1
WHO/HIV/2013.136
© World Health Organization 2013
HIV and adolescents: guidance for HIV testing and counselling and care for adolescents living with HIV
ANNEX 11 (a): Values and preferences: ALHIV survey
Care and treatment values, preferences, and attitudes of adolescents living with HIV
A survey for the development of WHO guidelines for HIV and adolescents:
guidance for HIV testing and counselling and care for adolescents living with HIV:
recommendations for a public health approach
2 Table of Contents
Acknowledgements
Abbreviations and acronyms Executive Summary
1. Introduction 2. Objectives 3. Methodology
3.1 Survey design
3.2 Distribution of the survey 3.3 Ethical considerations 3.4 Survey participants 3.5 Limitations of the survey 4. Key findings from survey 5. Discussion
6. Conclusions 7. Appendices
7.1 survey text in English
7.2 Key survey findings in table form Table 1. Final survey population by age
Table 2. Final survey population by gender/sex
Table 3. “If you are currently receiving paediatric or adolescent services, has/have your health- care provider(s) discussed how you will move to adult services?” (Q 16)
Table 4. “How easy is it for you to access your health care?” (Q18)
Table 5. “Do you feel that attending appointments with health-care providers interferes with your life?” (Q20)
Table 6. “If you miss an appointment with a health-care provider, does someone contact you to see why?” (Q21)
Table 7. “How comfortable do you feel asking any of your health-care providers questions about your general health?” (Q22)
Table 8. “How comfortable do you feel asking any of your health-care providers questions about HIV?” (Q23)
Table 9. “Are you responsible for the following:” (Q29) 7.3 Responses to open-ended questions (by age and gender)
7.3.1 “What do you like the most about the HIV care you receive?” (Q34)
7.3.2 “What suggestions do you have to improve HIV care for yourself or other young people?”
(Q35)
7.3.3 “Is there anything else that you would like to tell us?” (Q36) 7.4 Responses to open-ended questions (by theme)
7.4.1 “What do you like the most about the HIV care you receive?” (Q34)
7.4.2 “What suggestions do you have to improve HIV care for yourself or other young people?”
(Q35)
7.4.3 “Is there anything else that you would like to tell us?” (Q36)
3 Acknowledgements
The World Health Organization (WHO) would like to thank all of the adolescents who contributed their voices to this survey. We would also like to thank all of the partner organizations, non-governmental organizations (of all sizes and in all locations), and especially the youth organizations, who contributed time, money, and effort so we could reach adolescents and young people we may not have been able to access simply through email.
We would also like to thank the many individuals and organizations who contributed to the
development, distribution, and administration of the e-survey: Adam Garner, Georgina Caswell, and Gavin Reid (GNP+); Effi Stergiopoulou (Mortimer Market and Archway Centres, London); Pablo Torres Aguilera (dance4life); Neta Velichko (East Europe and Central Asia Union of PLWH); Scott McGill (Save the Children); Annette Sohn (TREAT Asia); Oyelakin Oladay Taiwo (Positive Action for Treatment Access);
Ntoli Moletsane (‘Mamohato Network and Camps – Sentebale); Grace Muriisa (UNICEF-Rwanda); Sonal Mehta (India HIV/AIDS Alliance); Freddy Perez (PAHO); Asha Mohamud (UNFPA); and the other kind and generous individuals who helped. Many people in the organizations mentioned above as well as the following organizations also contributed as well: UNAIDS, USAID, FHI360, CDC, Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS Foundation.
We would especially like to thank the following people who donated their time to translate the English- language survey so other adolescents and young people were able to contribute their voices to the consultation: Neta Velichko of the East Europe and Central Asia Union of PLWH (Russian); Carlo André Oliveras Rodríguez, Caribbean Treatment Action Group Regional Director of the International Treatment and Preparedness Coalition – Latin America and Caribbean (Spanish); Joumana Hermez of the WHO Eastern Mediterranean Regional Office (EMRO) (Arabic); Keneth Ehouzou of UNFPA (French); and Annette Sohn of TREAT Asia (Thai).
Written by Kathleen Fox, Department of HIV, World Health Organization, Geneva.
Survey developed and/or analyzed by Kathleen Fox, Rachel Baggaley, Katherine Noto, and Gonçalo
Figueiredo Augusto of the Department of HIV, WHO; and Jane Ferguson of the Department of Maternal,
Newborn, Child, and Adolescent Health, World Health Organization, Geneva.
4 Abbreviations and acronyms
AIDS acquired immune deficiency syndrome ALHIV adolescents living with HIV
ANC antenatal care ART antiretroviral therapy ARVs antiretrovirals
CDC U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention CHTC couples HIV testing and counselling
DHS Demographic and Health Surveys FBOs faith-based organizations
HIV human immunodeficiency virus HTC HIV testing and counselling MCH maternal and child health M&E monitoring and evaluation MMC medical male circumcision MSM men who have sex with men NGOs non-governmental organizations OST opioid substitution therapy
PEPFAR U.S President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief PITC provider-initiated testing and counselling PMTCT prevention of mother-to-child transmission PrEP pre-exposure prophylaxis
PWID people who inject drugs RCT randomized controlled trial STI sexually transmitted infection SW sex workers
TB tuberculosis UN United Nations
UNAIDS Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS UNICEF United Nations Children’s Fund
UNFPA United Nations Population Fund
USAID United States Agency for International Development VCT voluntary HIV testing and counselling
WHO World Health Organization
YKAP young key-affected population
5 Executive Summary
Globally, more than two million adolescents aged 10–19, and five million young people aged 15–24 are living with HIV. Many factors contribute to this: from low levels of testing and linkage to care and prevention, to poor retention in care and adherence to antiretroviral treatment (ART). By increasing adolescent-focused treatment and care services, adolescents and young people (10–24 years) will be more likely to be better engaged in care and treatment, thus reducing morbidity and mortality in this greatly underserved population.
A scoping exercise of published literature relating to the care and treatment values and preferences of adolescents living with HIV (ALHIV) was conducted using PubMed, Google scholar and Google. The search method employed combinations of terms for adolescents, HIV, care, service, and values and preferences. Studies were categorized and qualified by topic, study design type, and income level. This informed the content of an e-survey of 36 questions that was disseminated in six languages through various international and youth organizations (379 respondents aged 10–24 years from 46 countries completed the survey in full).
The scoping exercise highlighted eleven major themes, chief amongst them were access to care and medication, psychological/mental health support, transition and continuity of care services and support, learning materials about HIV, opportunities to participate in or be responsible for their own health care, and health-care provider knowledge, attitudes, and confidentiality. Data collected from the survey revealed that 72% of ALHIV had either some or significant difficulty accessing health care, but about 87%
felt comfortable asking health providers about either their general health (85%) or HIV (88%). Open- ended questions underscored the importance of staff and peer support (~72%). Respondents suggested better or more education (~37%) and age-appropriate support (~35%) as areas for improvement.
Adolescents need to be engaged in their HIV care and treatment. Governments and organizations need to tailor services to meet the specific needs of adolescents and support the development of
responsibilities aimed at self-care. At the same time, governments must identify and address barriers to
acceptable and effective provision of services to adolescents, including the training of service providers
to better communicate with this unique and underserved population.
6 1. Introduction
Globally, over two million adolescents aged 10–19, and five million young people aged 15–24 are living with HIV. Many factors contribute to this high prevalence: from low levels testing and linkage to care and prevention, to poor retention in care and adherence to antiretroviral treatment (ART) in this population. By increasing adolescent-focused treatment and care services, adolescents (10‒19 years) and young people (20–24 years) will be more likely to be better engaged in care and treatment, thus reducing morbidity and mortality in this greatly underserved population.
Adolescents living with HIV (ALHIV) have been infected with HIV through one of two pathways: through vertical transmission, from mother to child via pregnancy or breastfeeding, or through horizontal transmission, from either sexual (i.e. consensual or non-consensual penetrative sex) or non-sexual methods (e.g. injecting drug use, exposure to infected blood, medical procedures).
Systematic reviews have been conducted to examine a range of relevant studies on adolescent-related topics from the availability of HIV testing and counselling services for adolescents to the provision of and access to HIV care and treatment services for ALHIV. These reviews have indicated significant barriers and facilitators to improving the provision of and access to health care and HIV services for ALHIV:
however, few of the studies discussed in these reviews have included the values, preferences, and perceptions of the adolescents themselves.
The WHO guidelines development process requires consultation with stakeholders engaged at all levels:
this survey was developed to understand the values, preferences, and attitudes of the end-users—
adolescents and young people living with HIV—of various types of HIV care and treatment services and interventions. A survey was conducted to facilitate the inclusion of those voices into the guidelines process.
The results of the survey are presented in this report and will be used as supporting information for the Guideline Development Group (GDG). The GDG is comprised of experts in adolescent health and HIV from various countries and affiliations, including civil society. The data and results of the survey will be considered in conjunction with graded literature to aid the development of the guidelines at a meeting of experts to be held in October and November 2012.
2. Objectives
A study of the values and preference of adolescents was conducted to facilitate the participation of those who will be most affected by HIV care and treatment services for adolescents living with HIV and the inclusion of their voices in the guidelines development process. The key objectives of this study were:
To gain an adolescent perspective of HIV care and treatment services including the benefits and barriers to accessing services and remaining retained in care;
To have a better understanding of what aspects of care and treating are important to adolescents when seeking, initiating, and remaining in care;
To explore accessibility and effectiveness of services from adolescents’ viewpoints.
3. Methodology 3.1 Survey design
The development of the survey was conducted in two distinct phases. First, a scoping review of
published and gray literature (37 sources, descriptive studies, and reports were identified during the
7 literature review) was conducted to look at current discussions of and studies examining the values, preferences, and attitudes of adolescents and young people living with HIV (10–24 years) regarding their health and HIV care. The scoping exercise identified eleven key themes to be addressed in the
community survey:
Access to care and medication – broadly defined to include not only physical access to treatment and care, but also financial and social support (including provider and community stigma which were found to be major barriers to utilization of available services);
Structure of health-care services;
Availability of youth-friendly or adolescent-only services;
Opportunities to participate in or be responsible for one’s own health care;
Transition and continuity of care services and support – from paediatric and/or adolescent services to adult health- or HIV-care services;
Psychosocial/mental health support – from access to counsellors to skills development;
Peer, community, and social support;
HIV education and knowledge- and skills-building services;
Sexual and reproductive health education and services;
Knowledge, attitudes, and confidentiality of health-care providers;
Confidentiality, disclosure, and privacy.
Based on the findings of scoping exercise, examination of published and unpublished HIV-related surveys, and discussion with WHO and GNP+ (Global Network of People living with HIV) colleagues, a draft of the survey was developed. With the assistance of GNP+ the survey was pilot tested by seven members of Y+, a network within GNP+, comprised of adolescents and young people living with HIV—
from Africa, South America, and Asia, and feedback was provided through GNP+, thus maintaining the anonymity of the young people. Based on that feedback and further discussions with Georgina Caswell at GNP+, a second draft was developed and then pilot tested by five young people in a group at the Mortimer Market and Archway Centres in London.
The final survey was comprised of thirty-six questions: thirty-three close-ended and three open-ended.
Only three of the questions were required: The first asking for the respondent to consent to take the survey, another asking the respondent’s age, and the last asking for the respondent’s HIV status. The last two questions served to disqualify those who did not fall within the defined survey population—
adolescents and young people living with HIV (10–24 years).
The survey asked respondents to provide demographic data regarding their age, sex, location, occupation, and HIV status. If they indicated they were HIV-positive, they then answered questions about what types of services providers they access and how often, how they felt about the services available to them, what types of services they would like, and how responsible they were for their own health—from making their own appointments to remembering to take their medication. The
approximate completion time was twelve to fifteen minutes (depending on length of answers provided for open-ended questions).
The survey was translated by volunteers into five languages—Spanish, French, Russian, Thai, and Arabic, and, along with the English version, were uploaded to the internet.
3.2 Distribution of the survey
Information about the survey was provided to a wide range of international, national, and regional
networks working with adolescents living with HIV, asking them to circulate the survey in either digital
8 or paper form. A few of the community-based networks and groups also assisted with the
administration of the survey.
3.3 Ethical considerations Anonymity of participants
The survey was designed to keep the identities of the respondents anonymous. No identifiable information was requested and no IP addresses were stored. Where computer access was lacking or limited at best, the survey was administered on paper in a manner suitable to the context (e.g. placed in envelopes that were then sealed and shipped to WHO), while retaining the anonymity of the
respondents as best as possible. In cases where the respondents required assistance or translation by an administrator was required, survey administrators gained verbal consent from the adolescent
respondents.
Opt in, opt out
One group from Lesotho, administering the survey verbally on an individual basis, chose to eliminate the question asking if the respondents knew how they got HIV because the administrators felt that the question was too sensitive for their group of young people. Adolescents and young people taking the e- survey were able to skip almost all of the questions provided, with the exception of the three questions asking for their consent to take the survey, their age, and if they are living with HIV. The latter two questions were used to disqualify respondents who did not fall within the required age range of 10 ‒ 24 years and were not currently living with HIV. For those respondents within the qualifying age range, who chose not to disclose their HIV status, the disqualification message reemphasized the purpose of the survey: “We are looking for the opinions and experiences of young people (ages 10‒24) living with HIV who know they are living with HIV and are willing to disclose their status. If you are living with HIV and would like to complete the full survey, please start again.” On every page of the survey respondents were provided an exit button, enabling them to leave the survey at any point they wished.
3.4. Survey consultation respondents
The survey consultation was available in both electronic and paper versions in order to reach as many adolescents and young people as possible.
A total of 830 people started the online surveys—available in English, Spanish, French, Thai, and Russian—after which 376 were disqualified because of age or because they exited the survey and 116 were disqualified because they indicated they were not HIV positive or did not know or did not wish to disclose their status. The disqualification statement explained we were looking for opinions from young people living with HIV regarding their care and invited those who were disqualified to complete the survey by disclosing their status. 338 respondents remained within this group.
An additional 111 adolescents and young people completed paper versions of the survey, 2 of which were disqualified because they answered ‘I don’t know’ regarding their HIV status. 109 respondents remained within this group.
A total of 447 adolescents and young people completed the full survey.
• Ages: 10‒12 (26), 13‒14 (39), 15‒16 (47), 17‒18 (63), 19‒20 (91), 21‒22 (82), 23‒24 (99)
• 57 countries represented
– The greatest number of respondents come from Cameroon (55), India (50, evenly
distributed amongst the age groups), Nigeria (50, mainly between 17 and 22 years),
Thailand (28, evenly distributed amongst age groups), Ghana (25, mainly between 17
9 and 22 years), Lesotho (18, between 10 and 18 years), Philippines (17, between 19 and 24 years), Malawi (15, mainly between 14 and 20 years), Zimbabwe (15, mainly between 21 and 24 years), Mexico (13, between 19 and 24 years) and Rwanda (12, fairly evenly distributed amongst the age groups)
– Eight countries had between 5 and 10 respondents, while the remaining countries had between 1 and 3 respondents.
– Several adolescent-focused NGOs were very successful gaining participants in Cameroon, India, Lesotho, Malawi, and Rwanda. Surprisingly, teen club participation, even at the individual level, was very low or nonexistent in Swaziland (1) and Botswana (0).
• Participation from sub-Saharan Africa
– The following western and central African countries are represented: Cameroon (55), Cote d’Ivoire (1), The Gambia (1), Ghana (25), Nigeria (50), and Senegal (3).
– The following eastern and southern African countries are represented: Ethiopia (1), Kenya (7, 19‒24 years), Lesotho (18), Malawi (15), Mozambique (1), Namibia (7, 13‒20 years), Rwanda (12), South Africa (9, 10‒18 years), Swaziland (1), Tanzania (2), Uganda (8, 19‒24 years), Zambia (7), and Zimbabwe (15).
Table 1. Characteristics of survey respondents by age, sex, and country [including non-responses]
Ages Number per age
Number per gender
Countries
10‒12 26 (5.8%) M 14 Country M F T O NR Total
F 12 Cameroon 5 3 - - - 8
T - India 2 6 - - - 8
O - Lesotho 2 2 - - - 4
NR - Malawi - 1 - - - 1
Rwanda 2 - - - - 2
South Africa 1 - - - - 1
Thailand 2 - - - - 2
Total 14 12 0 0 0 26
13‒14 39 (8.7%) M 15 Country M F T O NR Total
F 24 Cameroon 2 5 - - - 7
T - India 3 6 - - - 9
O - Lesotho 1 3 - - - 4
NR - Malawi - 1 - - - 1
Moldova 2 - - - - 2
Namibia - 1 - - - 1
Nigeria 2 - - - - 2
South Africa - 3 - - - 3
Ukraine 1 - - - - 1
Zimbabwe 1 1 - - - 2
Thailand 2 - - - - 2
Uzbekistan - 1 - - - 1
NR 1 3 - - - 4
Total 15 24 0 0 0 39
15‒16 47 (10.5%) M 23 Country M F T O NR Total
F 21 Australia - - 1 - - 1
T 1 Cameroon 1 4 - - - 5
O - India 6 1 - - - 7
NR 2 Kazakhstan 1 - - - - 1
Lesotho 2 4 - - - 6
Malawi 2 3 - - - 5
Mozambique - 1 - - - 1
Namibia 1 - - - 1
Nigeria - 3 - - - 3
Rwanda 1 - - - - 1
South Africa 1 - - - - 1
Tanzania - - - - 1 1
Thailand 5 3 - - - 8
USA - 1 - - - 1
Uruguay 1 - - - - 1
NR 2 1 - - 1 4
10
Total 23 21 1 0 2 47
17‒18 63 (14.1%) M 28 Country M F T O NR Total
F 34 Afghanistan - - 1 - - 1
T 1 Cameroon 3 4 - - - 7
O - Estonia - 1 - - - 1
NR - Ghana 4 - - - - 4
India 4 3 - - - 7
Lesotho 3 1 - - - 4
Malawi 2 1 - - - 3
Namibia 1 3 - - - 4
Nepal - 1 - - - 1
Nigeria 6 5 - - - 11
Rwanda - 2 - - - 2
Thailand 3 7 - - - 10
United Kingdom - 1 - - - 1
USA - 3 - - - 3
Zimbabwe 1 - - - - 1
NR 1 2 - - - 3
Total 28 34 1 - - 63
19‒20 91 (20.4%) M 32 Country M F T O NR Total
F 55 Cambodia - - - 1 (gay men) - 1
T 1 Cameron 6 11 - - - 17
O 1 Ghana 4 10 - - - 14
- Gay men India 1 3 - - - 4
NR 1 Kenya - - - - - -
Lesotho - 1 - - - 1
Macau - 1 - - - 1
Malawi 3 2 - - - 5
Mexico 2 - - - - 2
Moldova - 2 - - - 2
Namibia - 1 - - - 1
Nepal 1 - - - - 1
Nigeria 7 15 - - - 22
Paraguay 1 - - - - 1
Philippines 1 - - - - 1
Rwanda 3 - - - - 3
South Africa 1 - - - - 1
Thailand - 2 - - - 2
Uganda - 2 - - - 2
United Kingdom 1 - - - - 1
Zambia - 1 - - - 1
Zimbabwe - 1 - - - 1
NR 2 3 1 - 1 7
Total 33 55 1 1 1 91
21‒22 82 (18.3%) M 41 Country M F T O NR Total
F 39 Argentina 3 - - - - 3
T 2 The Bahamas - 1 - - - 1
O - Bhutan - - 1 - - 1
NR - Cameroon 3 8 - - - 11
Colombia 1 - - - - 1
Cote d’Ivoire - 1 - - - 1
Dominican Republic 1 - - - - 1
Germany 1 - - - - 1
Ghana 1 5 - - - 6
India 6 2 - - - 8
Indonesia - 1 - - - 1
Kenya 1 2 - - - 3
Malaysia 1 - - - - 1
Mexico 2 1 - - - 3
Nepal - 1 - - - 1
Nigeria 3 6 - - - 9
Philippines 5 - - - - 5
Romania - 1 - - - 1
Rwanda 1 1 - - - 2
Senegal - 1 - - - 1
Tanzania 1 - - - - 1
Thailand - 2 - - - 2
Ukraine 1 - - - - 1
United Kingdom 1 - - - - 1
Uruguay 1 - - - - 1
USA 1 - 1 - - 2
Venezuela 1 - - - - 1
Vietnam 1 - - - - 1
Zambia 1 1 - - - 2
11
Zimbabwe 2 3 - - - 5
NR 2 2 - - - 4
Total 41 39 2 - - 82
23‒24 99 (22.1%) M 59 Country M F T O NR Total
F 30 Algeria - - 1 - - 1
T 4 Argentina 2 - - - 1 3
O 2 Belize 1 - - - - 1
- Bisexual - Gay male
Burma - - 1 - - 1
Colombia 1 - - - - 1
NR 4 Denmark 4 1 - - - 5
Egypt 1 - - - - 1
Ethiopia - 1 - - - 1
The Gambia - 1 - - - 1
Germany 1 - - - - 1
Ghana 1 - - - - 1
Guyana - 1 1
India 5 2 7
Indonesia 1 - - - - 1
Jamaica 2 - - - - 2
Kazakhstan - 1 - - - 1
Kenya - 2 - - 1 3
Malaysia 2 - - - - 2
Mexico 8 - - - - 8
Moldova - 1 - - - 1
Nigeria 3 - - - - 3
Philippines 8 - - 2 (gay male,
bisexual) 1 11
Romania - 1 - - - 1
Russia 3 - -- - - 3
Rwanda 1 1 - - - 2
Senegal 1 1 - - - 2
Spain 3 - - - - 3
South Africa - 3 - - - 3
Swaziland - 1 1
Thailand - 2 - - - 2
Uganda 3 3 - - - 6
Ukraine 1 - 1 - - 2
USA 2 1 1 - - 4
Zambia 1 3 - - - 4
Zimbabwe 2 4 - - - 6
NR 2 - - - 1 3
Total 59 30 4 2 4 99
Table 2. Regions and countries represented
Region and countries Number of
respondents
Western and Central Africa 135
Cameroon 55
Cote d’Ivoire 1
The Gambia 1
Ghana 25
Nigeria 50
Senegal 3
Eastern and Southern Africa 103
Ethiopia 1
Kenya 7
Lesotho 18
Malawi 15
Mozambique 1
Namibia 7
Rwanda 12
South Africa 9
Swaziland 1
United Republic of Tanzania 2
Uganda 8
Zambia 7
Zimbabwe 15
Eastern Mediterranean 3
Afghanistan 1
Algeria 1
12
Egypt 1
The Americas 41
Argentina 6
The Bahamas 1
Belize 1
Colombia 2
Dominican Republic 1
Guyana 1
Jamaica 2
Mexico 13
Paraguay 1
United States of America 10
Uruguay 2
Venezuela 1
Europe and Central Asia 31
Denmark 5
Estonia 1
Germany 2
Kazakhstan 2
Moldova 5
Romania 2
Russia 3
Spain 3
Ukraine 4
United Kingdom 3
Uzbekistan 1
South-East Asia 85
Bhutan 1
India 50
Indonesia 2
Myanmar (Burma) 1
Nepal 3
Thailand 28
Western Pacific 24
Australia 1
Cambodia 1
Macao (SAR) 1
Malaysia 3
Philippines 17
Viet Nam 1
No country indicated 25
Total 447