A NNALES DE L ’I. H. P., SECTION A
H. K NUTSEN R. S TABELL
On the possibility of general relativistic oscillations
Annales de l’I. H. P., section A, tome 31, n
o4 (1979), p. 339-353
<http://www.numdam.org/item?id=AIHPA_1979__31_4_339_0>
© Gauthier-Villars, 1979, tous droits réservés.
L’accès aux archives de la revue « Annales de l’I. H. P., section A » implique l’accord avec les conditions générales d’utilisation (http://www.numdam.
org/conditions). Toute utilisation commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infraction pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit contenir la présente mention de copyright.
Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques
http://www.numdam.org/
p. 339
On the possibility
of general relativistic oscillations
H. KNUTSEN (*) R. STABELL
Institute of Theoretical Astrophysics, Box 1029, University of Oslo, Norway.
Ann. Inst. Henri Poincare , Vol. XXXI, nO 4, 1979,
Section A:
Physique , théorique. ,
ABSTRACT. A group of solutions of Einstein’s field
equations
for aspherically symmetric
distribution of matter isinvestigated.
If the massis at rest at the initial moment and the pressure and
density
are both zeroat the
boundary (gas
cloud or dust cloud with adensity gradient
definedeverywhere),
it is found that oscillations are notpossible.
If thedensity
at the
boundary
ispositive,
it is shownthat,
for some classes ofsolutions,
oscillations are notpossible,
whereas other classes of solutionssatisfy
necessary conditions for
oscillatory
motion.However,
these conditionsare in
general
not sufficient.INTRODUCTION
In a series of papers G. C. MvVittie has
investigated
the radial motions of aspherically symmetric
mass distribution under the influence ofgravi-
tation and its pressure
gradient (McVittie, 1964,
1966 and1967). By impos- ing
certain symmetryconditions,
instead ofassuming
aparticular equation
of state, McVittie was able to solve Einstein’s
equations,
in part atleast,
for the coefficients of the metric. The
analytical
solutions of Einstein’sequations
for the interior of the massdistribution, assuming isotropic
(*) Present address : M0re and Romsdal School of Engineering, 6000 Alesund, Norway.
Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré - Section A - Vol. XXXI, 0020 - 2339/1979/339/S 5.00/
@ Gauthier - Villars
pressure, can be divided into four different classes
(McVittie, 1967;
here- after referred to asPaper I).
Aspecial
caseresulting
inexpansion
orcollapse
to a
singularity, depending
on the initial value of the radius of the mass,was
investigated by
McVittie and Stabell(1967).
The
possilility
ofoscillatory
motions among the solutions ofPaper
Iwas first
pointed
outby
Nariai( 1967)
andby
Bonnor and Faulkes( 1967).
An
investigation
of three of the four classes of solutions showed that neces-sary
(but
notsufficient)
conditions for oscillations are met in all threecases
(McVittie
andStabell, 1968,
hereafter referred to asPaper II).
Thepurpose of this paper is to
investigate
in more detail all four cases withregard
tooscillatory
motions.BASIC
EQUATIONS
With
co-moving
coordinates the metric within the mass is written(Paper I) :
where
Ro
is a constant,S and f
are dimensionless functions of t and r,respectively, and y
and ?y are dimensionless functions of the variable zdefined
by
where
Q
is another function of r. It is also shown inPaper
I thatIf the presssure is
isotropic,
then it is shown thatQ, f, and y satisfy
threeordinary
differentialequations
of the second orderwhere a and b are
arbitrary
constants and sumxes denote derivatives.It was shown in
Paper
I that(4)
and(5)
arealways integrable
in termsof
elementary functions,
but(6)
isonly
sointegrable
in fourspecial
cases,denoted in
Paper
Iby equations (A.26)
to(A.29).
These four cases, obtainedAnnales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré - Section A
341
ON THE POSSIBILITY OF GENERAL RELATIVISTIC OSCILLATIONS
by putting
one of the two constants ofintegration equal
to zero, are the group of solutions which will beinvestigated.
Equations (A.33)
and(A.34)
ofPaper
Igive,
for thedensity,
p, and the pressure, p,respectively :
To fit the internal solution to an external vacuum Schwarzschild solution it is necessary to
put
the pressureequal
to zero at theboundary :
Henceforth
boundary
values will be denotedby
the suffix b.In
Paper
II it was shown that the condition(9) gives
thefollowing equation
for the scale-function S :where
B1yb
+2(v 2 -
3. -YZ)bB2
+(1 - yb)(Y 2 - .Y -
and
Inspection
ofequation (10)
shows that it canalways
be written in the formwhere
Vol. XXXI, n° 4 - 1979.
and
Equation (14)
is anordinary
differentialequation
of first order forS~.
When it is solved for
S2,
we haveSt
as a function of S.In
Paper
II it was found that without loss ofgenerality
one could put : As is remarked inPaper II,
it isalways possible
toadjust
the constantRo
in
( 1)
so that S will have the valueunity
at apre-assigned
instant. It will beassumed that S = 1
corresponds
toS
=0,
and that the mass is at rest at the initial moment, i. e.The four cases,
(A.26)
to(A.29)
ofPaper I,
will now be dealt withseparately.
CASE A. 26 Case A.26 is defined
by
and
equation (6)
isintegrable
togive
thefollowing equation
For convenience a new
variable,
x, is introduced instead of the scale- functionby
Using
condition( 16), S
== 0 when S =1, equation ( 14)
can beintegrated
to
give (equ. (2.24)
inPaper II) :
where no, nl and xl are constants defined in
Paper II, involving
the constantsBv B2
andB3
defined inequations (11)
to(13).
Fos
oscillatory
motions to exist the scale function must vary betweenunity
and apositive value,
i. e. xl > 0. Thefollowing inequality
is thenobtained :
Annales de Henri Poincaré - Section A
343
ON THE POSSIBILITY OF GENERAL RELATIVISTIC OSCILLATIONS
xt
must also bepositive during
the motion. Fromequation ( 19)
thefollowing inequality
is then obtained :This last
inequality
can be put into thefollowing
form :The two constraints : xl > 0 and
x2
> 0 thentogether yields :
It is also
required, however,
that thedensity
at theboundary,
pb, ispositive
or zero at the initial moment :
From
equation (7)
thefollowing inequality
is theneasily
obtainedin contradiction to
inequality (20).
We therefore conclude that no
oscillatory
motion ispossible
in case A.26.CASE A. 27 This case is defined
by
and
equation (6)
isintegrable
togive
Using
condition(16), Sr
= 0 when S =1, equation (14)
can beintegrated
to
give (equ. (2.32)
inPaper II) :
where
M2,
xland x2
are constants(defined by
equs.(2.33)
and(2.34)
in
Paper II)
and where now x =Inspection
ofequation (24)
shows that oscillations canonly
exist if thefollowing inequality
is satisfiedHowever, from
equation (7)
and the condition(21)
for thedensity
atthe
boundary
thefollowing inequality
is obtained :in contradiction to
inequality (25).
We therefore conclude that no
oscillatory
motion ispossible
in case A.27.Vol. XXXI, n° 4-1979.
CASE A. 28 This case is defined
by
In the
following
§ we discuss various subcasesdepending
j on the value ’ of b.b - 1~
From
equation (6)
we getwhere a constant of
integration
isput equal
to zero.From
equation ( 14)
is now obtained(after
somecalculation)
where
Inspection
ofequation (28)
shows that oscillations arepossible only
ifHowever,
fromequation (7), requiring (21),
that thedensity
ispositive
orzero at the
boundary,
it is found thatin contradiction to
inequality (29).
Hence,
nooscillatory
motion ispossible
in thissubcase, (&2014!).
~ == - 1
From
equation (6)
we now getwhere K is a constant of
integration.
If K is putequal
to + 1, we obtain fromequation ( 14) :
where
Annales de I’Institut Henri Poincaré - Section A
345 ON THE POSSIBILITY OF GENERAL RELATIVISTIC OSCILLATIONS
Inspection
ofequation (31)
shows thatSr
= 0 when S =1,
i. e. when the motion is to start.Oscillatory
motions arepossible only
ifSt
= 0 for anotherpositive
value of S.Sr
must also bepositive during
the motion. From equa- tion(31)
thefollowing inequality
is then obtained : D0,
i. e.Inspection
of(31)
also shows that E1,
since E ~ 1 would make the denominatorequal
to zero at some timeduring
theoscillatory
motion.From
this,
thefollowing inequality
is obtained :Hence, using inequality (32),
we obtainFrom
equation (7)
with therequirement (21)
it isfound, however,
thatis in contradiction to
(33). Hence,
nooscillatory
motions can exist for thissubcase.
Without the restriction K = 1 we obtain from
equation ( 14) :
In this case
(with
Karbitrary)
we make theextra-requirement
that pb = 0always.
From
equation (7)
we then obtainThe
right
hand sides ofequations (34)
and(35)
must be identical. Remember-ing
that(In S)2
and In Sand 1 arelinearly independent
functions andnoting
that K = 0
implies
asingularity
in themetric,
we obtain :With this result it is
easily
seen thatonly
motions ofexpansion
or contrac-tion are
possible
in this subcase.Vol. XXXI, n° 4 - 1979.
& > - 1
Using
condition(16), S
= 0 when S =1, equation ( 14)
can beintegrated
to
give (equ. (2.29)
inPaper II) :
where
5,
n2 and ~-i are constants defined inPaper II,
and x =S8.
With the
requirements xl
> 0and x2t
>0,
necessary foroscillations,
the
following inequality
is obtained fromequation (37) :
If we
require
that thedensity
at theboundary
ispositive
at the initial moment, it iseasily
seen from(7)
that we get aninequality equal
to(38)
andnothing
is
gained. Using
the valuesgiven
in Table I inPaper II,
we find that oscilla- tions arepossible provided
that- 1 b
using
column1,
- 1 b 0
using
columns 2 or 3.An exhaustive
investigation
ofequation (37)
for the function x for allpossible
values ofBl, B2
andB3
is left for a laterinvestigation.
However,
if werequire
that thedensity
at theboundary,
pb, is zero at the initial moment,it is
easily
seen fromequation (7)
that thisimplies :
which is
incompatible
with(38). Hence,
with therequirement (39),
no oscilla- tory motions arepossible
in this subcase.The
special
case b = 0It was shown in
Paper
II that oscillations areonly possible
whenB1, B2
and
B3
take the values of column 1 of Table I in that paper. From column 1 it is seen thatwhere a
and 03B2
are constants ofintegration
defined inPaper
II.Inspection
of
equation (37)
shows thatoscillatory
motions may existonly
ifFrom
equation (7)
it is found(after
somecalculations)
that thedensity
ispositive everywhere
in the mass distribution and at any instant if :Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré - Section A
347
ON THE POSSIBILITY OF GENERAL RELATIVISTIC OSCILLATIONS
Since it is also
required
that x > 0 andQ
>0,
it is seen thatinequality (42)
is satisfied.
From
equation (8)
for the pressure it is found(after
somelengthy
calcu-lations)
thatwhere
From
(40)
and(41)
thefollowing inequality
is obtained :When this is used in the
following inequality :
(see
Table I inPaper II).
One more
inequality
is obtained :From the
expression
forQ given
in Table I ofPaper
II it is then found that :If necessary the
co-moving
coordinate r is redefined so that cos r ~ 1.It is then seen that :
From the
expression
forQ given
in Table I ofPaper
II it is then found that :Hence,
the value ofQ
is restrictedby
It is then seen that
R(Q, x)
> 0. Since x andQ
areindependent
Vol. XXXI, n° 4 - 1979.
variables
(x - Q)
may now takepositive
values. Hence the pressure pgiven by equation (43)
may takenegative
values.Thus, oscillatory
motions in this case must be discarded asphysically unacceptable.
CASE A. 29
In this case there are no restrictions on the constants a and b.
The
investigation
is divided into three subcases which are dealt withseparately.
From
equation (8), using
the conditions(9), 0,
and(16), St
= 0when S =
1,
we obtainwhere
and
For this case we
require
that pb = 0always.
From
equation (7), again using
condition(16),
we obtainCombining equations (46)
and(47)
anddifferentiating
we get(remembering
that
1, 20142014, and sin3 4 u
arelinearly independent functions) :
cos u cos u cos u cos u
Annales de Henri Poincaré - Section A
349
ON THE POSSIBILITY OF GENERAL RELATIVISTIC OSCILLATIONS
These three
equations
are satisfied if andonly
ifor
giving
either a static solution or motion ofexpansion
or contraction to asingularity.
In the
special
case a = 3 it is sufficient torequire
pb = 0 at the initialmoment. From
equation (7), using
condition( 16), S
= 0 when S = 1,we obtain
Bi - 2B~ - B;; = 0.
From
equation (8)
with therequirement (9),
pb -0,
we then obtainTo avoid
singularity
in the metric since yb =ý/;;
tg u, M must take values in the openInspection
ofequation (50)
then showsthat for oscillations to exist
lim sin
M[- MBg
sin M +2k(B2
+Bg)
cosM]
> 0.However it is
easily
seen that this limit isequal
to -k(Qr Q)2b
O.Hence,
no
oscillatory
motions arepossible
in thisspecial
case.(~ - 1)~
+ 4 ~ > 0As in the
previous
case werequire
p~ =0, always.
Fromequation (7), using
condition(16)
we obtainwhere
and
Inspection
ofequation (51)
shows thatwhen a2 =
0 thepossible
motionsare
expansion (ao
>0),
contraction(ao 0)
or static solution(ao - 0).
Vol. XXXI, nO 4 - 1979.
In the case a2 ~
0, using
also thecondition xt
= 0 when x = 1 we findthat
From
equations (52), (53)
and(54)
we getAdding (55)
and(56) yields
Inspection
ofequation (51)
shows thatoscillatory
motions arepossible only
ifand this is in contradiction with
equation (57).
From
equation (8)
for the pressure,using
conditions(9),
pb = 0 and(16),
we obtain :
where is
given
inequation (10)
and K is a constant ofintegration.
From
equation (7), with pb ~
0(and imposing
condition( 16))
we getCombining equations (58)
and(59)
anddifferentaiting
we get thefollowing
three
equations (remembering
that1, (K -
InS), (K -
InS) - 2
and(K -
InS) - 3
arelinearly independent functions) :
These three
equations
are satisfied if andonly
if(giving
a staticsolution),
orIn this latter case we get from
equation (59), imposing
thecondition (16), St = 0 when S =
1:2
Annales de Henri Poincaré - Section A
ON THE POSSIBILITY OF GENERAL RELATIVISTIC OSCILLATIONS 351
where
and
Inspection
ofequation (60)
shows thatoscillatory
motions areonly possible
if
Following
McVittie(see
equ.(A.10)
inPaper I)
we introduce a new radialcoordinate q
definedby
By
means of McVittie’s method of substitution(see
equ.(A.23)
inPaper I), equation (5),
with the new radialcoordinate q,
can be solved.We obtain two sets of solutions for the
functions~ ~, Q
andQr depending
on the value of a constant of
integration,
P. If P = 0 we have :where R is still another constant of
integration.
When P =t=0,
we have :We also have from
equation (6), using
the relation(2)
Vol. XXXI, nO 4 - 1979.
Since
Q
and S areindependent variables, inspection
of(74)
shows that ifsingularity
in the metric is to beavoided,
K must be apositive
constant.If we choose P =
0,
thenby equations (66)
to(69) using
the expres- sions( 11), ( 12)
and( 13),
we obtain :It is
easily
seen thatB3 = 0 implies B2
= 0 and hence K =0, i.
e.singularity.
Moreover T = 0 is in contradiction to
(64).
If we choose P 4=
0,
thenby equations (70)
to(73)
andusing
the expres- sions( 11 ), (12)
and( 13),
we obtainand
where
and
From
(76)
and(64)
it sollows that a necessary condition for oscillations is It is also seen thatonly
theplus sign
can be retained in(77)
to ensure that K ispositive. Inspection
of(74)
now shows that(80)
leads tosingularity
in themetric. Hence oscillations are not
possible
in this subcase.SUMMARY. The radial motions of a
spherically symmetric
mass areinvestigated
for a group of solutions of Einstein’sequations
foundby
McVittie
(Paper I).
Inparticular
we have examined thepossibilities
ofoscillations found in
Paper
II in more detail.Using
theexpressions
for thedensity
and pressure we have checked for inconsistencies or contradictionsor for the occurrence of a
singularity
in the metric. With thegeneral require-
ments that the pressure is zero at the
boundary
and the matterconfiguration
is at rest at the initial moment, we have obtained the
following
results :a)
If thedensity
ot theboundary
is zerothroughout
themotion,
tions are not
possible.
b)
If thedensity
at theboundary
is zero at the initial moment, oscillationsare not
possible
in the cases A.26, A.27 and in the sub cases A.28 with b =1= -1,
A.29 with a =3,
b - 1.c)
If wejust require
thedensity
to bepositive
at the initial moment, no oscillations arepossible
in either of the casesA.26,
A.27 or in the two subcases of A.28: b - 1 and b = 0.Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré - Section A
353
ON THE POSSIBILITY OF GENERAL RELATIVISTIC OSCILLATIONS
In addition it was found that in the
special
caseA.28,
b = - 1 witha constant of
integration put equal
to1,
oscillations are notpossible.
d)
In case A.28 with b > - 1 andB1, B2, B3
taken to have values to be found in Table I inPaper
II, it is found that necessary conditions for oscilla- tions aresatis,fied.
But these conditions are notsufficient.
In onespecial
case(& = 0)
the pressure is found to takenegative
values. This solution musttherefore be discarded as
physically unacceptable.
AKNOWLEDGMENTS
We wish to thank Prof. G. C. McVittie for
helpful
comments.REFERENCES
W. B. BONNOR and M. C. FAULKES, Mon. Not. R. astr. Soc., 137, 1967, p. 239.
G. C. MCVITTIE, Ap. J., 140, 1964, p. 401 G. C. MCVITTIE, Ap. J., 143, 1966, p. 682.
G. C. MCVITTIE, Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré, A, 6, 1967, p. 1 (Paper I).
G. C. MCVITTIE and R. S. STABELL, Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré, A, 7, 1967, p. 103.
G. C. MCVITTIE and R. S. STABELL, Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré, A, 9, 1968, p. 371 (Paper II).
H. NARIAI, Prog. Theor. Phys., 38, 1967, p. 740.
(Manuscrit reçu Ie 4 , mai 7P7P~.
Vol. XXXI, nO 4 - 1979.