Original article
Microbiology of pollen and bee bread :
taxonomy and enzymology of molds*
M. Gilliam, D. B. Prest B. J. Lorenz
US
Department
of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Carl Hayden Bee Research Center, 2000 E. Allen Road, Tucson, AZ 85719, USA(received 26-5-1988, accepted 18-8-1988)
Summary —
One-hundred andforty-eight
molds were isolated from thefollowing
samples of almond, Prunus dulcis,pollen :
floralpollen
collected by hand; corbicular pollen from pollen trapsplaced
on colonies of honey bees,Apis
mellifera, in the almond orchard; and bee bread stored in comb cells for one, three, and six weeks. Themajority
of molds identified were Penicillia(32%),
Mucorales (21%), and Aspergilli (17%). In
general,
the number of isolates decreased inpollen
as itwas collected and stored by the bees. Each type of
pollen sample appeared
to differ in regard tomold flora and dominant species. Aureobasidium pullulans, Penicillium corylophilum, Penicillium crustosum, and
Rhizopus nigricans
were among the molds that may have been introduced by beesduring
collection and storage ofpollen.
Mucor sp., the dominant mold in floralpollen,
was not foundin corbicular
pollen
and bee bread. Tests for 19 enzymes revealed that most of the moldsproduced caprylate esterase-lipase,
leucineaminopeptidase,
acidphosphatase, phosphoamidase, B-glucosi-
dase, andMacetyl-B-glucosaminidase.
Thus, enzymes involved in lipid,protein
and carbohydratemetabolism were produced by pollen molds. Molds could also contribute
organic
acids, antibiotics and other metabolites.pollen
- bee bread - moldsRésumé —
Microbiologie
du pollen et dupain
d’abeilles : taxonomie etenzymologie
des moi-sissures. A l’aide de divers milieux microbiologiques possédant des pH différents, on a isolé 148 moisissures des échantillons suivants de
pollen
d’amandier, Prunus dulcis :pollen
de fleurs récolté à la main;pollen
enpelotes prélevé
dans les trappes àpollen posées
sur des colonies d’abeilles(Apis mellifica)
dans un verger d’amandiers; etpain
d’abeilles stocké dans les cellules des rayons durant une, 3 et 6 semaines. Lamajorité
des moisissures identifiées sont des Penicillia (32%), desMucorales (21 %) et des
Aspergillia
(17%). C’est le pollen de fleurs qui est le plus riche en isolats, mais le plus pauvre en espèces. En général le nombre d’isolats diminue dans le pollenquand
il estrécolté et stocké par les abeilles.
Chaque
type d’échantillonpollinique
semble différer des autres par la flore de moisissures et les espèces dominantes. Puisque les moisissures sont identifiéesd’après
les besoins de croissance et la caractérisationmicroscopique
etmacroscopique
des struc-tures
morphologiques,
les données biochimiques ne proviennent pas des teststaxonomiques.
On a*Mention of a trademark, proprietary
product,
or vendor does not constitute a guarantee or warrantyby
the USDA and does notimply
its approval to the exclusion of otherproducts
or vendors that may also be suitable.donc
analysé
19 enzymes chez 78 isolats,représentant
28 espèces, par le système API ZYM.Aucune moisissure ne
produit
detrypsine,
de8-glucuronidase,
ni de a-mannosidase. Laplupart
des moisissures produisent de la
caprylate lipase-estérase,
de la leucine aminopeptidase, de la phosphatase acide, de laphosphoamidase,
de la8-glucosidase
et de laN-acétyle-l3-glucosamini-
dase. Les moisissures du
pollen produisent
donc des enzymes impliqués dans le métabolisme desprotéines,
deslipides
et des glucides.Ces résultats
suggèrent
que la flore de moisissures dupollen
enpelotes
et dupain
d’abeilles peut résulter d’inoculations microbiennes par les abeilles et de modificationschimiques
du pollendues aux substances ajoutées par les abeilles lors de la
régurgitation
du contenu dujabot
et à lafermentation microbienne, qui permet à certaines espèces de survivre et à d’autres pas. Même si, dans nos échantillons, les moisissures étaient
plus
nombreuses que lesespèces
de Bacillus et les levures, le pollen est rarement envahi par elles. Parcequ’elles
sontsusceptibles
de fournir des enzymes, des acidesorganiques,
desantibiotiques
et d’autres métabolites, les moisissures méri- tent des étudesplus approfondies.
pollen
-pain
d abeilles - moisissuresZusammenfassung — Mikrobiologie
von Pollen und Bienenbrot : Taxonomie undEnzymolo-
gie des Schimmels. UnterVerwendung
verschiedenermikrobiologischer
Medien mit unterschied- lichempH-Wert
wurden 148Schimmelpilze
von denfolgenden
Proben vonMandelpollen (Prunus
dulcis) untersucht :Blütenpollen
(von Hand gesammelt), Pollenhöschen (aus Pollenfallen an Bie- nenvölkern[Apis mellifera]
imMandelbaumgarten)
und Bienenbrot, das 1, 3 und 6 Wochen in derWabe gespeichert war.
Die am
häufigsten
auftretendenSchimmelpilze
waren Penicillia (32%), Mucorales (21 °l) und Aspergilli (17%). DerBlütenpollen
lieferte die meisten Isolate, aber die wenigsten Arten. Im all-gemeinen nahm die Anzahl der lsolate im Pollen mit dem Sammeln und
Speichern
durch die Biene ab. JederPollentyp
schien im Hinblick auf die Schimmelflora und die dominierenden Arten ver-schieden zu sein.
Da die
Schimmelpilze aufgrund
ihrer Wachstumserfordernisse sowiemikrosltopischer
wiemakroskopischer Charakterisierung
vonmorphologischen
Strukturen identifiziert werden, erhältman von taxonomischen
Untersuchungen
keine biochemischen Daten. Daher wurden 78 Isolate, die 28 Artenrepräsentieren,
mit dem API ZYM-System auf 19Enzyme
analysiert. Kein Schimmel-pilze produzierte
Trypsin, β-Glucuronidase oder a-Mannosidase. Die meisten Schimmelpilze produ-zierten
Caprylat-Esterase-Lipase, Leucin-Aminopeptidase,
saurePhosphatase, Phosphoamidase,
β-Glucosidase und
N-Acetyl-β-Glucosaminidase.
Dies bedeutet, daß die untersuchten Pollen- schimmel Enzyme des Protein-, Fett- undKohlehydratstoflwechsels produzieren.
Diese
Ergebnisse
deuten darauf hin, daß die Schimmelflora imHöselpollen
und im Bienenbrot einErgebnis folgender
Einflüsse ist : mikrobielle Inokulation und chemischeVeränderung
des Pol-lens durch
Zugabe
vonHonigmageninhalt
durch die Biene; Drüsensekretion sowie mikrobielle Fer- menta6on, die manche Schimmelarten tolerieren, andere nicht. ObwohlSchimmelpilze
in unserenProben weit zahlreicher waren als Bacillus spp. oder Hefen, wurde der Pollen selten von Schimmel überwachsen. Die
Schimmelpilze
sollten als potentielleSpender
von Enzymen,organischen
Säu-ren, Antibiotika und anderer Metabolite intensiver untersucht werden.
Pollen - Dienenbrot - Schimmel
Introduction
Studies have shown for many years that
pollen
and beebread,
that ispollen
storedin comb cells of the
hive,
differ biochemi-cally,
and extensiveanalyses
have beenconducted on various floral and bee-col- lected
(corbicular) pollens.
The conver-sion of
pollen
to bee bread has often beenpostulated
to be the result of microbialaction, principally
a lactic acid fermenta- tion causedby
bacteria andyeasts
(Foote,
1957;Haydak, 1958).
However,the chemical and biochemical
changes occurring
inpollen
as it is collected and storedby honey bees, Apis mellifera,
arenot
clearly understood,
andrelatively
littleis known about the
microbiology
ofpollen
and bee bread.
To better understand the nutrition of
honey bees,
we studied thechemical,
bio-chemical,
andmicrobiological composition
of
pollen
from asingle plant species
be-fore, during,
and afterstorage
in comb cells. Previous papers on thesubject by
researchers at the Carl
Hayden
Bee Research Center reviewed earlier work andreported
resultsconcerning yeasts (Gilliam, 1979a);
Bacillus ssp.(Gilliam, 1979b); fatty acids, sterols, vitamins,
titra- tableacidity,
minerals(Loper et al., 1980);
and
protein
content, aminoacids,
selected enzymes,pH,
and10-hydroxy-!2-deca-
noic acid
(Standifer et al., 1980).
In all thiswork,
the samesamples
ofalmond,
Pru-nus dulcis
(Prunus communis), pollen
were utilized.
Even
though
molds arewidely
knownfor their abilities to
degrade
and tosynthe-
size numerous
compounds including
theproduction
of many materialsimportant
tothe
drug,
food and chemicalindustries, they
have received scant attention inapi-
cultural research concerned with
pollen
and bee bread.
Early mycological
re-search
recognized
that certain molds arecommon
saprophytes
on and insidehoney
bees and broodcombs,
but effortswere concentrated on dead
bees; combs, particularly
from dead colonies; andmoldy pollen (Betts, 1912; Burnside, 1927).
Betts
(1912) reported
aspecies
of Clado-sporium
as well as Mucor erectus in corbi-cular
pollen
and Beftsiaalvei,
Eremascusfertilis, Gymnoascus
setosus,Oospora favorum,
and Penicillium crustaceum inpollen
stored in combs. She noted thathoney appeared
to be immune to attacksof molds. Burnside
(1927)
stated that most of thefungi
collectedby widespread
foraging
ofhoney
bees areprobably
unable to become established within the bee or the hive. He found that Penicillia
were the most common molds within the
hive, Aspergilli
occurred lessfrequently,
and
species
of Mucor did not grow well on brood combs.Fungus-caused spoilage
ofprovisions
and
mortality
ofhoney
bees are rare(Batra et aL, 1973). Recently
Gilliam andVandenberg (1988)
reviewed the literatureon
fungi pathogenic
or detrimental tohoney
bees.Only Ascosphaera apis
which causes chalkbrood disease inhoney
bees is of economicimportance.
The
pollen mold,
Bettsiaalvei,
is not a seriousproblem
since it does not grow well in cells that are filled withpollen
andfinished with a
layer
ofhoney
ontop (Skou, 1972).
Burri
(1947)
stated thatpollen
is germ- free in blossoms that have notopened
aswell as in
opened
blossoms if uncontami-nated
by
insect visitation or air currents.Neither of the two
microbiological
studiesof
pollen
and bee bread(Chevtchik,
1950;Pain and
Maugenet, 1966)
gave data onmolds, although
Chevtchik(1950)
men-tioned B. alvei as a
possible
consumer oflactic acid in bee bread.
Arizan et al.
(1967)
isolated Absidia ramnosa,Aspergillus flavus, Aspergillus fumigatus, Aspergillus niger, Aspergillus
terreus,Aspergillus versicolor,
Mucormucedo,
Penicilliumclavigerum,
Penicil-lium purpurogenum,
Rhizopus nigricans
and Trichothecium roseum from Indiancorn
pollen
collectedby
machine.Sainger
et aL
(1978) reported
that Altemaria alternata was the most common isolate inpollen
from 3 herbaceous annualplants.
Other molds isolated were
Aspergillus flavus, Aspergillus luchuensis, Aspergil-
lus
nidulans, Aspergillus sulphureus,
A.versicolor, Cladosporium
oxysporum,Epicoccum
purpurascens, Fusarium oxy-sporum, Monilia
fructigena,
Monilia sito-phila,
Monilia sp.,Rhizopus
sp., R.nigri-
cans and Trichoderma viride. Molds isola- ted from bee bread
by Egorova (1971)
were A.
flavus,
A.versicolor,
Mucoralboalter,
Penicilliumgranulatum,
Penicil-lium solitum and
Sporotrichum
olivecum.The
present
paperreports
the results of the isolation and identification of molds from almond floralpollen,
corbicularpol- len,
and bee bread stored in combcells;
analyses
of enzymesproduced by
select-ed
isolates;
andcomparison
ofspecies
isolated with those
previously reported
from
honey
bees in Arizona.Materials and Methods
Details concerning bee colonies and collect- ions of
pollen
and bee bread aregiven by
Gil-liam
(1979a), Loper
etal. (1980), and Standifer et al. (1980). Thefollowing samples
of almond pollen were examined : fresh floral pollen col-lected by hand; corbicular pollen containing
99.8% almond pollen from
pollen
traps placedon bee colonies in the almond orchard; and bee bread stored in cells for 1, 3, and 6 weeks in newly drawn combs of colonies of bees maintained in a greenhouse. Each
sample
wasdivided into 4
sub-samples
ofapproximately
0.75 g each. Then each of the 4
sub-samples
was homogenized by hand in 2.5 ml of sterile
0.85% NaCi in a glass tissue
grinder.
The homogenates wereplated
(0.1 ml) in duplicateon acidified yeast extract-malt extract agar containing 1% glucose,
pH
3.7—3.8 (Miller e t al., 1976);mycological
agar with lowpH
(Difco,pH
4.8); nutrient agar (Difco) acidified with 0.1 N HCI to pH 5.0; and eugon agar (Difco,pH
7.0). One plate from each sub-sample wasincubated at 25°C and one at 37°C. All were
incubated under aerobic conditions except eugon agar plates which were placed in 4%
C0 2
. During
a 2-week incubation period, plateswere examined
periodically
for moldgrowth.
When molds
appeared,
they were trans-ferred to plates of
Czapek
solution agar or malt extract agar (Difco) to allow time forsporulation
and to test for purity. These
plates
were incu-bated at 25°C under aerobic conditions. Pure
cultures of isolates were
lyophilized
for preser- vation until tests were conducted. Molds were tested and identifiedaccording
toNeergaard
(1945), DeVries (1952), Cooke (1959), Ames (1961), Booth (1961), Morton and Smith (1963),Ellis (1965), Raper and Fennell (1965),
Raper
and Thom (1968),
Zycha
et al. (1969), Kendrickand Carmichael (1973), Samson (1974), von
Arx (1975) and McGinnis et al. (1986).
Since molds, in contrast to bacteria and
yeasts, are identified on the basis of
growth requirements
andmicroscopic
and macroscop- ic characterization ofmorphological
structures, biochemical data do not result from tests for identification. Therefore, selected isolates weretested for 19 enzymes with the API ZYM sys- tem (Analytab Products)
using
the methods ofBridge
and Hawksworth (1984).Suspensions
of some isolates such as
Mucorssp.
and Alter-naria tenuis were sonicated for 1—10 min to
separate
fungal
spores before inoculation into the API ZYMstrips.
Also, malt extract agar and/or potato dextrose agar (Difco) were usedto prepare inocula of some cultures when
growth appeared to be less than optimal on
Czapek
solution agar.Results
No
attempt
was made to determine whe- ther spores ormycelial
elements wereisolated from
pollen
and bee bread. How- ever, molds were isolated on all 4 media used(Table I). Seventy-seven percent
of the isolates were from media incubated at25°C,
and 23% were from media at 37°C which is near the brood nesttemperature
of 34°C(Dunham, 1929). However,
theoptimum temperatures
for mostfungi
arein the range of 20-30°C
(Alexopoulos, 1962).
Isolations from floralpollen
increased with
decreasing pH
of themedia. In contrast, the
highest percent
of isolations from corbicularpollen
from thepollen trap
was on acidified nutrient agar with apH
of 5.0. Few isolations weremade from floral or corbicular
pollen
oneugon agar with a
pH
of 7.0, but thissituation
changed
with bee bread. Thepercent
of isolations on various mediawas similar in bee bread
samples
storedfor one week and for 3 weeks. These results indicate that a
variety
of mediawith different chemical
compositions
andpH
values incubated at both 25°C and 37°Caerobically
and underC0 2
shouldbe used for
determining mycoflora
ofpol-
len and bee bread.
One-hundred
forty-eight
molds wereisolated from
pollen
and beebread,
ofwhich 139 were identified
(Table II).
Over-all,
themajority
of molds identified werePenicillia
(32%),
Mucorales(21%),
andAspergilli (17%).
Floralpollen yielded
the
highest
number of isolates but the smallest number ofspecies.
In contrast, bee bread stored in comb cells for 3 weeks had the fewest isolates but thegreatest
number of differentspecies.
Ingeneral,
the number of isolates decreased inpollen
as it was collected and storedby
bees.
The most
frequent
isolate was Mucorsp., associated
exclusively
with floralpol-
len. All 19 isolates
appeared similar,
butspecies
identification was not made.They
were characterized
by
theproduction
ofcoenocytic mycelium,
somesympodially
branched
sporangiophores containing
gemmae
(chlamydospores)
andyellow globules, globose sporangia
withfinely spinose walls,
columella with a distinctcollarette,
andelliptical
smoothsporangio-
spores. The other molds identified from floral
pollen
were found in at least oneadditional
pollen
source.The second most
frequently
isolatedmold was Penicillium
corylophilum.
It wasassociated with corbicular
pollen
and allbee bread sources but not with floral
pol-
len. This was also the case for R.
nigri-
cans. Other
species
which firstappeared
in corbicular
pollen
and were then foundin bee bread were Aureobasidium
pullu- lans, Cladosporium herbarum,
Penicil-lium
chrysogenum,
and Penicillium crus- tosum.Aspergillus niger
was afrequent
isolate and was found in all
types
ofpollen samples except
bee bread stored for oneweek and was isolated most often from bee bread stored for 6 weeks. Another
frequently
encountered mold was Penicil- liumcyclopium
which was most abundant in bee bread stored for one week and wasfound in all
sample types except
corbicu-lar
pollen. Cladosporium cladosporioides
was the
only species
isolated from allsample types
but was mostprevalent
infloral
pollen.
Molds isolated from morethan one source of bee bread but not flo- ral or corbicular
pollen
wereAspergillus amstelodami,
A. flavus, and Paecilo- myces varioti. Alternaria tenuis was found in floralpollen
and bee bread stored forone
week,
and Penicilliumbrevi-compac-
tum was in floral and corbicular
pollen
butnot bee bread. Other than Chaetomium elatum which was found in bee bread stored for 6
weeks,
theremaining species
that were identifiedappeared
once inonly
one
type
ofpollen
source other than floralpollen. Thus,
eachtype
ofpollen sample appeared
to differ inregard
to mold floraand dominant
species
since thepredom-
inant mold in almond floral
pollen
wasMucor sp.;
in corbicularpollen,
P.corylo- philum
and P. crustosum were most com-mon; in bee bread stored in comb cells for
one
week,
P.cyclopium
and P.corylophi-
lum were the most numerous
isolates;
inbee bread stored for 3
weeks,
there wasno obvious dominant
species;
and in beebread stored for 6
weeks,
A.niger
wasmost common.
Eight
unidentified molds in Table 11 were non-viable afterlyophilization.
Wewere also unable to
assign
the unidenti-fied
Ascomycete
to genus. Itproduced
ostiolate dark ascocarps with unbranched terminal hairs. The asci were
cylindrical
and contained 4 ascospores.
Ascospores
were
ellipsoidal
toovoid, smooth,
non-apiculate,
andyellow-brown
to brown.Since it was difficult to determine
by light microscopy
whether the ascospores weresingle
ordouble-pored, scanning
electronmicroscopy
was used to reveal that themajority
weresingle-pored, although double-pored
ascospores were also pres- ent.To determine
enzymatic activity
of themolds from
pollen
and beebread, attempts
were made to test at least onestrain of each
species
and more strains ofthe
species frequently
isolated.However, Cladosporium sphaerospermum
did notsurvive
lyophilization
after identification and could not be tested.Thus,
78 isolatesrepresenting
28species
were each anal-yzed
for 19 enzymes. A total of 113 com-plete
tests were conductedowing
torepli-
cation of tests, use of additional media for
preparing
the inocula of strains which did not grow well onCzapek
solution agar,duplicate
tests which were incubated aslong
as 24h,
and testscomparing
enzy-mology
of spore andmycelial
inocula ofselected strains.
Aspergillus
amsteloda-mi,
Chaetomidiumpilosum,
Chaetomiumelatum,
Thielaviasepedonium, Xylohy- pha bantiana,
and the unidentified Asco-mycete
failed to grow wellenough
onCzapek
solution agar toyield
sufficientinocula for API ZYM tests and were there- fore grown on
potato
dextrose agar and malt extract agar and then tested for enzymes. Other selectedspecies
werealso grown on various
media,
and theenzymology
wascompared
to inoculafrom
Czapek
solution agar. Results of tests on inocula of the same strain pre-pared
on different media gave the same results except that the concentrations ofone or two of the enzymes
produced
werein a few cases
slightly higher
when thegrowth
medium waspotato
dextrose agarcompared
to malt extract agar. These dif- ferences could be related toimproved growth
of the molds and/or to the mediacomposition. Bridge
and Hawksworth(1984)
also found some minor variations with different media. We also noted a few similar minor variations when the incuba- tion time was extended for 24 h for strains of R.nigricans. Mycelial
inoculaproduced
the same enzymes as spore
suspensions, although
in smallerquantities.
Results of
enzymatic
activities basedon identities of the isolates
regardless
ofthe
pollen
source are shown in TablesIII-VI. All 40 Penicillia tested
produced
leucine
aminopeptidase,
acidphosphata-
se,
phosphoamidase,
andf3-glucosidase;
none
produced cystine aminopeptidase, trypsin, a-galactosidase, f3-glucuronidase,
or a-mannosidase
(Table 111).
Most alsoproduced
alkalinephosphatase, caprylate esterase-lipase,
andN-acetyl-B-glucos-
aminidase.
Enzymes produced by
Penicil-lia in the
highest
concentrations(>
20nmol)
were acidphosphatase by
P. cory-lophilum, N acetyl-f3-glucosaminidase by
P.
cyclopium,
andf3-glucosidase by
P.crustosum.
All
Aspergilli
testedproduced
acidphosphatase, phosphoamidase, B-gluco- sidase,
andN acetyl-f3-glucosaminidase;
none
produced myristate lipase, trypsin, chymotrypsin, f3-glucuronidase,
a-manno-sidase,
or a-fucosidase(Table IV).
Mostalso
produced
alkalinephosphatase, buty-
rate esterase,
caprylate esterase—lipase,
and leucine
aminopeptidase.
One of theA. flavus strains tested was var. columna- ris and gave the same reactions as strains identified as A. flavus.
Enzymes produced
in the
highest
concentrations(>
20nmol) by Aspergilli
wereN-acetyl-B-glucosamini-
dase and
fi-glucosidase by
A.niger,
alka-line
phosphatase by
A.flavus,
andalkaline and acid
phosphatases
and B-glucosidase by
A. versicolor.All Murocales tested
produced
leucineaminopeptidase,
and mostproduced
acid
phosphatase
andphosphoamidase (Table V).
Otherwise these molds pro- duced few enzymes. Theonly
enzymesproduced
inhigh
concentrations(>
20nanomoles)
werephosphoamidase by
allstrains of R.
nigricans tested,
acidphos- phatase by
3 of the 4 R.nigricans strains,
and leucine
aminopeptidase by
Mucorracemosus.
Of the other molds
tested,
most pro- duced acidphosphatase
andf3-glucosida-
se
(Table VI).
Alkalinephosphastase, butyrate
esterase,caprylate
esterase—lipase,
leucineaminopeptidase,
andphosphoamidase
wereproduced by
52—67% of them.
Enzymes produced
inthe
highest
concentrations(>
20nmol) by
various molds are as follows : alkalinephosphatase by
Aur.pullulans
from one-week bee
bread; caprylate esterase—lip—
ase
by
C. herbarum from corbicularpollen
andby
C.cladosporioides;
leucine amino-peptidase by
Aur.pullulans
andPeyrone-
lia sp.; acid
phosphatase by
Alt.tenuis,
Arthriniumphaeospermum,
Aur.pullu- lans,
C.cladosporioides,
C.herbarum, Peyronelia
sp.,Scytalidium
sp., and X.bantiana; phosphoamidase by
X. bantia- na;a-galactosidase by
Aur.pullulans
fromone-week bee bread and
by
C.cladospo-
rioides from corbicular
pollen; B-glucosi-
dase
by
Alt. tenuis and T.sepedonium
and
by
C.cladosporioides
from 6-week beebread;
and a-fucosidaseby
C. cla-dosporioides
from floral and corbicularpollen.
Enzymology
of the 78 molds tested ispresented
in Table Vil on the basis of thepollen
sources of the isolates. No moldsproduced trypsin, f3-glucuronidase,
or a-mannosidase. Few
produced myristate lipase,
andonly
oneproduced chymotryp- sin;
these isolates were from corbicularpollen.
Valineaminopeptidase
andcystine aminopeptidase
were notproduced by
isolates from 3-week bee
bread,
nor wasthe latter enzyme
produced by
molds fromcorbicular or 6-week bee bread. Few molds from other
pollen
sourcesproduced
these two
peptidases.
Of theglycos i dases, a-glucosidase
and a-fucosidast.were not associated with molds from either 3-week or 6-week bee bread and
were
produced by
few isolates from otherpollen
sources. Both a- andB-galactosi-
dases were
produced by
ahigher percent
of molds tested from floral
pollen
thanfrom other
pollen
sources. No molds from corbicularpollen produced B-galactosi-
dase.
However,
most molds from allpollen
sources
produced caprylate
esterase-lipase,
leucineaminopeptidase,
acidphosphatase, phosphoamidase, B-gluco- sidase,
andN acetyl-f3-glucosamidase.
Ahigh percent
of the isolates(> 50%)
fromall sources gave
positive
reactions for alkalinephosphatase.
This was also thecase with
butyrate
esteraseexcept
for those molds from one-week bee bread.Therefore, pollen
moldsproduced
enzymes involved in
protein, lipid,
andcarbohydrate
metabolism.Discussion
Seventy percent
of the molds identified from almondpollen
and bee bread wereAspergilli, Mucorales,
and Penicillia. We havepreviously
isolated fromapiarian
sources in Arizona most of the
species
ofAspergilli
and Penicillia found inpollen
and bee bread as well as Aur.
pullulans,
C.
claedosporioides, Mucorales,
andPeyronelia
sp.(Gilliam
andPrest,
1972,1977, 1987;
Gilliam etal.,
1974, 1977,1988). Frequent
isolates in thepresent study
which are new records of moldsfrom
apiarian
sources in Arizona areAlt.
tenuis,
Penicillium crustosum, and R.nigricans.
Molds which were not
present
in floralpollen
but werefrequent
isolates from cor-bicular
pollen
and bee bread may have been introducedby
the beesduring
col-lection and
storage.
The most obviousexamples
are Aur.pullulans,
P.corylophi-
lum,
P. crustosum, and R.nigricans.
Conversely, Mucor sp.,
the dominant mold in floralpollen,
was eliminated in corbic- ularpollen
and bee bread.Thus,
as withyeasts (Gilliam, 1979a)
and Bacillus ssp.(Gilliam, 1979b),
the mold flora of corbic- ularpollen
and bee bread may be the result of microbial inoculationsby
beesand chemical
changes
inpollen resulting
from additions
by
bees fromregurgitation
of
honey
sac contents and secretions ofglands
as well as microbial fermentation which allow somespecies
but not othersto survive. Even
though
molds were morenumerous than
yeasts
or Bacillus ssp. inour
samples, pollen
israrely
overgrownby
molds. Potential microbial
spoilage
ofpol-
len
provisions
may be controlledby
anti-biotic substances
produced by
the normalmicroflora, bees, pollen,
and/orhoney.
Klungness
andPeng (1983)
examinedcorbicular
pollen
and bee bread withscanning
electronmicroscopy
and foundno visible evidence of
digestion
or dam-age to
pollen grain
walls.They
concludedthat
microorganisms
associated with bee bread do not cause destruction ofpollen
intine or the
cytoplasm,
that substances bees add topollen during
collection andstorage
function as apreservative,
andthat the
regurgitation added
topollen probably
allowsgrowth
of some microor-ganisms
and inhibits thegrowth
of others.They
observed that the fewfungal
spores thatgerminated produced hyphae
less than 10 pm inlength.
If
microorganisms
areresponsible
forfermentation and the
accompanying
chemical
changes
ofpollen
stored incomb cells
by honey bees,
the molds may be acomponent
of therequired
microbialcomplement. They
could contribute anti- biotics,organic
acids and enzymes, pro- ducts for whichthey
are utilized industrial-ly.
Thesecompounds
may limit thegrowth
of deleterious
microorganisms
andprovi-
de enzymes for utilization of nutrients.
Indeed,
we have foundAspergilli,
Muco-rales, Penicillia,
and other molds in bee bread andguts
of worker bees which in- hibit thegrowth
of the chalkbroodfungus (Gilliam
etaL, 1988).
Enzymology
of our isolates revealed that themajor phosphatase
was acidphosphatase, although
alkalinephospha-
tase was
produced by
most isolatesexcept
the Mucorales. Moldsapparently
are not able to
participate
in the initialbreakdown of
long-chain fatty
acids asevidenced
by
the lack ofmyristate lipase.
However, they
didproduce butyrate
es-rase and
caprylate esterase—lipase
which act on shorter chain
fatty
acids.Leucine
aminopeptidase
was themajor aminopeptidase.
Molds did notproduce trypsin
orchymotrypsin. Phosphoamida-
se was
produced by
most isolates tested.Results for
glycosidases
revealed that Mucorales werequite
unreactive. How-ever, most other molds
produced B-gluco-
sidase which
hydrolyzes carbohydrates
such as
cellobiose, salicin, amygdalin,
and
gentibiose. N Acetyl-f3-glucosamini-
dase was also
produced by
most molds.This enzyme is involved in
hydrolysis
ofchitin. f3-Galactosidase which
hydrolyzes
lactose and
a-glucosidase
whichhydro- lyzes
sucrose,maltose, trehalose,
and melizitose were notproduced by
most ofthe molds.
In summary, molds as normal micro- flora in
pollen
and bee bread have recei- ved little attention.However,
our results indicate that becausethey represented
38% of the total
number
ofmicroorga-
nisms we isolated
(Gilliam, unpublished data), produced
avariety
of enzymes, andare well known for
production
of seconda- ry metabolites such asantibiotics, pheno-
lic
compounds, terpenes,
steroids, andpolysaccharides
as well as enzymes,they
merit more intensive
study.
Even if moldspores that
germinate
in corbicularpollen
and bee bread
produce
shorthyphae (Klungness
andPeng, 1983),
our resultswith selected isolates of various genera confirmed those with Penicillia
by Bridge
and Hawksworth
(1984)
thatmycelia
ino-cula
produce
th, same enzymes,although
in reduced amounts, as sporesuspensions
of the same strain. With thispublication
and those onyeasts (Gilliam, 1979a)
andBacillus ssp. (Gilliam, 1979b),
we have now
reported
77% of the total isolates from our almondpollen
and beebread
samples.
Theremaining microorga-
nisms will be described in a future
publi-
cation.
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. L.N. Standifer of the Carl
Hayden
Bee Research Center for the
pollen samples,
Dr. James T Sinski of the University of Arizona
for providing
scanning
electronmicroscopy
andconsultation on the unidentified
Ascomycete,
and Drs. E.W. Herbert Jr., D.R. Jimenez, and J.D. Vandenberg for reviewing the
manuscript.
References
Alexopoulos
C.J. (1962) Introductory Myco-logy.
John Wiley and Sons, New YorkAmes L.M. (1961) A
monograph
of the Chaeto- miaceae. US Army Res. Div. Ser. No. 2Arizan D., Popa A., Mitroiu P., Toma C., Serban M., Crisan 1. & Dobre V. (1967) Conservation du
pollen
par des radiations ionisantes. Bull.Apicole
10, 43-50Batra L.R., Batra S.W.T. & Bohart G.E. (1973)
The mycoflora of domesticated and wild bees
(Apoidea). Mycopathol.
Myco/.Appl.
49, 13-44Betts A.D. (1912) The
fungi
of the beehive. J.Econ. Biol. 7, 129-162
Booth C. (1961) Studies of Pyrenomycetes. Vi.
Thielavia, with notes on some allied genera.
Mycological
Papers, No. 83, CommonwealthMycological
Institute, Kew, EnglandBridge
P.D. & Hawksworth D.L. (1984) The APIZYM enzyme
testing
system as an aid to the rapid identification of Penicillium isolates.Microbiol. Sci. 1, 232-234
Burnside C.E. (1927)
Saprophytic fungi
asso-ciated with the honey bee. Mic;1. Acad. Sci. 8,
59-86
Burri R.
(1947)
DieBeziehungen
der Bakterienzum Lebenszyklus der Honigbiene. Schweiz.
Bienen-Ztg.
70, 273-276Chevtchik V. (1950)
Mikrobiologie pylov6ho
kvaseni. Publ. Fac. Sci. Univ. Masaryk 323, 103-130
Cooke W.B. (1959) An ecological life history of
Aureobasidium pullulans (deBary) Arnaud.
Mycopathologia
12, 1-45DeVries G.A. (1952) Contribution to the Know-
lege of the Genus Cladosporium Link ex Fr.
Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures, Baarn, The Netherlands
Dunham W.E. (1929) The relation of external
temperature on the hive temperature during the
summer. J. Econ. Entomol. 22, 798-801
Egorova
A.I.(1971)
Preservative microflora in storedpollen.
Veterinariya 8, 40-41Ellis M.B. (1965) Dematiaceous
Hyphomy-
cetes. Vi. Mycological
Papers,
No. 103, Com-monwealth
Mycological
Institute, Kew,England
Foote H.L. (1957) Possible use of
microorga-
nisms in synthetic bee bread
production.
Am.Bee J. 97, 476-478
Gilliam M. (1979a)
Microbiology
ofpollen
andbee bread : the yeasts.
Apidologie
10, 43-53 Gilliam M. (1979b)Microbiology
ofpollen
andbee bread : the genus Bacillus. Apidologie 10, 269-274
Gilliam M. & Prest D.B.
(1972) Fungi
isolatedfrom the intestinal contents of
foraging
worker honey bees, Apis mellifera. J. Invertebr.Pathol. 20, 101-103
Gilliam M. & Prest D.B. (1977) The
mycoflora
of selected organs of queen honey bees,
Apis
mellifera. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 29, 235-237 Gilliam M. & Prest D.B.
(1987)
Microbiology offeces of the larval honey bee,
Apis
mellifera. J.lnvertebr. PathoG 49, 70-75
Gilliam M. &
Vandenberg
J.D.(1988) Fungi.
In: Honey Bee Pests, Predators, and Diseases
(R.A. Morse and R. Nowogrodzki eds.), Comell
University
Press, Ithaca, New York (inpress)
Gilliam M., Prest D.B. & Morton H.L. (1974)
Fungi
isolated from honey bees, Apis mellife-ra, fed 2, 4-D and antibiotics. J. Invertebr.
Pathol. 24, 213-217 7
Gilliam M., Taber S. III, Lorenz B.J. & Prest D.B. (1988) Factors affecting
development
ofchalkbrood disease in colonies of honey bees, Apis mellifera, fed pollen contaminated with
Ascosphaera
apis. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 52, 314-325Gilliam M., Morton H.L., Prest D.B., Martin R.D.
& Wickerham L.J. (1977) The mycoflora of
adult worker
honey
bees, Apis mellifera : effects of 2, 4, 5-T andcaging
of bee colonies.J. Invertebr. PathoL 30, 50-54
Haydak M.H. (1958)
Pollen—pollen
substi-tutes—bee bread. Am. Bee J. 98, 145-146 Kendrick W.B. & Carmichael J.W. (1973)
Hyphomycetes.
In : TheFungi (G.C.
Ainsworth, F.K.Sparrow
and A.E. Sussman, eds.), Acade-mic Press, New York, Vol. IVA, pp. 323-509
Klungness L.M. & Peng Y. (1983) A scanning
electron
microscopic
study ofpollen
loads col-lected and stored by honeybees. J.
Apic.
Res.22, 264-271
Loper G.M., Standifer L.N.,
Thompson
M.J. &Gilliam M.
(1980) Biochemistry
and microbiolo- gy of bee-collected almond (Prunus dulcis)pol-
len and bee bread. Apidologie 11, 63-73 McGinnis M.R., Borelli D., Padhye A.A. & Ajello
L. (1986) Reclassification of
Cladosporium
bantianum in the genus
Xylohypha.
J. Clin.Microbiol. 23, 1148-1151
Miller M.W., Phaff H.J., Miranda M., Heed W.B.
& Starmer W.T. (1976) Torulopsis sonorensis, a new
species
of the genusTorulopsis.
Int J.Syst.
Bacteriol. 26, 88-91Morton F.W. & Smith J. (1963) The genera
Scopulariopsis
Banier, Microascus Zukal andDoratomyces
Corda.Mycological Papers,
No.86, Commonwealth
Mycological
Institute, Kew, EnglandNeergaard
P.(1945)
DanishSpecies
of Alter-naria and
Stemphylium. Taxonomy,
Parasitismand Economic Significance. Einar Munksgaard, Copenhagen
Pain J. & Maugenet J. (1966) Recherches bio-
chimiques
etphysiologiques
sur lepollen
emmagasind par les abeilles. Ann. Abeille 9, 209-236Raper K.B. & Fennell D.I. (1965) The Genus Aspergillus. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore
Raper K.B. & Thom C. (1968) A Manual of the Penicillia. Hafner, New York
Sainger
J.K.,Garg
A.P. & Sharma P.D. (1978)Mycoflora
of somepollen grains.
Acta Botan.Indica 6, 165-168
Samson R.A. (1974) Paecilomyces and some
allied Hyphomycetes. Studies in Mycology, No.
6, Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures, Baarn, The Netherlands
Skou J.P. (1972)
Ascosphaerales.
Fiesia 10,1-24
Standifer L.N.,
McCaughey
W.F., Dixon S.E., Gilliam M. &Loper
G.M.(1980)
Biochemistryand microbiology of pollen collected by honey
bees (Apis mellifera L.) from almond, Prunis
dulcis. 11. Protein, amino acids and enzymes.
Apidologie
11, 163-171 1von Arx J.A. (1975) On Thielavia and some
similar genera of Ascomycetes. Studies in Mycology, No. 8, Centraalbureau voor Schim- melcultures, Baarn, The Netherlands
Zycha H.,
Siepmann
R. & Linnemann G. (1969)Mucorales. J. Cramer, Lehre, Germany