• Aucun résultat trouvé

Early Language Acquisition in French Sign Language: preliminary data on the development of gestures and signs

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Early Language Acquisition in French Sign Language: preliminary data on the development of gestures and signs"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: hal-01878678

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01878678

Submitted on 21 Sep 2018

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

Early Language Acquisition in French Sign Language:

preliminary data on the development of gestures and signs

Elise Guy-Guyenet, Caroline Bogliotti, Anne Lacheret-Dujour

To cite this version:

Elise Guy-Guyenet, Caroline Bogliotti, Anne Lacheret-Dujour. Early Language Acquisition in French Sign Language: preliminary data on the development of gestures and signs. 8th Conference of the International Society for Gesture Studies – Gesture and Diversity, Jul 2018, Cape Town, South Africa.

�hal-01878678�

(2)

Corpus-based study: longitudinal design Participants: 3 sign-exposed children

Data collection:

 Spontaneous child-caregiver interactions at home

 Video recording with 2 cameras

 45-minute sessions at monthly intervals (for 2 years)

≈ 50 hours of parent-child interactions were recorded

Coding procedure: ELAN software: 10-minute sample per session

Identifying and categorizing manual behaviours:

DEICTIC: pointing, showing, giving, ritualized request

LEXICAL UNIT: exact match or close to a form in the adult lexicon

SIGN-LIKE: form that ressembles SL but is not part of the LSF lexicon

CONVENTIONAL: codified gesture shared among a community

G/S?: form whose meaning is unclear, could be a gesture or a sign

+ Annotation of functional aspects : 711 manual behaviours were analyzed for the 9-18-month period.

Early Language Acquisition in French Sign Language:

preliminary data on the development of gestures and signs

14

Guy-Guyenet, Bogliotti & Lacheret-Dujour

Université Paris Nanterre & Modyco CNRS-UMR 7114

Background

Early language acquisition : same developmental sequence in speech- and sign-exposed children :

• The onset of gestures between 9 and 13 months precedes the onset of the first lexical units

• Children use both gestural and linguistic repertoires to communicate during the second year

Specificity of sign-exposed children language acquisition :

• Gestural and linguistic development occur in the same visual-gestural modality

• Both gestures and signs are produced by the manual articulators

To collect developmental data on French Sign Language (LSF) acquisition from birth to 3 y.o :

1. To describe gestural and lexical development in LSF

2. To investigate the way children reorganize their gestural and linguistic repertoires during language development

0 20 40 60 80 100

9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

Number of manual productions

Age in months

Developmental pattern per type of manual behavior

LU + Sign-like GIVE + SHOW PT (index + hand)

Others (RR + CG + G/S?)

Aim of the study

Methodology

NAME SEX HEARING STATUS BIRTH ORDER NUMBER OF VISITS

Léna female hearing 1st 20

Soline female deaf 2nd 20

Paul male hearing 3rd 17

Meaning

Manner of use

Gaze direction

Caregiver’s response

Results

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

9;25 10;25 11;14 12;18 13;16 14;14 15;22 16;10 17;08 18;12

Number of manual productions

Age in months

LÉNA

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

9;05 10;08 11;06 11;28 12;18 13;16 14;23 16;03 17;07 18;03

Number of manual productions

Age in months

PAUL

Sign-like LU

DG

Deictic

Gestures Referential Gestures

59.4% 40.4%

PT-index UL Sign-like Others (CG + G/S ?)

67.1% 50.5% 39.7% 9.8%

The developmental progression of communicative gestures and signs

observed is in line with previous research studying language development in both sign- and speech- exposed children.

Further research is needed to investigate the SIGN-LIKE types.

Annotations and analyzes of the parental input are ongoing.

Results can be discussed in terms of:

1. Stages of development for both communicative gestures and signs:

SHOWING/GIVING> POINTING > Lexical unit

2. Frequency and types of gestures and signs

Deictic gestures (mainly POINTING) are the most prominent type of manual behavior and are used productively not only in the early stage but also after the emergence of the first signs.

From 14 months on, POINTING and LU+SIGN-LIKE show the same developmental

trajectories. 0

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

9;12 10;19 11;09 12;28 13;25 14;15 15;20 16;09 18;12

Number of manual productions

Age in months

SOLINE

Conclusion and perspectives

Acknowlegments :

We thank the children and their families for their participation in this study 3. Variability across children and across sessions

Children exhibit different patterns according to onset (first signs and first deictic gestures) and productivity per type of manual production.

Références

Documents relatifs

While discontinuity between pointing gestures and points used as personal pronouns was illustrated in American Sign Language, the same phenomenon was not

For example, Phillips (1995) reports data from children learning 9 different languages and concludes that rates of OI errors vary on a continuum from high in English

the Middle Pleistocene, of anatomical features related to the language loop on hominin endocasts are 299. focused on the 3Fc

• SP-E and SI-E children communicate through gestural means – mainly Deictic Gestures – before they are able to produce their first Lexical Units ─ words or signs

From a qualitative perspective: so far, our results are consistent with previous studies in SL development. The types of gestures used by the child change over time. Both

Pulling together results from the previous analyses (see Table 4) it can be noticed that the appearance of different expressions in the case of similar recurring communicative acts

Our proposal is that SOC works with both oral and written language, but results in different products, and that structural differences between these products have great impact on the

3D Engine, Avatars, VRML, X3D, Sign Language, French Sign Language, Automatic Translation, Natural Language .Automatic Processing,