• Aucun résultat trouvé

Guidelines on mental health promotive and preventive interventions for adolescents: helping adolescents thrive Web Annex. GRADE evidence profiles and tables of included studies

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Guidelines on mental health promotive and preventive interventions for adolescents: helping adolescents thrive Web Annex. GRADE evidence profiles and tables of included studies"

Copied!
66
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Web Annex. GRADE evidence profiles and

tables of included studies

(2)
(3)

Web Annex. GRADE evidence profiles and

tables of included studies

(4)

© World Health Organization 2020

Some rights reserved. This work is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 IGO licence (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/igo).

Under the terms of this licence, you may copy, redistribute and adapt the work for non-commercial purposes, provided the work is appropriately cited, as indicated below. In any use of this work, there should be no suggestion that WHO endorses any specific organization, products or services. The use of the WHO logo is not permitted. If you adapt the work, then you must license your work under the same or equivalent Creative Commons licence. If you create a translation of this work, you should add the following disclaimer along with the suggested citation: “This translation was not created by the World Health Organization (WHO). WHO is not responsible for the content or accuracy of this translation. The original English edition shall be the binding and authentic edition”.

Any mediation relating to disputes arising under the licence shall be conducted in accordance with the mediation rules of the World Intellectual Property Organization (http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/mediation/rules/).

Suggested citation. Web Annex. GRADE evidence profiles and tables of included studies. In: Guidelines on mental health promotive and preventive interventions for adolescents: helping adolescents thrive. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2020.

Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.

Cataloguing-in-Publication (CIP) data. CIP data are available at http://apps.who.int/iris.

Sales, rights and licensing. To purchase WHO publications, see http://apps.who.int/bookorders. To submit requests for commercial use and queries on rights and licensing, see http://www.who.int/about/licensing.

Third-party materials. If you wish to reuse material from this work that is attributed to a third party, such as tables, figures or images, it is your responsibility to determine whether permission is needed for that reuse and to obtain permission from the copyright holder. The risk of claims resulting from infringement of any third-party-owned component in the work rests solely with the user.

General disclaimers. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of WHO concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Dotted and dashed lines on maps represent approximate border lines for which there may not yet be full agreement.

The mention of specific companies or of certain manufacturers’ products does not imply that they are endorsed or

recommended by WHO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. Errors and omissions excepted, the names of proprietary products are distinguished by initial capital letters.

All reasonable precautions have been taken by WHO to verify the information contained in this publication. However, the published material is being distributed without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. The responsibility for the interpretation and use of the material lies with the reader. In no event shall WHO be liable for damages arising from its use.

This publication forms part of the WHO guideline entitled Guidelines on mental health promotive and preventive interventions for adolescents: helping adolescents thrive. It is being made publicly available for transparency purposes and information, in accordance with the WHO handbook for guideline development, 2nd edition (2014).

(5)

Contents

PICO 1: Preventive interventions for all adolescents . . . . 1

PICO 2A: Preventive interventions for adolescents exposed to violence . . . . 4

PICO 2B: Preventive interventions for adolescents exposed to poverty . . . . 8

PICO 2C: Preventive interventions for adolescents exposed to humanitarian emergencies . . . . 13

PICO 3: Preventive interventions for pregnant and parenting adolescents . . . . 21

PICO 4: Preventive interventions for adolescents living with HIV/AIDS . . . . 28

PICO 5: Preventive interventions for adolescents with emotional symptoms . . . . 32

PICO 6: Preventive interventions for adolescents with disruptive/oppositional behaviours . . . . 42

Included studies . . . . 48

(6)
(7)

PIC O 1: P rev en tiv e in ter ven tions f or all adolesc en ts

WHO Guidelines on mental health promotive and preventive interventions for adolescents GGuuiiddeelliinneess oonn mmeennttaall hheeaalltthh pprroommoottiivvee aanndd pprreevveennttiivvee iinntteerrvveennttiioonnss ffoorr aaddoolleesscceennttss.. AANNNNEEXX 77:: GGRRAADDEE EEVVIIDDEENNCCEE PPRROOFFIILLEESS AANNDD TTAABBLLEESS OOFF IINNCCLLUUDDEEDD SSTTUUDDIIEESS PICO 1: Preventive interventions for all adolescents

GRADE Evidence Profile Certa

inty assessment of patients Effect Certainty Importance of studies Study design Risk of biasInconsistency IndirectnessImprecisionOther considerationspsychosocial interventionstreatment as usualRelative (95% CI) Absolute (95% CI) Positive mental health Face-to-face interventions 67 randomized trials serious avery serious bnot serious serious cpublication bias strongly suspected d26069 21332 - SMD 0.257 SD higher (better; 0.097 higher to 0.416 higher)

◯◯◯ VERY LOW CRITICAL

Mental disorders (depression and anxiety) Face-to-face interventions ae48 randomizedserious serious not serious not serious none 21967 16867 - SMD 0.088 SD trials lower (better; 0.151 lower to 0.025 lower)

⨁⨁◯◯ LOW CRITICAL

Aggressive, disruptive, and oppositional behaviour Face-to-face interventions abc47 randomizedserious very serious not serious serious publication bias24275 16927 - SMD 0.294 SD dtrials strongly suspected lower (better; 0.564 lower to 0.024 lower)

◯◯◯ VERY LOW CRITICAL

(8)

WHO Guidelines on mental health promotive and preventive interventions for adolescents Certainty assessment of patients Effect Certainty Importance of studies Study design Risk of biasInconsistency IndirectnessImprecisionOther considerationspsychosocial interventionstreatment as usualRelative (95% CI) Absolute (95% CI)

Substance use Face-to-face interventions bf43 randomizednot serious very serious not seriousserious none5675646566- SMD 0.040 SD trials lower (better; 0.117 lower to 0.302 higher)

◯◯◯ VERY LOW CRITICAL Self-harm and suicide - not reported Face-to-face interventions - - - - - - - - - - - - CRITICAL

School attendance - not reported Face-to-face interventions - - - - - - - - - - - - IMPORTANT

Risky sexual and reproductive health behaviours - not reported Face-to-face interventions - - - - - - - - - - - - IMPORTANT CI: Confidence interval; SMD: Standardized mean difference. Explanations Note: Results from existing systematic reviews a. Downgrade by one for risk of bias; are as follows: over 30% of one category (outcome assessor blinding) had high risk of bias. b. Downgrade by two for inconsistency, significant and high heterogeneity. c. Downgrade by one for imprecision; 95% CI spans unimportant benefit and important benefit. d. Downgrade for asymmetrical funnel plot; publication bias suspected. e. Downgrade by one for inconsistency; significant heterogeneity more than 75%. f. Downgrade by one for imprecision; 95% CI spans unimportant benefit and important harm.

(9)

WHO Guidelines on mental health promotive and preventive interventions for adolescents Summary of Findings Table OutcomesAnticipated absolute effects* (95% CI) Relative effect (95% CI) ** of participants (studies) Certainty of the evidence (GRADE) Comments Risk with treatment as usualRisk with psychosocial interventions Positive mental health - Face-to-face interventions- SMD 0.257 SD higher (better; 0.097 higher to 0.416 higher) Approximate OR = 1.59 (1.19 to 2.12)47401 (67 RCTs) ◯◯◯ VERY LOWa,b,c,dIt is not known whether psychosocial interventions increase positive mental health when compared to treatment as usu Mental disorders (depression and anxiety) - Face-to-face interventions - SMD 0.088 SD lower (better; 0.151 lower to 0.025 lower) Approximate OR = 0.85 (0.76 to 0.96)38834 (48 RCTs) ⨁⨁◯◯ LOWa,ePsychosocial interventions may decrease mental disorders sl when compared to treatment as usual. Aggressive, disruptive, and oppositional behaviour - Face-to-face interventions- SMD 0.294 SD lower (better; 0.564 lower to 0.024 lower) Approximate OR = 0.59 (0.36 to 0.96)41202 (47 RCTs) ◯◯◯ VERY LOWa,b,c,dIt is not known whether psychosocial interventions decrease aggressive, disruptive and oppositional behaviour when com to treatment as usual. Substance use - Face-to-face interventions - SMD 0.040 SD lower (better; 0.117 lower to 0.302 higher) Approximate OR = 0.93 (0.81 to 1.73)103322 (43 RCTs) ◯◯◯ VERY LOWd,e,fIt is not known whether psychosocial interventions decrease substance use when compared to treatment as usual. Self-harm and suicide - not reported - Face- to-face interventions- - - - - School attendance - not reported - Face-to- face interventions - - - - - Risky sexual and reproductive health behaviours - not reported - Face-to-face interventions - - - - - *The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI). ** Approximate OR obtained through logarithmic transformation of SMD according to the method by Hasselblad and Hedges (1995). Where SMD is lower in the intervention group the reciprocal value of the approximation was determined. Glenton, C., et al. (2010). Presenting the Results of Cochrane Systematic Reviews to a Consumer Audience: A Qualitative Study. Medical Decision Making. DOI:10.1177/0272989X10375853 CI: Confidence interval; SMD: Standardized mean difference; OR: Odds ratio. GRADE Working Group grades of evidence High certainty: The Working Group is very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect. Moderate certainty: The Working Group’s moderately confident in the effect estimate. The true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different. Low certainty: Confidence in the effect estimate is limited. The true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect. Very low certainty: The Working Group has very little confidence in the effect estimate. The true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect. Explanations Note: Results from existing systematic reviews are as follows: a. Downgrade by one for risk of bias; over 30% of one category (outcome assessor blinding) had high risk of bias. b. Downgrade by two for inconsistency; significant and high heterogeneity. c. Downgrade by one for imprecision; 95% CI spans unimportant benefit and important benefit. d. Downgrade for asymmetrical funnel plot; publication bias suspected. e. Downgrade by one for inconsistency; significant heterogeneity more than 75%. f. Downgrade by one for imprecision; 95% CI spans unimportant benefit and important harm.

(10)

PICO 2A: Preventive interventions for adolescents exposed to violence Table of Included studies Author and year Country, territory and areaProgramme intentStudy designTotal sample (N) Age (mean, SD)Girls (%) Boys (%) Screening Used Auslander et al. (2017)USA Prevent mental disorders (depression and PTSD) and promote social problem-solving

RCT34 (n=27)14.6, 1.3 100%n/aHistory child maltreatment investigated by Child Protective Services, history of trauma causing various difficulties as determine by referring caseworker/therapist Carrion et al. (2013)USA Prevent mental disorders (depression, anxiety and PTSD)

RCT69 (n=65)11.56, 1.9091%9%Referral by trained school staff based on symptoms and impairment associated with trauma and violence exposure Danielson et al. (2012)USAPrevent mental disorders (depression, anxiety, and PTSD), promote family cohesion, and prevent risk behaviours (externalizing behaviours, substance use)

RCT3014.80, 1.5188%12%Screened for eligibility at clinic specializing in trauma O'Callaghan et al. (2013)Democratic Republic of the Congo Prevent mental disorders (depression, anxiety, and PTSD), promote prosocial behaviour, and prevent conduct problems RCT5216.02, 0.80100%n/aModified Traumatic Life Events Questionnaire to determine who had witnessed/experienced rape/sexual violence van Rosmalen- Nooijans et al. (2017)

NetherlandsPrevent mental disorders (depression and anxiety)RCT10018.55, 2.5791%9%Self-reported experience of family violence and registration on FtV homepage Stein et al. (2003)USA Prevent mental disorders (depression, anxiety, and PTSD), and prevent disruptive behaviour

RCT12610.95, 0.3556%44%Modified version of the 34- item Life Events Scale to assess exposure to violence and symptoms of PTSD Wolfe et al. (2003)USA Prevent mental disorders (internalizing problems), prevent interpersonal sensitivity, hostility, and externalizing behaviours, and promote emotional support RCT191 (n=158)15.18, 1.0950%50%Referral by Child Protection Services Maltreated youths attending special needs school in the community

PIC O 2A: P rev en tiv e in ter ven tions f or adolesc en ts e xposed t o violenc e

(11)

GRADE Evidence Profile Certainty assessment of patientsEffect Certainty Importance of studiesStudy designRisk of biasInconsistencyIndirectnessImprecisionOther considerationspsychosocial interventionstreatment as usualRelative (95% CI) Absolute (95% CI) Positive mental health 4 randomized trials very serious anot serious serious bvery serious cnone 152 115 - SMD 0.187 SD higher (better; 0.374 lower to 0.748 higher)

◯◯◯ VERY LOW CRITICAL

Mental disorders (depression and anxiety) adbc7 randomizedvery serious very serious serious very serious none 301 257 - SMD 0.339 SD trials lower (better; 1.219 lower to 0.541 higher)

◯◯◯ VERY LOW CRITICAL

Aggressive, disruptive, and oppositional behaviours adbc4 randomizedvery serious very serious serious very serious none 196 170 - SMD 0.347 SD trials lower (better; 1.575 lower to 0.881 higher)

◯◯◯ VERY LOW CRITICAL

Substance use ec1 randomizednot serious not serious very serious very serious none 15 15 - SMD 0.049 SD trials higher (worse; 0.364 lower to 0.462 higher)

◯◯◯ VERY LOW CRITICAL

Mental disorders (disorders specifically related to stress) adbc7 randomizedvery serious very serious serious very serious none 301 257 - SMD 0.002 SD trials higher (worse; 1.046 lower to 1.050 higher)

◯◯◯ VERY LOW CRITICAL

Self-harm and suicide not reported

Références

Documents relatifs

• Mental health and psychosocial support programming for survivors of conflict-related sexual violence should, as far as possible, be integrated into general health services, as

Recommendation: Voluntary medical male circumcision (VMMC) should continue to be promoted as an additional efficacious HIV prevention option within combination prevention

Their point of view was that the Quran, read by all Muslims, young and old, instructs on many of these issues within their serious legal framework, such as major ritual

The first set of costs and impacts are those most closely associated with the intervention or its impact, such as intervention costs, health benefits and health-care cost

• More research is required on the impact of psychosocial interventions that aim to: reduce mental disorders (depression and anxiety), substance use, self-harm and suicide;

Should psychosocial interventions be considered for pregnant adolescents and adolescent parents to promote positive mental health, and prevent mental disorders, self-harm and/or

Finally, the HAT toolkit provides an essential resource guide to support the implementation of a whole-of- society approach as a means to achieving the goal of ensuring that

Finally, the HAT toolkit provides an essential resource guide to support the implementation of a whole-of- society approach as a means to achieving the goal of ensuring that