A NNALI DELLA
S CUOLA N ORMALE S UPERIORE DI P ISA Classe di Scienze
M ITSURU N AKAI L EO S ARIO
Manifolds with strong harmonic boundaries but without Green’s functions of clamped bodies
Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa, Classe di Scienze 4
esérie, tome 3, n
o4 (1976), p. 665-670
<http://www.numdam.org/item?id=ASNSP_1976_4_3_4_665_0>
© Scuola Normale Superiore, Pisa, 1976, tous droits réservés.
L’accès aux archives de la revue « Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa, Classe di Scienze » (http://www.sns.it/it/edizioni/riviste/annaliscienze/) implique l’accord avec les conditions générales d’utilisation (http://www.numdam.org/conditions). Toute utilisa- tion commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infraction pénale.
Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit contenir la présente mention de copyright.
Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques
http://www.numdam.org/
but without Green’s Functions of Clamped Bodies (*).
MITSURU NAKAI
(**) -
LEO SARIO(***)
We are interested in
costructing,
on agiven
Riemannian manifoldM,
the biharmonic Green’s function
PM(X, y)
of theclamped body,
characterizedby
on
M,
with~~
the Dirac measureat y,
and the « Dirichlet dataat the ideal
boundary
of M ». The function is theanalogue
of the Green’sfunction of the
clamped plate, significant
in thetheory
ofelasticity.
Theconstruction of the function and the nature of
(2)
have been discussed inRalston-Sario
[6]
from the viewpoint
of apriori
estimates and in Nakai- Sario[2]-[4]
from the viewpoint
of kernelpotentials.
We denoteby
the class of
noncompact
Riemannian manifolds M which do notcarry PMe
Several
complete
characterizations of the class0~
were obtained in Nakai-Sario[5].
The natural
question
arises as to whether or not a harmonicnondegeneracy
of the ideal
boundary
of M is sufficient to entail the existence of We denoteby OHx
the class of Riemannian manifolds M which carry no non- constant harmonic functions with theproperty
X = P(positive), B (bounded),
y(*)
The work wassponsored by
the U.S.Army
Research Office, Grant DA-ARO-31-124-73-G39. MOS Classification 31B30.
(**) Nagoya
Institute ofTechnology.
(***) University
of California, LosAngeles.
Pervenuto alla Redazione il 15 Dicembre 1975.
43 - .dnn,ati della Scuola Norm. Sup. di Pisa
666
D
(Dirichlet finite),
or BD(B
andD).
Let0~
be the class ofparabolic
mani-folds. The
following
strict inclusion relations are well known(Schiffer-Sario-
Glasner
[8], Hada-Sario-Wang [1], and,
for acomplete reference,
Sario-Nakai [7]) :
Thus the
strongest
harmonicnondegeneracy
is and we ask ex-plicitly :
does assure that The purpose of thepresent
paper is to show that the answer is in the
negative, i. e. ,
and this relation holds for every dimension
N ~ 2
of the manifold. Since anysubregion
of the EuclideanN-space
EN forN>5,
and anysubregion
of EN with an exterior
point
forN = 2, 3, 4 carries @ (Nakai-Sario [4]),
a manifold in
(5)
willbe, by necessity,
somewhat intricate.1. - Consider the sets
in the Euclidean space EN of dimension
N ~ 2 .
Denoteby
the double of ~N with
respect
toi.e.,
thetopological
manifold udefined in an obvious manner, y with the i
(i = 1, 2)
du-plicates
of ~N.In terms of the
polar
coordinates(r, 0) = (r, 01,
...,ON-’)
ofpoints
x =
(xl, ... , xN), [x [ = r,
in ~N the Euclidean metric(line element) Idxl I
is
given by
We introduce the Riemannian metric
on
with cp and y strictly positive
C°° functions on[1, 00)
suchthat
(9)
defines a 000 metric on2N by symmetry.
Denoteby
the manifold
~
with metric(9).
We couldactually
allow ds to be anysmooth metric on
(10)
aslong
as it satisfies(9)
on aneighborhood
of each«
point
atinfinity)} ði =1, 2 ), i. e. , duplicate
in=1, 2 )
of thepoint
at infinite ð of EN and hence of EN. The manifold
2§f
can also be viewedas the double
of
the Riemannianmani f oZd ~~ ~
=(EN, ds)
withrespect
to TN.2. - We consider the
following
two conditions on thefunctions cp and "p:
The existence of functions
satisfying
these conditions isobvious,
the choiceq~ (r )
=r2
andy(r)
=r- ~N- s»(N-1>
forlarge
rbeing
anexample.
The purpose of thepresent
paper is to prove:THEOREM. The
mani f otd (N ~ 2 )
carries nonconstant Dirichletfinite
harmonic
functions, yet
does not admit the biharmonic Green’sof
the
clamped body, i.e.,
if
andonly if
thefunctions
g~and y satisly
conditions(11 )
and(12).
We will prove, in Nos. 3 and 4
below,
twopropositions, A)
andB),
fromwhich the above theorem will follow at once.
3. - Denote
by W = W(a) (0’> 1)
theregion
in~N,
andby Wi =
i itsduplicates
in(EN)
i(i =1, 2 ) .
On eachW(a)o
theLaplace-
Beltrami
operator
L1 = db-E-
d for takes the formwith If
(11)
issatisfied,
then668
is a harmonic function on This means that the hacrmonic measure
1-
a) of 6
i withrespect
toW(ai)
ispositive and, therefore,
with the class of those Riemannian manifolds M with
compact
ornoncompact distinguished
smooth boundaries y which carry no nonconstantDirichlet
finite harmonic functions withboundary
values zero on y.By
the two
region
criterion(cf.,
e.g., Sario-Nakai[7]), (16) implies
thatif
(11)
is assumed.Suppose
now that(11)
is not valid. The functionis also harmonic on
W(a),
but(i =1, 2). Hence, and,
afortiori,
We have shown :
A)
Themanifold °HD il
and theand
satisly (11).
4. - The surface element of TN considered in EN is d6 =
~,(o) dol ... doN-1,
with finite total measure
Therefore,
the surface elementof I x =
r > a in±~v
is and thevolume element of i in
11
isUnder
assumption (11),
the condition(12)
is thusequivalent
toIf we assume that
(12),
orequivalently (18),
y does nothold,
thenby
theRalston-Sario theorem
[6]
orby
the Nakai-Sario theorem[~ ],
we concludethat
~~ ~ ~ 0~ .
°Conversely
assume, underassumption (11),
that~~ ,~ ~ 0~ .
We wish todeduce the
invalidity
of(12),
orequivalently,
of(18).
Theproof
isby
con-tradiction.
Suppose
that(12),
orequivalently (18),
holds. Fix anarbitrary
and then a such that Let
Then, by Nakai-Sario [2 ]- [5 ] ,
we haveThe function h =
.HM( ~ , y) has,
for any fixed r >, cr, the « Fourierexpansion »
where
(m = i,
...,mn)
is acomplete
orthonormalsystem
ofspherical
harmonics of
degree n ~ 1,
and thus U(n = 1, 2,
... ; m= 11
...,mn)
is acomplete
orthonormalsystem
inL2(TN; dO). By
the Parsevalidentity,
for every
oo).
Sinceho(r)
satisfiesdho = 0
andhnm(r)
satisfies the« P-harmonic
equation >>
we see that
ho
andhnm
are all subharmonic onW(a)i w W(G)2
and con-sequently f (r)
is subharmonic on uW(G)2. Therefore, f (r)
takes onits maximum in
[a, oo)
at a or b.By (19),
As a direct consequence of
(12),
we see that670
In view of
(22)
and(23),
we must havelim inf,-+oo f (r)
=0, i.e.,
there exists anincreasing divergent
sequence~rn~
in such thatf(rn)
-~ 0( n -~ oo ) .
Sincefor every
n = 1, 2, ...,
we havef(r)
=0, i.e.,
This with and the maximum
principle yields
on
2§~~ . Again by
the maximumprinciple, 2v( ~ , ~) c cH~( ~ , y)
onU
1~(y)2?
with c = 00. HenceHowever,
this isimpossible
in view of(18)
and(19).
Thusw 0p implies
that
(12)
is not satisfied.B)
Underassumption (11),
themanilold
E0,0 i f
andonly if
thef unctions
qJ and 1psatisfy (12).
REFERENCES