• Aucun résultat trouvé

Magnetization and neutron studies on single crystals of ferromagnetic UTe and USb0.8Te0.2

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Magnetization and neutron studies on single crystals of ferromagnetic UTe and USb0.8Te0.2"

Copied!
4
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: jpa-00218820

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/jpa-00218820

Submitted on 1 Jan 1979

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

Magnetization and neutron studies on single crystals of ferromagnetic UTe and USb0.8Te0.2

A. Delapalme, G. Busch, O. Vogt, G. Lander

To cite this version:

A. Delapalme, G. Busch, O. Vogt, G. Lander. Magnetization and neutron studies on single crystals of ferromagnetic UTe and USb0.8Te0.2. Journal de Physique Colloques, 1979, 40 (C4), pp.C4-74-C4-76.

�10.1051/jphyscol:1979424�. �jpa-00218820�

(2)

JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE Colloque C4, supplément au n° 4, Tome 40, avril 1979, page C4-74

Magnetization and neutron studies on single crystals of ferromagnetic UTe and USb

0>8

Te

0

.

2

A . D e l a p a l m e , G. B u s c h (*), O . V o g t (*) a n d G. H . L a n d e r (**) DRF/DN, C.E.N.-G., 85 X, 38041 Grenoble Cedex, France

(*) Laboratorium fur Festkorperphysik, ETH, Zurich, Switzerland (**) CEN-G and Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, 111 60439, U.S.A.

Résumé. — Les mesures d'aimantation sur monocristaux montrent que les moments magnétiques sont alignés selon la direction < 111 ), jusqu'à des champs de 90 kOe. Les moments saturés sont 1,91 ± 0,05 fj,B dans UTe et 2,58 ± 0,05 /j,B dans USb0,8Te0,2. Des mesures par neutrons polarisés sur les mêmes monocristaux donnent des valeurs pour le moment 5f ordonné de 2,25 ± 0,05 /u,B et 2,64 ± 0,05 /xB respectivement. Nous attribuons la différence à la polarisation des électrons de conduction 6d-7s.

Abstract. — The magnetization measurements on single crystals demonstrate that the magnetic moments are confined to the (111) direction, even in fields up to 90 kOe ; the saturated magnetic moments are 1.91 ± 0 . 0 5 (XB in UTe and 2.58 ± 0 . 0 5 /xB in USb08Te02. Polarized-neutron experiments on the same single crystals give values for the 5f ordered moments of 2.25 ± 0.05 ju,B and 2.64 ± 0.05 /AB respectively. We attribute the discrepancies between the magnetization and neutron moments to the polarization of the 6d-7s conduction electrons.

1. Introduction. — A n u m b e r of e x p e r i m e n t a l investigations o n poly crystalline u r a n i u m m o n o c h a l - c o g e n i d e s samples h a v e b e e n p e r f o r m e d in t h e past a n d a r e r e v i e w e d b y W e d g w o o d a n d K u z n i e t z [1].

Single-crystal studies on U S h a v e b e e n r e p o r t e d [2, 3]. T w o q u e s t i o n s p o s e d b y t h e s e studies are : a ) h o w t o explain t h e large d i s c r e p a n c y b e t w e e n t h e m a g n e t i c m o m e n t s as d e r i v e d from n e u t r o n a n d magnetization e x p e r i m e n t s a n d b) t o w h a t e x t e n t c a n t h e n e u t r o n magnetic f o r m factor b e u s e d t o derive t h e e l e c t r o n i c g r o u n d s t a t e ? W e r e p o r t h e r e t h e r e s u l t s of m a g n e t i z a t i o n a n d n e u t r o n studies o n U T e a n d on c o m p o u n d s w i t h t h e formula U S b0 8Te0 2

for w h i c h f e r r o m a g n e t i s m is o b s e r v e d .

2. Sample preparation. — Stoichiometric a m o u n t of t h e e l e m e n t s w e r e held at 600 K for 2 w e e k s t o get a p o w d e r . T h e r e a c t i o n p r o d u c t w a s g r o u n d , p r e s s e d a n d e n c a p s u l a t e d in a sealed t u n g s t e n c r u c i b l e . T h e crucible w a s k e p t for a b o u t t h r e e w e e k s at a t e m p e - r a t u r e 50 °C b e l o w t h e melting point with a t e m p e r a - t u r e gradient of 20 °C. T h e resulting recrystalli- z a t i o n p r o c e s s p r o d u c e d high-purity single c r y s t a l s , a n d parallelepipeds consisting of (100) faces ( — 1 x 1 x 1 . 5 m m ) w e r e u s e d in t h e e x p e r i m e n t s ; t h e crystals a r e f o u n d t o b e within 1 % of stoichio- m e t r y , a s suggested b y m i c r o p r o b e t e c h n i q u e .

3. Magnetization. — F i g u r e 1 s h o w s m e a s u r e - m e n t s t a k e n o n t h r e e different U T e single crystals a n d indicates clearly that t h e e a s y axis is t h e ( 1 1 1 ) direction as it is for U S [3]. T h e m o m e n t s in t h e ( 1 1 0 ) a n d ( 1 0 0 ) directions a r e given b y V 2 / 3 <r( n l > a n d v T / 3 c r< l u ) r e s p e c t i v e l y (cosine-

Fig. 1. — Magnetization versus applied field for the three princi- pal directions in UTe at 1.5 K (solid curve is the initial magnetization).

law). T h u s t h e m o m e n t s a r e confined t o t h e n e a r e s t ( 1 1 1 ) axis e v e n u p t o 90 k O e . E s t i m a t e s of t h e a n i s o t r o p y field in U S [3] r a n g e u p t o 1 000 k O e a n d this is a p p a r e n t l y t h e o r d e r of m a g n i t u d e w e h a v e t o e x p e c t in U T e a s well. T h e s a t u r a t e d m o m e n t is 1.91 ± 0 . 0 5 jaB.

Figure 2 s h o w s t h e initial magnetization m e a s u r e d on t h r e e different U S b0 8T e0 2 c r y s t a l s . Again w e get t h e m a x i m u m m o m e n t along t h e ( 1 1 1 ) axis ; t h e m o m e n t s in t h e o t h e r directions follow t h e cosine- l a w . H o w e v e r , t h e fields r e q u i r e d for s a t u r a t i o n a r e practically t h e s a m e for all t h r e e m a i n directions in s h a r p c o n t r a s t t o t h e m o d e l of simple uniaxial aniso- t r o p y .

Article published online by EDP Sciences and available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/jphyscol:1979424

(3)

MAGNETIZATION AND NEUTRON STUDIES ON SINGLE CRYSTALS C4-75

Fig. 2 . - The same as figure 1 for USbo sTea at 4.2 K .

4 . Structural studies and polarized neutron experiments. - By an independent determination, extinction was found small (7

--

2.5' of arcs) and b ,

--

b,, = 0.15 at 5 K . To determine

b,,

we obtained data on a stoichiometric sample of UO, ; we obtain b , = (0.846 2 0.005) lo-'' cm. On the question of stoichiometry we take the approach that all our experiments must be consistent and that the microprobe analysis and all experimental evidence lead into being within

1

% of stoichiometric. Finally we refine b,, = (0.614 2 0.010) lo-'* cm. For polariz- ed neutron experiments, our preliminary analysis of the magnetic scattering amplitudes (Fig. 3) shows that the moment on the tellurium site is zero, as expected (for a contrasting situation in uranium compounds, see [ 4 ] ) . To determine the saturated magnetic moment we have integrated the magnetiza- tion density p (r) over the atomic volume V,,,,. The integration can be performed as a function of radius R and for UTe we find it constant between

1

and 2

A

giving a value of 2.25 2 0.05 pB. The constant value of ,u ( R ) shows that the uranium moment is localized within a range of

1 A,

in good agreement with our expectation of localized 5f electrons.

5 . Summary.

-

We have established that in both UTe and USbo,Teo, the (

1 1 1

) is the easy axis and that the anisotropy field is very large. The origin of this anisotropy is difficult to determine. One obvious

s i n O/k

Fig. 3 . -Form factor of UTe ; form factor of USbo.sTeo have equivalent features. The arrow on the ordinate axis is the magneti- zation value.

ingredient is the electrostatic crystal-field at the uranium site, but there was a failure to observe discrete crystal-field levels with neutron spec- troscopy [ 2 ] . The magnetic moments of a number of actinide ferromagnets are given in table I with the difference

Po

- p

t.

Neutron experiments will see the localized magnetic moment only, but the magnetization experiments measure the total mo- ment. A simple explanation is that the conduction electrons are polarized antiparallel to the localized moment. Since the conduction electrons participat- ing in the R.K.K.Y. exchange mechanism should be polarized parallel to the spin component S and for the light actinides J = L - S, this implies that the conduction electron contribution s should be antipa- rallel to g J , the localized moment. The sign of pep =

Fo

- pz is therefore consistent with these arguments. A number of qualitative remarks can be made about the conduction-electron polarization as

Table I. -

Magnetic moments and the conduction electron polarization in actinide compounds

Compound - US [61 UTe USbo.,Teo 2

USb [5]

NpA12 PUP

Magnetization

PO

(PB)

Neutron P (PB)

-

1.70 t 0.03 2.25 2 0.05 2.64 2 0.05 2.82 2 0.05

1 .so

2 0.05

0.77 2 0.07

pep= P o - P o N

(PB) Sample

Single crystal

>>

Powder Powder

(4)

C4-76 A. DELAPALME, G. BUSCH, 0. VOGT AND G. H. LANDER

given in table I. Notice that since s increases from to USb,,Te,, suggests that the additional electron in U, Np, and

Pu

so I p,,

I

should increase ; uranium Te, as compared to Sb, goes into the conduction telluride is something of an exception here. On the band. This would imply that UTe is a 5f3 configura- other hand, the reduction in I peep

I

is going from UTe tion, as postulated for USb.

References

[I] WEDGWOOD, F. A. and KUZNIETZ, M. K., J. Phys. C 5 (1972) [4] DELAPALME, A . , LANDER, G. H. and BROWN, P. J., J. Phys.

3012, and LONGWORTH, G., WEDGWOOD, F. A. and C 11 (1978) 1441.

KUZNIETZ, M., J. Phys. C 6 (1973) 1652. [5] LANDER, G. H., MUELLER, M. H., SPARLIN, D. M. and VOGT, [2] WEDGWOOD, F. A., J. Phys. C 5 (1972) 2427 and J. Phys. C 7 O . , Phys. Rev. 14 (1976) 5035.

(1974) 3203. [6] WEDGWOOD, F. A., J. Phys. C 5 (1972) 2427.

[3] TILLWICK, D. L. and DU PLESSIS, P. de V., J. Magn. Mag.

Mat. 3 (1976) 319 ; ibid. 3 329.

Références

Documents relatifs

Thus, the step structure observed -at 3.8 and 4.6 T is concluded to be caused by successive phase transitions from non- magnetic phase into thermally frustrating, incommen-

No clear panomalies were obtained, however, corresponding to the C-I phase boundary re- gion was identified [9] in the magnetic phase diagram by utilizing the infrared

In UBi 2 the Fermi surface is not rebuilt during the transition from the paramagnetic to antiferromagnetic state and such a large hump in the resistivity is not

Instead, our polarized neutron diffraction and magnetization measurements reveal that the low temperature dynamics is connected to domain relaxation processes and not to a spin

Magnetization measurements on UAs single crystals : observation of a ferrimagnetic spin

— Magnetization and neutron diffraction studies of USb 0 9Te 0 .i single crystal lead to the determina- tion of a multiaxial magnetic structure at low temperature whereas

2, inasmuch as our data deduced from magnetic measu- rements fully agree with those deduced from magnetooptical measurements /4/ for samples with similar electron

It was these results and observations which initially suggested to choose the well-shaped crystals mentionned when studying the sample dependence of the ESR signal