• Aucun résultat trouvé

Scholarship in Software, Software as Scholarship

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Scholarship in Software, Software as Scholarship"

Copied!
3
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Software  in  Scholarship,  Scholarship  in  Software  

29–30  January  2015  

Universität  Bern,  UniS  room  A105   Workshop: 29 January 2015

10:00 – Welcome

10:15 – Opening remarks

Prof. Willard McCarty, King’s College London

A matter of prepositions: Software in scholarship and scholarship in software?

10:45 – Panel 1. Assessment and process

• Eugene Lyman, Independent Scholar

Scholarly Software and the Enhancement of Critical Scrutiny

• Aris Xanthos, Université de Lausanne

By scholars, for scholars: a case study on quality assessment of scientific software

• Oleksandr Makarenko, National Technical University of Ukraine Mathematical Modeling in Scholarship and their Representation in Software

12:15 – Lunch break

14:00 – Panel 2. Confrontation and collaboration

• James Baker, British Library

Removing Black Boxes: Exposing Scholarship to Researchers

• Pieter Francois, University of Oxford

Connecting Modes of Scholarship through the Library: The genesis of the Sample Generator for Digitized Texts

• Jonas Schneider, Universität Zürich Geovisualizing History

15:30 – Coffee break

16:00 – Panel 4: Creation

(2)

• Manfred Thaller, Universität zu Köln

Engineering, Science, Art, Scholarship: On implicit assumptions in the software for semantic image databases.

• Joris van Zundert, Huygens ING, and Gregor Middell, independent scholar

Code and Authorship in the Humanities 17:00 – Closing keynote

David Berry, University of Sussex

Softwarization, Archives, and the Digital Humanities

(3)

Roundtable on Peer Review for Digital Scholarly Work 30 January 2015

Schedule:

9:00 – Welcome

9h10 - 10h40 : Position papers (max. 15 min. each) 10h40 - 11h: Coffee Break

11h-12h30: Collective Discussion on specific issues 13h - Lunch for all roundtable participants

Participants (in alphabetical order):

• JAMES BAKER, Digital Research Team, British Library - Stepping back - playing as research

• CLAIRE CLIVAZ, Laboratoire des cultures et humanités digitales, Université de Lausanne - Reshapping the peer-review process: heretic remarks in a digital time

• SETH DEMBO, Director of Scholarly Communication and Digital Initiatives, American Historical Association - AHA's Ad Hoc Committee on Professional Evaluation of Digital Scholarship by Historians

• INGRID KISSLING, Head of the Humanities and Social Sciences division, Swiss National Science Foundation – Peer review under revision – The digital

challenge for funding agencies

• EUGENE LYMAN, University of Boston – Publishing digital projects reviews:

practical suggestions

• NICOLAS THÉLY, Professor for Digital Humanities, Université de Rennes 2 – Toward an evaluation grid for Digital Humanities projects

• PHILIP STEINKRÜGER, Editor of RIDE (Review Journal for digital editions and ressources); KU Leuven and Institute for Documentology and Digital Editing (IDE) – Toward a catalogue of criteria for the review of digital editions

• SACHA ZALA, Director of the Swiss Historical Association & director of the Diplomatic Documents of Switzerland – Some dogmatic postulates for the digital historical sciences

Registration:

Registration is free of charge. To register, send a mail to

[email protected], with your full name and function, and specifying if you want to attend both the Workshop (29th January) and the Roundtable (30th January) or just the Workshop or the Roundtable.

Références

Documents relatifs

The future of academic libraries lies in adopting a global view of the evolutions that occur in the academic world, whether in research, learning or in teaching.. The future

Textbook costs: The costs of textbooks purchased as required by instructors are covered by the TaiwanICDF, subject to the approval of the director of the student’s

International applicants should, whenever possible, submit an expert reference by a university lecturer at the university in Germany where they would like to study; if you have

Proof of admission to doctoral studies by a state or state- recognised university, as a rule in Germany, must be included in with the application.. Proof of admission to doctoral

Title: Building 9066 Archive into Wikipedia: A Case Study of Digital Scholarship, History and Activism at Fresno State.. Abstract: Can special collections, archival materials

The DFCM was purposefully selected as a powerful setting to explore community faculty members’ perceptions about engagement in educational scholarship given its size (it is one

We need to identify the common tools and the common sources of semantic material.. And it will be slow – it took crystallography 15 years to create their dictionaries and system

Print is plural by design, and variants in the text make each copy of this relatively common early modern book unique, but we describe the First Folio’s provenance up to the point