• Aucun résultat trouvé

Productivity gains through CIS/2 electronic data exchange format for steel structures

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Productivity gains through CIS/2 electronic data exchange format for steel structures"

Copied!
20
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Vous avez des questions? Nous pouvons vous aider. Pour communiquer directement avec un auteur, consultez la

première page de la revue dans laquelle son article a été publié afin de trouver ses coordonnées. Si vous n’arrivez pas à les repérer, communiquez avec nous à PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca.

Questions? Contact the NRC Publications Archive team at

PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca. If you wish to email the authors directly, please see the first page of the publication for their contact information.

https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/droits

L’accès à ce site Web et l’utilisation de son contenu sont assujettis aux conditions présentées dans le site LISEZ CES CONDITIONS ATTENTIVEMENT AVANT D’UTILISER CE SITE WEB.

READ THESE TERMS AND CONDITIONS CAREFULLY BEFORE USING THIS WEBSITE.

https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/copyright

NRC Publications Archive Record / Notice des Archives des publications du CNRC :

https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/view/object/?id=a6baf8eb-a435-493d-bd13-d1134cece9d3 https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/voir/objet/?id=a6baf8eb-a435-493d-bd13-d1134cece9d3

NRC Publications Archive

Archives des publications du CNRC

Access and use of this website and the material on it are subject to the Terms and Conditions set forth at

Productivity gains through CIS/2 electronic data exchange format for steel structures

(2)

http://irc.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca P r o d u c t i v i t y g a i n s t h r o u g h C I S / 2 e l e c t r o n i c d a t a e x c h a n g e f o r m a t f o r s t e e l s t r u c t u r e s I R C - O R A L - 8 5 8 P a r d a s a n i , A F e b . 1 3 , 2 0 0 8

A version of this document is published in / Une version de ce document se trouve dans:

Workshop on Computational Tools and Technologies for Construction Practitioners (London, Ontario, February 13, 2008)

The material in this document is covered by the provisions of the Copyright Act, by Canadian laws, policies, regulations and international agreements. Such provisions serve to identify the information source and, in specific instances, to prohibit reproduction of materials without written permission. For more information visit http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/showtdm/cs/C-42

Les renseignements dans ce document sont protégés par la Loi sur le droit d'auteur, par les lois, les politiques et les règlements du Canada et des accords internationaux. Ces dispositions permettent d'identifier la source de l'information et, dans certains cas, d'interdire la copie de documents sans permission écrite. Pour obtenir de plus amples renseignements : http://lois.justice.gc.ca/fr/showtdm/cs/C-42

(3)

Acknowledgments

J

itender

Singh, Hastings and Aziz

Ltd.

T

(4)

Outline

• Construction Process Inefficiencies • Electronic (Design) Data Exchange • CIS/2

• Case Studies

• Barriers to its adoption

(5)

Construction Process

Inefficiencies

• Inefficiencies result from continued reliance on paper-based information management systems

– Manual reentry of data,

– Duplication of business functions

Project Conception

Project Delivery

Design Fabrication Operation/

Maintenance

Analysis Design Detailing

(6)

Cost of Inefficient

Interoperability in

Construction

Three type of costs arising out of Inefficient Interoperability:

Type of Costs Due to

Avoidance Redundant systems

Mitigation Manual re-entry of data

Delay Idled employees

Total Costs 15.8 Billion

• Cost Analysis of Inadequate Interoperability in the U.S.

Capital Facilities Industry (NIST GCR 04-867, 2004)

– Increased new construction costs by $6.18 per sq. ft.

– Increased O&M costs by $0.25 per sq. ft.

• Causes of Inadequate Interoperability:

– Fragmented nature of industry – Lack of standardization in IT – Inconsistent technology

(7)

Interoperability

• Interoperability – “the ability of two or more systems or components to exchange information and to use the information that has been

exchanged” IEEE Standard Computer Dictionary • Interoperability is defined as the ability to:

– Manage,

– Communicate (Data Exchange and Access)

electronic product and project data between collaborating firms and within individual companies design, construction, maintenance, and business process systems.

• Information need only be entered into the system only once:

– It is then available to all stakeholders instantaneously through on an as needed basis

(8)

Interoperability

Solutions

• Three ways to achieve :

– Point to point data translators – Mandating the use of

proprietary tools across an industry

– establishing neutral data standards (e.g. CIS/2)

• Technologies – XML – DXF – STEP – SNIF – CIS/2 – IFC

– AEX (Automated Exchange of Equipment Data)

(9)

EDI using XML: Hammond

Manufacturing

<Transformer> <Category>Distribution</Category> <Primary>208</Primary> <Secondary>240</Secondary> <Temp_Rise>150</Temp_Rise> </Transformer> Design Automation System

(10)

CIS/2

• CIMSteel Integration Standards Version 2

• CIS/2 is intended to create a seamless and integrated flow of information among all parties of the steel supply chain.

• It is not a S/W (software) package that you buy.

• Just like DXF, it is a file format for Electronic Data Interchange. • The CIS/2 file is imported/exported in a steel related CAD S/W. • Some S/W vendors charge for their CIS/2 import/export feature. • Provides for DBMS

(11)

CIS/2 Benefits

• The CIS/2 translators eliminate the need to re-input data into SDS/2 from paper drawings.

• EDI helped reduce detailing errors by providing an accurate transfer of member sizes and locations.

• The hours normally required for detailing and checking for errors are greatly reduced.

• Cost savings throughout the project since erection could begin sooner and occupancy could occur earlier.

• Savings in estimating the material cost (e.g. importing the model into Fabtrol)

(12)

Case Study

• The Baptist West Hospital in Knoxville, TN:

– RAM Structural System interfaced with SDS/2 detailing

software using CIS/2 technology to streamline design, detailing, fabrication and erection on a fast-track hospital project.

– Steel detailer imported CIS/2 files in SDS/2 thus quickly got to work on shop drawings

(13)

Barriers to Electronic

Data Interchange

Barriers

• Current Business Model do not support EDI

• Only paper as a valid mechanism of information exchange. Solutions:

• There needs to be a new business model that will allow for data in electronic format to be the deliverable

(14)

IFC (Industry

Foundation Classes)

• Developed by IAI (International Alliance for Interoperability)

• Serves the need for most architectural, general contracting and some facilities management task

• Lacks sufficiently complete representation of structural eng to be effectively used by structural engineers.

• Relationship between IFC and CIS/2

– IFC integrate the different design disciplines horizontally

– While the CIS/2 format integrate the design, analysis, detailing, and fabrication processes vertically.

(15)

Data Exchange with

CIS/2

Detailing

Fabrication

NIST VRML and IFC Translator

Spencer Steel Spencer Steel

Fabtrol SDS/2

Analysis

Hastings and Aziz RAM Structural

CIS/2 CIS/2

CIS/2 CIS/2

Verification

(16)

NIST CIS/2-VRML

Translator

• The NIST CIS/2 VRML translator imports CIS/2 files

– Exports VRML that can be viewed: • In a VRML Browser

• In a web browser with VRML plug-in – Exports IFC files that can be:

• Imported into many IFC viewers and CAD programs.

• Converted to a DWG file with the DDS-CAD Viewer and imported into AutoCAD.

(17)
(18)

Application of CIS/2:

Tools for As-Built

• Mobile Tools for Inspection of Steel Structures Project at IRC

– To assist in the visual inspection of steel structures – To create As-Built construction documentation

GPS coordinate system to local coordinate system converter Indoor GPS Longitude Latitude Altitude CIS/2 File NIST CIS/2 to VRML Translator VRML Model Location Aware 3D Model Navigator

(19)

References

• CIMsteel Integration Standards, www.cis2.org

• CIS/2 and IFC - Product Data Standards for Structural Steel

(http://cic.nist.gov/vrml/cis2.html#IFC)

• Cost Analysis of Inadequate Interoperability in the U.S. Capital Facilities Industry.

Michael P. et. al. NIST GCR 04-867

• The CIS/2 Format: Another AEC Interoperability Standard,

http://www.aecbytes.com/buildingthefuture/2005/CIS2format.html

• Interoperability and the construction process, A white paper for building owners and

project decision makers, Coleman, G.S. AISC

• American Institute for Steel Construction, http://www.aisc.org

• Utilizing Interoperability & eCommerce,

http://www.aisc.org/template.cfm?template=/ContentManagement/ContentDisplay.cfm& ContentID=31814

• Building Better, Modern Steel Construction, June 003

(20)

Références

Documents relatifs

[r]

Valid roots in a language take a wider set of affixes in common than invalid roots, and, because of this, the expected outcome, largely borne out in test files, is that feature sets

The purpose of the Variability Exchange Language is to support the standardization of these interfaces by a common exchange format that defines, which information is exchanged between

Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of

Rivara, grammairien, dans son livre traitant du «système de la comparaison», parle de comparabilité par nature (6). En d’autres termes, la question de la comparabilité ne

The article analyzes data format requirements from collection support services, content owners, and external users, as determined by the presentation, storage, and

Achieving consensus of data exchange between competing parties is challenging, though it is a challenge worth addressing, as the value of a more complete market view allows parties

In this paper we develop an intuitionistic relevance-logic based semantics that allows us to extend the polynomial time “naive evaluation” tech- nique to Data Exchange