• Aucun résultat trouvé

Role of Innovation System in Coffee Agroforestry System to Adapt to Climate Change in Kenyan Coffee and Dairy Sectors

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Role of Innovation System in Coffee Agroforestry System to Adapt to Climate Change in Kenyan Coffee and Dairy Sectors"

Copied!
18
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Role of Innovation System in Coffee Agroforestry

System to Adapt to Climate Change in Kenyan Coffee

and Dairy Sectors

Presenter:

Kinfe ASAYEHEGN

Co-authors:

Ludovic TEMPLE, Cirad UMR Innovation Ana IGLESIAS,

(2)
(3)

Presentation Plan

Introduction

Area of the Study

Data and Methods

Results and Discussion

Conclusions

(4)

Why to adapt to climate change

The IPCC biophysical and socio-ecological working groups

and other researchers confirmed that climate change is a

reality.

An increase in global food demand: demand for cereals, is

expected to increase by 70% (Smith et al., 2006) and

livestock products by 50% in the next half

century(Thornton, 2010).

Agriculture is among the sectors highly affected by CC

(Bryan et al., 2013; Lobell et al., 2008).

(5)

Climate change impacts in agriculture ( IPCC, 2013)

2010-2029 2030-2049 2050-2069 2070-2089 20 40 60 80 100 PE RC EN TA G E O F YI EL D PRO JE C TI O N S 0 2090-2109 0 – -5% -5 – -10% -10 – -25% -25 – -50% -50 – -100% 50 – 100% 25 – 50% 10 – 25% 5 – 10% 0 – 5% Range of Yield Change

Increase in Yield

Decrease in Yield

(6)

Why Innovation in coffee agroforestry?

An adjustment to the actual or expected changes in the agricultural sector using different innovative adaptation strategies has to be

among priorities in policy decisions.

Adaptation- process of adjustment to actual or expected climate effects, seeks to moderate harm or exploit beneficial opportunities” (IPCC 2014)

Different agents (producers, institutions, food industries) and

scales (from individual to global scale) (Wreford et al. 2010)

 Reducing the sensitivity of the affected system  Altering the exposure of a system to the impact

 Increasing the resilience and building capacity of socio-ecological systems ( Adger, 2006; Gallopin, 2006) .

(7)

This presentation therefore focuses on two case studies

in the Kenyan coffee based agroforestry system, i.e. the

coffee and dairy sectors, which differ in terms of

stakeholders and institutional setups.

1)

what characteristics of the innovation systems are particular to each sector in the adaptation process to climate change?

2)

How these characteristics of the innovation affect the adaptation process and competitiveness of the sectors?

(8)

Data collection

 Survey data

Face-to-face FGDs 9 FGDs

Household interviews 120 interviews

Historical analysis

 Key informant interviews

Stakeholders‘ interview (n=23)

Officials and experts : MOA, CRI, cooperatives and unions, private sectors, international Research centres, NGOs, CBOs,

 Historical climate data (1980-2014) , public data bases

8

Coffee farmers Dairy farmers

(9)

Methodology

(1) characterized the innovation system of the coffee sector and

dairy sector separately,

(2) combined the analysis to understand the difference in the

innovation system of the two sectors and what affects for the

competitiveness across the sectors,

(10)

Measured changes in Temperature

(11)

Measured changes in Rainfall

y = -17,102x + 1487,2 R² = 0,1814 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 19 80 19 82 19 84 19 86 19 88 19 90 19 92 19 94 19 96 19 98 20 00 20 02 20 04 20 06 20 08 20 10 20 12 20 14 R ai n fa ll in m m Years Coffee zone y = -0,6509x + 941,31 R² = 0,0006 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 19 80 19 82 19 84 19 86 19 88 19 90 19 92 19 94 19 96 19 98 20 00 20 02 20 04 20 06 20 08 20 10 20 12 20 14 R ai n fa ll in m m Years Food crops zone

(12)

Mann-Kendall test of significance

Variable

Mann-Kendall’s tau

p-value Sen’s slope Mean

T Max 0.503 <0.0001** 0.043 25.75

T min 0.509 <0.0001** 0.032 14.19

T inter annual variability 0.592 <0.0001** 0.037 0.033

Rainfall coffee -0.334 0.0040** -17.100 1179.00

Rainfall food -0.052 0.6730 -1.485 925.72

Significance level(%): 5

(13)

Actors’ interaction in the coffee sector

(14)

Actors’ interaction in the dairy sector

(15)
(16)

Conclusions

Farmers who are aware of CC are more willing to explore adaptation strategies, further improves their hh income.

The strong correlation b/n socio-institutional variables and adaptation suggests the need for the establishment of local institutions

Adaptation to CC in the coffee and dairy depends on the roles of SSI

in the coffee, actors’ system is centralized and the SI is oriented on

technology dev’t while the dairy sector, is based on institutional building.

The capacity to innovate, depends on institutional arrangement in addition to the technology dev’t, suggesting the dairy could be an example for the coffee sector.

(17)

Difference between sectors

In the coffee sector, the

actors’ system is highly centralized

and the SI is oriented towards technology development.

In the dairy sector consists of a diversity of actors, and its SI is

based on institutional building and marketing.

Sintesis :

The capacity to innovate and adapt in the coffee agroforestry

system, depends on specificities of sector (institutional

arrangements, to technology development

Suggesting that the dairy sector in Kenya could be an

example for the coffee sector ?

(18)

Références

Documents relatifs

Calculation of fertilizer needs using &#34;Soil Diagnosis&#34; method ( Fertiliser amount = Crop needs – soil nutrients). F Very accurate but time consuming &amp; expensive

We mobilize the SSI approach in order to explore conditions of adapta- tion to climate change in the coffee and dairy sectors, which are similar in terms of farmers’ objectives

Institutional infrastructure and System of Innovation (SI) in the coffee.. The case study on the coffee and dairy sectors of Central Kenya revealed that the system

Qualitative surveys enabled us to document: 1/ the detailed procedures for land acquisition on the plateau, and showed how these procedures were progressively strengthened following

The data were analyzed in four directions: (1) farmers’ perceptions about climate change, (2) trends for temperature and rainfall over 30 years, (3) relations

Jarvis (1) (1) international Center for tropical agriculture (Ciat), Decision and policy analysis research area, Cali, Colombia; (2) CGiar research program on Climate

General method VHSR image Tree locations automatic Tree locations manual Tree crown diameters automatic Tree crown diameters manual Tree height automatic Tree

given plant inside a mixed heterogeneous plot (whatever plant architecture, leaf area, layers, neighbors etc.) allows to 1/ study competition for light in complex plots 2/