• Aucun résultat trouvé

Reflections on TREC QA

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Reflections on TREC QA"

Copied!
1
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Reflections on TREC QA - Ellen Voorhees, NIST, USA

The TREC (later TAC) Question Answering track reinvigorated the question answering research community, fostering extensive research on different question types and finding answers in different kinds of corpora.

Parallel evaluations extended the research further to include a variety of languages and media types. In recent years, the TAC QA track evolved into the Knowledge Base Population (KBP) track, where the task is (essentially) factoid-question answering combined with entity resolution: answer strings must be resolved into the appropriate nodes of a pre-existing ontology.

KBP is itself viewed as an initial test of capability for Machine Reading systems. In this talk I will reflect on what the lessons learned from the QA track suggest for creating a Machine Reading evaluation with the goal of creating a vibrant Machine Reading research community.

Références

Documents relatifs

The prototype includes all classical components of a QA system: (a) question classification, (b) passage retrieval, (c) answer extraction and (d) natural language processing

The table shows the number of Right, Wrong, ineXact and Unsupported answers, as well as the percentage of correctly answered Factoids, Temporally restricted

The solver module engine starts by producing a First-Order Logic expression representing the question and a logic facts list representing the texts information.. There is

Keywords: question answering, QA, text preprocessing, tokenization, POS tagging, document indexing, document retrieval, Lucene, answer extraction, query formulation.. 1

• In subsequent questions of the same cluster, the system first parses the question, obtaining its pivots, and then calls the method SetTopic, which appends to the question pivots

Inspired by previous TREC evaluation campaigns, QA tracks have been proposed at CLEF since 2003. During  these  years,  the  effort  of  the  organisers  has 

(1) incorporation of syntactic knowledge in the IR-engine, (2) incorporation of lexical equivalences, (3) incorporation of coreference resolution for off-line answer extraction,

Based on the question type two different strategies of answer extraction are triggered: for factoid questions answers are extracted from best IR-matched passages and selected by