WP/2008IDHP/10
Report Series No. RS/2008/GE/Ol(PHL)
REPORT
MEETING ON ROAD SAFETY DATA
Convened by:
WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION
REGIONAL OFFICE FOR THE WESTERN PACIFIC
Manila, Philippines 13-14 February 2008
WHOIWFRO LIBRARY
MANILA.PHILIPPINES
Not/or sale
Printed and distributed by:
Wodd Health Organization Regional Office for the Western Pacific
Manila, Philippines September 2008
English only
NOTE
The views expressed in this report are those of the participants in the Meeting on Road Safety Data and do not necessarily reflect the policies of the World Health Organization.
This report has been printed by the Regional Office of the Western Pacific of the World Health Organization for the participants in the Meeting on Road Safety Data, which was held in Manila, Philippines from l3 to 14 February 2008.
CONTENTS
SUMMARy ... -1-
1. INTRODUCTION ... -1 -
1.1 Background infonnation ... - 1 -
1.2 Objectives ... - 2 -
1.3 Participants ... - 2 -
1.4 Organization ... -2 -
1.5 Opening remarks ... - 3 -
2. PROCEEDINGS ... -3-
2.1 Summary of papers ... - 3 -
3. CONCLUSIONS ... -8 -
3.1 Sharing experiences in the collection of data pertaining to road safety ... - 8 -
3.2 Common methods of obtaining country data for the Global Status Report on Road Safety ... - 8 -
ANNEXES:
ANNEX 1 - LIST OF PARTICIPANTS AND SECRETARIAT ANNEX 2 - PROGRAMME OF ACTIVITIES
ANNEX 3 - LIST OF DOCUMENTS DISTRIBUTED DURING THE MEETING
KeywordS:
Accidents. Traffic / Traffic safety
SUMMARY
The Meeting on Road Safety Data was conducted in Manila, Philippines from 13 to 14 February 2008 by the World Health Organization (WHO) Regional Office for the Western Pacific.
The objectives of the meeting were:
(l) to share experiences in the collection of data pertaining to road safety; and (2) to discuss and agree on common methods to obtain country data for the Global Status Report on Road Safety.
The meeting was attended by 21 participants who were officials of the Ministry of Health or other national agencies and institutions responsible for road safety. The participants were from Brunei Darussalam, Cambodia, China, Cook Islands, the Federated States of Micronesia, Fiji, Japan, Kiribati, the Lao People's Democratic Republic, Malaysia, Mongolia, Niue, Papua New Guinea, the Philippines, the Republic of Korea (two participants), Palau, Samoa, Tonga, Vanuatu and Viet Nam.
The proceedings included the following presentations and discussions: an introduction to collection of road traffic injury data; progress in international road safety efforts; country experiences in road traffic injury data; pilot testing of a questionnaire by Malaysia and the Philippines; introduction to the Global Status Report on Road Safety (GSRRS); questionnaire and indicators; roles and responsibilities of National Data Coordinators (NOCs); identification of consensus panel members; consensUs meeting methodology; and entering and validating data and planning the data collection process.
The conclusions of the meeting were as follows:
(1) Sharing experiences in the collection of data pertaining to road safety.
Worldwide, an estimated 5.2 million people died of injuries in 2002, accounting for 9% of mortality and 12% of the world's burden of disease. Of these, nearly 1.2 million people died as a result of road traffic crashes. In the Western Pacific Region, there were approximately 304 000 road traffic deaths in 2002. The health sector has a role to play in road traffic injury prevention through data collection, advocacy, emergency service, prevention, evaluation and policy-making.
Participants from Malaysia and the Philippines shared their valuable experience in the pilot testing of the GSRRS questionnaire. Issues on road traffic injury surveillance included data collection by different agencies and variable definitions of road traffic injury deaths and the severity of injury. These issues need to be resolved through detailed comparison of the data from various sources and underscore the need for a centralized, standardized road traffic injury data system.
(2) Common methods of obtaining country data for the GSRRS.
The presentations were useful to participants regarding the methodology of the data collection process. The participants agreed to the following steps and strategic plan for collection of road traffic injury data for the GSRRS.
• Identification of consensus panel members and sending them the respondents' questionnaire to fill out.
• Collecting supporting documents.
• Arranging the consensus panel meeting and filling out the final country questionnaire.
• Entering and validating data in the Internet-based system.
• Obtaining government clearance for country reports.
Participants agreed to use the opportunity of the global survey to strengthen the road traffic injury surveillance system, build capacity for intersectoral coordination and seek more resources for road traffic injury prevention activities.
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background infonnation
Injuries and violence are major problems impairing the health and welfare of
vulnerable populations. Worldwide, an estimated 5.2 million people died of injuries in 2002, accounting for 9% of mortality and 12% of the world's burden of disease. Of these, nearly
1.2 million people died as a result of road traffic crashes. This represents an average of 3242 people dying globally each day, with another estimated 20 to 50 million injured or disabled every year. In addition to the human suffering they cause, road traffic accidents place a huge burden on national eGonomies.
In the Western Pacific Region, road crashes cause approximately 300 000 deaths annually. Most countries in the Region are experiencing rapid economic development, exposing their populations to the ill effects of motorization. Given current rates of motorization, road traffic injuries are expected to rise.
In 2004, the United Nations General Assembly, for the first time, discussed and adopted resolution A/RES/58/289 on improving global road safety. The resolution invited WHO to act as the coordinator on road safety issues within the United Nations system. The resolution was sponsored by more than 50 countries.
Subsequently, the World Health Assembly adopted resolution WHA57.1 0 on road safety and recommended the incorporation of road traffic injuries into public health
programmes. The United Nations General Assembly, on 26 October 2005, adopted a second resolution on road safety (A/RES/60/5) which invited Member States to implement the recommendations of the World Report on Road Traffic Injury Prevention, jointly published by WHO and the World Bank.
The health sector has a role to play in road traffic injury prevention through data collection, advocacy, emergency service, prevention, evaluation and policy-making.
Accurate, consistent, unbiased and comparable infonnation on injuries, addressing their causes, sociocultural determinants and their consequences, is key to sound policy-making. As countries move towards policy-making and setting priorities for road traffic injury prevention, there is a need to respond to the demand for accurate and timely data.
WHO has developed a number of tools, including Irifury Surveillance Guidelines and Guidelines for Conducting Surveys on lrifury and Violence. to assist countries in assessing the nature and extent of injury morbidity and mortality. Once the extent and risk factors of road traffic injuries are detennined, cost-effective interventions, such as use of helmets and seat belts, drinking and driving countenneasures, speed limitation and increased conspicuity of vulnerable road users, can be implemented. WHO has published good practice manuals, namely Helmets and Drinking and Driving. WHO has initiated a new project to develop a Global Status Report on Road Safety (GSRRS) on a country-by-country basis. The country situation will be assessed based on a standard list of items, such as crash incidence; existence of legislation on seatbelts; motorcycle helmets; speed and blood alcohol concentration;
seatbelt and motorcycle helmet wearing rates; and the existence of a national plan of action on road safety. Data collection in countries will be coordim",·d by national data coordinators (NDCs) through a consensus panel, consisting of representatives from government agencies, nongovernmental organizations and academic institutions. The infonnation collected in this process will be synthesized in a report that will serve as a key tool in advocating for increased focus and investment on road safety at national levels. This two year project has been made possible through a donation from the Bloomberg Philanthropies. With this support, WHO
-2-
will be able to accelerate its assistance to countries to enhance their road safety data collection and, in particular, to implement the recommendations of the 2004 World Report on Road Traffic Injury Prevention.
1.2 Objectives
The objectives of the meeting were:
(1) to share experiences in the collection of data pertaining to road safety; and (2) to discuss and agree on common methods to obtain country data for the GSRRS.
1.3 Participants
The meeting was attended by 21 participants, who were officials of the Ministry of Health, or other national agencies and institutions responsible road safety. The participants were from Brunei Darussalam, Cambodia, China, Cook Islands, the Federated States of Micronesia, Fiji, Japan, Kiribati, the Lao People's Democratic Republic, Malaysia, Mongolia, Niue, Papua New Guinea, the Philippines, the Republic of Korea (two participants), Palau, Samoa, Tonga, Vanuatu and Viet Nam.
For the meeting, WHO provided four staff members to serve as the secretariat. A list of participants and secretariat members is given in Annex 1.
1.4 Organization
The meeting programme is given in Annex 2, and a list of documents distributed during the meeting can be found in Annex 3. The documents include presentation materials,
overview of the GSRRS, respondents' questionnaire, fmal country questionnaire, instruction manual, consensus methodology and information for NDCs. Copies of these papers can be obtained upon request from the WHO Regional Office for the Western Pacific.
The meeting selected Dr Nguyen Thi Hong Tu of Viet Nam as Chairperson.
The technical sessions of the meeting began with an introduction to collection of road traffic injury data and progress in international road safety efforts. Participants from Malaysia and the Philippines shared their valuable experience in the collection of road traffic injury data and the pilot testing of the questionnaire. There was a discussion of these experiences and the presentations and discussions addressed the first objective of the meeting.
The second objective was dealt with by plenary discussions, which included an overview of the GSRRS, questionnaire and indicators, roles and responsibilities ofNDCs, identification of consensus panel members, consensus meeting methodology, entering and validating data, and planning the data collection process. There was detailed discussion after the respective presentations.
- 3 -
1.5 Opening remarks
On behalf of Dr Linda Milan, Director, Division of Healthy Communities and Populations, Dr Hisashi Ogawa, Acting Director of the Division and Regional Adviser in Healthy Settings and Environment, delivered the opening speech. Dr Ogawa emphasized that with approximately 300 000 road traffic deaths every year in the Region, road traffic injuries were a significant public health concern. Aside from the human suffering they cause, road traffic crashes place a huge burden on national economies. As most countries in the Region are experiencing rapid economic development and motorization, road traffic injuries are expected to increase.
Because of their public health significance, WHO has increased its efforts to prevent road traffic injuries in recent years. WHO has initiated a project to compile the Global Status Report on Road Safety. For this, data will be collected from countries and will be synthesized in a report that will serve as a key tool in advocating increased focus and investment on road safety at both national and international levels. Dr Ogawa then officially opened the meeting.
2. PROCEEDINGS
2.1 SummarY of papers
2.1.1 Collecting data on road traffic injuries
Dr Tamitza Toroyan, Technical Officer, Violence and Injury Prevention and Disability, WHO Headquarters, Geneva, presented an overview of the importance of collecting reliable data on road traffic injuries. She stated that the main reasons for collecting such data were to describe the magnitude of the problem, identify risk factors, establish priorities and allocation of resources for prevention, develop and evaluate interventions and raise awareness of the problem. Road traffic injury data involves many agencies, such as transport, health, law and enforcement, industry, research and nongovernmental organizations.
The potential challenges in collecting road traffic injury data are technical issues (e.g.
defmitions, under-reporting, missing or incomplete records, and lack of a system for keeping records), administrative issues (e.g. clearance, procedures and logistics), working relationship between institutions, physical resources (e.g. lack of equipment and power outages) and human resources (skills). The source of data (e.g. transport, health and enforcement) will determine the type of information available. Data from health agencies will provide information on age, gender, type and severity of injury, the role of alcohol and drugs,
outcome and disability, the cost of treatment, and pre-hospital and emergency services. Data from the transport sector will provide information on exposure, vehicle standards and
infrastructure standards. Data from the enforcement agency will shed light on the number and type of victims, types of vehicles involved, location of crashes and contributing factors to crashes (e.g. alcohol and speeding). Hence, a reliable road traffic injury surveillance system is required to help decision-makers in the planning process.
2.1.2 Progress in international road safety efforts
Dr Krishnan Rajam, Technical Officer, Injury and Violence Prevention, WHO Regional Office for the Western Pacific, presented an overview of progress in international road safety efforts. He stated that road traffic injuries are a major public health and
developmental problem worldwide, resulting in 1.2 million deaths annually and between 20 and 50 million injured or disabled victims. It is the tenth leading cause of death globally
-4-
and accounts for 2.1 % of all deaths. Road traffic deaths mainly affect the young, with most victims vulnerable road users.
Building on the Haddon Matrix, the systems approach seeks to understand interactions between different causative factors and identifies where interventions can take place. The role of public health in preventing road traffic injuries includes surveillance, research, interventions and services, and evaluation, policy and advocacy.
WHO has developed a number of tools, including Injury Surveillance Guidelines and Guidelines for Conducting Surveys on Injury and Violence which can be used to assess the nature and extent of injury morbidity and mortality. WHO has published good practice manuals, namely Helmets and Drinking and Driving and the 2004 World Report on RO(la Traffic Injury Prevention.
2.1.3 Pilot testing of the Global Status Report on Road Safety questionnaire in Malaysia Dr Rosnah Ramly, Principal Assistant Director, Violence and Injury Prevention Unit, Ministry of Health, Malaysia presented her experience in the pilot testing of the GSRRS questionnaire. She gave an outline of the selection of consensus panel members, organization of the consensus panel meeting and filling out of the fmal country questionnaire. The
consensus panel members had earlier given their comments on the questionnaire and suggestions to improve the data collection process.
2.1.4 Pilot testing of the Global Status Report on Road Safety questionnaire in the Philippines
Dr Theodora Cecile Magturo presented her experience in the pilot testing of the GSRRS questionnaire and highlighted such issues pertaining to road traffic injury
surveillance as data collection by different agencies, variable definition of a road traffic injury death within a particular period of a crash, minor or severe injury, and the number of injured victims. The consensus panel members submitted their comments on the questionnaire and suggestions to improve the data collection process.
2.1.5 Introduction to the Global Status Report on Road Safety
Dr Rajam presented an overview of WHO's efforts to develop the GSRRS on a country-by-country basis. The country situation will be assessed based on a standard list of items, such as crash incidence, existence of legislation on seatbelts, motorcycle helmets, speed and blood alcohol concentration, seatbelt and motorcycle helmet wearing rates, and the existence of a national plan of action on road safety. Data collection in countries will be coordinated by national data coordinators through a consensus panel, consisting of
representatives from governmental agencies, nongovernmental organizations and academic institutions. The information collected in this process will be synthesized in a report that will serve as a key tool in advocating for increased focus and investment on road safety at a national level.
2.1.6 Questionnaire and indicators
Dr Toroyan gave a detailed presentation on the GSRRS questionnaire and indicators.
The questionnaire contained three major sections, namely:
Section A: Lead Agency, Road Safety Strategy, Funding Section B: Data
Section C: Interventions
-5-
Each section had questions pertaining to the respective topic. An instruction booklet was prepared for the consensus panel members to assist them in filling out the questionnaire.
The participants then discussed indicators and their definitions.
2.1. 7 Roles and responsibilities of National Data Coordinators and the Regional Data Coordinator
Dr Rajam highlighted the roles and responsibilities of the National Data Coordinators (NDCs) and Regional Data Coordinator (ROC).
The main responsibilities of the NDC are as follows:
• identification of consensus panel members and sending them the respondents' questionnaire to be filled out;
• collecting supporting documents;
• arranging the consensus panel meeting and filling out the final country questionnaire;
• entering and validating data in the Internet-based system;
• obtaining government clearance for the country report.
The main responsibilities of the ROC are as follows:
• work with NDCs and country offices to identify consensus panel members and develop data collection time lines;
• supervise and support NDCs to:
• translate the questionnaire into a local language
• plan and facilitate the consensus meeting
• collect good quality country-level data
• enter data into web-based data collection system;
• validate data;
• develop a brief regional report based on country data.
2.1.8 Identification of other questionnaire respondents and their role
Dr Toroyan gave an overview of how the NDCs should identify other questionnaire respondents who will form the consensus panel. Representatives of the sectors that must be included are health, transport and enforcement/police. Other respondents could be from the following institutions: Ministry of Education, National Statistics Office, nongovernmental organization with road safety activities and an academic working in road traffic injury research. There should be no more than eight respondents, including the NDC.
The role of the respondents (consensus panel members) is as follows:
• to complete the respondents' questionnaire before the consensus panel meeting;
- 6-
• to collect background documentation as requested in the questionnaire;
• to attend the consensus panel meeting and participate in the discussion; and
• to assist in obtaining government clearance of country report and disseminate results of the project.
2.1.9 Consensus meeting methodology
Dr T oroyan gave a detailed presentation of the methodology for the consensus panel meeting. The NDC or an independent facilitator should facilitate the meeting. She
highlighted the definitions and importance of the consensus process for obtaining the responses to the fmal country questionnaire. There was a need for all members to state the answers. Where there is a differing opinion, members need to discuss and arrive at a
consensus. If it is not possible to arrive at a consensus, this must be stated and an explanation given in the space for "comments". She explained the components of the meeting and skills required for facilitating the process. The panel members need to fil! out an evaluation form after the meeting and send it directly to the RDC.
2.1.10 Process for entering and validating data
Dr Toroyan presented details of the data entry process for the GSRRS. She
demonstrated how data should be entered into the Internet-based system. Each NDC is given a unique identification name and Pllssword to log into the system. The NDCs were advised to sp!ITe at least 3-4 hours to enter the data along with attachments. They need to send the fiJlflI country questionnaire, respondents' questionnaire and supporting documents by mail tp the RDC.·
2. 1.11 Planning the N adonal Data Collection process
Dr Rajam summarized the roles and responsibilities of the NDC and explained the time line of the project. The responses to the fmal country questionnaire need to be entered into the Datacol (Data Collection) System by 31 May 2008. The final government cle!ITance for the country report needs to be obtained by 31 July 2008.
The next steps to be followed by the NDCs were summarized as follows.
(1) Identification of respondents:
identify respondents (in conjunction with RDC);
prep!ITe budget with RDC, if needed. (in conjunction with RDC);
arrange for translation of respondents' questionnaire, instruction booklet and evaluation form, if needed;
invite respondents (phone, direct, email, fax, formal invitation) and set a date for the consensus panel meeting;
send respondent's questionnaire/instruction booklet (translated if needed) to respondents with stamped, addressed envelope and set a deadline to receive;
and
collect supporting documents and translate relevant pages only, if needed.
-7 -
(2) Arrange consensus panel meeting:
go through questionnaire to see where respondents agree and disagree on response;
arrange facilitator (if needed) for consensus meeting;
• arrange venue, transport, accommodation and meals; and
• make copies of evaluation form and prepare stamped, addressed envelope.
(3) Conduct consensus panel meeting:
facilitate meeting;
fill out [mal country questionnaire;
administer evaluation form;
make copies of final country questionnaire, respondent's questionnaire and supporting documents.
(4) After consensus panel meeting:
make copies of final country questionnaire, respondent's questionnaire and supporting documents, scan supporting documents and translated page of supporting documents;
arrange for uninterrupted time and internet access to enter data;
type out answers in Word file so that data entry into Datacol is made easier;
enter data into Datacol;
send final country questionnaire, respondent's questionnaire and back translated (into English) and analysed evaluation form (if evaluation form was administered in local language) to RDC;
after data entry, check data in Datacol to see if there are any errors.
(5) Clearance:
when WHO Headquarters sends country data in tabular form (a few pages) obtain clearance from relevant authorities;
prepare brief country report;
arrange to launch country report in July 2009.
- 8 -
3. CONCLUSIONS
3.1 Sharing experiences in the collection of data pertaining to road safety
Worldwide, an estimated 5.2 million people died of injuries in 2002, accounting for 9% of mortality and 12% of the world's burden of disease. Of these, nearly 1.2 million people died as a result of road traffic crashes. In the Western Pacific Region, there were
approximately 300 000 road traffic deaths in 2002. The health sector has a role to play in road traffic injury prevention through data collection, advocacy, emergency service, prevention, evaluation and policy-making.
The main reasons for collecting reliable data on road traffic injuries are to describe the magnitude of the problem, identify risk factors, establish priorities and allocation of resources for prevention, develop and evaluate interventions, and to raise awareness of the problem.
Road traffic injury data involves many agencies, such as transport, health, law and enforcement, industry, research and nongovernmental organizations.
The potential challenges in collecting road traffic injury data are technical issues (e.g.
definitions, under-reporting, missing or incomplete records, and lack of a system for keeping records), administrative issues (e.g. clearance, procedures and logistics), working relationship between institutions, physical resources (e.g. lack of equipment and power outages) and human resources (e.g. skills). The source of data (e.g. transport, health and enforcement) will determine the type of information available. Data from health agencies will provide
information on age, gender, type and severity of injury, role of alcohol and drug~, outcome and disability, cost of treatment, pre-hospital and emi:rgency servjces. pata from the transport sector will provide information on exposure, vehicle stanflards and infrastructure standards. Data from the enforcement agency will shed light on the number and type of . victims, types of vehicles involved, location of crashes and contributing factors (e.g. alcohol and speeding). Hence, a reliable road traffic injury surveillance system is required to help decision-makers in the planning process.
Participants from Malaysia and the Philippines shared their valuable experience in the pilot testing of the GSRRS questionnaire. Issues on road traffic injury surveillance included data collection by different agencies in these countries and variable definitions of road traffic injury deaths and the severity of injury. These issues need to be resolved through detailed comparison of the data from various sources, and underscore the need for a centralized, . standardized road traffic injury data system.
3.2 Common methods of obtaining country data for the Global Status Report on Road Safety
WHO has initiated efforts to develop a Global Status Report on Road Safety (GSRRS) on a country-by-country basis. The country situation will be assessed based on a standard list of items, such as crash incidence, the existence oflegislation on seatbelts, motorcycle
helmets, speed, blood alcohol concentration, seatbelt and motorcycle helmet wearing rates, and the existence of a national plan of action on road safety. Data collection in countries will be coordinated by national data coordinators through a consensus panel, consisting of representatives from governmental agencies, nongovernmental organizations and academic institutions. The information collected in this process will be synthesized in a report that will serve as a key tool in advocating for increased focus and investment on road safety at the national level.
-9-
The participants agreed to the following steps and strategic plan for collection of road traffic injury data for the GSRRS:
• identification of consensus panel members and sending them the respondents' questionnaire to be filled out;
• collecting supporting documents;
• arranging the consensus panel meeting and filling out the final country questionnaire;
• entering and validating data in the Internet-based system; and
• obtaining government clearance for country report.
Participants agreed to use the opportunity of the GSRRS to strengthen the road traffic injury surveillance system, build capacity for intersectoral coordination and seek more resources for road traffic injury prevention activities
Brunei Darussalam
Cambodia
China
Cook Islands
Fiji
LIST OF PARTICIPANTS AND SECRETARIAT
Mr Haji Rozaly Haji Saidon
Assistant Director of Land Transportation Department
Land Transport Department Ministry of Communication Bandar Seri Begawan 1110 Tel: 6752451979
Fax: 673 2454362
E-mail: [email protected] Dr Prak Piseth Raingsey
Director
Preventive Medicine Department Ministry of Health
151-153, Avenue Kampuchea Kron Phnom Penh
Tel: 855 12862022
E-mail: [email protected] Dr Jiao Yahui
Deputy Director
Department of Medical Administration Ministry of Health
No. 1 Xizhimenwai South Road Xicheng District
100044. Beijing Tel: 86 10 35462097 Fax: 86 10 68492513
E-mail: [email protected] Dr Josephine Aumea Herman
Director of Community Health Services Ministry of Health
Rarotonga Tel: 68229110 Fax: 68229100
E-mail: [email protected] Dr Berlin Kafoa
Senior Research Fellow Fiji School of Medicine Private Mail Box Suva
Tel. No.: 6793311700 Extn.: 3250 Fax No.: 6793321107
E-mail: [email protected]
ANNEXl
Japan
Kiribati
Lao People's Democratic Republic
Malaysia
Micronesia, Federated States of
Dr Shinji Nakahara Assistant Professor
Department of Preventive Medicine St. Mariana University School of Medicine 2-16-1 Sugao, Miyamaeku
Kawasaki City, Kanagawa 216-8511 Tel: 81 44 977 8111
Fax: 81 44 977 8356
E-mail: [email protected] Ms Mweritonga Rubeiariki
Health Promotion Officer Ministry of Health P.O. Box 268 Nawerewere Tarawa
Tel: 68628100 Fax: 68628162
E-mail: [email protected] Dr Phoutsavath Pisith
Chief of Hospital Management Division Department of Curative Medicine Ministry of Health
Vientiane
Tel: 856 20 5402432 Fax: 85621 217848
E-mail: [email protected] Dr Rosnah bt Ramly
Principal Assistant Director (NCD) Disease Control Division
Ministry of Health
Level 6, Block ElO, Complex E
Federal Government Administrtive Centre 62590 Putrajaya
Tel: 603-88834133 Fax: 603-8888 6277
E-mail: [email protected] MrBenJesse
Health Planner and Health Information System Manager
Department of Health and Social Affairs Division of Health
P.O. Box PS 70 Palikir Pohnpei FM 96941 Tel No.: (691) 320 2619 Fax No.: (691) 320 5263 E-mail: [email protected]
Mongolia
Palau, Repllblic of
Papua New Guinea
Philippines
Dr Sakhiya Ariuntuya Officer-in-charge
Health Statistics and lnfonnation Department National Center for Health Development Enkhtaivan Street-13-b,
Ulaanbaatar 210648 Tel: 99098628 Fax: 976 II 320653
E-mail: [email protected] Mr Bob Tunifo Talagi
Manager - HealthIHospital Health Department
P.O. Box 33 Alofi
Tel: 6834100 Fax: 683 4265
E-mail: [email protected] Mr Ismael Aguon
Chief
Patrol Division
Bureau of Public Safety P.O. Box 790, BRT Building Koror
Tel: 680 488 5407 Fax: 680488 3075
E-mail: [email protected] [email protected] Chief Inspector Peri Kanguma
Traffic Directorate Police Headquarters P.O. Box 85
Koneaibu NCD
Tel: 322149! 6552440 Fax: 3226144
E-mail: [email protected] Dr Theodora Cecile Magturo
Medical Specialist II Department of Health
NCDPC, Building 13, Tayuman, Sta. Cruz Manila
Tel: 4186871 Fax:· 732 9966
E-mail: [email protected]
Republic of Korea
Samoa
Tonga
Vanuatu
Dr Young taek Kim Director
Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 194 Tongilo, Eunpyung-Gu
Seoul 112-701
Tel: 82 2 380 2930 Fax: 822 355 2539
E-mail: [email protected]
Dr Lee Jin-Seok Assistant Professor
Department of Health Policy & Management Seoul National University College of Medicine 28 Y oungon-dong, Ghongno-Gu
Seoul 11 0-799 Tel: 82 2534 6352 Fax: 82 2743 2009
E-mail: [email protected]
Mr Ponifasio Vasa
Senior Information Analyst Ministry of Health, Samoa Private Mail Box
Apia
Tel: 68568100 Fax: 685 26553
E-mail: Ponifasiov@)health.gov.ws
Dr Siale 'Akau'ola Medical Superintendent Vaiola Hospital
Ministry of Heslth P.O. Box 59 Nukualofa Tel: 23200 Fax: 24210
E-mail: [email protected]
MrBen Taura
Health Promotion Officer I Violence and Injury Focal Point Ministry of Health
Vanuatu Government
Shefa Provincial Health Office, Health Department
Port Vila Tel. No.: 25356
E-mail: [email protected]
VietNam Dr Nguyen Thi Hong Tu Deputy Director General
Vietnam Administration of Preventive Medicine Ministry of Health
138 A Giang Vo HaNoi
Tel. No.: 84 4 7366349 Fax No.: 8447366241
E-mail: [email protected]
SECRETARIAT
Dr Hisashi Ogawa (Responsible Officer) Regional Adviser in Healthy
Settings and Environment
WHO Regional Office for the Western Pacific United Nations Avenue corner
POBox 2932, Taft Avenue 1000 Manila, Philippines Tel. No.: 528 9886
Fax No.: 521 1036
E-mail: [email protected]
Dr Krishnan Rajam (Co-responsible Officer) National Data Coordinator
Healthy Settings and Environment
WHO Regional Office for the Western Pacific United Nations Avenue corner
POBox 2932, Taft Avenue 1000 Manila, Philippines Tel. No.: 528 9838 Fax No.: 521 1036
E-mail: [email protected] Dr Tamitza Toroyan
Technical Officer
Unintentional Injuries Prevention WHO Headquarters
Geneva, Switzerland Tel: +41 227913208 Fax: +41 227914907 E-mail: [email protected]
Dr John Juliard Go
National Professional Officer Noncommunicable Diseases
WHO Representative Office in the Philippines National Tuberculosis Centre Building Second Floor, Bldg. 9
Department of Health
San Lazaro Hospital Compound Sta. Cruz, Manila, Philippines Tel: +632 5289063
Fax: +632731 - 3914 E-mail: [email protected]
13 February 2008 (Wednesday)
08.00 - 08.30 08.30 - 09.00
09.00 - 09.30 09.30 - 09.45
09.45 -10.15 10.15 - 10.45
ANNEX 2
PROGRAMME OF ACTIVITIES
Speaker
Registration Opening ceremony Welcome by DHP
Self introduction of participants Selection of meeting chair persons Administrative announcement Tea/Coffee break
Briefing on objectives and expected Dr Krishnan Rajam outcomes, and programme of the
meeting
Principles of Road Safety Dr Tamitza Toroyan Overview of international road Dr Krishnan Rajam safety efforts
Objective 1: To share experiences in the collection of data pertaining to road safety 10.45 - 11.45
11.45 -13.00
Presentation of experiences from pilot testing of questionnaires
• Malaysia
• Philippines Lunch break
Dr Rosnah bt Ramly
Dr Theodora Cecile Magturo
Objective 2: To discuss and agree on common methods to obtain country data for the Global Status Report on Road Safety (GSRRS)
13.00 - 14.00 Introduction to the GSRRS Dr Krishnan Rajam 14.00 - 15.00
15.00 - 15.30 15.30 - 16.30 16.30-17.30
14 February 2008 (Thursday)
08.00 - 09.00 09.00 - 10.00 10.00-10.30 10.30 - 11.30 11.30 - 12.30 12.30 - 13.00
Questionnaire and indicators Coffee Break
Questionnaire and indicators (continued)
Roles and responsibilities of national data coordinators and regional data ~oordinators
Dr Tamitza Toroyan
Dr Tamitza Toroyan Dr Krishnan Rajam
Identification of other questionnaire Dr Tamitza Toroyan respondents and their role
Consensus meeting methodology Dr Tamitza Toroyan Coffee break
Consensus meeting methodology Dr Tamitza Toroyan Process for entering and validating Dr Tamitza Toroyan data
Closing ceremony
ANNEX 3
LIST OF DOCUMENTS DISTRIBUTED DURING THE MEETING
WPRl2008IDHP 11 OIHSE( 1 )/2008/IBI1 WPRl2008IDHPIl OIHSE(1 )2008/1 B/2 WPRl2008IDHP 11 OIHSE( 1 )200811 a WPRl2008IDHPI1 OIHSE( 1 )2008/1 b WPRl2008/DHPI1 OIHSE(1 )/2008.2 WPRl2008IDHP/I OIHSE( 1 )12008.3 WPRl2008IDHP 11 OIHSE( 1 )/2008.4 WPRl2008IDHP/I OIHSE( 1 )/2008.5 WPRl2008IDHPIl OIHSE(1 )12008.6 WPRl2008IDHP/I OIHSE(1 )/2008. 7 WPRl2008IDHP/I OIHSE(1 )/2008.8 WPRl2008IDHP/I OIHSE( 1 )/2008.9 WPRl2008IDHPI1 OIHSE( 1 )/2008.1 0 WPRl2008IDHPI1 OIHSE(1 )/2008.11 WPRl2008IDHPIl OIHSE(1 )/2008.12 WPRl2008IDHPI10IHSE(I)/2008/INF.l1 WPRl2008IDHP/I OIHSE( 1 )l2008/INF.l2 WPRl2008IDHPI1 O/HSE(1 )/2008/INF.!3 WPRl2008IDHPI1 OIHSE( 1 )l2008/INF.l4 WPRl2008IDHP/I O/HSE( 1 )/20081INF.l5 WPRl2008IDHP 11 OIHSE( 1 )/2008/INF.l6
Information Bulletin No. 1 Information Bulletin No.2 Agenda
Programme of Activities
Collecting Data on Road Traffic Injuries Progress in International Road Safety Efforts Pilot Testing of GSRRS Questionnaires Pilot Testing of the World Health Organization Questionnaires on Road Safety Data
Introduction to Global Status Report on Road Safety Questionnaire and Indicators
Roles and Responsibility of National Data Coordinators and Regional Data Coordinators
Identification of other Questionnaire Respondents and their Role
Consensus Meeting Methodology Process for Entering and Validating Data Planning the National Data Collection Process Global Status Report on Road Safety (Overview) Global Status Report on Road Safety: Respondents' Questionnaire
Global Status Report on Road Safety: Final Country Questionnaire
Global Status Report on Road Safety: Instructions for Completion of Respondents' Questionnaire
Global Status Report on Road Safety: Information for National Data Coordinators
Global Status Report on Road Safety - DAT ACOL Training Manual
