• Aucun résultat trouvé

Proof. It

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Proof. It "

Copied!
5
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

dimensional holomorphy

Philip J. Boland

Abstract

Let U be an open subset of a complex locally convex space E, and H(U) the space of holomorphic functions from U to C. If the dual E' of E is nuclear with respect to the topology generated by the absolutely convex compact subsets of E, then it is shown that H(U) endowed with the compact open topology is a nuclear space. In particular, if E is the strong dual of a Fr6chet nuclear space, then H(U) is a Fr6chet nuclear space.

I f E is a complex locally convex space and U is an open subset of E, then H(U) is the space of all holomorphic functions from U to C. A function f : U-~C is holomorphic if it is continuous and G~teaux holomorphic (that is, f restricted to U n F is holomorphic or analytic in the usual sense whenever F is a finite dimen- sional subspace of E). z0 will denote the compact open topology on H(U). F o r each compact K c U, PK will denote the semi-norm on H(U) defined by p ~ : ( f ) =

=sup~cK If(x)[ = [fIK. H(U), PK is the semi-normed space H(U) with respect to the semi-norm p~:.

It is classically known that if H(U) is the space o f holomorphic functions on the open subset U of C" endowed with the compact open topology, then H(U) is a Fr6chet nuclear space. In this article we investigate the nuclearity o f H(U) when U is an open subset o f a space E whose dual E ' is nuclear with respect to the topology generated by the absolutely convex compact subsets o f E. A n y quasi- complete dual nuclear space E has this property (a space E is quasi-complete if its closed bounded subsets are complete, and E is dual nuclear if its strong topological dual is nuclear). Therefore in particular any Fr6chet nuclear or ~ F N (strong dual o f a Fr6chet nuclear space) space has this property.

Proposition 1. Let E be a locally convex space such that E' is nuclear with respect to the topology generated by the absolutely convex compact subsets of E.

I f U is an absolutely convex open subset of E, then H(U), z o is a nuclear space.

(2)

88 Philip J. Boland

Proof. It

suffices to show that if K is compact in

U,

then there exists a com- pact /~ such that

U D g . D K

and the mapping

H ( U ) , p e ~ H ( U ) , p K

is absolutely summing. By a characterization of Pietsch [3], it suffices to sbow

that

there is a

positive

R a d o n measure /z on C(/~)

such

that

pK(f)<=fe If]d#

for all

fCH(U).

Let

now K be given. Since E" is nuclear with respect to the topology generated by the absolutely convex compact subsets o f E, K is contained in the absolutely convex hull o f a rapidly decreasing sequence {x,} in E (see [3]), where rapidly decreasing means that (1

q-rl)Pxn--~O

for all p > 0 . Therefore

K [ X 1 : (Z~--I ~iXi "*Z~----1 I~il "~ l},

N o w choose 0~ such that 0 < ~ < 1 / 2 and K c ( 1 - 2 ~ ) U , and then choose N such

= Y.~ ~ 1}cc~U. Define

that { Z ~

2i(N+i)4x~+i :~..,,=1 I)'il

Y = { Z L l ~ ' i X i : Zi=l"~iXi ~ K , r Z~--1 l~il ~ l},

and

X3 = {,~=,2~(I +i2)XN+I : 12il <=

1}.

N o t e that

X3c{T~12i(N+i)4xN+~:Y~7=~

[2~]<=l}c~U, where ~Y3 denotes the closure o f Xa, and hence X a is compact in ~U. Clearly .V2c.~ 3. Furthermore

Y c K + X ~ c ( 1 ~a) U,

and therefore K c Y + X ~ c Y + X a c U.

Next

let T = vector span o f {xl, ..., xu} and choose ),1 . . . . , Yt from (x 1 . . . XN}

to form a basis for T. Let UT= U n T. Since Y is compact in (1 - ~ )

UT,

we m a y find 2r polydiscs of dimension t, L I, ..., L,, M~, ..., M,, such that Y c L ~ u . . .

. . . u L ~ c M I u . . . u M , c ( 1 - a ) U T , L i c M i

for each i = 1 , . . . , r , and if Li has

Z i i i i

polycenter

( l Y e , zz y2, ..., z~yt)

and polyradius (r~, r~,

.... r,),

then M~ has the same polycenter with polyradius (r~+e, r~+e . . . . , r[q-~) where ~>0. F o r each

i = l , . . . , r ,

let

K,=L,+X~

and /~,=M~+X3. Note that K c U ~ = ~ K ~ , and that K ~ / ~ U for each i = l . . . . r. If - , K = U~=~ K~, then /~ is compact in U and ~ - contains /(. To show that

H(U), p t ~ H ( U ) , PK

is absolutely summing, it clearly suffices to show that

H(U), Pe,~H(U), p ~

is absolutely summing for each i = 1, ..., r.

We do this for i = 1.

To show that

H(U), pe--,H(U), PK~

is absolutely summing, we show the existence o f a positive R a d o n measure /~ on C(K~) such that

IfIK~ <~ f~Ifld~

for all

f~H(U).

F o r notation's sake, we let

(zly I .... , z~yt)

be the polycenter of L~ and (rx, ..., r~) the polyradius. Let C = ] - / ~ ~ (1 + ] - 2) and D = / / ~ . = x (r~ + e) e - t F o r each n = 1, 2 . . .

(3)

define the positive Radon measure p. on C(/~) by

n + - - 2 ~ f a ~ t

p,(~o) = D(2~z)-t-"/Ij=,(1 j )do "'" f2o~ ~P(Zk=l (zkyk+ei'k(rk+e)yk)+

+ ~ = x (d&( 1 + k2)x~+k)) d~l.., doq dill.., dfl,.

Note that IXn(cp)~DC]rplg 1 for all q~EC(Rx). Also if f E H ( U ) , it follows by the Cauchy integral formula that

IflLx+xz,, <= P~({f{),

, ~ 2 ~

where X 2.=-{Z,=1 ,xN+i:2,=112il 1}.

To see this, let wEIa+X2,,,. Then W=~tk=1(Zk+Wk)Yk+~=l(Wx+kXN+k), and by the Cauchy integral formula

f(w) = (2,a)-,-. f ... f f ( Z L 1 (z,+ r

+ G = ~ + ~ x ~ + ~ ) " 1-Ik=1 ({k--Wk) ' -~ 1-Ik=1 ({N+k--WN+k)--ld{* "'" d{,d{N+l ... d{s+, "

where

{ k = ( r k + O e % k = l . . . t, { S + k = ( l + k 2 ) d& k = l , . . . , n .

Taking absolute values, it follows that [f(w)l<=~,(lfl), and hence Ifl LI+X~,,~ ~ ~n < (If I)

Suppose we show that lira,/~,(qO exists for all q~EC(/~I). Defining #(qO=

=lim,/z,(~o), it follows that # is a positive Radon measure on C(R0. Moreover, since [flL~+X~,<=#.({fl), it follows that

-</t(Ifl) for all f<H(U).

If[K~ = lim [f[L~+X,,. =

n

Hence it remains to show that lira,/,,(~p) exists for all q~EC(R0.

Let ~pCC(R~) and 6 > 0 be given. There exists a neighborhood W of 0 in E, such that if x - y E W , and x, yEIT[ 1, then

ko(x)-~0(y)l<&

Pick s such that 'l n " ( 1 - ( 1 + J ~ ) - g l < a - if n>s, then { Z T = ~ 2 j ( I + j ~ ) x N + j : I 2 j [ ~ I } c W and I -- s=~+*

Then

Im(~o)-~,(q,)l <=

D (2zc)-'-"//s=~ (l + j - z ) f ... f ] q~(Z;= ~ (Zkyk+ei=k(rk+OYk)+

+ X~,=~ (elan( t + ")Xs+R)) --//~=,+1 (1 --(1 +fl)--0q~(Z~=l ( z t y ~ + d ~ ( r ~ + O y ~ ) + + Z ; = a (d&(1 + k2)X~+k))[ da~ .,. da, dfl, ... dfl, <= D C 6 + D C 6 Iq~[g~.

(4)

90 Philip J. Boland

Hence /Xn(q0 is Cauchy, and limn/z.(~p) exists. This completes the p r o o f o f the proposition.

It is now clear that if V is any translate of an absolutely convex open set in E, where E" is nuclear with respect to the topology generated by the absolutely con- vex compact subsets of E, then H ( V ) , zo is nuclear. Since every point in an arbitrary open subset U of E has a fundamental system o f neighborhoods V o f this type, we are able to prove the following theorem.

Theorem 1. Let E be a locally convex space such that E" is nuclear with respect to the topology generated by the absolutely convex compact subsets o f E , Then i f U is an open subset o f E, H ( U ) , Zo is nuclear.

Proof. Let K be compact in U. Then there exist compact sets K1 . . . Km and open translates o f absolutely convex sets V1 . . . . , Vm such that K = K 1 ~3...

... • K m c V1 u . . . UVmC U . F r o m the remark following Proposition 1, we can find compact sets /~1 . . . / ~ where K i c K i c V i and positive R a d o n measures pi such -~ for all f E H ( U ) and i = 1 . . . m.

Let /~=/~lk-J...k-)/~m

that [f[~::_f~, [f[dPi

and define the positive R a d o n measure # on C ( ~ ) by for

Clearly f K = . ~ i = l <x;m IflIq~--P([f[) for all f E H ( U ) . It follows that H ( U ) , p ~

~ H ( U ) , PK is absolutely summing, and this completes the proof.

Corollary L I f U is an open subset o f the strong dual o f a Frdchet nuclear space E, then H ( U ) , z o is a Frdehet nuclear space.

In general, if U is an open subset of the locally convex space E, we may con- sider another topology z a on H ( U ) defined as follows. A compact set K in U will be said to be rapidly decreasing if it is contained in the absolutely convex hull o f a rapidly decreasing sequence in E. z a will denote the topology on H (U) o f uniform convergence on rapidly decreasing compact sets o f U. In general, Zd~--ZO, and z a is finer than the topology o f uniform convergence on compact sets of finite dimension. It is clear from the results in this paper that H ( U ) , z a is a nuclear space.

Author's Note: Many o f the results in this paper have been proved indepen- dently by Prof. Lucien Waelbroeck. His w o o f s will be published in the Proceedings o f the Conference on Infinite Dimensional H o l o m o r p h y , State University o f Campinas, 1975.

(5)

Bibliography

1. BOLAND, P. J., Holomorphic functions on nuclear spaces, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 209 (1975), 275--281.

2. BOLAND, P. J., Malgrange theorem for entire functions on nuclear spaces, Proceedings on infinite dimensional holomorphy, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 364 (1974), 135--144.

3. PlrTsct% A., Nuclear locally convex spaces, Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete, Band 66, Springer Verlag, New York, 1972.

Received October 27, 1975 P. J. Boland

Department of Mathematics University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.

Références

Documents relatifs

The IESG performs technical review and approval of working group documents and candidates for the IETF standards track, and reviews other candidates for publication in the

Any 1-connected projective plane like manifold of dimension 4 is homeomor- phic to the complex projective plane by Freedman’s homeomorphism classification of simply connected

In the first part, by combining Bochner’s formula and a smooth maximum principle argument, Kr¨ oger in [15] obtained a comparison theorem for the gradient of the eigenfunctions,

Without assuming bounded sectional curvature, the sec- ond author [W] proved that N is isometric to the hyperbolic space H n provided that there are two such special

To handle the case of partial differential operators the abstract theory o f symmetric relations on a Hilbert space may be used.. The abstract theory was first

If q ∈ ∂Ω is an orbit accumulation point, then ∆ ∂Ω q is trivial and hence there does not exist a complex variety on ∂Ω passing through

(Note that if E is compact and all sets in I are nowhere dense, then I perf is dense in K(E) as closures of non-empty open sets are elements of I perf and they form a dense set.)

[3] O.Osagiede Beyond GDPR Compliance – How IT Audit Can Move from Watchdog to Strategic Partner, isaca.org [4] Regulation (EU) 2016/679 on the protection of natural persons