• Aucun résultat trouvé

TABLE 4. Outcomes of the Analytic Hierarchy Process test.RankbetweenWeightBetweenDimensionRank of sub-dimensionFeatureRankwithinWeightwithin

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "TABLE 4. Outcomes of the Analytic Hierarchy Process test.RankbetweenWeightBetweenDimensionRank of sub-dimensionFeatureRankwithinWeightwithin"

Copied!
1
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

TABLE 4. Outcomes of the Analytic Hierarchy Process test.

Rank betwee n

Weight Between

Dimension Rank of sub- dimension

Feature Rank

within

Weight within

1 43% Aesthetics --- F12. Device weight 1 51%

--- F13. Device size 2 27%

--- F18. Customise/

personalize 3 22%

2 24%

Usability &

Aesthetics

--- F10. Display size 1 56%

--- F9. Camera

appearance 2 23%

--- F11. Control command 3 21%

3 17% Price --- --- --- ---

4 16% Usability 1. Findable

accessories F16.User Guide 1 54%

F17.Durability and

safety 2 25%

F15. Service for

download apps 3 22%

1. Default

accessories F14.Native apps 1 50%

F8. Connect with

other devices 2 29%

F5. Type of

connectivity 3 21%

2. Internal features

F3. Capacity to extend

memory 1 38%

F2. Memory 2 35%

F1. Speed of

processing 3 26%

3. Physical features

F4. Camera

resolution/zoom 1 50%

F7. Display resolution 2 30%

F6. Battery durability 3 20%

Références

Documents relatifs

Particularly, the hidden Mar- kov chain can be applied for modeling the abstraction hierarchy level of the at- tack that the agent perceived as well as the corresponding mental

Keywords: Multicriteria analysis; Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP); Stock exchange market; Stock selection; Moroccan

Our simplest test statistic, the Finite Set Independence Criterion (FSIC), is an average of covari- ances of analytic functions (i.e., features) defined on each of X and Y..

The problem of optimizing the choice of cryptographic information security algorithm for e-government IT project management in Ukraine by us- ing nonlinear

Contribution 1: Comparing and evaluating existing predictive process monitoring methods To compare the techniques conceptually, we propose a taxonomy of ex- isting methods for

In a number of studies, the notion of bank attractiveness is being investigated among a specific group of clients (social, age, etc.). For example, the research [4] provides the

Ñ öåëüþ ðåøåíèÿ çàäà÷è êëàññèôèêàöèè ïðåäìåòîâ è îáíàðóæåíèÿ íå òèïè÷íîñòåé ïðåäëàãàåòñÿ, ïðè- ìåíèòü àëãîðèòì îáúåäèíåíèÿ ÌÀÈ ñ îäíèì èç

Based on table 1, we can conclude that in 1st experiment group which used the chosen criteria from having focus group discussion with ZEM, we can get at most 80.95% accuracy which