A NNALI DELLA
S CUOLA N ORMALE S UPERIORE DI P ISA Classe di Scienze
G. G REINER R. N AGEL
On the stability of strongly continuous semigroups of positive operators on L
2(µ)
Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa, Classe di Scienze 4
esérie, tome 10, n
o2 (1983), p. 257-262
<http://www.numdam.org/item?id=ASNSP_1983_4_10_2_257_0>
© Scuola Normale Superiore, Pisa, 1983, tous droits réservés.
L’accès aux archives de la revue « Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa, Classe di Scienze » (http://www.sns.it/it/edizioni/riviste/annaliscienze/) implique l’accord avec les conditions générales d’utilisation (http://www.numdam.org/conditions). Toute utilisa- tion commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infraction pénale.
Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit contenir la présente mention de copyright.
Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques
http://www.numdam.org/
Stability Strongly Semigroups
of Positive Operators
onL2(03BC).
G. GREINER - R. NAGEL
(*)
One of the fundamental
problems
in infinite-dimensional linearstability theory
is to decide whetherfor the
generator
A of astrongly
continuoussemigroup {T(t)}t_,o
of boundedlinear
operators
on a Banach space(see [9]). Here,
denotes the
spectral
bound of A whileis the
growth
bound of~T(t)~t~o.
The coincidence of thespectral
andgrowth
bounds means that
stability
of thesemigroup depends
on the location of thespectrum
of thegenerator.
Moreprecisely,
y suppose that(*)
is true.Then
s(A)
0implies lim
t--11 T(t) ==
0.We refer to
[7]
for acomplete
discussion of(*),
but recall that« s (A )
= coo » does not hold ingeneral,
neither forsemigroups
on Hilbertspaces
(see [10]
or[2],
th.2.17)
nor forpositive semigroups
on Banachlattices
(see [4]).
In this note we combine the Hilbert space and the(*)
Questo lavoro 6 statocompletato
durante unsoggiorno
del secondo Autore presso l’Universith di Bari inqualita
diprofessore
visitatore.Quest’ultimo
coglie
l’occasione perringraziare
il Comitato delle Scienze Mate- matiche del C.N.R. per aver permesso questosoggiorno
e l’Istituto di Analisi Mate- matica dell’Università di Bari per la corteseaccoglienza.
Pervenuto alla Redazione il 10
Giugno
1982 ed in forma definitiva il 5 Feb- braio 1983.258
order structure and show that
s(A)
= for everystrongly
continuoussemigroup
onconsisting
ofpositive operators,
i.e. such thatT(t)f
is apositive
function wheneverf C- L2(lt)
ispositive
and[The proof
of this result wasinspired by
a recent paper of L. Monauni[6].
In
fact, using implicitely
Lemma 1below,
he characterizes thegrowth
bound mo for
semigroups
on Hilbert spacesby
the boundedness of theresoi-
vent
along imaginary
axes A+ iR,
A > Forpositive semigroups
onL2-spaces
we obtain thisproperty
from theintegral representation
statedin Lemma 2. For the basic
concepts
onone-parameter semigroups
we referto
[1]
or[2].
LEMMA 2. Let H be a Hilbert space. Then the vector-valued Fourier trans-
form Y, .L2(IL~, H) -~ L2(ll~, H) defined by
.F’ H.F,
and suitable F E
.L2(lE~, H),
is anisometry.
PROOF.
Every
Hilbertspace H
isisomorphic
to for some measurespace
(X,
Given a Banach space G and anoperator
T EC(G),
thenF(.) t-~ T(~(’))
defines anoperator Id ~ T
onL2(fl; G) satisfying T~~
In
particular, Id@ T
is an isometricisomorphism
if the same istrue for T.
Now,
observe that the Hilbert spaceL2(R; H) -
is
canonically isomorphic
toL2 (R)). Moreover,
thisisomorphism
trans-forms into where Y denotes the scalar-valued Fourier trans- form on
L2(R).
Since Y isunitary
the assertion follows.LEMMA 2
([3],
3.2 or[4], 3.3 )..Let strongly
continuoussemigroup of positive operators
on a Banach lattice E and denoteby (A, D(A))
its
generator.
Then the resolventintegral
exists
for every ~,
E Csatisfying
Re A >s(A).
Inparticular,
the resolvent:=
(A
-A)-’,
 Esatisfies 11 IIR(Re Â) II for
every A c- C with Re  >s(A).
THEOREM. Let be a
strongly
continuoussemigroup of positive
operators
on.L2(,u).
Then thespectral
bounds(A) of
thegenerator
A coincides with thegrowth
bound 000of ~T(t)~t~o.
PROOF. We may assume that 0 which
implies
thats(A)
c0. Forevery with
Re a > s(A),
andf
E.L2(,u),
we definecontinuous, L2(p,)-
valued functions
For Re a > 0 it follows from the definition of 000 that is contained in
L2(R,
nL2(p)). Using
theintegral representation
of the resol- vent we infer from[2],
th. 2.8 thatBy
Lemma 1 we conclude and obtainfor some constant CaE R
independent
off.
In order to prove the
assertion,
we assume to thecontrary
thats(A)
0.Then take and and recall the
following
identity:
Since
6~(’)
is continuous andJIB(a±iA)II II
is dominatedby IIR(Re a) II (use
Lemma2)
we obtainThe inverse Fourier transform
applied
toG f gives
a new functionWe
already
stated in(1)
thatH f =
for every L-t with Re a > 0.260
Now
keep
S E Randf E D(A2)
fixed and observe that the mapis
analytic
on C. On the other hand the functionis
analytic
onfa
E C: Re a >s(A)}.
This can be seen from the theorem of Morera sincefor every closed curve 1’ contained in the
right semiplane
determinedby s(A).
Here the order ofintegration
may be reversed since the norm of theintegrand
is dominatedby 2~,-2( ~~R(Re a) ~~ ’ ~~ (a - A)2 f ~~ + (use
(3)
and Lemma2).
From theuniqueness
theorem foranalytic functions,
we conclude that
on the
semiplane {a
E C: >s(A)}. Applying
Lemma 1again
we obtainfor and
f E D(A2) .
For Bex>0 we could estimate
by
a suitablemultiple
oflifli 2 (see (2)).
In order to obtain ananalogous
estimate forwe use the
following
relation betweenR(Re a)
and.R(-
Rea) .
Choose0 - Lx - s(A)
in such a way that(1- 2a.R(a) )
becomes invertible.Using
the resolventequation
in the formone deduces the
identity
which
yields
the estimatefor every
f
ED(A2)
and some constantda independent
off.
Putting together (4), (5)
and(2)
we havefinally
for every
f E D(A2)
and a constantda c_ a
stillindependent
off.
Since
D(A2)
is dense in we may extend this ectimate and obtainfor
By
Datko’s theorem(see [8],
p.121)
thisimplies
0
contradicting
ourassumption.
Therefore thespectral
bounds(A)
has to be 0.
FINAL REMARK. While
u s(A)
= holds forpositive semigroups
on(see [3], 3.3),
on and on([3], 3.3,
also[5])
we do not knowwhether the statement still holds for 1 p oo, 2.
REFERENCES
[1]
A. BELLENI-MORANTE,Applied Semigroups
and EvolutionEquations,
OxfordUniversity
Press, Oxford, 1979.[2] E. B. DAVIES,
One-parameter Semigroups,
Academic Press, London, 1980.[3] R. DERNDINGER, Über das
Spektrum positiver Generatoren,
Math. Z., 172(1980),
pp. 281-293.
[4] G. GREINER, J. VOIGT, M. WOLFF, On the
spectral
boundof
the generatorof
semi-groups
of positive
operators, J.Operator Theory,
5 (1981), pp. 245-256.[5] U. GROH, F. NEUBRANDER, Stabilität
starkstetiger, positiver Operatorhalbgruppen
auf C*-Algebren,
Math. Ann., 256(1981),
pp. 509-516.262
[6] L. A. MONAUNI, On the abstract
Cauchy problem
and the generationproblem for semigroups of
boundedoperators,
ControlTheory
CentreReport
No. 90, War- wick, 1980.[7] R. NAGEL, Zur
Charakterisierung
stabilerOperatorhalbgruppen,
SemesterberichtFunktionalanalysis, Tübingen,
1981-82.[8] A. PAZY,
Semigroups of
linearoperators
andapplications
topartial differential equations,
Univ.Maryland
Lecture Notes No. 10, 1974.[9] A. J. PRITCHARD, J. ZABCZYK,
Stability
andstabilizability of infinite
dimen-sional systems, SIAM Rev., 23
(1981),
pp. 25-52.[10] J. ZABCZYK, A note on
C0-semigroups,
Bull. Acad. Polon. Sci., 23(1975),
pp. 895-898.
Mathematisches Institut Universität
Tiibingen
Auf der
Morgenstelle
10D-7400