E and its dis- tribution outside the U S A is sparse. Epidemiological studies in Sweden [2], N o r w a y [3], the U K [4], and n o r t h e r n Switzerland [5] indicate that H G E is e n d e m i c in those countries. Recently, investigators in Slovenia p r o v i d e d serological and m o l e c u l a r evidence of H G E in their country [6]. B e c a u s e of the m a r k e d serological cross-reactivity b e t w e e n the m e m b e r s of the Ehrlichia phagocytophila g e n o g r o u p , Ehrlichia equi and Ehrli- chia phagocytophila, antigen can be used in serological tests for H G E [7].

In the p r e s e n t study, sera f r o m 1515 individuals f r o m five risk groups were investigated to d e t e r m i n e the pre- valence, if any, of H G E in Switzerland.

Materials and Methods

Sera from 1515 persons from five groups representing different risk categories for tick exposure were collected between January 1993 and December 1996 and tested for antibodies to Ehrlichia phagocytophila by indirect immunofluorescence. All persons re- sided in the eastern region of Switzerland.

Group 1 consisted of 373 newborn babies from which umbilical cord blood was collected, and group 2 was composed of 530 ran- dom blood donors. Group 3 consisted of 258 recreational hunters who were assumed to have a high risk of tick exposure due to their weekly hunting activities. Group 4 consisted of 149 patients who had been diagnosed previously with Lyme borreliosis by their own physicians on the basis of clinical evaluation and anti- body to Borrelia burgdorferi screened by enzyme immunoassay (EIA) and confirmed by immunoblotting. The 205 patients in

(2)

208

group 5 had been diagnosed previously with acute central Euro- pean fickborne encephalitis on the basis of clinical evaluation and a positive EIA test for antibodies to the central European tick- borne encephalitis virus.

All serum samples were examined for antibodies to Ehrlichia phagocytophila (Swiss strain) by indirect immunofluorescence as described previously [8]. Values _>80 were considered positive, because nonspecific reactivity is likely to occur in less diluted se- rum. Values from the five groups were compared using the chi- square test. P values _<0.05 were considered statistically signifi- cant.

Table 1 lists the reference sera and conjugated antisera used to determine possible cross-reactivity with Ehrlichia phagocytophila

antigen via indirect immunofluorescence. Sera from four human patients with HGE acquired in the USA (provided by J.S. Dump er, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA), and sera from three horses experimentally infected with HGE (provided by J.E. Madigan, University of California, Davis, USA) were drawn during the acute phase of infection and again approximately 30 days later.

Results and Discussion

O u r a p p r o a c h was to e x a m i n e g r o u p s o f individuals with different risk factors f o r tick e x p o s u r e . G r o u p 1 c o m p r i s e d n e w b o r n s , c h o s e n b e c a u s e tick e x p o s u r e can

be safely ruled o u t in these subjects; 99.5% of t h e sera f r o m this g r o u p h a d a negative a n t i b o d y titre (Table 2). T w o samples h a d titres o f 80, w h i c h m a y h a v e reflected m a t e r n a l antibodies. U n f o r t u n a t e l y , m a t e r n a l s e r u m samples w e r e n o t available to c o n f i r m o u r suspicion. I n c o m p a r i s o n , 0.85% o f babies b o r n to m o t h e r s living in Switzerland h a d positive titres for B o r r e l i a b u r g d o r f e r i

[9]. G r o u p 2, consisting of r a n d o m l y c h o s e n b l o o d do- nors, was p r e s u m e d to r e p r e s e n t individuals with a rela- tively low, or average, risk of tick e x p o s u r e ; h o w e v e r , b e c a u s e the d o n o r s r e m a i n e d a n o n y m o u s , the true ex- p o s u r e r a t e was u n k n o w n . O f the samples f r o m this g r o u p , 98.9% h a d a titre o f < 8 0 , a n d only six (1.1%) h a d a titre o f 80. G r o u p 3 c o m p r i s e d hunters, w h o w e r e c h o s e n b e c a u s e they, b y virtue of their r e c r e a t i o n a l ac- tivity, can be e x p e c t e d to h a v e a h i g h e r risk o f tick bites c o m p a r e d with t h e a v e r a g e p o p u l a t i o n . This expecta- tion was b o r n e o u t b y a statistically significant h i g h e r i n c i d e n c e o f positive titres ( 9 % ) in this g r o u p as c o m - p a r e d with g r o u p s 1 a n d 2 (p < 0.001).

A s e x p e c t e d , the highest s e r o p r e v a l e n c e o c c u r r e d in in- dividuals s e r o p o s i t i v e f o r B o r r e l i a b u r g d o r f e r i (12.7%) or the central E u r o p e a n t i c k b o r n e encephalitis virus (19.5%). C o m p a r e d with g r o u p s 1 a n d 2, these differ-

Table 1 Reference sera and conjugated antisera used to determine specificity

Reference serum Species Conjugated antiserum

Coxiella burnetti a bovine FITC conjugated

Ehrlichia canis a canine FITC conjugated

Ehrlichia risticii a equine FITC conjugated

Ehrlichia chaffeensis b human FITC conjugated

Rickettsia rickettsii b human FITC conjugated

Rickettsia typhi b human FITC conjugated

Brucella abortus a bovine FITC conjugated

A n a p l a s m a marginale a bovine FITC conjugated

Babesia bovis a bovine FITC conjugated

Babesia divergens a bovine FITC conjugated

rabbit anti-bovine IgG ~ rabbit anti-dog IgG d goat anti-horse IgG e goat anti-human IgG f goat anti-human IgG f goat anti-human IgG f rabbit anti-bovine IgG ~ rabbit anti-bovine IgG ~ rabbit anti-bovine IgG ~ rabbit anti-bovine IgG r

a Reference sera were obtained from the U.S. National Veterinary Services Laboratories (Ames,

Iowa)

b Reference sera obtained from J. S. Dumler, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine (Baltimore, Maryland)

c Rabbit anti-bovine/FITC, Nordic Immunological Laboratories b.v., The Netherlands

aFluorescein_conjugated affinipure rabbit anti-dog IgG, Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, Inc., USA

e Goat anti-horse IgG affin. FITC-conjugated, Chemical Credential, USA

f Fluorescein-conjugated affinipure goat anti-human IgG, Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, Inc., USA

Table 2 Distribution of titres to Ehrlichia phagocytophila in five groups of individuals with different risk categories for tick exposure

Group No. (%) (no. of samples)

Titer < 80 Titer = 80 Titer = 160 Newborns (373) 371 (99.5) 2 (0.5) 0 Blood donors (530) 524 (98.9) 6 (1.1) 0 Hunters (258) 235 (91.0) 19 (7.4) 4 (1.6) Patients with Lyme 130 (87.3) 13 (8.7) 6 (4.0)

borreliosis (149)

Patients with CETE (205) 165 (80.5) 35 (17.1) 5 (2.4) Total (1515) 1425 (94.0) 75 (5.0) 15 (1.0) CETE, central European tickborne encephalitis

(3)

ences were statistically significant (p < 0.001). O t h e r in- vestigators f r o m N o r w a y [3] and Switzerland [5] h a v e studied patients with L y m e disease for antibodies to the Ehrlichia equi antigen, and found a c o m p a r a b l e sero- p r e v a l e n c e of 10.2% and 17.1%, respectively. U n l i k e Borrelia burgdorferi, the virus causing central E u r o - p e a n tickborne encephalitis has a m a r k e d l y h e t e r o g e - neous g e o g r a p h i c distribution in Switzerland and oc- curs p r e d o m i n a n t l y in so-called natural loci [10]. This distribution m a y explain the low discrepancy b e t w e e n the n u m b e r of positive s e r u m samples in groups 4 and 5.

R e f e r e n c e sera used for d e t e r m i n a t i o n of cross-reactivi- ty had a n t i b o d y titres to Ehrlichia phagocytophila of 10 or 20; the exception was Ehrlichia chaffeensis seroposi- tive r e f e r e n c e sera, which had a titre to Ehrlichia pha- gocytophila of 40. All acute and postinfection sera with d o c u m e n t e d acute H G E infection showed seroconver- sion: a two- to four-fold increase in titres was o b s e r v e d in sera f r o m humans, and a four- to seven-fold increase in titres was found in sera f r o m equines.

O f the four h u m a n patients with H G E f r o m w h o m paired sera were collected, two had titres of 40 thirty days after the acute phase. According to the criteria de- scribed, these results would have b e e n classified as negative. T h e m i n i m a l increase in titre in these two pa- tients might b e explained by the relatively rapid recov- ery of these individuals following antibiotic t r e a t m e n t and the fact that a d e c r e a s e d bacterial load m a y h a v e f a v o u r e d a low seroresponse. A n o t h e r possible expla- nation is that antigenic structural diversity could exist a m o n g otherwise indistinguishable granulocytic ehrli- chial isolates. Nevertheless, we a s s u m e d that the specif- icity and sensitivity of o u r anti-Ehrlichia phagocytophi- la a n t i b o d y test was acceptable, and thus, the Ehrlichia phagocytophila antigen was suitable for detection of se- r u m antibodies to the agent of H G E acquired in Eu- rope.

W e realise that findings f r o m serological examinations to detect an infection that has not yet b e e n identified in Switzerland by clinical observations, by direct detection of the organism, or by m o l e c u l a r techniques, must be i n t e r p r e t e d with caution. H o w e v e r , several observa- tions indicate that the occurrence of H G E in Switzer- land is possible and, in fact, very likely. First, the p r o b - able vector for the agent of H G E , Ixodes ricinus, has a wide distribution in Switzerland and, d e p e n d i n g on the

209 region, m a y transmit Borrelia burgdorferi and/or the central E u r o p e a n t i c k b o r n e encephalitis virus. Second, we recently r e p o r t e d a new subspecies of the Ehrlichia phagocytophila g e n o g r o u p in dogs in Switzerland [11]; of the 16S r R N A gene this subspecies had a 100% ho- m o l o g y with that of the agent of H G E [12].

Acknowledgements This study was supported by the Kommis-

sion zur F~Srderung des akademischen Nachwuchses and the Swiss Federal Office of Public Health. The authors wish to thank Dr. med. Walter Bossard, Dr. reed. David Nadal, and Dr. med. vet. Felix Grimm for supplying serum samples.

References

1. Bakken JS, Krueth J, Wilson-Nordskog C, Tilden RL, Asano- vich K, Dumler JS: Clinical and laboratory characteristics of human granulocytic ehrlichiosis. Journal of the American Medical Association (1996) 275:199-205.

2. Dumler JS, Dotevall L, Gustafson R, Granstr6m M: A popu- lation-based seroepidemiologic study of human granulocytic ehrlichiosis and lyme borreliosis on the west coast of Sweden. Journal of Infectious Diseases (1997) 175 : 720-722.

3. Bakken JS, Krueth J, Tilden RL, Dumler JS, Kristiansen BE: Serological evidence of human granulocytic ehrlichiosis in Norway. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infec- tious Diseases (1996) 15:829-832.

4. Sumption KJ, Wright DJM, Cutler S J, Dale BAS: Human ehrlichiosis in the UK. Lancet (1995) 346:1487-1488. 5. Brouqui P, Dumler JS, Lienhard R, Brossard M, Raoult D:

Human granulocytic ehrlichiosis in Europe. Lancet (1995) 346: 782-783.

6. Petrovec M, Furlan SL, Zupanc TA, Strle F, Brouqui P, Roux V, Dumler JS: Human disease in Europe caused by a granu- locytic Ehrlichia species. Journal of Clinical Microbiology (1997) 35:1556-1559.

7. Dumler JS, Asanovich KM, Bakken JS, Richter P, Kimsey R, Madigan JE: Serologic cross-reactions among Ehrlichia equi, Ehrlichia phagocytophila, and human granulocytic Ehrlichia. Journal of Clinical Microbiology (1995) 33:1098-1103. 8. Pusterla N, Wolfensberger C, Gerber-Bretscher R, Lutz H:

Comparison of indirect immunofluorescence for Ehrlichia phagocytophila and Ehrlichia equi in horses. Equine Veteri- nary Journal (1997) 29:490-492.

9. Nadal D, Hunziker UA, Bucher HU, Hitzig WH, Duc G: In- fants born to mothers with antibodies against Borrelia burg- dorferi at delivery. European Journal of Pediatrics (1989) 148: 426-427.

10. Truninger K, Bossart W, Vetter W: Fever and headache. Praxis (1996) 85:1180-1184.

11. Pusterla N, Huder J, Wolfensberger C, Litschi B, Parvis A, Lutz H: Granulocytic ehrlichiosis in two dogs in Switzerland. Journal of Clinical Microbiology (1997) 35:2307-2309. 12. Chen S-M, Dumler JS, Bakken JS, Walker DH: Identification

of a granulocytotropic Ehrlichia species as the etiologic agent of human disease. Journal of Clinical Microbiology (1994) 32: 589-595.

Figure

Table 1  Reference  sera  and  conjugated  antisera  used  to  determine  specificity

Références

Documents relatifs

Assessment of Influenza D virus in swine: first serological evidence for exposure of breeding sows in France.. Epizone Annual Meeting : Crossing barriers, Sep 2017,

Les différenciations entre catégories socioprofessionnelles ou entre hommes et femmes sont relativement moins importantes pour le soutien social que pour les deux autres caté- gories

We demonstrate the ability of in vitro quantitative light-induced fluorescence (QLF) to quantify changes in mineralization of bovine enamel discs that had been exposed in vitro to

lactique en présence de metformine est faible ; 0,03 cas par 1000 patients par année, avec un facteur de mortalité de 0,015 cas par 1000 patients par année, soit dix fois moins

Saidi K and Mbarek M B 2016 Nuclear energy, renewable energy, CO 2 emissions, and economic growth for nine developed countries: evidence from panel Granger causality tests

Elements for modeling transmission between persons, inspired from circuits modeling..

Here, we performed a pilot study of four serological assays to assess the amounts of anti–SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in serum samples obtained from 491 healthy individu- als before

We have considered two methods: the first one is to use the semi-supervised learning algorithm presented in [21] because the Laplacian ∆ of a hypernode graph is positive