• Aucun résultat trouvé

Pan-Canadian Protocol For Collaboration On School Curriculum

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Pan-Canadian Protocol For Collaboration On School Curriculum"

Copied!
3
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Council of Ministers of Education, Canada  1 PAN‐CANADIAN PROTOCOL 

FOR COLLABORATION ON SCHOOL CURRICULUM   

WHEREAS education in Canada is a provincial responsibility; 

 

WHEREAS the ministers of education are committed to the improvement of the quality  of education provided in their provinces and territories and believe that inter‐

jurisdictional cooperation can contribute to the realization of that objective; 

 

WHEREAS the ministers recognize that we share many common educational goals and  agree to ensure greater harmonization of the ways we set about achieving them; 

 

WHEREAS the ministers of education wish to enter into an agreement to facilitate  curriculum collaboration among the provinces and territories, recognizing that shared  resources, both human and financial, can increase the quality and efficiency of the  curriculum development process; 

 

WHEREAS the ministers wish all citizens to have a fair and equitable opportunity in  education and wish to provide increased accessibility to education; and 

 

WHEREAS the ministers recognize and respect the distinct character of francophone and  anglophone education; 

 

THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows: 

 

PART 1 ‐ Object of Collaboration   

The following matters relating to education for learners from entry to end of secondary  schooling (grade 12) may be the object of collaboration among interested parties: 

 

1.1. identification of curriculum outcomes and related standards; 

1.2. curriculum in the English language; 

1.3. curriculum in the French language; 

1.4. assessment of student performance; 

1.5. application of technology to curriculum and the use of distance education for  delivery; 

1.6. the establishment of means for exchanging information electronically and in  other ways among the parties. 

   

(2)

Council of Ministers of Education, Canada  2  

The parties will encourage and support the spirit and intent of this agreement and  explore future possibilities for cooperation among the parties, including educational  institutions and agencies within their jurisdictions.  

 

PART 2 ‐ Definitions   

For the purposes of this agreement, "curriculum" includes learning outcomes associated  either with a specific grade, level of schooling or area of study and may also include any  one or more of the following, as identified for a particular project: 

 

2.1 a vision statement and broad goals for a program of study for a specific grade  or level of schooling; 

2.2 curriculum objectives for a program of study at a specific grade or level of  schooling; 

2.3 program components, learning activities, teaching strategies, resource  materials, and formative evaluation strategies; 

2.4 summative evaluation procedures and instruments.  

 

PART 3 ‐ Operations and Procedures   

3.1 Projects may be undertaken through written agreement of any two or more  jurisdictions. 

3.2 Priority will be given to projects and initiatives that meet the needs of all the  signatories to this agreement. 

3.3 The deputy ministers of the participating parties will approve each project  plan and will resolve problems that may arise in the implementation of a  project plan. 

3.4 Working groups will be established for each project from among the  participating jurisdictions. 

3.5 A lead party for each project will be selected from among those participating  and will be responsible for coordinating that working group. 

3.6 Work on projects and initiatives will be by consensus among the parties. 

Consensus points will be established to ensure approval at critical stages of  each project. 

3.7 Jurisdictions will be responsible for and must ensure that appropriate  consultation is undertaken with stakeholders in their province or territory. 

 

(3)

Council of Ministers of Education, Canada  3  

3.8 Human and financial resources for a given project will be determined by the  participating parties. 

3.9 Each jurisdiction is responsible for decisions regarding field testing, piloting  and implementation for each project. 

3.10 Overall management of this Protocol, based on advice from senior officials  responsible for curriculum, is the responsibility of the Advisory Committee of  Deputy Ministers of Education. 

3.11 This protocol will be periodically reviewed and, if necessary, amended by the  Advisory Committee of Deputy Ministers of Education. 

3.12 A party may terminate its participation in this agreement by giving three  hundred sixty‐five (365) days written notice to all other parties of its  intention to do so.  

 

Revision : 1997 10 16   

Références

Documents relatifs

The encoding of an object type is simply how that object type is represented using the object type’s syntax.. Implicitly tied to the notion of an object type’s syntax and

It indicates what kind of packet we’re dealing with (OPEN, REGISTER, GET, GETNEXT, GETBULK, SET, COMMIT, UNDO, TRAP, RESPONSE, UNREGISTER, or CLOSE).. SNMP DPI

o allow each member to verify the identify of the controller, o allow each member to verify the controllers authorization to rekey the group, group identification, and

There are 3 control packets used to open or close the session at the MATIP level for exchanging Type B data. 10.1.1 Session Open

Node executing a short path protection request signals an idle request with wrapped status on the short (across the failed span) path and a protection request on the long

Several objectives for this methods have been identified, like to enable an e-mail user to send and receive faxes from his/her e-mail interface, to allow some kind of

We are not endeavoring to present a comprehensive how-to document for generalized SNMP agent, MIB module, or management application design and development. We will, however,

replacement of PA-PK-OCSP-RESPONSE pre-authentication data elements are, at worst, downgrade attacks, where a PKINIT client or KDC would proceed without use of CRLs or OCSP