• Aucun résultat trouvé

Addendum to the article “On ballistic diffusions in random environment”

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Addendum to the article “On ballistic diffusions in random environment”"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Ann. I. H. Poincaré – PR 40 (2004) 385–386

www.elsevier.com/locate/anihpb

Addendum to the article

“On ballistic diffusions in random environment”

Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré

Probabilités et statistiques 39 (5) (2003) 839–876

Lian Shen

Department of Mathematics, ETH-Zurich, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland Available online 15 April 2004

The object of this addendum is to clarify a step in the proof of Theorem 2.4 of [1], namely that the quantities in (2.21) of [1]

A1def= ˆPωx[V] and A2def= ˆPωy

f (X·y, λ·), D= ∞ gty

are independent underP, as it is used below (2.21).

This fact follows fromR-separation, cf. (1.6) of [1], and (1), (2) below:

(1) A1isHL(y·4R)-measurable (in place of “HL(y·7R)-measurable” stated below (2.21) of [1]), (2) A2isHR(y·2R)-measurable (in place of “HR(y·R)-measurable” stated below (2.21) of [1]).

To see (1), one simply uses, withv=y·−7R, the following fact:

(3) Form1, integer,v∈R,U∈Fm⊗Sm1, withU⊂ {suptm·Xtv},Pˆωx[U]isHL(v+3R)-measurable.

The statement (3) follows from

(4) ForO∈F1, withO⊂ {supt1·Xtv},Pˆωz,λ=1[O]andPˆωz,λ=0[O]areB(Rd)⊗HL(v+3R)-measurable, together with the Markov property and standard arguments. To see (4), one simply observes that

• when z·v−8R, in view of (2.8), (2.9) of [1] andBz⊂ {x∈Rd: x· > v}, one hasPˆωz,λ=1[O] =0, andPˆωz,λ=0[O] =11εPωz[O], and hence 1{z·v8R}ωz,λ=i[O],i=0,1, areB(Rd)⊗HL(v+3R)-measurable inz, ω,

PII of original article: S0246-0203(03)00027-X.

E-mail address: lshen3@bloomberg.net (L. Shen).

0246-0203/$ – see front matter 2004 Elsevier SAS. All rights reserved.

doi:10.1016/j.anihpb.2004.01.001

(2)

386 L. Shen / Ann. I. H. Poincaré – PR 40 (2004) 385–386

• when z· < v −8R, Uz ⊂ {x ∈ Rd: x · < v +3R}, and hence 1{z·<v−8R}ωz,λ=i[O], i=0,1, are B(Rd)⊗HL(v+3R)-measurable inz, ω, since the bridge-measure conditioned on{TUz>1}, which appears in (2.8), (2.9) of [1] depends in aB({z: z· < v−8R})⊗HL(v+3R)-measurable fashion onzandω, as can be seen by expression the finite-dimensional marginals in terms ofpω,Uz(·,·,·).

The fact (2) is plain, and this completes the clarification of what is done below (2.21).

References

[1] L. Shen, On ballistic diffusions in random environment, Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Probab. Statist. 39 (5) (2003) 839–876.

Références

Documents relatifs

Our proof in this case consists in proving first that we may neglect in probability (using a first-moment method) the time spent backtracking into these deep valleys; and then that

of ballistic regimes and directional transience. However, when κ 6 1, such an invariant probability does not exist, and we only know that the walk is sub-ballistic. We prove

Let us finally mention that Theorem 1 generalizes the aging result obtained by heuristical methods of renormalization by Le Doussal, Fisher and Monthus in [13] in the limit case

Maximum likelihood estimator consistency for ballistic random walk in a parametric random environment.. Francis Comets, Mikael Falconnet, Oleg Loukianov, Dasha Loukianova,

Deducing from the above general result a meaningful property for the random walk, in the sense of showing that U (ω, ξ n ω ) can be replaced by a random quantity depending only on

Asymptotic normality and efficiency of the maximum likelihood estimator for the parameter of a ballistic random walk in a random environment. Random difference equations and

Key words : Asymptotic normality, Ballistic random walk, Confidence regions, Cramér-Rao efficiency, Maximum likelihood estimation, Random walk in ran- dom environment.. MSC 2000

In the following lemma we recall results of Andreoletti and Devulder (2015) which say, roughly speaking, that the time spent by the diffusion X outside the h t -valleys is