• Aucun résultat trouvé

Rebuttal: Is evidence-based medicine overrated in family medicine?: Yes.

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Rebuttal: Is evidence-based medicine overrated in family medicine?: Yes."

Copied!
1
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Web exclusive

Rebuttal: Is evidence-based medicine overrated in family medicine?

Ross E.G. Upshur

MD MSc CCFP FRCPC

C. Shawn Tracy

YES.

There are many points of agreement between our position and that of Drs Labrecque and Cauchon.1 We agree that data from scientific research are an impor- tant component of medicine and are one of the key dis- tinguishing features of modern medicine. We agree that medicine needs to incorporate patient preferences and values and that clinicians should be expert and humane.

However, we think it is a mistake to equate evidence- based medicine (EBM) with everything good in medicine.

Evidence-based medicine cannot simply appropriate all science into medicine. There are many sciences that contribute to modern medicine, but EBM states that only certain forms of research should inform medical prac- tice. It is very important to draw clear lines of demarca- tion among science, scientific data, and EBM.

Evidence-based medicine fails to deliver on crucial aspects of its mission such as reliable and validated tools for integrating patient values and preferences into clinical care. Rather than being viewed as part of the core of EBM, patient- or person-centred, value-based, and narrative-based approaches have emerged in response to the perceived deficiencies in EBM.2-4 Some of the decision aids that Drs Labrecque and Cauchon mention are welcome and laudable,1 but there is much more work to be done.

The issue of the role of the pharmaceutical industry is an important concern that we all share. Yet there is nothing in the tool kit of EBM that addresses problems such as suppressed studies or ghost-writing. We need additional tools to assess the credibility and trustworthi- ness of research.

Finally, we must disagree that EBM defines excel- lence in medical practice. Evidence-based medicine has

been largely silent about ethics and other crucial ele- ments of humanism in medicine.5 It has been successful in sensitizing practitioners to the threats of bias in mea- surement. The claim that medicine is an art and a sci- ence is often made, but is really not informative. Science and art are remarkably heterogeneous human pursuits.

Medicine is a practice informed by science that rests upon a moral imperative to serve the needs of people seeking to restore, maintain, or improve their health.

Evidence-based medicine has contributed to this goal, but is by no means the gold standard of care.

Dr Upshur is Professor in the Department of Family and Community Medicine and Dalla Lana School of Public Health at the University of Toronto in Ontario, and Medical Director of Clinical Research at Bridgepoint Health. Mr Tracy is Research Associate at Bridgepoint Health.

Acknowledgment

Dr Upshur is supported by the Canada Research Chair in Primary Care Research.

Competing interests None declared Correspondence

Dr Ross Upshur, Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, 2075 Bayview Ave, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5;

e-mail ross.upshur@gmail.com References

1. Labrecque M, Cauchon M. Is evidence-based medicine overrated in family medicine? No [Debates]. Can Fam Physician 2013;59:1162-3 (Eng), 1166-7 (Fr).

2. Miles A, Mezzich J. The care of the patient and the soul of the clinic: person- centered medicine as an emergent model of modern clinical practice. Int J Pers Cent Med 2011;1(2):207-22.

3. Little M, Lipworth W, Gordon J, Markham P, Kerridge I. Values-based medi- cine and modest foundationalism. J Eval Clin Pract 2012;18(5):1020-6.

4. Greenhalgh T. Narrative-based medicine in an evidence based world. BMJ 1999;318(7179):323-5.

5. Malterud K. The art and science of clinical knowledge: evidence beyond measures and numbers. Lancet 2001;358(9279):397-400.

These rebuttals are responses from the authors of the debates in the November issue (Can Fam Physician 2013;59:1160-3 [Eng], 1164-7. [Fr]).

e475

Canadian Family PhysicianLe Médecin de famille canadien

|

Vol 59: noVemBeR • noVemBRe 2013

Rebuttals

Références

Documents relatifs

Without locking critical reading up and throwing away the key, clinical research data that have been subjected to rigorous analysis or critical synthesis inde- pendent of

Dr Labrecque is Full Professor in the Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine at Laval University and Clinician-Researcher in the Research Centre of the

A s an attorney and advocate for patient safety, I believe the authors of the Motherisk article that appeared in the August 2013 issue of Canadian Family Physician give

More specifically, the goal of our study is to explore the opinions of graduates in family medicine about collaboration with community pharmacists with regard to 3 distinct

Or perhaps we will continue to be the only profes- sionals able to deliver comprehensive and continuous care; the only ones able to help, guide, and advise; the only ones able to

In a US study by Helton and Pathman, 3 family practice residents reported very positive attitudes toward elderly patients, yet only two-thirds of them thought that

Most  physicians  are  aware  of  the  dangers  involved  when  patients  pick  and  choose  between  conventional  and  alternative  modalities  with- out 

Those who were licensed to practice in Canada on or before January 1, 1994,* and who currently hold a licence in good standing to carry out independent family or gen-