HAL Id: jpa-00246449
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/jpa-00246449
Submitted on 1 Jan 1991
HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.
L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.
cells
Erwin Frey, David Nelson
To cite this version:
Erwin Frey, David Nelson. Dynamics of flat membranes and flickering in red blood cells. Journal de
Physique I, EDP Sciences, 1991, 1 (12), pp.1715-1757. �10.1051/jp1:1991238�. �jpa-00246449�
f Phys. Ifrance 1
(1991)
1715-1757 DtCEMBREI991, PAGE 1715Classification
PhysicsAbstracts
64.60Ht-68.35Ja-87.10+e
Dynamics of flat membranes and flickering in red blood cells
Erwh
Frey
and David R. NelsonLyman
Laboratory of Physics, HarvardUniversity,
Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, U.S.A.(Received3 Jkne 1991,
accepted
ihfinal fvnn 20August 1991)
Abstract. A theory of the
dynamics
ofpolymerized
membranes in the flat phase ispresented.
Thedynamics
of dilute membrane solutions is strongly influenced bylong-ran ged hydrodynamic
interac-tions among the monomers, mediated by the
intervening
solvent. We discuss the renormalization of the kinetic coefficients for the undulation and phonon modes due to hydrodynamic "backflow"(2imm behavior).
Thedynamics
is also studied for fleedraining
membranes(Rouse dynamics)
correspond-ing
to the Brownian dynamics method used in Monte Carlo simulations. The long time behavior ofthe dynamic structure factor is given by stretched exponentials with stretching exponents determined
by
the exponents of the elastic coefficients and the wave vectordependence
of the Oseen tensor. We alsostudy
the dynamics of the thickness fluctuations in red blood cells(flicker phenomenon) taking
into account the
underlying polymerized
spectrin skeleton.Qualitatively
differentdynamical
behavior ispredicted
for spectrin skeletons isolated from their natural lipid environment.t. Introduction.
There b now considerable theoretical and
experimental
interest in the statistical mechanics of membranes[I].
In contrast to linearpolymers, surfafies
fall into severaluniversality
classes[2], depending
onrigidity,
surfacetension,
and variousmicroscopic
constraints. One class of mem-branes that is
being
studiedthoroughly
is that ofpolymerized (or tethered)
membranes [3]. Theseare two-dimensional
analogs
of linearpolymer chains,
and theirstudy
b a natural extension ofpolymer
science.But,
unlikepolymers,
which arealways
coiled up in threedimensions,
tethered membranes areexpected
to exhlit a flatphase
withlong
range order in the surface normals at lowtemperatures
orhigh rigidity [4,5].
Thb flat
phase
has several unusualproperties. First,
the vely existence of a flat D= 2 di-
mensional
phase
bsurprbing,
since the theorem ofHohenberg
and of Mermin andWaguer
[6]forbids
spontaneous
symmetrybreaking
for two dimensional systems with a continuous symme-try. However,
thecoupling
between thein-plane
elasticdegrees
of freedom and theout-of-plane
undulations introduces an effective
long-ranged phonon-mediated
interaction among the undula- tions [4]. Thesystem
therefore does not fall in theregime
ofvalidity
of theHohenberg-Mermin- Wagner
theorem.Actually,
the lower critical dimension found toleading
order in a IId-expansion
is Die
= 2 2
Id
< 2[7,8],
where d is theembedding
dimension.Second,
the classicaltheory
ofelasticity
is believed to break down due to the thermalout-of-plane
fluctuations. The critical ex-ponents, describing
the nonclassical behavior oftwo-point
correlation functions in the flatphase
can be evaluated in
approximation
schemes such as the e- orI/d-expansion [7-10].
The elasticconstants are
singular
atlong
wavelengths, implying
forexample
that the classical Hooke law isinvalid in the flat
phase.
The fluctuations in
polymerized
membranes were also studiednumerically by
Monte Carlo simulations[11-13]
and moleculardynamics
methods[14,15].
The results of these simulations suggest thatsimple triangulated
tethered membranes with self-avoidance arealways flat,
due to thelarge entropically-induced bending rigidity.
Ahigh temperature crumpled phase
has so farbeen observed
only
in the case of nonself-avoiding "phantom"
membranesill].
From the
experimental
side there are severalapproaches
to obtain tethered membranes.Poly-
merized networks appear
naturally
in abiological
context[16,17].
Anexample
of abiological
tethered surface is the
spectrin protein
skeleton oferythrocytes, separated
from its natural envi-ronment
[18]. Polymerization
ofLangmuir
films[19]
andlipid bilayers [20]
is anotherpossibility,
provided
that the films can be madesufficiently
flexible andplaced
in anappropriate
solvent. Apartial polymerization
ofphospholipid
vesicles has beenreported recently [21]. Recently
thin membranes ofgraphite
oxide have beensynthesized by exfoiliating graphite [22]. Probing
the conformation of these membranesusing quasi-static light scattering
shows that thesegraphitic
membranes are folded into bactal
objects
with a fractal dimensiondf
m 2.5indicating
thatthey
may be in the
crumpled phase.
Whereas the statics of
polymerized
membranes has been studiedquite extensively,
thedynam-
ics of
polymerized
membranes have been studiedonly
in thecrumpled phase [3,23].
These inves-tigations
followclosely
theconcepts
known frompolymer dynamics [24].
Thedynamics
of linearpolymers
in agood
solvent arefairly
well understood. Thesimplest approach
topolymer dynam-
ics is to
neglect
thehydrodynamic
interaction between different segments, which is known as the Rouse model[25].
It isknown,
however, that thelong-ranged hydrodynamic
interaction betweendifferent monomers, mediated
by
theintervening
solvent,strongly
influences thedynamics (2imm dynamics) [26,27].
Thedynamics
of thickness fluctuations of red blood cells has been studiedby
Brochard and Lennon
[28] using concepts
known from thedynamics
of surface waves[29].
In this paper we extend the
equilibrium
statistical mechanics ofpolymerized
membranes in the flatphase
totime-dependent quantities
andstudy
thedynamics
of membranes in a solvenL Our purpose is to calculatetransport
coefficients like the diffusion constant of the center of mass motion(molecular weight dependence),
correlation functions of thein-plane
andout-of-plane
modes and the
dynamic scattering
factor. The results areparametrized by
theamplitudes
andexponents
of the(singular) equilibrium
elastic constants andby transport
coefficients.We consider
polymerized
flat membranes,I.e.,
a system of atoms or monomers that are con- nected to form aregular
two-dimensional array embedded in d-dimensional space(see Fig.I).
What
distinguishes
the staticuniversality
class of tethered membranes fromliquid
membranes is their fixedconnectivity.
The statics of the flatphase
ofpolymerized
membranes is characterizedby
a non local wave vectordependent bending rigidity,
andin-plane
elastic constants[1,4,7,9]
n(k)
-Jk~'-~+2'
,
(1.1)
1(k)
-Jp(k)
-v k~
(1.2)
In
dynamics, additionally,
thepermeability
ofthe membrane to solvent moleculesplays
a crucial role. Consider asimple
model of beads of radius a connectedby permeable
tethers as shown infigure
I. Weneglect
for now intemal elastic forces within the membranes. For verylarge
mesh size thevelocity
of aparticle
is determinedonly by
the localhydrodynamic
forcesacting
on it.N°12 DYNAMICS OF FLAT MEMBRANES AND FLICKEItING 1717
v v
Rg.
I.Simplified
model of apolymerized
membrane vdth beads connected by tethers. In fishnet-like polymers such asspectrin,
these tethers are themselves linearpolymer
chains. A force F acting on aparticle
generates motion of the solvent indicated ty the lines vith arrows.
The bare vhcous
drag
coefficients (u,1~relating
the force on theparticle
to itsin-plane (u)
and out-of-plane (h) velocity
is thensitnply
(u,1~ =6~qa,
where q is thedynamic vhcosity
of the solvenL Ingeneral
however, thevelocity
of aparticle depends
in acomplicated
way on the forcesacting
on all other
particles,
becallse of thelong
range solventvelocity
fieldgenerated by
a localized force. Theimportance
of this fluid backflow(hydrodynamic interaction)
increases as the mesh size of thepolymerhed
network decreases. If the membrane bcompletely itnpermeable
to thefluid,
theout-of-plane
modes become slaved to the fluid motionperpendicular
to theplane
of the membrane. In this case thedynamics
b very similar to that of surface waves[29].
Thein-plane motion,
however, should still show someslip
relative to theliquid.
The above
argument
shows that thedynamics
ofpolymerized
networks are sensitive to thepermeability
of the membrane for solvent molecules. We can think ofhighly permeable
and itn-permeable
membranes asconstituting
two differentdynamic universality
classes ofpolymerized
membranes. As an
example
ofhighly permeable polymerized
membranes one may think of iso- latedspectrin networks,
whereas red blood cells themselves(I.e.,
alipid bilayer
with aspectrin
skeleton
attached) represent impermeable
Membranes.The bare friction of the membrane vith the solvent is determined
by
the structure(perme- ability)
of the membrane. We will show in section 2 that thehydrodynamic
interaction betweendifferent monomers causes the renormalized
mobility (p
-v I
IQ
to becomeinversely proportional
to the wave vector k.
One
explanation
of this effect is that in the limit of [on gwavelength
the motion of the membrane becomes slaved to thedynamics
of the solvent. In this limit thedynamics
becomesequivalent
to a classical
hydrodynamic problem
with theboundary
condition that the vhcous stress of the solventequals
the elasticforc~s
of the membrane.Upon neglecting
all nonlinear effects one has forexample 2q(~
p =KS
andj~
= ~z for the
out-of-plane
fluctuationsh,
where it thez z
velocity
field of the solvent and p thehydrostatic
pressure. Theexpression
for thein-plane
motionare similar. A
simple scaling analysis
of theseequations gives ~~l'~~
-vnk~h(k, t), I.e.,
the kinetic coefficient isinversely proportional
to the wave vector k. One has to note,however,
that the above consideration is based on theassumption
that one canneglect
nonlinear effects. In order tostudy
those one has to use moresophisticated
methodsadapted
fromdynamic
renormalizationtheory,
which will be thesubject
of section 3.The crossover %om a wave vector
independent
friction( ~ltouse dynamics, highly permeable membranes)
to(
-v k
(Zhnm dynamics, impermeable membranes)
is determinedby
the ratio of the~bare)
friction coefficients(u
and (1~ for theh-plane
andout-of-plane
motion and thedynamic vhcosity
q of the solvent. The crossover vector for theout-of-plane
undulation mode is found to bekh =
), (13)
and for the transverse and
longitudinal phonon
modes one obtainski
=),
and kjj =) (1.4)
Q
Fbr
large vhcosity
q and%r for low friction( (high permeability)
the crossover wave vectors become very small or even less than the smallest accessible wave vector km~ = «IL.
In this case thedynamics
b Rouse-like in the entire wave vectorreghne.
In theopposite regime
of very smallvhcosity
and/or smallpermeability
the crossover to Zitnmdynamics
sets inalready
for verylarge
wave vectors. The location of the crossover
point
can thus be tunedby
thevhcosity
of the solventand%r the
permeability
of the membrane.In section 3 we
study
the Rouse and 2immdynamics by dynamic
renormalizationtheory
and find that the criticaldynamic exponents characterizing
the wave vectordependences
of the char-acteristic
frequencies
ru,1~ for the(overdamped)
undulation and thephonon
modes are rl~ -~ k~',
(1.5)
ru -v k~.
,
(1.6)
where the
dynamic
criticalexponents
are determinedby
the wave vectordependences
of the mo- bilities and the staticexponents (
and w,~~'
l~ ~~ $~n~~y~~nl~cs
~~'~~
and
12
+ w for Rousedynamics
, ~~~~ l + w for Zhnm
dynamics
Here and in the remainder of the Introduction we
specialize
to a D = 2 dimensional membrane embedded in d= 3 dimensions. The
corresponding expressions
forgeneral
d and D can be found in the main text. Estimates of(
from simulations are in the range(
= 0.5 0.67[11,12,15],
whilew is now believed to be rather small
[30].
A
quantity
which can bedirectly
measured inexperiments
b thedynamic
structure factor. In theregitne
where the wavelength
is muchlarger
than the linear dimension L of the membraneonly
the overall translational motion of the membrane can be seen. Then thedynamic
structure factor shows anexponenthl decay
S(k,t)
-v exp
[-Dk2t]
,
(1.9)
where the diffusion constant is
N°12 DYNAMICS OF FLAT MEMBRAN& AND FLICKERING 1719
~
II /L2
for Rousedynamics,
~~ ~~'~' l
IL
for Zimmdynamics.
This result should be
compared
with D-v
L-~/5,
obtained for Zitnmdynamics
in thecrumpled phase [23].
In the
opposite regime,
where the wavelength
is much smaller than the linear ditnension of themembrane,
one isprobing
the internal motion of the membrane. Thelong
time behavior of thedynamic
structure factor isgiven by
s~elchedeqonen4Alv S(k,t)
-J
expj-Ck~t"j
,
(I.ll)
if the
scattering
vector lies in ororthogonal
to the membraneplane.
Forout-of-plane scattering
vector the
stretching exponent
isgiven by
«Rowe =2(/(2
+2()
in theregime
of Rousedynamics
and azinm =
2(/(1
+2()
in the 2immregime,
where(
is theroughness
exponent. Forin-plane scattering
vector we let a -fl,
where flRowe = w/(2
+w)
and flzimm = WI(I
+w).
Since the ex-ponent
w,descrling
the renormalization of thephonon
modes, issupposed
to be a small number, the latterdecay represents
an enormousstretching
whichapproximates
analgebraic decay.
Forthe
special
case w = 0 the static structure factor has power lawsingularities
with atemperature dependent exponent analogous
to the behavior of two dimensional solids. The timedependence
is characterized
by
analgebraic decay,
which is half as fast as thespatial decay
for Rousedynamics
and
equally
fast for Zitnmdynamics.
An
important application
of thedynamics
of flat membranes are the thermal thickness fluctu- ations of red blood cells. The membrane of anerythrocyte essentially
consists of alipid bilayer
~believed
to be in aliquid phase)
with aspectrin polymer
network attached to the innerlayer through proteins.
The presence of thespectra implies
that unlike thephospholipid component
of abiological membrane,
thecomposite
red blood cell membrane exhlits a shear modulus.Under normal
physiological
conditions the red blood cells show a remarkable flickerphe-
nomenon, which can be seen
by phase
contrastmicroscopy [28].
This flicker due to thermal fluc- tuations of the cell thickness.Recently
thespectrin
skeleton oferythrocytes
has beenseparated
from their natural environ- ment[18].
These isolatedspectrin
networks differ from thecomposite
red blood cell notonly
in themagnitude
of their elastic constants but also -and moreimportantly-
in theirpermeability
for solvent molecules. Whereas thepermeability
of the red blood cell ismainly
determinedby
the flowthrough
smallprotein
channels, the isolatedspectrin
network ishighly permeable
for sol- vent molecules. Asargued
above thepermeability
of the membrane determines the location ofthe crossover from Rouse to Zitnm
dynamics.
Hence weexpect qualitatively
different behaviorfor isolated
spektrin
networks asopposed
to red blood cells as a consequence of their differentpermeability
and elasticproperties.
In section 5 we consider a
simplified
model of two membranes,separated by
an average dis-tance d and
neglecting edge
effects. We find thefollowing
crossover scenario for the thermalthickness
flucmalions:
For high~ypenneablk
membranes,like
the isolatedspectrin
network thereis a crossover from Rouse to 2imm behavior at a wave vector kl~ =
(1~/4q.
As a consequence ofhydrodynamic screening
effects this is followedby
a reentrant crossover to Rousedynamics
when kd < I. The 2imm behavior isrestricted to a wave vectorregime (h/4q
> k >I/d.
Forhighly permeable
membranes this becomes a very narrowregime
or even vanishes ifkl~ < IId.
A
completely
different crossover scenario is obtained forbnpemeabld membranes,
like thecomposite
red blood celL There one has todistinguish
betweenlarge
and small ratio ofstretching
to
bending
energy y. For y » I, which is the case for red blood cells, one obtains a crossover from 2immdynamics
with a kinetic coefficientproportional
toIlk
to a kinetic coefficientproportional
to k2 when kd < I. In the
regime
y < < I the linewidth shows a crossover from Zimmdynamics
to a kinetic coefficientproportional
to k. the results for the case of a verylarge
ratio y ofstretching
to
bending
energy reduce to the results of Brochard and Lennon[28]
for fluid like membranesprovided
we assume aliquid-like roughness exponent (
= I.But,
in addition to thelipid bilayer
there is also a
spectrin
network attached to thebilayer leading
to a solid-like structure of thecomposite objecL
Thisimplies
that there is a crossover bom fluid- to solid-like behavior which has observable static[30]
as well asdynamical consequencies.
The crossover scenario of the fluctuations of the difference of the
ih-plane
modes is similar tothat of the thickness fluctuations in the case of
highly permeable membranes,
whereas forimper-
meable membranes the crossover is from 2imm to Rouse
dynamics.
Thein-plane
modes have up to now not been studiedexperimentally.
It would beinteresting
todesign experiments
whichmeasure the
in-plane dynamics
of membranes.Whereas the crossover of the relative modes is characterhed
by
achange
in the wave vectordependence,
the center of mass modes forphonons
and undulations show an enhancement of theamplitude by
a factor of two inpassing
from kd » I to kd « I.We thus conclude that the crossover scenario, upon
passing
from kd < < I to kd > > I,depends sensitively
on twofactors,
thepermeability
of the membrane and the ratio ofstretching
tobending
energy. Thb becomes evident ifone considers the two extreme cases
(I)
anitnpermeable
fluid((
=I) lipid bilayer (with
y »1) [28]
and(it) polymerized ((
m0.5)
holatedspectrin
networks withhigh permeability.
The line width for the flicker modes arer)°
-v
k6 and
r)"~
-v
k3, respectively, I.e., they
differby
three powers in the wave vectorlThe remainder of the paper is
organized
as follows: In section 2 we introduce theLangevin equations
of motiondescribing
thecoupled dynamics
of the membrane-solventsystem. Using
the functionalintegral
formulation of Janssen[31]
and de Dominicis[32]
we define agenerating
func- tional for thedynamic
correlation and response functions.By integrating
out the solventvelocity
fields we find an effective fluid-mediated
long ranged hydrodynamic
interaction between differentsegments
of the surface. In apreaveraging approximation (similar
to that used for linearpolymer chains),
thehydrodynamic
interaction leads to a renormalimtion of the kinetic coefficients. Therenormalization of the
resulting
effective model is studied in section 3. It is found that thedy-
namicexponents
can beexpressed entirely
in terms of the staticexponents
and theexponent
ofthe kinetic coefficients. The
scaling properties
and the wave vector and timedependence
of thedynamic
structure factor h dhcussed in section 4. In section 5 we discuss thehydrodynamic
modes of two flat membranes. This can be considered as a model system for red blood cells. In theAp- pendix
we show how to obtain thescaling
functions from a self consistentdynamical theory
which is similar to modecoupling theory.
2. Model.
In thb section we introduce
equations
of motion for thedynamics
of a membrane in its flatphase suspended
in a fluid solvent. We shall describe thedynamics
of a membrane-solvent systemby
aset of
coupled Langevin equations.
Apart
bom the nonlinearcoupling
between thebending
andstretching modes,
which determine the staticproperties
of flatmembranes,
thedynamics
of dilute membrane solutions arestrongly
influenced
by long-ranged hydrodynamic interactions,
medhtedby
theintervening
solvent. Weassume that the
dynamics
ispurely dissipative
since the contributions of the inertial terms formembranes in a solvent can be
neglected
forsufficiently large
times. TheLangevin dynamics
N°12 DYNAMICS OF FLAT MEMBRAN& AND FLICKERING 1721
for the membrane conformation
#(s, t) (
s is an intemal coordinate
parametrizing
monomer po-sitions)
states that the friction force(( fit R; (s, t)
goq[ji(s, t), t]j
is balancedby
the intemalelastic forces of the membrane and the random forces
proportional
toe;(s, t)
°~'f>
~~ =-L); ((~l~))
+go~;jfi(s, i), ij
+e;(s, i)
,
(2.i)
where the matrix of the bare friction coefficients
((
per unit area is the inverse matrix of the bareOnsager
kinetic coefficientsL);.
The values of these friction coefficientsdepend
on the perme-ability
of the membrane to solvent molecules. As discussed in theIntroduction,
thepermeability
should
depend
on the mesh size. If the membrane iscompletely impermeable
to the fluid the On- sager coefficients for theout-of-plane
motion are zero and these modes become slaved to the fluid motionperpendicular
to the referenceplane
of the membrane. Thein-plane motion, however,
should stiff show someslip
relative to theliquid.
7i((ji))
is the bee energy functional(made
dimensionlessby dividing by kBT)
for the mem- brane conformation fieldji(s, t).
In the flatphase
the excitations can bedecomposed
into trans-verse undulations,
h,
and intemalphonon modes,
u#(s, i)
= m is +
(u(s, i), h(s, i))j (2.2)
The
quantity
m is the orderparameter
and characterizes the extensionfactor, I.e.,
the ratio between the actual linear size of thefluctuating
membrane and its size at T = 0. The internal space of the membrane is characterizedby
a D-dimensional vector s. Note that vectors s in theintemal space are written in
boldface,
while vectorsji
in the d-dimensional external space aredenoted with an arrow.
The free energy functional is
given by [4,5]
7i =
/ d~'s
I)lou(;
+pou(;
+(° (ii~h~)~ (2.3)
with the straiJ~ tensor
vii =
ia;u;
+a;
vi +a; ha a;
h«1(2.4)
The coefficient no b the bare
bendiJ~g'rigidity,
andlo
and PO are the bare Lam6 coefficients. The parameter go is the barestrength
of thehydrodynamic interaction,
I.e., thecoupling
to the solventvelocity
field ~;[£, ii.
This coefficient isarbitrary,
and may be taken to beunity
as isrequired
for a Galilean invariant model. One should also note thatmode-coupling
coefficients of thestreaming type (here go)
are not renormalized ingeneral [33,34].
If one sets goequal
to zero,equation (2.I)
describes the free
draining ~ltouse)
model for the membranedynamics.
The
dynamics
of the solventvelocity
field is descriedby fluctuating hydrodynamics.
The rel-evant
hydrodynamic equations
of motion for the fluidvelocity
are those of lowReynolds
numberhydrodynamics.
The solventdynamics
is thus describedby
linearized Navier-Stokesequations,
which
incorporate
friction forces due to the membrane and the random thermalvelocity
fluctua- tions in the fluid~'l'~~
=voo~~;(£, t) h f d~s ~jjj fij b(£ ji(s, t)) I)
+
(;(£, t). (2.5a)
Here vo is the kinematic solvent
vhcosity,
p h thehydrostatic
pressure, PO is the fluid massdensity
and0(£, t)
are random thermal forcesdriving
the system toequilibrium
as t - c~J. It is assumed that the fluid isincompresslle,
I.e.,it
I= 0,
(2.5b)
which is an
adequate assumption
fordescn~ing
lowfrequency dynamics
ofthe membrane. Inertialterms are also
unimportant
at lowfrequencies.
The random forces6(s, t)
and0(£, t),
necessaryfor
producing
the correctequilibrium
dhtrlution function for both the membrane and the solvent in thelong
timelimit,
are Gaussian white noise sources with zero means and variances<
8~(S, t)e; (S', t')
> =2Lib(S S')b(t t'), (2.6a)
<
(;(I,i)(;(r,1')
> =-2noo2J(I- t)J(i i')J;;
,
(2.6b)
where no = vopo is the
dynamic vhcosity
and we have setkBT
= I. It can be shown that cor- relations calculated from the above
Langevin equations satisfy
the usualfluctuation-dissipation
relations.
The
equations
of motion for the fluid(2.5)
can beformally
solvedby
firsttransforming
intok-space
_
~~ ~ b7i
-;tR(s,t)
+
~p(I, t)
+ ("(~>
t)
~~'~~~i~"j~'~~
+
vok~~;(~>t)
"~p /~
~blo(S>t)~
~°it I(I, t)
= 0,
(2.7b)
and then
eliminating
the pressure inequation (2.7a) using
theincompressibility
condition(2.7b).
One finds
where
P((I)
=
b;; (~J
(2.9)
is the transverse
projection
operator. The formal solution ofequation (2.8)
is~i(~>
t)
=£~ dt~e-~°~'~~-~'>Pi(k) (>(~> t) i f d~S j~ll, ,~e"~~~~'>l
(2.i°)
This shows
that,
whenever a force(2nd
term in the square brackets on theright
hand side ofEq. (~10))
acts on a surface element of the membrane, the result is a distortedvelocity
field in the whole fluid. This "backflow" decreasesonly slowly (inversely proportional
to thedistance)
and drives other elements of the membrane into motion. As we will see, thishydrodynamic
interaction leads to a drastic renormalization of the kinetic coefficient. Note also thatonly
the transverse noise(f (I, t)
=
P((j (I, t)
enters since the fluid isincompressible.
N°12 DYNAMICS OF FLAT MEMBRANES AND FLICKEItING 1723
As in discussions of
polymer
chaindynamics [24],
we assume that thetypical
solvent relaxation times are much shorter than those of the membrane conformation and make thereplacement [35]
e-"°~'l~~~')
-
~
~
b(t t') (2.I I)
lAok
In this Markovian
approximation
the formal solution of the fluidequation simpli%es
to~;(i,t)
=
(~ l§((i) (; (I, t)
~°/ d"s ~/)
~~
exp
(-it #(s, t))j (2.12)
"o PO ; S>
Therefore the
hydrodynamic
interaction termgall#(s, t), ii
in theLangevin equation
for themembrane becomes
90~i
ljl(~> f) fl
" 90/ ~~d ~ 41') (j (I, f)
~~P
(~ii jl(~, f))
~
~[ /
d~s'jR)),,
i~ exPI-i'-
I#(S>t) #(s'>t)) II
~~ ~~~
One way to
proceed
would be to insert theseexpression
into theLangevin equation
for the membrane andstudy
thedynamics directly
in terms of theequations
of motion as in the renor-malization group
approach
todynamic
criticalphenomena [36~7].
Here we formulate insteada
path integral description
for the membrane-solventdynamics,
a method which has also beensuccessfully
used tostudy
criticaldynamics.
Before
analyzing
the effects of thenonlinearity
in the static Hamiltonian and thehydrodynamic
interaction let us consider a
simple
case first. If the membrane iscompletely itnpermeable
for the fluid and there is noslip
for thein-plane
motion of the membrane, thedynamics
of the membranebecomes
completely
slaved to thedynamics
of the solvent, I.e.(
= ~z
(t),
and =~;(t), (i
= z,y).
Neglecting
effects from theroughness
of the membrane surface and the nonlinearities in the static Hamiltonian(see
SeCL2.2)
thedynamic problem
isequivalent
to a classicalhydrodynamic problem
vith theboundary
conditions that the vhcous stress of the fluidequals
the elastic forces of the membranewhere for we are the case ~y = 0. these
boundary
efficients
A and B
thesolution of
the linear
_ ik~-iwt (~
p =
-iu~pAe~~e'~~~'~'
Without even
solving
theseequations explicitely
one canrecognize
bom a purescaling analysis
that the
equations
of motion for the undulation andphonon
modes are of the form~~~~~
'~
~°~~~~~'~~'
JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE r T i, Pr 12, DtCEMBRE iwi 68
~~~~~
~~'~ ~~° ~
~~°~~~~~~'~~'
Compared
to a Rouse model with wave vectorindependent
kinetic coefficient the above anal-ysis
shows that in theregime
where the membranedynamics
is slavedby
the solvent motion the kinetic coellients becomeinversely proportional
to k. Here this is a consequence of the solution of a classicalhydrodynamic problem
withboundary
conditions similar to the well knownproblem
of
capillary
waves. Thephysical
reason is thelong ranged
nature of thehydrodynamic
backflowas
explained
above.In the next section we formulate a
path integral description
of thedynamics,
which allows us tostudy
the effects of static anddynamic
nonlinearities and to scrutinize theapproximations
made in the abovehydrodynamic analysis. Furthermore,
this formalism allows us tostudy
thegeneral
case of a D-dimensional membrane embedded in d dimensions.
2. I PATH INTEGRAL FORMULATION AND DYNAMIC FUNCTIONAI- In Order to
implement dy-
namic renormalization
theory
in a wayanalogous
to static criticalphenomena
we need a func- tional which generates theperturbation expansion
for thefrequency dependent
correlation and responsefunctions,
which follows from theequations
of motion. We shall use a functional inte-gral
formulation [31,32~38~39] which converts theI-angevin equations
into adynamic
functional with one additional field[39].
The idea is that instead ofsolving
theI-angevin equations (2.I)
and(2.8)
for the membrane fieldji(s, t)
and solventvelodty
fieldI(jl, t)
in terms of the random forces6(s, t)
and[ (jl, t)
and thenaveraging
over the Gaussianweight
'°(181> Iii I)
'* ~XP
l~( /
dt/ d~SeS(S> t)(L~~ )iJeJ
(Si)j
x exp
j- j
dt
j ddzii (£, t)
(no (I?)2)- IL (£, t)j
,~~'~~~
one can eliminate the random forces in favour of the conformation variables for the membrane and the
velocity
fields of the solventby introdudng
apath probability density W((R)j (v))
viaW(lRl, lvl)DiRlDivl
=
W(let, I(il)DielDi(il (2.15)
Furthermore,
it b convenient toperform
a Gausshn transformation in order to "linearize" thedynamic
functional. TMs isaccomplished by introducing
response fieldsfi
and[31,32,38,39]
w(lRl> l~l)
"
/ Dlikl ID lib]
~~P
(J(lRl> I RI l~l> 161)j (2'16)
For more details on the
general
formalism we refer the reader to references[31,32,38,39].
Thedynamical
functional hgiven by
J(iRi> iii> i~i> iii)
"Jflu,d(iRi> iii> i~i> iii)
+Jmembrane(iRii ikii i~i> i~i) (2.17)
where
Jfluw =
/
/dt16; (I,t)qok~P((I)@;(-I,t) @;(I, t) l§((I)
[fi, vok~]v;(-I,t)
~
i@;(~> t)iii(i) f d~S
~~ll
i~ exPli~ (S>t)11
~~~~~~
N°12 DYNAMICS OF FLAT MEMBRAN& AND FLICKERING 1725
and
Jm~m~nn~ =
fdDs f
di(i(s, i)Lj;jl;(s, i) i(s,i) a,R~(s,i)
+Lj;
~
~)j~ ~j
,+
golli(S,t)411')v>ijl(S,t), lj
~~ ~~~~We have used the notation
f~
=f d~k/(2x)~
andf~
=fdw/2x.
Since thedynamical
func- tional isquadratic
in the solventvelodty fields, they
can beintegrated
outexactly.
One finds~XP
(~efl(lRl> lkl)j
"/I'll@I /l'lvl
~XP(~(lRl> lkl> lvl>
I@I)j
~
" C°"t. X eXP
(JRou«(lRl> lhl)
+JHydm(lRl> lhl)j
~~The first term,
Jx~u«(jRj, j&j)
=
f dDs f
di
(i(s, i)Lj,j(s,i)
-i(s,i) (a,R;(s,i)
+Lj ~~~j ~)j
,~~'~~~~
corresponds
to thedynamics
of a beedraining
membrane. Inanalogy
to thepolymer
case we call it the Rousepart [25]
of thedynamical
functional. The second term is moreconveniently
written in Fourier spaceJHydro(lRl, I RI)
=
=
) ( / (Q;(I,
W),
-Q;(I, W))(A~ ~(l,
W));>(Q; (-I, -W), -Q; (-I, -W))~,
~~'~°~~and describes the
hydrodynamic
interaction benveen different parts of the membrane. Here~-l([
'~))_,
'J ~2 +(~~~2)2
l -jw +0v~k2
lW~~~+ V0k~~2lpT([)
ij(~ ~~)
and we have defined the
"generalized"
Fourier transforrmQ;(I, t)
=/ d~s
~
/)
~~
exp
I-it ji(s, t)j
,
(2.22a)
and
t~;(I, t)
=
d~slii(s, t)
expI-it ji(s, t)j (2.22b) Explidtely
one finds in the Markovianapproxhnation (see Eq. (2. II))
JHyd»((R), (li))
=
j $ / d~s / d~s' /
dt
li~(s, t)P((I)fi;(s', t)
~ ~~
)(s, t) pf~j)
6~l~-;i.(#(s,q-#(s',q)
'
bR;(s',t)j
This can also be written as
JHydm(lRl, till)
=
/
dt/ f(q,t)K;;(-q)
(hi (-q,t) ~~~) ~j (2.24)
where
K;;(q)
=
/ / d~s / d~s'P((I)
[~e~'~'(~~~')
expI-it (ji(s, t) ji(s', t))j (2.25)
k no
2.2 PREAVERAGING API'ROXiMATION. One way to
analyze
thehydrodynamic
interaction is toreplace
theoperator K;;(q) by
itsaveraged
value <It;; (q)
>, the so called Oseen tensor.This
preaveraging approximation
isfrequently
used inpolymer physics
and is due to Kirkwood and Riseman[27]
and Zimm[26].
As in reference[15],
we assume that the static fluctuations discussed in reference[4,7,9]
have beenincorporated
intorenormalized,
wave vectordependent
elasticconstants.
Accordingly,
we make thereplacements
<o -KR(q)
~q~~~+~',
~o-
~R(q)
~q~,
andlo
-AR(q)
~ q~ inequation (2.3). Upon averagingwith respect
to thisfully
renormalizedstatic Hamiltonian one finds
<
K;;(q)
>=L~ / /d~(s s') l~((I) ~e~~(~+~~l'(~~~'l
~
x exp
(-2ki
kmx~"'(p)
sin~(p (s s') 2)j
,
~~~~~
p
where the static
susceptAility
matrixx~"'(p)
readsxh(P)
=x~~(P)
=<h(p)h(-p)
>m~~/~~, (2.27a)
fop
the undulation modes with theroughness exponent (
and~ l
(2-27b)
~j(p)
>P;[(P)~~
~))p2+W
~
~'~~~~P~~~
for the
phonon
modes with theexponent
w. As shownby
Aronovitz andLubensky [9],
the expo-nents
(
and w are notindependent,
butobey
instead theimportant scaling
relation(
=(4
D +w). (2.28)
The coellidents K, and p are wave vector
independent
renormalizedamplitude
factors.By
astra1glltforward scaling analysis
ofequation (2.26)
one finds< K»
(q) >=q~<°-~L~ !~ i,, f d~ ~Pi(I) ~~zj~+
~j~
e->~?~+"~~.~
x exp
(- Ah(da)<x<~'~(q~~~lj (2.29)
~
x exP
I- Ii /
~~At~(es)
+lAt~ es)) x<~+~~-~i~i~?i~-~l
N°12 DYNAMICS OF FLAT MEMBRAN& AND FLICKERING 1727
where dco = d D is the co-dimension and the
amplitude
factorsAh
(?s)
=f d~vv~~~~'(I
C°S(Yis)) (2.30)
and
Ai,T(?»)
"f d~V V~~~~(I
C°S(Y
?»))PtT(Y) (2.31)
depend
on is =(s s') /<s
s'<.ki
and k,, denote thein-plane
andout-of-plane components
of the wave vectorI respectively.
Thisscaling analysis
is valid for 0 <(
< and 0 < w + 2 D < 2.Otherwise the
p-integration
inequation (2.26) depends explicitly
on the lower or upper bounds of theintegraL
With these restrictions theleading
wave vectordependence
of the Oseen tensor in the flatphase
isgiven by
< 1<fla,(q) >~-
q~«~~ (2.32)
Currently accepted
values of(
for d =3,
D = 2 are in the range 0.5 <(
< 0.67[4,15,30,40]
while it is believed that w > 0
[9,15,40].
Thelong
wavelength
behavior of the Oseen tensor is thusindependent
of theprecise
values of the static criticalexponents (
and w.Furthermore,
it does not
depend
on the internal and external dimensionseparately,
but insteadsolely
on the co-dimension. From thisanalysis
thehydrodynamic
interaction can beregarded
as relevant for d« < 2,marginal
for dco= 2 and irrelevant for dco > 2. The
marginal
casecorresponds
to rod likepolymers (D
=I)
in d = 3 dimensions withbending rigidity.
The above result for the Oseen tensor is
equivalent
toreplacing
the termji(s, t) ji(s', t)
inthe
hydrodynamic interaction, equation (123), by
its average value ss',
which h non zero due to the fact that the membrane is flat on average. Thisapproximation corresponds
toneglecting
somecorrelation effects in the
hydrodynamic
interaction. The I/q-behavior
of the Oseen tensor reflects the broken symmetry of the flatphase.
In thecrumpled phase
the average value ofji(s, t) ji(s', t)
is zero, but there are non trivial renormalizations due to self-avoidance
(see below).
The
dynamic properties
of a solution ofself-avoiding crumpled
membranes hasrecently
been studiedby
Mutukumar[23] using
apreaveraged
Oseen tensorapproach.
He finds for the Oseen tensor< Kcrumpied >'~
q~~
~~~ ~~(~"~~)
where
D + 2
(2.34)
" "
@
is the
exponent
of the mean square dbtance benveen twopoints
of the manifold,<
ijl(°) jl(L)l~
>=lLl~"
,
(2.35)
found in a self consistent
approach
for the excluded volume eflecL This result for theexponent
v agrees with a
Flory type
argument[3],
and with the value foundby
numerical simulations[3],
v = 0.80 + 0.05. A first order
e-expansion gives
v = 0.556[11,41].
If theFlory
value for v(v
= 4IS,
for d = 3, D=
2)
is used the wave vectordependence
of the Oseen tensor isgiven by
< Kcrumpjed >~-
q~~'~,
which is close to what we found for the flatphase. But,
thephysical
basis iscompletely
diflerenLIn the
crumpled phase
the wave vectordependence
of the Oseen tensordepends cruchlly
onthe renormalization of the "elastic" coellicients due to self-avoidance or
equivalently
on the fractal dimension df = 2Iv
m 2.5 of thecrumpled objecL
One should note that without self avoidance(I.e.,
for"phantom" membranes)
the radius ofgyration
scales asRg
~41implying
that theOseen tensor would scale as < K~mmpled >~
q~2,
which iscompletely
different from the above result with self-avoidance.In the flat
phase
the wave vectordependence
is dominatedby
the fact that the membrane isa flat
objecL Actually, summarwing
both results,equations (132)
and(2.33)
the wave vectordependence
can be written in terrm of the bactal dimension as< Kcmmpled >'*
i~~~~~~~~i'" (2.36)
In the flat
phase,
theleading
wave vectordependence
of the Oseen tensor can be obtainedby making
thereplacement
exp
(-it (ji(s, t) ji(s', t))j
- exp
(-it (ji(s, t) ji(s', t))j (2.37)
in the
hydrodynamic interaction, equation (124).
With thbapproximation,
theresulting dynam-
ical functional
corresponds
to thefollowing
set of effectiveLangevin equations
for thephonon
modes
and the undulation modes
~~~~
~~~~~~ 6h/~i, t)
~~~~~'~~
'~~'~~~~
where the
hydrodynamically
renormalized kinetic coefficients aregiven by Dii(k)
"
~°~"
~~~
k
~'~ ~~~
' ~~~~~~
L(k)
=Lo
+ ~2) (2.39b)
The covariance of the nobe terms are
<
b;(k,q0;(k',1')
>=2D;;(k)6(k
+k')6(i
11) ,
(2.40a)
<
b~ (k, i)b~(k',1')
>=2L(k)b(k
+k')b(i
11(2.40b)
The
hydrodynamic
interaction leads to kinetic coefficientsproportional
to I/k
in thelong
wavelength limi~ reflecting
thelong-ranged
nature of the fluid-medhted interaction.At the harmonic level one can
already
discuss the crossover from Rouse to Zimm behavior(for sufficiently permeable membranes), I.e.,
a crossover in the kinetic coefficients from a wave vectorindependent
constant to thesingular
I/k-behavior.
As can be inferred fromequations (2.39),
thecrossover wave vector for the out-of-
plane
undulations bgiven by
kh ~2
=
~