• Aucun résultat trouvé

A Brexit et chimie

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "A Brexit et chimie"

Copied!
1
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

L’ACTUALITÉ CHIMIQUE N° 450 4 Avril 2020

......

......

......

......

....

Brexit et chimie

Interview of Professor Richard Catlow, Vice-President of the Royal Society

s the Royal Society is the UK’s National Academy of Sciences, do you think that Brexit will damage UK research?

Yes, there is a potential danger that Brexit could damage research in the UK and other European countries. We have been working hard with the other European Academies and Research Institutions to prevent this case. If UK stays closely associated with Horizon Europe [1], Brexit should not damage research in the UK and Europe. I am quite optimistic and our main challenge will be to be part of Horizon Europe.

Actually you have many collaborations with European Research Centers, National Academies and industries;

this will probably protect UK Science?

Today we have many bilateral or multilateral collaborations with Europe and on both sides we are eager to continue. We are currently participating in Horizon 2020 [2] and we hope to participate in Horizon Europe. I am optimistic for two reasons:

UK Government is positively disposed, and our colleagues in European Academies wish UK Science to be part of European scientific collaboration.

But no complacency, nothing is given yet and we are working hard to convince both UK and EU to keep UK participation for the advancement of Sciences.

Are all disciplines involved? What about the collaborations with industry?

Science is international across the full range of disciplines and all disciplines are involved in collaborative projects.

Obviously the funding of large facilities such as CERN, and the ESRF (European Synchrotron Radiation Facility), is already multinational. Maybe it will be more difficult to get funding for smaller bilateral and multilateral projects. If we succeed in remaining part of Horizon Europe, then the key issue will be largely solved for both bilateral or multilateral projects.

For the industry, my experience is that they want to collaborate where the expertise is but they will all want to be involved in Horizon Europe.

Still optimistic for next years?

First, to be part of the next Horizon Europe, we need to continue to work with UK and European Governments and European Science Institutions to illustrate to both sides the benefits.

We have received strong support from the French Academy of Science, the Dutch KNAW and German Leopoldina; they help us to make it clear that Brexit has to preserve scientific collaboration. We have strong support from all our collea- gues in Europe which we greatly appreciate.

To be part of Horizon Europe is our major challenge and objective.

Professor Richard CATLOW is Fellow of the Royal Society (FRS), Foreign Secretary and Vice-President of the Royal Society.

https://royalsociety.org/people/richard-catlow-11198

[1] www.horizon2020.gouv.fr/cid145004/presentation-du-programme-horizon-europe-09- 2019.html

[2] www.horizon2020.gouv.fr

Is Brexit going to damage UK science?

A

Patricia PINEAU, Rédactrice en chef.

* redac-chef@lactualitechimique.org

Références

Documents relatifs

In this paper I will investigate the relation between the affective dimension of these normative pressures and their moral dimension by arguing that an important moral

[r]

In terms of their actual influence in their chosen cities, and the de facto modes of participation of resident European citizens, there are many grounds for thinking that the

One of the blenniids (Blennius fluviatilis) occurs in European freshwater. They are therefore omitted here. species keying out together are not necessarily related

2000s - Gender equality policy - Legal instruments (soft Reconciliation as a means (anti-discrimination) law measures - gender of promoting employment, - Equal treatment

There is current little research evidence that would allow firm conclusions, but there are indications that spatial planning systems are responding to shared challenges and

The results in column 3 indicate that the cost of debt for the globally systemic banks is not necessarily influenced by the value of implicit guarantees although their level

Whether inland or on islands, it is expected that many COGENT countries will be interested in testing and scientifically evaluating these designs to allow conserving