• Aucun résultat trouvé

Aperiodic Order

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Aperiodic Order"

Copied!
56
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Thomas Fernique

Laboratoire d’Informatique de Paris Nord CNRS & Univ. Paris 13

(2)

Quasiperiodicity Local rules Some issues

Outline

1 Quasiperiodicity

2 Local rules

3 Some issues

(3)

Outline

1 Quasiperiodicity

2 Local rules

3 Some issues

(4)

Quasiperiodicity Local rules Some issues

The good, the bad and the ugly

Tiling: covering ofRn by interior-disjoint compact sets called tiles.

(5)

The good, the bad and the ugly

A tiling isperiodic if it is invariant by a translation.

(6)

Quasiperiodicity Local rules Some issues

The good, the bad and the ugly

It isaperioric otherwise.

(7)

The good, the bad and the ugly

A tiling isquasiperiodic if eachpattern reoccurs uniformly.

(8)

Quasiperiodicity Local rules Some issues

Substitutions

A method to define quasiperiodic tilings: substitutions.

(9)

Substitutions

A method to define quasiperiodic tilings: substitutions.

(10)

Quasiperiodicity Local rules Some issues

Substitutions

A method to define quasiperiodic tilings: substitutions.

(11)

Substitutions

A method to define quasiperiodic tilings: substitutions.

(12)

Quasiperiodicity Local rules Some issues

Substitutions

A method to define quasiperiodic tilings: substitutions.

(13)

Substitutions

A method to define quasiperiodic tilings: substitutions.

(14)

Quasiperiodicity Local rules Some issues

Cut and projection

Another method: discretize linear subspaces of higher dim. spaces.

(15)

Cut and projection

(16)

Quasiperiodicity Local rules Some issues

Cut and projection

(17)

Cut and projection

(18)

Quasiperiodicity Local rules Some issues

Cut and projection

(19)

Quasicrystals (1982)

Quasicrystal: quasiperiodic material (aperiodic order).

(20)

Quasiperiodicity Local rules Some issues

Quasicrystals (1982)

Can stabilization be explained by short-range energetic interaction?

(21)

Outline

1 Quasiperiodicity

2 Local rules

3 Some issues

(22)

Quasiperiodicity Local rules Some issues

Dimension 1

Consider bi-infinite words over a finite alphabetA.

Subshift: the words avoiding a setF offorbidden finite words.

Subshift of finite type(SFT): F can be chosen to be finite.

Sofic subshift: letter-to-letter image of an SFT.

Examples: the words overA={a,b} with alternating a’s and b’s?

SFT

at most one b?

Sofic not SFT

exactly oneb?

Not a subshift

runs of b’s all of the same length?

Not sofic

(23)

Quasiperiodicity Local rules Some issues

Dimension 1

Consider bi-infinite words over a finite alphabetA.

Subshift: the words avoiding a setF offorbidden finite words.

Subshift of finite type(SFT): F can be chosen to be finite.

Sofic subshift: letter-to-letter image of an SFT.

Examples: the words overA={a,b} with alternating a’s and b’s?

at most one b?

Sofic not SFT

exactly oneb?

Not a subshift

runs of b’s all of the same length?

Not sofic

(24)

Quasiperiodicity Local rules Some issues

Dimension 1

Consider bi-infinite words over a finite alphabetA.

Subshift: the words avoiding a setF offorbidden finite words.

Subshift of finite type(SFT): F can be chosen to be finite.

Sofic subshift: letter-to-letter image of an SFT.

Examples: the words overA={a,b} with

alternating a’s and b’s? SFT

at most one b? Sofic not SFT

exactly oneb? Not a subshift

runs of b’s all of the same length? Not sofic

(25)

Quasiperiodicity Local rules Some issues

Higher dimensions

Proposition

Any non-empty sofic subshift contains a periodic word.

Conjecture (Wang, 1960)

Any non-empty sofic tiling space contains a periodic tiling. Algorithm to decide whether a given tile set does tile.

(26)

Quasiperiodicity Local rules Some issues

Higher dimensions

Proposition

Any non-empty sofic subshift contains a periodic word.

Tiling space: higher dimensional extension of subshift.

Conjecture (Wang, 1960)

Any non-empty sofic tiling space contains a periodic tiling. Algorithm to decide whether a given tile set does tile.

(27)

Higher dimensions

Proposition

Any non-empty sofic subshift contains a periodic word.

Tiling space: higher dimensional extension of subshift.

Conjecture (Wang, 1960)

Any non-empty sofic tiling space contains a periodic tiling.

Algorithm to decide whether a given tile set does tile.

(28)

Quasiperiodicity Local rules Some issues

Undecidability

Theorem (Berger, 1964)

There is a non-empty sofic 2D tiling space without periodic tilings.

Explicit construction based on substitutions (play puzzle!).

Theorem (Berger, 1964)

There is no algorithm to decide whether a tile set tiles the plane. Proof sketch:

simulate computation by square tiles (2D 'space ×time); run computation eveywhere for longer and longer time; rely on the undecidability of the Halting problem.

(29)

Quasiperiodicity Local rules Some issues

Undecidability

Theorem (Berger, 1964)

There is a non-empty sofic 2D tiling space without periodic tilings.

Explicit construction based on substitutions (play puzzle!).

Theorem (Berger, 1964)

There is no algorithm to decide whether a tile set tiles the plane.

simulate computation by square tiles (2D 'space ×time); run computation eveywhere for longer and longer time; rely on the undecidability of the Halting problem.

(30)

Quasiperiodicity Local rules Some issues

Undecidability

Theorem (Berger, 1964)

There is a non-empty sofic 2D tiling space without periodic tilings.

Explicit construction based on substitutions (play puzzle!).

Theorem (Berger, 1964)

There is no algorithm to decide whether a tile set tiles the plane.

Proof sketch:

simulate computation by square tiles (2D 'space ×time);

run computation eveywhere for longer and longer time;

rely on the undecidability of the Halting problem.

(31)

Penrose again

It does not mean that it cannot be proven for a given tile set!

(32)

Quasiperiodicity Local rules Some issues

Outline

1 Quasiperiodicity

2 Local rules

3 Some issues

(33)

Quasiperiodicity Local rules Some issues

Method comparison

Can we compare the methods to generate quasiperiodic tiling?

substitutions (and S-adic extension);

cut and projection;

local rules.

Some results:

Kari- ˇCulik is not substitutive(Monteil);

substitution ⇒ local rules(Mozes, Goodman-Strauss, F.-Ollinger); for cuts: computable ⇔ local rules(F.-Sablik);

some algebraic cuts ⇒ substitution (Harriss, Arnoux-Ito, F.,. . . ).

(34)

Quasiperiodicity Local rules Some issues

Method comparison

Can we compare the methods to generate quasiperiodic tiling?

substitutions (and S-adic extension);

cut and projection;

local rules.

Do exist other methods,e.g., for Jeandel-Rao tile sets?

Some results:

Kari- ˇCulik is not substitutive(Monteil);

substitution ⇒ local rules(Mozes, Goodman-Strauss, F.-Ollinger); for cuts: computable ⇔ local rules(F.-Sablik);

some algebraic cuts ⇒ substitution (Harriss, Arnoux-Ito, F.,. . . ).

(35)

Method comparison

Can we compare the methods to generate quasiperiodic tiling?

substitutions (and S-adic extension);

cut and projection;

local rules.

Do exist other methods,e.g., for Jeandel-Rao tile sets?

Some results:

Kari- ˇCulik is not substitutive(Monteil);

substitution ⇒ local rules(Mozes, Goodman-Strauss, F.-Ollinger); for cuts: computable ⇔ local rules(F.-Sablik);

some algebraic cuts ⇒ substitution(Harriss, Arnoux-Ito, F.,. . . ).

(36)

Quasiperiodicity Local rules Some issues

Growth

Dead ends: the existence of tilings does not mean it is easy to tile!

(37)

Growth

Idea: add a tile only where there is no choice (intuitive & realist).

(38)

Quasiperiodicity Local rules Some issues

Growth

Idea: add a tile only where there is no choice (intuitive & realist).

(39)

Growth

Idea: add a tile only where there is no choice (intuitive & realist).

(40)

Quasiperiodicity Local rules Some issues

Growth

Idea: add a tile only where there is no choice (intuitive & realist).

(41)

Growth

Works in some cases (quadratic cuts inR4, work in progress).

(42)

Quasiperiodicity Local rules Some issues

Maxing rules

How to tile with as few square tiles as possible?

(43)

Maxing rules

Lozenges only cannot tile the plane. Squares are needed!

(44)

Quasiperiodicity Local rules Some issues

Maxing rules

Squarestransfer informationbetween lozenges.

(45)

Maxing rules

The possible tilings discretize the planes of a hyperbola inGr(4,2).

(46)

Quasiperiodicity Local rules Some issues

Maxing rules

The possible tilings discretize the planes of a hyperbola inGr(4,2).

(47)

Maxing rules

Square minimization yields aperiodicity (Ammann-Beenker tilings).

(48)

Quasiperiodicity Local rules Some issues

Maxing rules

Which other aperiodic tilings can be described this way? Penrose?

(49)

Sphere packings

Findk different spheres in Rn whose densest packing is aperiodic.

(50)

Quasiperiodicity Local rules Some issues

Sphere packings

Fork = 1, n∈ {2,/ 3,8,24}. Maybe for some n≥10?

(51)

Sphere packings

Good candidates to prove maximimal density: compact packings.

(52)

Quasiperiodicity Local rules Some issues

Sphere packings

Good candidates to prove maximimal density: compact packings.

(53)

Sphere packings

Good candidates to prove maximimal density: compact packings.

(54)

Quasiperiodicity Local rules Some issues

Sphere packings

Good candidates to prove maximimal density: compact packings.

(55)

Sphere packings

90%

98%

80%

90%

Good candidates to prove maximimal density: compact packings.

(56)

Quasiperiodicity Local rules Some issues

Sphere packings

For 2 discs (9 cases), 3 discs (164 cases) or 2 balls (1 case):

The densest compact packings always contain a periodic packing.

Références

Documents relatifs

lorsqu’on descend dans le tableau périodique: dans un solvant polaire protique, les petits anions sont plus solvatés que les nucléophiles volumineux, donc moins

Les réactions d'addition sont défavorisées car le produit d'addition n'est plus aromatique (destruction d’une double liaison). Les substitutions électrophiles concernent les

In one of their experiments, Capalbo and Glenney illustrated that the use of colour information in a recognition task outperformed the performance of “TheVoice”

Fomin growth diagrams for the Robinson-Schensted correspondence and for the jeu de taquin are some rules allowing the construction of the 4th Ferrers diagram once 3 Ferrers

These questions have been taken up by several authors, over many years, and by various methods. The most popular energies ω for hierarchical par- titions derive from that of D.

By doing so, one can simultaneously work on improving the upper and lower.. bounds used in the Benders decomposition algorithm. By using local branching in the L-shaped algorithm,

Planar tilings Multigrid dualization Grassmann coordinates Patterns Local rules Sufficient conditions Necessary conditions.. Cut the plane and project onto

Actually, since our model does not allow the goalkeeper to be a substitute, the choice to update nb-gk-subs or nb-fp-subs may only depend on the role of the player that leaves