BIOLOGY AND FISHERY OF THE "TITI ' SHRIMP XIPHOPiNAEUS RIVCTI ON THE PACIFIC COAST OF COlOMBIA, SOUTH AMERICA
CENTRE FOR NEWFOUNDLAND STUDIES
TOTAL OF 10 PAGES 0 lY
MAY BE XEROXED
(Withou1 Author's Pcrmtssion)
ORLANDO MORA-LARA
~. I
362274
.··· ·
..
.
. .
. .
'· .
·.·
'·
. ...
.
. .
'•. l
. . . . .
\.
... . _ \
•'
..
:.
. .
~:I
•• !1
-
-· . .
l
- · .: ·.·
·- ..
. ·
I J--.,
.
'.·
' .
-... -
I •
BIOLOGY AND F1SHERY OF
THE
"TITI" SHRIMP" ! . .
. XIPHOPENAEUS RIVETI ON THE PACIFIC COAST
.
.
·.
'
.
.
..
' t, OF -coi.iOMBIA, SOUTH AMERICA
. . . .
(.
'·-,
.· - .t :
'
. ·
I
' .
1 .
A Thesis ·
suhnitted 'in.p!U'tial fulfillmen:t of the requirements for the
~-.
.
. -.
aegree of . MASTER'OF SCIENCEDepartment of Biology • Memorial University o~ Newfoundland
St. -John,. s, Newfoundland, Can(\da
..
Aprii', 1973
.
.: ' I
.
- .
o ·
j·.
...
. .. .
._,
'
. .
.· :·-
. :
· . ·.
,_ .
.: .
..
,
.. : · .
..
.-.
.. .
.
. ..
.
-.
·
..
.
--
.,. . ·-.. ,
.. .
·.'
. ~ --\~';'"..
. --:;{ti'
.
~...
.: r ··
,.
:·
'
..
, I''•
.
. .
•'
· .
'
.
,
I •·
., '
-.
~.
,,
...
..
c.
•.j
-·
.
).
•
.,
!\BSTRACT
The commercial importance'of-this species £n Colombia
is
·refl~ct;e~ :Ln land~ngs of-abo}lt four m'illion pounds (ta.j.l weight) '. . I
in l97i,. having been _increasingly r~ported in, the last few years •
' .. ·.
as demand and price increased. Analysis o~ the fishery in?icated the necessity for mana~emer:t }:)Y l:ipdting the number .oJ vessels
~efore depletion would_become app~ent. Biology of the species,
.
.
•
based on monthly sample~ taken ~uring survey fishing, gave co~version
factors of 1.?2 for •tail weight to total weight and 0.,61 for. total' weight to tail weight. Length-weight, etc. ,
.
relationships ind~catedth~t _males gained more -we_ig_ht with increa·se in size than feJ!!ales, ·
but.the latter grew to much larger sizes. ,, Maxima ·for~ar~pace length
.
~.
"\were 26 and-35 mm, respectively, in the samples. Ayerage monthly
.
.
gro~h in fem:les~~as est~ated ~t 2.9 mm· carapace l~ngth. First maturity in males was reached at a carapace .lenifth'of 15 mrn; maturity ··
was c~ntinuous thereafter,· as· shown. by presence of spermatophpres. In . females, first 'niaturi ty was opserved at 17 nun cl, but data on their
·reproductive cycles inditates .that they ma~ure; ~nd spawn up to four - -·
times over the period indicated by the range of carapace length
•
observed: ~heir gonads were rated as 'juvenilel.irnrnature, maturing, and mature, based on sizes o~ ... r.. ovaries and ova, the .. . . largest ' . ova b~ing ,
..
', - ·
0. 25 mm in
di~~ter b~tor~{-~p..,awning.
'Highper~entages ~ith
iarge ova0 . . . .. ~. • ' " •
in each monthly SaiJlple indicated frequent.... 11
....
· spawnings·, probably. @ numbering five times a year'for th~ population.
$ I"
. .
.. -
,_
-
. .
.
. .
\ .
-·. l
.
'..
-....
. .. · ~
· / \
(}
·
..
l' .
.
,
•
.
,
...
·~ ...
..
.. .
. ,. .
• •
. . , .. .
·
'Pro~~coids
of cestodespara~ftJzed
principally thehepa.topancreas. Food ·o~ganisms were observed to be p:im~ily other crustaceans 1 po~ycha.etes and peie9ypods ~ The sex ratio w~s biased
. . ' in favour.of females. This is interprete~ _to be due to a gear'
;:, tl•
se'l.ectipn or p~eference qf/for 'iarger s~pnp. With· regards to bathymetric distribution, 's-10 m and ·mostly in rie.ar~shore location's.
' ,· I .
. \ . "
were--faV.oure~ t' and • SOm~ adultS t aS ·~ell aS -.j~e!)ileS 1 were foun~,
within estuaries. Recruitment app~ared to ,occu~~our times annually,
based oh length frequency s'ampXes.
. ·
The thesis further-examines the ·.genus
)
.
.,and the species and morphology details iven . Howeyer 1. no final deci~ion· is mad'e separa ion of
x.
riveti .froll) ~ J<royeri.• I ... .._ •
. -~
.
.
.+' .,. r
.iJ .,
- .
r
"
..;!'-,~· ~l
.... f., •
. : . I
.
-,
~. '.. ,
. .
. '
·_
\ .:
.
'.',• 'I
'
.
':
• .
.
'~
'
.
...
\
',' \ :
·~
. .
,-.0
. . ·.
.
··-
.... ·.:·.
.
·~. ..
,
...
~ -~·-..··
. J •' '
' \
;I • •
1 •• ••
·,, I •
' 'I
'•
. ! .
.
•-
.·.~·
:
.
·~
·'
. .
:.
. .
:I • ..· ' '
.: . I '
- ·
· ... .s. -i-
-> .'.
''
...
,
. ..
.
'. . .
.
~. ~ .
'·
. " '
... " ... ' ..
I
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .
· > r ~ espe-~ ial1y.·grateful
to Dr. Squire~I · for his..
.
' ..
,._ . . ... ::guidance.througn_the time of tpe investigation in the field, as
. .
.
. ..
. : ,...
. .,.
...
; ..
~ . .·well as in t~e l~boratory~ _and_ tor reading the man~scrip~ and ,.-/
• I
offering:construct~ve criticism
. .
· ... .
. -~ ..,, ,
·- .
I am indebte4 to Dr f F . . Gner i and Dr. C. Tapias, Director . and· Co-D.irecto~ ,: f.e.spectivel~, of' the. Marine Fisheries D~ve1o.P:"ent
. . . . ,:_ i .·. .
·Projec.t:in Col~~bi~, for the ,''opportunity to atterid Memorial
.·
.
uni~~rsity _on
a-F~9
fellowship.. .
'
.
'. ..,.trrt!' - .
. ·,I th~nk. the Institute de lo? Recursos-Naturales Renovables
J
-
·'. .
' '• .-
~. ~ ·
an;t.gl~ .teful
to Dr. F. Aldrich __for his assistance• . • 1
...
.throughout the' course of my studies at Memorial University of
"""""' . .. : ,, .. . .1 '· .
·" Newfoundla:~a, st .. Jobn'
s,
"Newfoundland·, canada •..
"
I aiso thank the FAP central offices in Rome for aiiowing
•• t,t;
? •.
m~ to .Undertake a· degree progra~ in Ca~ada.
•\
.
• I
,, This .work would not have been possibte without the.
valua.ble help of, ~h~ .captain and crew aboard the M/V "C~c;que", . ·
·.
.
and a_l
1
so the following per son? : E. _vergara, L. Casquete, .
·-
·.
. ... . ..
J
I'
·.
.,_ ' .,.·
J •
.. I
l .
J
•·
/
-~
. .
'····.
'.
J\
'·
:.
..
. .,
. .
'0,.
':
·. ~
..
I ' ..
,.
. .
. .
..;
.. . .
. -ii'-
'.
D. Roldan. and L. candela for the ccil!e~t.ion. of· ~~·st~cs_ in.
Buenaventura, Tum a co and
Guapi.
. '
·I Fl1¥u1k Octavio' Bernal fo--;; the drawing'(; s .
in .
Fig~es . 2\
I
. ·:
.·
and for preparing the other figure~.
, .
,i . ,.
'
....
.·.
.
.
i I.
.
\ .
I
I.r
i1
I
)\
\' ..
.t
.
\
.. .~,.. \
I
t;
.'
' ...
:·~:
l .
.
·.. .
·.·
. .
'
.
;,., '
'
..
-!J
..
·~...
,.
q
s · .
.··_,
. . .
..
\\ .
·\ t
( . . .
j
lt.
./.
':
'.\.0
,
.
II .
..
. .
\...
~
.
• "!' .
..
"
-~
.
\
~
. ,
.
.
.
.
..
...
'.
··'
- , .
. ' i I
.. t·
'••' .
..
•'
· -
.
. .
'
.
I •
..
·.
·.
. .
..
.·
·f· .
.
..
;
.
.
·.
.·
.·
j---.
,.
-ii'i-
TABLE OF CONTENTS
\.. ·
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ---·---.:.---'----~---
' .
'LIST OF -TABLES
--- - ---
0 . . . .---
. '
' LIST OF FIGURES ---7~---·-~ ------------
·'
INTRODUCTION v
MAT,ALS. 1\N~ METHODS
Population T1 sampling
Hyd~ography ---~~---~--~-~~---
- .
Lengths and Weights ~--------~-~---
'
Lengths ------------~----------
welghts
----
~ •--~--- •
I~---~----~----
•• ¥ • t
--Sex detei:minatiolf
--- ---
• 0---
r . /
sexual maturity. . • · ---l---• ----• ---~---~--. . 0 ----~---1~- sex ratio
. ,
.--- --- ---
Stomach contents
--- .
. .- --
Parasitism ~---~---
Conv~rsion factor from tail \Oeight to total weight
Graphs·~---.:.-:.:..--------------:----~---:---
.
.
.E·~ti:mation of·
·g.rowth --..:---'::..---:---:, : : , ;, o o I I ,o o o - • • • 4'> t e
· .. Esti.lna .
.
.. don:>~£
...
... recruitment: ---· .
..
. :· st~tis.tics.. --- . ·. ---
.--
··.
Landings ---
/
•.
'·
...
·~ ·
.t, "'-
·• I·~ .
· ~
"
Page i vi i
-ix
.1
•
4
6
6
...
7
.
:I7 .-.
8
8
..
8
-i'i>•
8 8 9
·9
'9
,. .
(-·~
9.
..
~10
I 11
11.
...
;.
.y l
0
'
•:
;'
'"
.' .., .
. I
... ...
·' .
..
t. ":
..
,.
'•
.'
..
-iv-
Page TAXONQMY
---:-:----J
'---
Nomenc.la t\lre --..,--7--- --:----:-
-7'--- ---
13 13
/s~ientific va'~id
.. -
name..:----~--- -~-·- .
___ _: ____ .:. ____ _ 13T~onomy
---..!--.-"""'---..;-:..,---
\ ...
.· ----.:. ___ ...:_ ___ 0
13 Affinities ---..:---·---' - - - 13 Generic n~e. ------~---~7-----.1-'t---':"Genotype ---~---1 14' Species nan~e ----:---.---
I
15TY!>e .. ·~.ocal.ity 7'---:..----~---:---~---~---·-
1 Diagnosis ---.:.---.:.--..:.--.:.---
. ,
1Objective· syn6nym
--- .
.• • • - 0 • ....
Key. for the spec~es ----...---. . . ~ ---..
.
!l'axonomic status VernaC).t,1C:r names
Morphology ---:-::---
'
. . . ~ . . . . . I
External morphology ---
, r
Size relaj~:ion~hips ___ ;... __________ ,..: ____________ .
~ ' ~ # •
\ I ' ~ ' .
Main characteris'tics ~--·---.---
DISTRIBUTION ---~
. . · l ________ ' .
...._______ . . ;!,'
_.~ ___________________
< . ._
~istribul ~ i~ .··n ___ .:. _____ :..<:" --~~~~~---...:---~----\.~.: t~··
. Detail·s-of
·~I o - '
t.
. , . . 0 •
. Adu.~.. ts ---.:.---... ---... ---;--.---
• I "
Length frequency. di~tribut;ons· ---""-::.---.,
. '• •.
. .
I
. · ... ~.
..~ ..
J, ~
...-.. ..
15 15 i7 17
'17 17 18 .: 18
18
'
18
24 24 25 .. ·25'
. .
,. I
\
'>
·,
q
· )
,,
.
.•
r .-
ol
.. t
q. .,
.. :...:.) ,'
·.'
, .... ·.
.·
\ .
.
\..
\
, ' I
. ,( .. .
...
I •·. ·{
ti . .
) ~~
'I
;p
.I
..
I '•
·:
>
.·
. .
:-:"
. .
.. ·
·- .- ~ . .
· •
.
.• 'I
. ·
~. .
• -v-··. . .
I
;. Recrui tllient ---~---:...-:--:---..:--l--'---
Fishing press.ure .
·- -· . - ~---~ . ~--- .
._.- ~~~:
. ~.. ::;: ~_:
___ ._ ____ _.
.
. ~{·. . II . . '
'14 •BIOLOGY J ••
---1--- --- ~ - --- '---- _::---- -~--- ---- --
. . I •
Length and/or Weight Relationships s~-":1---~---.:..--
~ ~
.
r1~v~·lQ'· ·
' ··~1~~~ .
. Total length~carapace length r~lationship ----"':-
Total we1.g t . h ..
-
tatl weigi~· relationship _,...______ .
'
Total weight - .total length relat~onship
---
· ~
. .
Total weight
-
!=arapace length relationship·---- Growth.
. ~. . . .. . .
Tail .. weight carapace eRgth relationship
" .
- ·. .
.
,.
... .
___ .:,._____________________ - ---
Estirnatio~ of the conversion facto~ from
tail to totaiJ weight ---;-.---":"---· -Reproduction
--- . . ---
.
:'
.
' I
·Male reproductive system ---..:.~---------:--
. , . ; ' I _1 • ' •
Female' reproductive system ---,..---7----
. .
Sexual maturity·--:---.---~-----~----:-.:..-----
.
.
--- -· - ---- --- ---
Females ---
.9
'---. . Ol . ""' · , ,.
Size at first 'sexual
..
maturity---
.. .
Nwnber of spaWnings. per year ._ _________ · .. , .
p
·.
: ' .
. ..
·l.
' .
- ·
"""
0
·-~
'
: P~g~. ' -.---
:'
25 27
\•
32 '
"\
3:l
'
:·--o r
32·
34' 34 .•
39 43 43
47 51 . 51
52
53
~ ' .
. ..
53 54
..
54 55 ~
.·
. .
.
·•
'
I.
.
:~...
' '
"' -t
..
-vi-
.
. ..
P'ar asi tism ---·--- ---•-----:--~----
\ ·.·
Food ~nd feeding ---.:.---..:.-
- . .
.~"' ..
' .)
-
.I • E~ology -~--.:.--~--~---• ---~---·-
..
. . .
..
' . .,.
Popala t~on ---:--- --
.
---. ----.
--.---· Structure ---~---~---..
---/ · -
• I..
. , ..sexual ratio ---...!.-~----:-------.:.
_____ _
. •. Distribution
.
'.
·r.ocal .. geogr- aphic distribution ---:----~ .,
North of Buenaventura
7--:--- - -'---:-- _:
· ,
s~u-£{ of Buenav~t~ra-____ . ______ _. ______ _.
. ' •"'Bathymetri.c distribution. of juveniles
and adul ts •
---:---
i' 0---\-r----·
General batqymetric
. .
. distribution-
F.ISHING ---.:.--• . '--~--.:..---~~---
~ ...·---:._~--- . . Histo~: ~f
the Pacific shrimp industry·--- -~~-:- 7 ~-:--
..
0 "\ 'Boats and fishing gear --- Physical. characteristics of the Coast ---:---.
Q
COastal fea~ures-and fishing areas - - --- S~imp processing ---:---·---
.•
.
.Monthly landings and recruitment _,:. _______ . ________ .
Annua~. l.andipgs . __ : ___ .._ ________________ .:, _____ ,;,. ____ _ .
·
Total ·effort ----.,---.---
.·
DISCUSSION ---.---.--:--- REFERENC'S ----;---.---'---
. ... .· ..
1/ •
.,.
. . .
. .
.Page
..
. .
57 60 62 64 64 64 64 64 64 67.
67 69
74
"
74 74.
77
?B
79
Bl
84 . . 84'
89 97
)
~~-
,,.
.
..
. .
· .
....
• '
..
·.
• •
-~
... .
...
1=.·
·... ~.
.
...
. ..
..
. .
• TABLE'.'
I.
. .
. . .
II.
III . .
·IV.
.·
v.
· .
•• VI.
VII .•
.·
..
VIII.·
·'
. ·
-vi.i-.
.
'·
.
. ·.
Length and/or weight ·relat'ionship equabions for X. riveti from the Pacific coast of
. . .
..
;Colombia, 196'9 • ---,.---.... ----:---
. .
1Monthly percentage of -sexual niatut;ity. in
I •
female x'.: ri veti _____ ..;·---;---.:.--·
----
l i ~ ' I) ~
Monthly percentage of . .Parasites found in male arid female shrimps, north and sout:h
- - I
---~ -:-7---~--~---
·of Buenaventura
. .
.
Per cent . of different elements in stomach i contents of X. riveti• ---~---¢41
0 •
Sex ratio o~ ~.r1veti North and SQuth of . .
. .
Buenaventura 7--- Average catch of .X. riveti by the M/V "Cacique"
f ' . •• .
·and env'i~nrnentjH col)ditiors. in areas North of
\ ~
Buena:ventura l" ---.. , ---·
.
·,},'. f" . . .
Average· catc'h' of .. X. riveti by· the.
M/V
·"Cacique".
.
a.nd environmental c9ndi ti~ns in areas South of ' Buenaventur~ ---
Depth dis~ibution of male ·an~ female juveniles .and adults from bo1;:h North and south of Buenaventura ---
..
Page
. .. 33.
56
·.·
. .
58
..
61
65
66
68
70
~-
. .
.
'
• 'r
'
.. .
• • 0 ' ' -•· . .
.. .. ...
"""·.-""""''
.c:p
. .
p. ..
.
'..
r . .
.. .
. .
....
I '
•'.
•.·
.
·- ~
T,ABLE.
IX.
. ..
x.
XI.
-·
. .
-viii-
'\ •
•
\ ...
-~ .
·Total 'catch and catc~ per .unit of effort
' r -
~dc~rding·~o·depth range ~n the· North~n
zone of Buenaventu...-a "1969 .... -~-·-_______ _; _____ _
" r ' '
. . -.. . \
, ..
ToJ:al' catch and catch per unit of e'ffort'
~ccording to depth range in the
,.
southern~zone of Buenaventura, 1~69:---~---·--~~---~
.
/ '. .
. .
some characteristics of shrimp processing plants !~ted on the Pacific cocu;t of
. , ~. . .
.. .
Colombia ___ .... __ :_ _______ ... ----~------.:.· __ .:.._...:_·_ ·
r.
XII. Some ·characteristics
of
the'. shrimp fleet}-
. XIII.
·~ '
'
.
..
x:tv .
of the Pacific coast o.f Coloml:tia• ---... ..:.
I
Loss of wej.ght ·in "titi '' shr.iinp ~ riveti .thromih the proces's .of
.
- . peeling and · ..<>
, "" • - Cl ••
d~eining ---·---'---.:.-__________ ,;. ____ ~.
<>.
Annu~l landings of "titi" shrimp X. riveti
. • 0
Pag":'
. .
•
.,·' 71
'72
•75- .
').
'
•,-7.6 7
•
82
of the'Pacific coast 'of Colornbia,,l958-1~7l-- 85
..
)rv.
...
.·
'•
Total '·landings, total 'effort and ca:tch _per . unit. of effort .of
"t~ti"
• shrimp of· the... . \#
pacific·coast of Colombia ---
·.
,·
,•
·c.
f •.,
,q
''
.. . .
... ·'·
.
..
-
87
.a. •
;.
.
•,•'
.
· '
.,.-' .•
'I'-
•,
~
.·
'
~- .
. .
••
- .
.•
• • J
...
~
·.
. ...
. ;:.
•
...
'" ..:-:
.. ~ ... :
• • 0
• 6
..
.
. ..
. .
i
•
~·
.. I
~
..
,•
. '
.
. G • • •
-~
·
.. (/ ~·
·.
'
. . ..
FIGURE
i.
-ix-
•, I
'LIST OF FIGURES
.. .
.....
, ·~. M~p of ~he Pacific coast of Cololl\l:)ia , showing·- . '"
fishing_' sta.tion'~ and ,place names. used in the
.. . " ' .. .
. . .
. :·
0 c.:· . . . te,?Ct '---~----;:---.--:-.~>o
_______ _: ______ . ____ :__:_.., __ ::_
...
: 2.
3.'
.
..•
xlphopenaeus riveti A
1,·antenna; :A
2, antennu:e:
.
.,~Mi, ma'Xilltrl;;l: ms
2, .. m'axilla; Mnd
1, detail of
o mandible; ·Mnd, mandible; Mpi, first maxilliped;
Mp2,. seGond, nia~iiiipeq_l ~p
3
~. third maxilliped~iphopenaeus riveti· a. petasma, posterfor
~iew;·b. Petasma,
.
anterior view; , . c.- .
Appendix....
masc~lina; d.,Thelycum ---J---~ I
4·. Xiphopenaeus.
-~i~eti'.. 'carap~c.e
and total'l~ngth
•• 0 '
\ ' frequency distributions ·of females North of
...
.
j...·auenaventura ---
. . .
. 4A; . '
·xiphopenaeus riveti~ Carapacre and total let:tgth" ·
~
~frequency dl~tributions
.
of females South· of.
.Buenaveritura
---,---""":' .
"- --
4B.r Xiphopenaeus ~iveti. Carapace and total length
. . ..
0 ()
4c.·.
f~equency distributions ?f male~ North of
. •,
.Buenave~tura·---~---n---
.. ..
. .
Xiphopenaeus riveti. Carapace ' .'~nd tot~l ·lengf;h
.. .
. ),. ...
fr~qu~ncy distribu~ion~ of ~ales Sou~h of
E\uenaventura
--- --- ---
~ •
.,
~ I .' "
I
,. 1:;:1 .. o!
. ·
• . .• ~ tr'O
•
Page
. ..
•. 5
:
21
. '22
..
·.:..,• ' <J
·-
.·.
.
/ 30
31
"
.
. .
'·
. l
...
-·~ ,.
..:.
. .
' ·-
'•
0
. .
"
. .
...
'·
' I
v ·
·'
-·~ . . ~
. •
. . .
. .
;
' ..•.
-x.:..
FIGUJffi .
5. ·· Total length--... ., .. carapace length
. relati~nship ~
ip'
m~le
and female Xiphopenaeus riveti ---. .
6. Total length-carapace length relationshiP. in '
·m~les !:~ 9- f.~a:~~~ combi.~et\.f x.iph~pe.naeus
. .r1vet1 ---·
~~. ,;.;..-c) . '.. . • . :
~
. . ..
7':
··Total weight-tail weight :z::e'lationship in male.
.and female Xiphopenaeus riveti ~---~~------
.
.a.
Total weig.ht-tail weight relation~hiP!? in males and females combinedor
Xiphopenaeus.
.riveti
--- ---.:0---
' 9.
Total weight-total length relationships in. . .
• I 'lj> ffJ
'male'and female Xiphopenaeus riveti ---
.
.. . (
.·.
.. . . . .
• 10. · Total ~ight-total length relationships in
ma
..
les and females"combined of Xiphopenaeus 0.
.riveti
---
11. Total weight-carapace lengtn· relationships in male and female ~iphopenaeus riveti --- 12. Total weight-carapace leng~h relationships
'i~·males and.~emal~s combined o~ Xiphopenaeus
• • , 0 •
~-~ 0 0 '
riveti -~------~----~-----------
c•
?
.
.•' I . ..1 . . Paye'" .
. '·.
.·.·
35
·r
36.
37 -~
0\_
38 ,o
'I
41
42
44
..
4 •
(
' .
\
...
• I>
. ..
.( .. .. .
'G• ·. .
.
-xi-\\
FIGURE
13. : Tail ·weight-carapace length relat;ionships
:-
:;---~ mal~
and femaleXiph~praeus r~veti
--- 14.. Tail weight-carapace length relationshipsin ma\es and females combined of Xiphopenaeus<
'
' ,,
-------~-. .
15. Monthly modes of female ...
x.
riveti, 1969 ---- 16.
17 •·
Relation between the monthly modes of one
\
.
'
month against
t~e
modes ofriext . month · -~--- -
' '
Growth #curve of female X. riveti. ·:---:--~-- Number of parasites found"in Xiphope~aeus
riveti.male~ and females at each carapa~e length -
,\
Page
.,
.
.~45 ·'
46
48'
\
49
50
_59 _
._ ...
19. Peeled and deveining "titi"_ .shrimp at .-the shrimp processing plants of the Pacific coast
.
-
.of Colombia ~--- ·80'
.
\ !.
'Average monthly catch 'ttail weight lb) 'and percentage ~f recruitinent of "titi" shrimp·
Xiphopenaeus ri veti from the Pact'tj.l coast
of Colombia --- 83
21. .Total catch per vessel-month a.nd total fishing
T
effort (number of.vessel-months) for-.''titi" .
shrim~ Xiphopenaeus.riveti, 1968-1971 ----:---~--. 88'
.
"..
..
-
..
'~
.
/
.... ---;--
,)
! '
;
•.
{
.. 'INTRODUCTION
··The "titi" shrimp (Xiphopenaeus riveti Bouvier} is one
'
.
. of the most abundant sp~cies in the commercial catches on the
. !
Pacific coast of Colombia. It is caught at the .same time as
.! J
•
Penaeus {L) occidentalis, P. stylirostris, ~· vann~ei, Trachypenaeus sirnilis pi:lcificus, T. byrdi, T. faoea; Prctrachypene precipua and
-¢
occ'asiona~l.Y with Pala~on (Nematqpalaemon) colombiensis.
(\
In
1953, the beginning _of the shrimp industry,· the "titi"was not reported in ·the landing statistics. However, in 1966 the .companies located on the Pacific. coast began t? ·,expori;?: this shrimp
'•
to fhe United States.
This exporta~ion provided the reason for the grow~ng economic
~
,tmportance of_ the species. Previous to this many captains. took part of the· catch for priva~e use. and "under the table" sales,, but in 1969 higher pay was provided for these men; givin~ them the incentive tq land the entire catch at the· shrimp compan'ies in which
0
theywere employed.
,, \
For these reasons, as well as an int~sified fishing effort .the fi~ures of landings have 'increased from a few thousand pounds
in 1958 ~o 3,834,000 tail-poun~s in 197~. This exceed~d the
~andings of the "langostino" or white shrimp (Penaeus (L}
occidental is, P. stylirostris and P. vannamei)
.
~which reached2,359,000 tail-pounds in 1971.
,
.•
"
0
·,
J -
':. .·
-2- ·
·- ·
The amount produced by the artisan fisher.y doe~ nd't ,
reach an appreciable percentage, but some companies,_ such as those located in Turnaco and Guapi, buy' fr6m the a+tisan fishermen even
'
the-smallest quantities (i.e., two kg) in order ·to increase the compan¥'s production.
.
:;.~·
~
The economic importance that this resource represents in '•/,, this cquntry. is implicit in the recent increase in its exports.
For_.example, in 1971 tbe exports of this species reached ' 2,168,360 tail-poun~s with a value of U.S. $864,475, Therefore, a scientific
~
.
study qf its biological cycle, its troP,hic relatio.nship and i~s · . population dynamics, is of fundamental importance in order to maintain this resource at a rationally exploited level.
Some work previous to this paper that had been done were the following: Smith in 1885 described the genus Xiphopenaeus.
: l __
In 1907 Bouvier described the species'riveti from some sp~cimens collected by Rivet in P<;lita, Peru. · ·.Burkenroad in 1936 reviewed the genus and matle some criticisms. of Bouvier's observations on X. riveti, ~onc,luding that i t was a varietal form of X. kroyeri.
"
In Brazil, however, work has ·been done on the sexual maturity (Borges, 1947·) 1 fishery biology (Neiva and Wise, 1963);
population dynamics (Santos, et al., 1968) anc\_ reproduction
(Santos, et al., 1971) ~n its counterpart, the sea }?ob, Xiphopenaeus r
kroye'ri, .of the Atlantic.·
'·
. .
1-
;
·'
. ·
.·
~
·:. · ·
'
..
. .
.. . .
:.
.t
·.
-3-
·.
The has a ~is~ibution range from. the northeastern·' Portion of M~ ico to ·Pa ita , .... P iura·, Pe.FU ( Pere._z', . F. • I 1970)
.... '
/'•
.~ .
.
;···.
. .
·.·
. ,
I
.
,
·,
-, •.
.
·.
·.
,
..,
.
\,
· ..
0 ,.•
! :
,
.
·: I
.
•..
· '
. .
..
,,(.
..
.
. .
. .
.-•
. .
. ·
· . . .
,.
.,
~
. .
...
.
.':":-> /. .
.
·--;-..
·'I
.· .
. 4
. ·
., _
· .
I '
. -
, -
1 .
. 4'·
. . .
. .
I' • • '
. .
.. . · A
' ' .
:·
1 • • ..
- ··-· - -.
~..
0,.
·~~ -4- .
. I
. . .
·MATERIALS AND METHODS
..
The present work was done in the Marine Science Center
. . .... ·: /
.of Buenaventura wi~lr the support of the United Nations
De~elopment P~ograrn (FAO) and· the Institute de·Desarrollo de
. .. 0
los Recursos Naturales Renovables, INDERENA, of the
~~i~mbian
Gove~nment. The monthly sampling start'ed in January 1~69, and -:··
was' continued to February 197 0 •
. .
' .
In order to carry·out objectives a local fishing vessel
• • u
. wa.·s chartered monthly for eight or 'ten days U:o occupy ~tatipns
;· .
n6rth or south o.f Buenaventura at depths of 5- (9 rn) ,· 10 (18m),
.
'20 (37 rn), · 30 '(55 ~) an:d 40 (73 m) fathOIT!S.
'
. .
During this study.
'.::
the ~'titi" shrimp was ,caught at 97 of thE:! 280 stations (Fig. l)
'
.
/
• ··
. . . .
.
.. at-depths between 3. and 30 fatl1_oms. rAPPt:Oxirnately 1,400· specirn~ns·
· were studied
iz:t
detail from the ·monthly sarnp~es c?lle:ctoo during -;the cruises. To determine frequency distributions, ·carapace··lengths of 9,319 specimens· arid total. le.ngths .of 4,503 specimens , .
·W~e.. measured. I • . , . ""'
This study,_ ondert-tlken along the Pacific coast .of
·-.
Colombia (encompassing 1,300 km) gives prel~inary 'information on
! . .
..
the natural his·tory
·and~popu lati~n·
d}rnamics of the "titi". s_l;tr~P·
· .
•J
.
. .Also, taxonomy, sexual maturity .. ' food, p~rasitisrn, sex ratio, growth, ..
fishing areas, statistics of catch and effort anp commerc~al landings were studied •
·
..
'
.
. 'i
I
l
.
'
. .
.. . ,
-,.
I .
t;~ ·
.:..s-
/, y • ...
.
' ·'""
- .. . - ""
• •
~ D
~ -~ '
•
I..
0--
uI
1
•
,
f
.
j••
'. . i
., ,I
"
4I I
...
· l .. .. ..
I
:...
I
I u..
-:-·-
. I ..
4 .:;.. · • .. .. .. ..
~- .
CD0.
,
I
.
!~ ·r
"
·J
~
·~ :
. .
0. .
z ~~rf: I I•'
..
• I
...•
.J ~ I
...
0 I' •I
4 4':--
. ,
" -
. -:--?
i
I· w _-
... •"
l
GORGONISLA A...
-J.,
I I. .
u.,_ . ,. .. " .. ... . .
. :•• ..
TIMBIOUI,
•I •0'
. . I BOCA G'IJA Pt 0
•
,.I SAN JUAN
t
I'
.. . .
aENSENAOA
r
TUM ACO"
i CABO
I
MANGLARES p ~·. .
:..
#c~ ..... _ ... ... , ..
_...
.t:.
..
Fig.
~1. Map of
the :Pacifi~·~oast· ofColombia ···:
showing fishing stat ions and
pl~cenames . u' sed · in . the t'ext.
~
,.
. .··
. • '0'\ .'
. .
-~
0
...
.
· .• .. ;
·-t
....
...
..
'·· .
.-·
. •·
. ..
. .
, I
{...
...
~-6-
Population Sampling
·'
Sampling £or each zone north and south o~ .,Buenaventura
. .
~s biJl:tonthly. ·.Samples for biol~gical analysis were _collected
by
the author aboard ..
.the - shl:imp vessel M/V 11Cacique" (for 12 months)·and on the R/V 11Choco11 (January·, .19?0) • I
Trawling was done for one hour at each station' •. The captain always ·tried to. maintain the-·same deP;9· . He foUowed the method of f~shing ?sed by fishermen in·these wate~s turning in a wide circle in each area. · Once the·t9tal catch was aboard, the comrner6ial
( 0 •
s~~cies of· shrimp~, fish and crabs were,separated • The total catch ·
"- .···
of ·"titi" was we~ghed with
a
sprin_g balanc~ ... frbm the total catch a random sample was taken.and put in a one--gallon jar with seawater an~ ·.formalin (10%). If the .catch was large enough, ~orne of i t·
t .. • i 0 . . . . ,,. A;. , •
was stored ~n cloth bags or 9arqboard boxes in the refrigera~ed hold
t~
calculate later in the'.
laboratory conversion factors.
from tail. weight to tota~. weight •
Hydrography
'·
.
.
,II
I •
At the e'nd of each haul, water sample~ 'were. taken from. neal\ . · • the bottan using Nansen bottles for tempera_
..
ture andt salinity .determinations. A COIIDllOn mercury thermaneter witJl an accuracy of ~
±fr.S~C ~s used: for determining surface ~emperatures, and-a revers~g
..
. ' :·,
thermometer
fcJ
the bottom· teniper'atures. · · E,:or:th~
wa~i: · ~a~sparency
. .. · .
'