• Aucun résultat trouvé

Potential causes and consequences of gastrointestinal disorders during a SARS-CoV-2 infection

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Potential causes and consequences of gastrointestinal disorders during a SARS-CoV-2 infection"

Copied!
8
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: hal-02934850

https://hal.sorbonne-universite.fr/hal-02934850

Submitted on 9 Sep 2020

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - NoDerivatives| 4.0 International License

Potential causes and consequences of gastrointestinal disorders during a SARS-CoV-2 infection

François Trottein, Harry Sokol

To cite this version:

François Trottein, Harry Sokol. Potential causes and consequences of gastrointestinal disor- ders during a SARS-CoV-2 infection. Cell Reports, Elsevier Inc, 2020, 32 (3), pp.107915.

�10.1016/j.celrep.2020.107915�. �hal-02934850�

(2)

Review

Potential Causes and Consequences of Gastrointestinal Disorders

during a SARS-CoV-2 Infection

Franc¸ois Trottein

1,

* and Harry Sokol

2,3,4

1

Centre d’Infection et d’Immunite´ de Lille, INSERM U1019, CNRS UMR 9017, University of Lille, CHU Lille-Institut Pasteur de Lille, 59000 Lille, France

2

Sorbonne Universite´, INSERM, Centre de Recherche Saint-Antoine, CRSA, AP-HP, Saint Antoine Hospital, Gastroenterology Department, 75012 Paris, France

3

INRA, UMR1319 Micalis & AgroParisTech, 78350 Jouy en Josas, France

4

Paris Center for Microbiome Medicine, Fe´de´ration Hospitalo-Universitaire, 75012 Paris, France

*Correspondence: [email protected] https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2020.107915

Coronaviruses cause several human diseases, including severe acute respiratory syndrome. The global co- ronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has become a huge threat to humans. Intensive research on the pathogenic mechanisms used by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is urgently needed—notably to identify potential drug targets. Clinical studies of patients with COVID-19 have shown that gastrointestinal disorders appear to precede or follow the respiratory symptoms. Here, we review gastrointestinal disorders in patients with COVID-19, suggest hypothetical mechanisms leading to gut symp- toms, and discuss the potential consequences of gastrointestinal disorders on the outcome of the disease.

Lastly, we discuss the role of the gut microbiota during respiratory viral infections and suggest that targeting gut dysbiosis may help to control the pathogenesis of COVID-19.

Coronaviruses are enveloped RNA viruses containing a large (25 to 32 kb), single-stranded, positive-sense RNA genome.

These viruses circulate continuously in human populations and generally cause mild respiratory diseases, including the common cold. In contrast, the zoonotic severe acute respira- tory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) and the Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) cause severe respiratory diseases and are associated with a high mortality rate when they spread to humans (Fehr et al., 2017). No spe- cific antiviral drugs or vaccines have been approved for combating infections by SARS and MERS. In late 2019, a new infectious respiratory disease (now termed coronavirus disease 2019 [COVID-19]) emerged in Wuhan, China (Wang et al., 2020a; Zhu et al., 2020). This disease spread rapidly across China and to other countries. The World Health Organi- zation recently declared the COVID-19 outbreak to be a pandemic. SARS-CoV-2 is the etiological agent of COVID-19 (Zhu et al., 2020). A phylogenetic analysis has shown that SARS-CoV-2 is most closely related to SARS-CoV (nucleotide similarity: 89.1%). COVID-19 is characterized by acute patho- logical outcomes, including pneumonia and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and has a substantial mortality rate (Chen et al., 2020). ARDS during a SARS-CoV-2 infection is also associated with dysregulation of cytokine production, barrier leakage, and organ dysfunction. COVID-19 is more se- vere in individuals with comorbidities (diabetes mellitus, cardio- vascular diseases, and hypertension) and in the elderly (Guan et al., 2020; Wu and McGoogan, 2020).

SARS-CoV-2 Can Target the Gastrointestinal Tract in Humans

Both SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 can infect host cells when the viral spike protein binds to its cell surface receptor angiotensin- converting enzyme II (ACE2). With the exception of human coro- navirus (hCoV) NL63, the seven other hCoVs have other host cell receptors (also exopeptidases). ACE2 is a homolog of angio- tensin-converting enzyme (ACE), the central enzyme in the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS), which is crucial for the physiology and pathology of all organs (Gheblawi et al., 2020). ACE2 maintains the homeostasis of RAAS as a negative regulator. Virus entry also requires cleavage of the spike protein (priming) by a type II transmembrane serine protease called TMPRSS2. This priming step is essential for fusion of the viral and cell membranes (Matsuyama et al., 2010; Hoffmann et al., 2020; Zhou et al., 2020a). Additional proteases (including furin) might be involved in SARS-CoV-2 priming (Coutard et al., 2020). SARS-CoV-2’s binding affinity for human ACE2 is 10 to 20 times greater than that of SARS-CoV; this disparity might result from differences in spike protein methylation and/or cleav- age sites (Jin et al., 2020;Wang et al., 2020b). Hence, the expres- sion of ACE2 is essential for SARS-CoV-2’s entry into host cells.

As discussed later, changes in ACE2’s functional activity might

critically affect the disease outcome. In humans, ACE2 and

TMPRSS2 are strongly expressed in lung tissue in general and

by epithelial cells in particular. This strong expression explains

why the lung appears to be the most vulnerable target organ dur-

ing COVID-19. A recent single-cell analysis revealed that more

(3)

than 80% of ACE2-expressing pulmonary cells were type II alve- olar cells (Zhao et al., 2020); hence, this cell type might have a crucial role in coronavirus invasion and replication. Bronchial transient secretory cells (with a phenotype between those of goblet cells and ciliated cells) also express high levels of ACE2 (Lukassen et al., 2020). Furthermore, epithelial cells in the upper respiratory tract (specifically nasal goblet/secretory cells and ciliated cells) express both ACE2 and TMPRSS2 (Sungnak et al., 2020). This combined expression in the upper airways may be correlated with enhanced transmission of the virus.

ACE2 is also expressed in many extrapulmonary tissues, including the heart, liver, kidney, and intestine (Crackower et al., 2002; Hamming et al., 2004; Hashimoto et al., 2012). In the latter, high levels of ACE2 are found on the luminal surface of differentiated epithelial cells in the small intestine, whereas levels are lower in the crypt cells and in the colon (Hashimoto et al., 2012; Liang et al., 2020). Human proximal and distal enter- ocytes coexpress dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (the receptor for MERS-CoV) and alanine aminopeptidase (the receptor for hCoV-229E) (Liang et al., 2020). In the intestine, ACE2 acts as a coreceptor for nutrient uptake and especially amino acid ab- sorption from food (Hashimoto et al., 2012). On the one hand, the gut might be a major entry site for SARS-CoV-2; this would suggest that consumption of contaminated food can propagate the virus in humans. On the other hand, the intestinal expression of ACE2 might have essential implications for fecal-oral trans- mission and thus the containment of viral spreading. As seen during previous coronavirus outbreaks, around half of all COVID-19 patients have detectable SARS-CoV-2 RNA in their stools—even when it is no longer found in the respiratory tract (Zhang et al., 2020; Xiao et al., 2020b; Wang et al., 2020c). The virus has also been detected in gastrointestinal histological sam- ples and by endoscopy (Xiao et al., 2020a; Lin et al., 2020).

Importantly, infectious viruses were detected in fecal samples of COVID-19 patients, suggesting that the digestive tract might be a site of viral replication and activity (Xiao et al., 2020b;

Zhou et al., 2020c). Several studies using human small intestinal organoids have shown that SARS-CoV-2 replicates in entero- cytes (Zhou et al., 2020c; Zang et al., 2020; Lamers et al., 2020). The presence of virus in the stools and its fecal persis- tence suggest that fecal-oral transmission is possible. A study (mouse system) reported that intragastric inoculation of SARS- CoV-2 causes productive infection and leads to pulmonary path- ological changes (Sun et al., 2020). Collectively, the lung is not the only site targeted by SARS-CoV-2, and enteric infection oc- curs. Here, we review gastrointestinal disorders in patients with COVID-19, suggest hypothetical mechanisms leading to gut symptoms, and discuss the potential consequences of gastroin- testinal disorders on the outcome of the disease.

SARS-CoV-2 Causes Gastrointestinal Disorders in Humans

Various research groups have analyzed the epidemiological and clinical characteristics of gastrointestinal disorders in patients with COVID-19. The percentage of patients with gastrointestinal disorders (as evidenced by vomiting, nausea, and/or diarrhea) varies depending on the study. In China, Jin and colleagues enrolled 651 patients on admission, i.e., before treatment with

antiviral or antibiotic drugs, which might have biased the analysis (Jin et al., 2020). Interestingly, 11.4% of COVID-19 patients had at least one gastrointestinal tract symptom, the most common being diarrhea (in 5% to 8% of patients). In the study by Jin and colleagues, the intestinal disorders lasted a median of 4 days and appeared to precede the respiratory symptoms.

Gastrointestinal symptoms were more frequent in severe/critical cases of COVID-19 (23%) than in mild COVID-19 (8%) (Jin et al., 2020). In other studies performed in China and Hong Kong, the proportion of COVID-19 patients (n total = 254, 59, 204, 58, 138, and 1,099, respectively) who developed gastrointestinal disorders was 26%, 25.4%, 18.6%, 11%, 13.7%, and 8.7%, respectively (Zhou et al., 2020b; Cheung et al., 2020; Pan et al., 2020; Lin et al., 2020; Wang et al., 2020c, Guan et al., 2020). Other studies (of 40 COVID-19 patients in Europe and 278 and 318 COVID-19 patients in the United States) reported that 55%, 35%, and 61% of the patients, respectively, displayed gastrointestinal signs and symptoms (Effenberger et al., 2020;

Nobel et al., 2020; Redd et al., 2020). Importantly, meta-analyses of studies totaling 4,243, 6,686, and 10,890 patients found that the pooled prevalence of gastrointestinal symptoms was 17.6%, 15%, and 10%, respectively (Cheung et al., 2020; Mao et al., 2020; Sultan et al., 2020). SARS-CoV-2 infection triggers an inflammatory response in the gut, as evidenced by elevated fecal levels of calprotectin (a marker protein expressed mainly by neutrophils) (Effenberger et al., 2020). Lin and colleagues also observed that although the presence of SARS-CoV-2 in the stool does not correlate with gastrointestinal symptoms, the presence of SARS-CoV-2 in intestinal tissue is generally associated with severe gastrointestinal symptoms (Lin et al., 2020). The use of human small intestinal organoids will be instru- mental in better analyzing the modalities of enterocyte infection and its impact on the inflammatory response. Furthermore, it will be interesting in the future to determine the consequences of pre-existing digestive diseases (i.e., inflammatory bowel dis- ease) on gastrointestinal disorders caused by SARS-CoV-2 and on the severity of COVID-19.

Potential Mechanisms of Gastrointestinal Disorders in COVID-19

Gastrointestinal disorders in COVID-19 patients are likely to have several etiological factors. The recruitment of inflammatory cells (i.e., from the bone marrow) and/or the systemic and local pro- duction of inflammatory cytokines are likely to have a role. In this setting, local inflammation might weaken the epithelial bar- rier. Cellular damage induced directly by viral replication and spreading might also actively contribute to injury and inflamma- tion of the gut epithelium. Gastrointestinal symptoms in COVID- 19 patients might also result from dysfunction of ACE2. As mentioned earlier, ACE2 is a key regulatory enzyme in the RAAS, and the latter is known to influence immune functions and inflammation (Ranjbar et al., 2019). ACE2 is an essential regulator of intestinal homeostasis, and a lack of this enzyme ac- centuates the intestine’s susceptibility to inflammation (Hashi- moto et al., 2012). The intestinal phenotype is (at least partly) due to ACE2’s non-catalytic function. A lack of ACE2 alters the expression of the neutral amino acid transporter B

0

AT1 on intes- tinal epithelial cells, which lowers the intake of tryptophan and

2 Cell Reports 32 , July 21, 2020

Review

OPEN ACCESS

(4)

thus reduces the production of nicotinamide and (potentially) other tryptophan-derived metabolites with a critical role in intes- tinal homeostasis (Hashimoto et al., 2012; Agus et al., 2018).

Binding of the viral spike protein to ACE2 leads to reduced expression of the latter but does not change the expression of ACE (Kuba et al., 2005). During SARS-CoV infections, the expression of ACE2 is considerably reduced—at least in the lungs (Kuba et al., 2005). Given the key role of ACE2 in intestinal homeostasis, reduced expression and impaired function of this protein during a SARS-CoV infection might substantially contribute to local disorders and pathogenesis. It remains to be seen whether drugs able to modulate ACE2 expression, such as ACE inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers (used in hypertension and diabetes), can modulate gastrointes- tinal disorders, including gut dysbiosis, in the context of SARS- CoV-2 infection. Along with inflammation and dysfunction of ACE2, other mechanisms might be implicated in gastrointestinal symptoms in COVID-19 patients. Because hypoxia is a major clinical symptom in COVID-19 patients (Cavezzi et al., 2020) and is known to be critical in intestinal homeostasis, including microbiota composition and function (Singhal and Shah., 2020), it is also likely that oxygen deprivation might be important in gastrointestinal disorders and disease severity. Recent evi- dence suggests that SARS-CoV-2 may affect the central ner- vous system (Paniz-Mondolfi et al., 2020; Helms et al., 2020).

Regarding the importance of the gut-brain axis, one can specu- late that this may play a role in gastrointestinal disorders during SARS-CoV-2 infection. It is possible that the enteric nervous sys- tem could be affected by SARS-CoV-2, either by direct viral infection or through the elicited immune response (e.g., inflam- matory cytokines), amplifying diarrhea and possibly stimulating the vagus nerve to promote vomiting.

ACE2 Dysfunction Alters the Composition of the Gut Microbiota

It is well established that the gut microbiota has a critical role in intestinal homeostasis and that changes in its composition and function activity are involved in local inflammation (Blander et al., 2017; Lavelle and Sokol, 2020). A lack of ACE2 leads to substantial alteration in the composition of the gut microbiota in mice; this partly results from reduced production of the antimi- crobial peptides that control the gut’s microbial community (Ha- shimoto et al., 2012). Moreover, disruption of the ACE/ACE2 axis during pulmonary hypertension (loss of ACE2) is associated with alteration of the gut microbiota in humans (Santisteban et al., 2016; Kim et al., 2020). One can speculate that the decrease in ACE2 availability during SARS-COV-2 infection is enough to alter the composition of the gut microbiota. Recent pilot studies sug- gest gut microbiota alterations during SARS-CoV-2 infection (Yu et al., 2020; Gu et al., 2020b; Zuo et al., 2020). In a cohort of 30 COVID-19 patients (fecal sample analysis using 16S rRNA gene sequencing), infection was associated with a significant decrease of bacterial diversity and abundance (Gu et al., 2020b). Significant changes in gut microbial communities were noticed, including lower relative abundance of beneficial (buty- rate-producing) bacteria, such as several genera from the Rumi- nococcaceae and Lachnospiraceae families. However, signifi- cantly higher relative abundance occurred of opportunistic

pathogens, including Streptococcus , Rothia , Veillonella , and Actinomyces . Of interest, the gut microbial signature of patients with COVID-19 was different from that of H1N1 patients (Gu et al., 2020b). Enrichment of opportunistic pathogens and depletion of beneficial commensals was also observed in a (longitudinal) study using deep shotgun metagenomics (15 COVID-19 patients) (Zuo et al., 2020). In particular, enrichment of opportunistic pathogens known to cause bacteremia, including Clostridium hathewayi , Actinomyces viscosus , and Bacteroides nordii , was observed. Lower relative abundance of beneficial commensals, including the anti-inflammatory bacte- rium Faecalibacterium prausnitzii , Alistipes onderdonkii , Rose- buria , and Lachnospiraceae taxa , was also noticed. The authors found a correlation between rise or drop of these bacteria and disease severity. Of note, altered microbiota composition per- sisted after clearance of SARS-CoV-2 and resolution of respira- tory symptoms, indicating that resiliency is long lasting (Zuo et al., 2020). Hence, SARS-CoV-2 infection modifies the compo- sition of the gut microbiota in humans. It is possible that reduced levels of commensal bacteria with important physiological func- tions, such as butyrate producers, may promote the overgrowth of intestinal conditional pathogenic bacteria. Whether these changes increase intestinal mucosal permeability and endotoxin concentrations in the blood, ultimately triggering inflammation and cytokine release exacerbation, remains to be investigated (Figure 1). Further analyses are urgently needed in larger human cohorts to confirm and detail gut microbiota alterations in COVID-19 patients. Studies should prospectively include asymptomatic COVID-19-confirmed subjects and patients at disease onset, during disease course, and over the long term af- ter discovery to delineate the role of microbiome changes in SARS-CoV-2 infection and post-infection recovery. It will be crit- ical to consider patients treated or not with antibiotics (and other medications) and the comorbidity status of those patients. The consequences of SARS-CoV-2 infection on the gut microbiota should also be investigated in relevant animal models of COVID-19. Possible models include non-human primates, fer- rets, human-ACE2-expressing mice, and hamsters (Callaway, 2020). The impact of SARS-CoV-2 on the gut microbiota’s meta- bolic output also remains to be defined. This aspect is of partic- ular importance because in a mouse model, the altered gut mi- crobiota associated with ACE2 deficiency (1) favors intestinal inflammation and (2) confers susceptibility to colitis when trans- ferred to wild-type animals (Hashimoto et al., 2012). In parallel, it remains to be determined whether alterations in the microbiota influence the extraintestinal outcomes of COVID-19. Altogether, direct enterocyte infection, disruption of the enteric ACE2 axis (and interference with nutrient absorption), hypoxia, alterations of the enteric nervous system and local immune response, and changes in inflammatory cytokine levels might lead to adverse intestinal outcomes (including dysbiosis) in patients with COVID-19.

The Potential Role of the Gut Microbiota in COVID-19 Outcomes

Evidence suggests that the gut microbiota can remotely boost

the host’s response to respiratory viral infections. Paradoxically,

dysbiosis of the microbiota can also worsen the outcome of the

(5)

disease. The gut microbiota’s role in hCoV infections has yet to be defined. In the setting of influenza infections, the results of ex- periments with antibiotic treatment (to deplete the residual mi- crobiota) have demonstrated that the gut microbiota is critical for controlling viral replication (Ichinohe et al., 2011; Abt et al., 2012; Steed et al., 2017; Bradley et al., 2019). Bacterial cell wall components and bacterial metabolites (such as desamino- tyrosine) favor the production of type I interferons and inflamma- some-dependent cytokines by pulmonary cells. The gut micro- biota also boosts CD8

+

T cell effector function, a process that contributes to viral clearance (Ichinohe et al., 2011). Whereas altering the gut microbiota with antibiotics increases the severity of the infection, stimulating the microbiome with a high-fiber diet has the opposite effect (Trompette et al., 2018). The stimulatory mechanisms involve short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs, the end products of dietary fiber fermentation by commensal bacteria) that are absorbed by and act on immune cells to reduce the in- flammatory component of infection. SCFAs also enhance the effector activity of CD8

+

T cells by stimulating cellular meta- bolism (Trompette et al., 2018). Similar protective effects have

been observed with the respiratory syncytial virus (Antunes et al., 2019). It remains to be seen whether the gut microbiota also participates in early control (through innate immunity) and late control (through adaptive immunity) of coronavirus replica- tion, and this topic warrants investigation (Figure 1). It would also be useful to investigate the effect of SCFA-promoting high-fiber diets and/or probiotics on the outcome of SARS- CoV-2 infection.

Patients with respiratory infections generally have gut- dysfunction-related complications that worsen the clinical course. For example, this type of gut-lung crosstalk has been described during influenza infections in both humans and animal models. Severe influenza A virus infection is associated with in- testinal disorders and gut microbiota alterations (Wang et al., 2014; Qin et al., 2015; Deriu et al., 2016; Groves et al., 2018;

Yildiz et al., 2018; Sencio et al., 2020). These changes were attributed partly to infection-related reduction in food consump- tion (Sencio et al., 2020) and to interferon production (Wang et al., 2014; Deriu et al., 2016). We recently looked at whether microbiota conditioned by influenza A virus enhanced suscepti- bility to bacterial superinfection, a major cause of mortality dur- ing epidemics and pandemics (McCullers, 2014). In fecal transfer experiments, we showed that the dysbiotic microbiota remotely compromises the lung’s defenses against pneumococcal infec- tion. In mechanistic terms, a reduction in SCFA production is associated with a decrease in the alveolar macrophages’ bacte- ricidal activity (Sencio et al., 2020).

Whether gut disorders (including microbiota alterations) influ- ence on outcomes in COVID-19 is still an open question. Evi- dence suggests that SARS-CoV-2 infection alters the gut-blood barrier and thus leads to systemic dissemination of bacteria, en- dotoxins, and microbial metabolites (Wang et al., 2020c; Huang et al., 2020; Guan et al., 2020). This might affect the host’s initial response to SARS-CoV-2 infection and might then contribute to multisystem dysfunction, septic shock, and the systemic inflam- mation storm seen in the second phase of SARS-CoV-2 infec- tion, which typically result in death (Guan et al., 2020; Huang et al., 2020; Wang et al., 2020c). Clinical studies have demon- strated that the presence of a gastrointestinal disorder in COVID-19 patients is associated with a more aggressive clinical course, including ARDS, liver injury, a higher body temperature, and shock (Jin et al., 2020). Moreover, the risk factors for severity and mortality in COVID-19 (such as diabetes) (Singh et al., 2020) are known to be associated with disturbances of the intestinal microbiota and, in particular, low production of SCFAs. This is particularly the case for patients with metabolic syndrome (obesity, high blood pressure, and diabetes) who exhibit severity factors for viral infections (including respiratory infections) (Ba- dawi et al., 2018; Honce and Schultz-Cherry, 2019). The role of intestinal dysbiosis in this setting needs to be investigated, e.g., by performing fecal transfer experiments in relevant animal models. We speculate that ACE2 disruption, changes in microbi- al profiles, and intestinal inflammation and leakiness during SARS-CoV infection strongly amplify systemic pathways in co- morbid individuals and exacerbate underlying pathologies (e.g., diabetes and hypertension). SARS-CoV-2 infection may also deteriorate the course of human inflammatory bowel dis- eases (Effenberger et al., 2020). The mortality rate associated Figure 1. The Gut Microbiota’s Hypothetical Role in SARS-CoV-2

Infection

A healthy gut microbiota boosts the lungs’ antiviral response, including inter- feron production and the effector function of CD8

+

T cells (step 1). Soon after infection, SARS-CoV-2 replicates in the intestinal compartment and decreases the expression and activity of ACE2 (step 2). This leads to gut dysbiosis and gastrointestinal symptoms (step 3). Meanwhile, viral infection of the lungs triggers the systemic production of interferons and elicits weight loss, both of which trigger gut dysbiosis (step 3). Changes in the composition and functional activity of the gut microbiota and impairment of the gut’s barrier function contribute to disease outcomes, including ARDS, a systemic cytokine storm, and multiorgan dysfunction (step 4).

4 Cell Reports 32 , July 21, 2020

Review

OPEN ACCESS

(6)

with SARS-CoV-2 infection is higher in older adults, who also tend to display chronic low-grade inflammation with underlying microbiota alterations and gut leakiness. In the setting of COVID-19, can we exploit the gut microbiota for the patient’s benefit? At present, no direct clinical evidence suggests that modulation of the gut microbiota has therapeutic value in pa- tients with COVID-19. However, it is tempting to speculate that targeting gut microbiota might be a therapeutic option.

Concluding Remarks

The complex pathogenesis of SARS-CoV-2 infection is only start- ing to be deciphered. Along with the respiratory tract, the gastro- intestinal tract is an entry and replication site for SARS-CoV-2. The gut constitutes one of the main extrapulmonary target organs with regard to symptoms and is a potential route for virus dissemina- tion; its role therefore needs to be actively explored. In particular, several lines of evidence suggest that SARS-CoV-2 infection is associated with alteration of the gut microbiota. It remains to be determined whether the gut microbiota influences the gastrointes- tinal and pulmonary signs and symptoms of COVID-19 and overall mortality. Putative changes in the gut microbiota’s composition and functional activity might be biomarkers of disease severity.

Lastly, and if the gut microbiota does prove to affect the disease’s severity and mortality rate, targeting the microbiota’s various components might be an attractive therapeutic strategy. In this setting, conventional approaches like antibiotic treatment target- ing pathobionts (preferably with a narrow-spectrum drug), probi- otics, and fecal transfer might be relevant. However, more specific interventions (e.g., live biotherapies or microbiota-derived metab- olites) based on an in-depth understanding of the mechanisms involved are attractive.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We acknowledge support from our funding agencies Institut National de la Sante´ et de la Recherche Me´dicale, the Centre National de la Recherche Sci- entifique (CNRS), the University of Lille, the Pasteur Institute of Lille, the Re´gion des Hauts-de-France, and l’Agence Nationale de la Recherche (AAP ge´ne´ri- que 2017, ANR-17-CE15-0020-01, ACROBAT) (to F.T.). F.T. received salary support from CNRS, and H.S. received salary support from Sorbonne Univer- site´ and Saint Antoine Hospital. We thank Corinne Grangette and Isabelle Wo- lowczuk (Centre d’Infection et d’Immunite´ de Lille) for critical comments on the manuscript.

REFERENCES

Abt, M.C., Osborne, L.C., Monticelli, L.A., Doering, T.A., Alenghat, T., Sonnen- berg, G.F., Paley, M.A., Antenus, M., Williams, K.L., Erikson, J., et al. (2012).

Commensal bacteria calibrate the activation threshold of innate antiviral immunity. Immunity 37, 158–170.

Agus, A., Planchais, J., and Sokol, H. (2018). Gut microbiota regulation of tryp- tophan metabolism in health and disease. Cell Host Microbe 23, 716–724.

Antunes, K.H., Fachi, J.L., de Paula, R., da Silva, E.F., Pral, L.P., Dos Santos, A.A´., Dias, G.B.M., Vargas, J.E., Puga, R., Mayer, F.Q., et al. (2019).

Microbiota-derived acetate protects against respiratory syncytial virus infec- tion through a GPR43-type 1 interferon response. Nat. Commun. 10, 3273–

3289.

Badawi, A., Velummailum, R., Ryoo, S.G., Senthinathan, A., Yaghoubi, S., Va- sileva, D., Ostermeier, E., Plishka, M., Soosaipillai, M., and Arora, P. (2018).

Prevalence of chronic comorbidities in dengue fever and West Nile virus: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 13, e0200200.

Blander, J.M., Longman, R.S., Iliev, I.D., Sonnenberg, G.F., and Artis, D.

(2017). Regulation of inflammation by microbiota interactions with the host.

Nat. Immunol. 18, 851–860.

Bradley, K.C., Finsterbusch, K., Schnepf, D., Crotta, S., Llorian, M., Davidson, S., Fuchs, S.Y., Staeheli, P., and Wack, A. (2019). Microbiota-driven tonic interferon signals in lung stromal cells protect from influenza virus infection.

Cell Rep. 28, 245–256.e4.

Callaway, E. (2020). Labs rush to study coronavirus in transgenic animals—

some are in short supply. Nature 579, 183.

Cavezzi, A., Troiani, E., and Corrao, S. (2020). COVID-19: hemoglobin, iron, and hypoxia beyond inflammation. A narrative review. Clin. Pract. 10, 1271–

1277.

Chen, G., Wu, D., Guo, W., Cao, Y., Huang, D., Wang, H., Wang, T., Zhang, X., Chen, H., Yu, H., et al. (2020). Clinical and immunological features of severe and moderate coronavirus disease 2019. J. Clin. Invest. 130, 2620–2629.

Cheung, K.S., Hung, I.F.N., Chan, P.P.Y., Lung, K.C., Tso, E., Liu, R., Ng, Y.Y., Chu, M.Y., Chung, T.W.H., Tam, A.R., et al. (2020). Gastrointestinal manifesta- tions of SARS-CoV-2 infection and virus load in fecal samples from a Hong Kong cohort: systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastroenterology, Pub- lished online April 3, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2020.03.065.

Coutard, B., Valle, C., de Lamballerie, X., Canard, B., Seidah, N.G., and Decr- oly, E. (2020). The spike glycoprotein of the new coronavirus 2019-nCoV con- tains a furin-like cleavage site absent in CoV of the same clade. Antiviral Res.

176, 104742–104746.

Crackower, M.A., Sarao, R., Oudit, G.Y., Yagil, C., Kozieradzki, I., Scanga, S.E., Oliveira-dos-Santos, A.J., da Costa, J., Zhang, L., Pei, Y., et al. (2002).

Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 is an essential regulator of heart function.

Nature 417, 822–828.

Deriu, E., Boxx, G.M., He, X., Pan, C., Benavidez, S.D., Cen, L., Rozengurt, N., Shi, W., and Cheng, G. (2016). Influenza virus affects intestinal microbiota and secondary Salmonella infection in the gut through type I interferons. PLoS Pathog. 12, e1005572.

Effenberger, M., Grabherr, F., Mayr, L., Schwaerzler, J., Nairz, M., Seifert, M., Hilbe, R., Seiwald, S., Scholl-Buergi, S., Fritsche, G., et al. (2020). Faecal cal- protectin indicates intestinal inflammation in COVID-19. Gut, Published online April 20, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2020-321388.

Fehr, A.R., Channappanavar, R., and Perlman, S. (2017). Middle East Respira- tory Syndrome: Emergence of a Pathogenic Human Coronavirus. Annu. Rev.

Med. 68, 387–399.

Gheblawi, M., Wang, K., Viveiros, A., Nguyen, Q., Zhong, J.C., Turner, A.J., Raizada, M.K., Grant, M.B., and Oudit, G.Y. (2020). Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2: SARS-CoV-2 receptor and regulator of the renin-angiotensin sys- tem: Celebrating the 20th anniversary of the discovery of ACE2. Circ. Res.

126, 1456–1474.

Groves, H.T., Cuthbertson, L., James, P., Moffatt, M.F., Cox, M.J., and Tre- goning, J.S. (2018). Respiratory Disease following Viral Lung Infection Alters the Murine Gut Microbiota. Front. Immunol. 9, 182–193.

Gu, S., Chen, Y., Wu, Z., Chen, Y., Gao, H., Lv, L., Guo, F., Zhang, X., Luo, R., Huang, C., et al. (2020b). Alterations of the gut microbiota in patients with COVID-19 or H1N1 Influenza. Clin. Infect. Dis. Published online June 4, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaa709.

Guan, W.J., Ni, Z.Y., Hu, Y., Liang, W.H., Ou, C.Q., He, J.X., Liu, L., Shan, H., Lei, C.L., Hui, D.S.C., et al.; China Medical Treatment Expert Group for Covid-19 (2020). Clinical characteristics of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in China.

N. Engl. J. Med. 382, 1708–1720.

Hamming, I., Timens, W., Bulthuis, M.L.C., Lely, A.T., Navis, G., and van Goor, H. (2004). Tissue distribution of ACE2 protein, the functional receptor for SARS coronavirus. A first step in understanding SARS pathogenesis. J. Pathol. 203, 631–637.

Hashimoto, T., Perlot, T., Rehman, A., Trichereau, J., Ishiguro, H., Paolino, M.,

Sigl, V., Hanada, T., Hanada, R., Lipinski, S., et al. (2012). ACE2 links amino

(7)

acid malnutrition to microbial ecology and intestinal inflammation. Nature 487, 477–481.

Helms, J., Kremer, S., Merdji, H., Clere-Jehl, R., Schenck, M., Kummerlen, C., Collange, O., Boulay, C., Fafi-Kremer, S., Ohana, M., et al. (2020). Neurologic features in Severe SARS-CoV-2 infection. N. Engl. J. Med. 382, 2268–2270.

Hoffmann, M., Kleine-Weber, H., Schroeder, S., Kr€ uger, N., Herrler, T., Erich- sen, S., Schiergens, T.S., Herrler, G., Wu, N.H., Nitsche, A., et al. (2020). SARS- CoV-2 cell entry depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and is blocked by a clinically proven protease inhibitor. Cell 181, 271–280.e8.

Honce, R., and Schultz-Cherry, S. (2019). Impact of obesity on Influenza A Vi- rus pathogenesis, immune response, and evolution. Front. Immunol.10, 1071–

1084.

Huang, C., Wang, Y., Li, X., Ren, L., Zhao, J., Hu, Y., Zhang, L., Fan, G., Xu, J., Gu, X., et al. (2020). Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coro- navirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet 395, 497–506.

Ichinohe, T., Pang, I.K., Kumamoto, Y., Peaper, D.R., Ho, J.H., Murray, T.S., and Iwasaki, A. (2011). Microbiota regulates immune defense against respira- tory tract influenza A virus infection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 5354–

5359.

Jin, X., Lian, J.S., Hu, J.H., Gao, J., Zheng, L., Zhang, Y.M., Hao, S.R., Jia, H.Y., Cai, H., Zhang, X.L., et al. (2020). Epidemiological, clinical and virological characteristics of 74 cases of coronavirus-infected disease 2019 (COVID-19) with gastrointestinal symptoms. Gut 69, 1002–1009.

Kim, S., Rigatto, K., Gazzana, M.B., Knorst, M.M., Richards, E.M., Pepine, C.J., and Raizada, M.K. (2020). Altered gut microbiome profile in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension. Hypertension 75, 1063–1071.

Kuba, K., Imai, Y., Rao, S., Gao, H., Guo, F., Guan, B., Huan, Y., Yang, P., Zhang, Y., Deng, W., et al. (2005). A crucial role of angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) in SARS coronavirus-induced lung injury. Nat. Med. 11, 875–879.

Lamers, M.M., Beumer, J., van der Vaart, J., Knoops, K., Puschhof, J., Breu- gem, T.I., Ravelli, R.B.G., van Schayck, J.P., Mykytyn, A.Z., Duimel, H.Q., et al.

(2020). SARS-CoV-2 productively infects human gut enterocytes. Science, Published online May 1, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abc1669.

Lavelle, A., and Sokol, H. (2020). Gut microbiota-derived metabolites as key actors in inflammatory bowel disease. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 17, 223–237.

Liang, W., Feng, Z., Rao, S., Xiao, C., Xue, X., Lin, Z., Zhang, Q., and Qi, W.

(2020). Diarrhoea may be underestimated: a missing link in 2019 novel corona- virus. Gut 69, 1141–1143.

Lin, L., Jiang, X., Zhang, Z., Huang, S., Zhang, Z., Fang, Z., Gu, Z., Gao, L., Shi, H., Mai, L., et al. (2020). Gastrointestinal symptoms of 95 cases with SARS- CoV-2 infection. Gut 69, 997–1001.

Lukassen, S., Chua, R.L., Trefzer, T., Kahn, N.C., Schneider, M.A., Muley, T., Winter, H., Meister, M., Veith, C., Boots, A.W., et al. (2020). SARS-CoV-2 re- ceptor ACE2 and TMPRSS2 are primarily expressed in bronchial transient secretory cells. EMBO J. 39, e105114.

Mao, R., Qiu, Y., He, J.S., Tan, J.Y., Li, X.H., Liang, J., Shen, J., Zhu, L.R., Chen, Y., Iacucci, M., et al. (2020). Manifestations and prognosis of gastroin- testinal and liver involvement in patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 5, 667–678.

Matsuyama, S., Nagata, N., Shirato, K., Kawase, M., Takeda, M., and Taguchi, F. (2010). Efficient activation of the severe acute respiratory syndrome corona- virus spike protein by the transmembrane protease TMPRSS2. J. Virol. 84, 12658–12664.

McCullers, J.A. (2014). The co-pathogenesis of influenza viruses with bacteria in the lung. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 12, 252–262.

Nobel, Y.R., Phipps, M., Zucker, J., Lebwohl, B., Wang, T.C., Sobieszczyk, M.E., and Freedberg, D.E. (2020). Gastrointestinal symptoms and coronavirus disease 2019: a case-control study from the United States. Gastroenterology, Published online April 12, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2020.04.017.

Pan, L., Mu, M., Yang, P., Sun, Y., Wang, R., Yan, J., Li, P., Hu, B., Wang, J., Hu, C., et al. (2020). Clinical characteristics of COVID-19 patients with diges-

tive symptoms in Hubei, China: A descriptive, cross-Sectional, multicenter study. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 115, 766–773.

Paniz-Mondolfi, A., Bryce, C., Grimes, Z., Gordon, R.E., Reidy, J., Lednicky, J., Sordillo, E.M., and Fowkes, M. (2020). Central nervous system involvement by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). J. Med. Vi- rol. 92, 699–702.

Qin, N., Zheng, B., Yao, J., Guo, L., Zuo, J., Wu, L., Zhou, J., Liu, L., Guo, J., Ni, S., et al. (2015). Influence of H7N9 virus infection and associated treatment on human gut microbiota. Sci. Rep. 5, 14771–14784.

Ranjbar, R., Shafiee, M., Hesari, A., Ferns, G.A., Ghasemi, F., and Avan, A.

(2019). The potential therapeutic use of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors in the treatment of inflammatory diseases. J. Cell. Physiol. 234, 2277–2295.

Redd, W.D., Zhou, J.C., Hathorn, K.E., McCarty, T.R., Bazarbashi, A.N., Thompson, C.C., Shen, L., and Chan, W.W. (2020). Prevalence and character- istics of gastrointestinal symptoms in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection in the United States: A multicenter cohort study. Gastroenterology, Published online April 22, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2020.04.045.

Santisteban, M.M., Kim, S., Pepine, C.J., and Raizada, M.K. (2016). Brain-gut- bone marrow axis: Implications for hypertension and related therapeutics.

Circ. Res. 118, 1327–1336.

Sencio, V., Barthelemy, A., Tavares, L.P., Machado, M.G., Soulard, D., Cuinat, C., Queiroz-Junior, C.M., Noordine, M.L., Salome´-Desnoulez, S., Deryuter, L., et al. (2020). Gut dysbiosis during influenza contributes to pulmonary pneumo- coccal superinfection through altered short-chain fatty acid production. Cell Rep. 30, 2934–2947.e6.

Singh, A.K., Gupta, R., Ghosh, A., and Misra, A. (2020). Diabetes in COVID-19:

prevalence, pathophysiology, prognosis and practical considerations. Dia- betes Metab. Syndr. 14, 303–310.

Singhal, R., and Shah, Y.M. (2020). Oxygen battle in the gut: hypoxia and hyp- oxia-inducible factors in metabolic and inflammatory responses in the intes- tine. J. Biol. Chem. Published online June 5, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1074/

jbc.REV120.011188.

Steed, A.L., Christophi, G.P., Kaiko, G.E., Sun, L., Goodwin, V.M., Jain, U., Esaulova, E., Artyomov, M.N., Morales, D.J., Holtzman, M.J., et al. (2017).

The microbial metabolite desaminotyrosine protects from influenza through type I interferon. Science 357, 498–502.

Sultan, S., Altayar, O., Siddique, S.M., Davitkov, P., Feuerstein, J.D., Lim, J.K., Falck-Ytter, Y., and El-Serag, H.B.; American Gastroenterological Association (2020). AGA institute rapid review of the gastrointestinal and liver manifesta- tions of COVID-19, meta-analysis of international data, and recommendations for the consultative management of patients with COVID-19. Gastroenter- ology, Published online May 11, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2020.

05.001.

Sun, S.-H., Chen, Q., Gu, H.-J., Yang, G., Wang, Y.-X., Huang, X.-Y., Liu, S.-S., Zhang, N.-N., Li, X.-F., Xiong, R., et al. (2020). A mouse model of SARS-CoV-2 infection and pathogenesis. Cell Host Microbe, Published online May 27, 2020.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2020.05.020.

Sungnak, W., Huang, N., Be´cavin, C., Berg, M., Queen, R., Litvinukova, M., Ta- lavera-Lo´pez, C., Maatz, H., Reichart, D., Sampaziotis, F., et al.; HCA Lung Biological Network (2020). SARS-CoV-2 entry factors are highly expressed in nasal epithelial cells together with innate immune genes. Nat. Med. 26, 681–687.

Trompette, A., Gollwitzer, E.S., Pattaroni, C., Lopez-Mejia, I.C., Riva, E., Per- not, J., Ubags, N., Fajas, L., Nicod, L.P., and Marsland, B.J. (2018). Dietary fi- ber confers protection against flu by shaping Ly6c patrolling monocyte he- matopoiesis and CD8

+

T cell metabolism. Immunity 48, 992–1005.e8.

Wang, J., Li, F., Wei, H., Lian, Z.-X., Sun, R., and Tian, Z. (2014). Respiratory influenza virus infection induces intestinal immune injury via microbiota-medi- ated Th17 cell-dependent inflammation. J. Exp. Med. 211, 2397–2410.

Wang, C., Horby, P.W., Hayden, F.G., and Gao, G.F. (2020a). A novel corona- virus outbreak of global health concern. Lancet 395, 470–473.

6 Cell Reports 32 , July 21, 2020

Review

OPEN ACCESS

(8)

Wang, Q., Zhang, Y., Wu, L., Niu, S., Song, C., Zhang, Z., Lu, G., Qiao, C., Hu, Y., Yuen, K.Y., et al. (2020b). Structural and Functional Basis of SARS-CoV-2 Entry by Using Human ACE2. Cell 181, 894–904.e9.

Wang, D., Hu, B., Hu, C., Zhu, F., Liu, X., Zhang, J., Wang, B., Xiang, H., Cheng, Z., Xiong, Y., et al. (2020c). Clinical characteristics of 138 hospitalized patients with 2019 novel coronavirus-infected pneumonia in Wuhan, China. JAMA 323, 1061–1069.

Wu, Z., and McGoogan, J.M. (2020). Characteristics of and important lessons from the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak in China: summary of a report of 72 314 cases from the Chinese center for disease control and pre- vention. JAMA, Published online February 24, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1001/

jama.2020.2648.

Xiao, F., Tang, M., Zheng, X., Liu, Y., Li, X., and Shan, H. (2020a). Evidence for gastrointestinal infection of SARS-CoV-2. Gastroenterology 158, 1831–

1833.e3.

Xiao, F., Sun, J., Xu, Y., Li, F., Huand, X., Li, H., Zhoa, J., Huang, J., and Zhao, J. (2020b). Infectious SARS-CoV-2 in feces of patient with Severe COVID-19.

Emerg. Infect. Dis. 26, Published online May 18, 2020. https://doi.org/10.3201/

eid2608.200681.

Yildiz, S., Mazel-Sanchez, B., Kandasamy, M., Manicassamy, B., and Schmolke, M. (2018). Influenza A virus infection impacts systemic microbiota dynamics and causes quantitative enteric dysbiosis. Microbiome 6, 9–25.

Yu, L., Tong, Y., Shen, G., Fu, A., Lai, Y., Zhou, X., Yan, Y., Wang, Y., Pan, Y., Yu, Z., et al. (2020). Immunodepletion with hypoxemia: A potential high risk subtype of coronavirus disease 2019. medRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/

2020.03.03.20030650.

Zang, R., Gomez Castro, M.F., McCune, B.T., Zeng, Q., Rothlauf, P.W., Son- nek, N.M., Liu, Z., Brulois, K.F., Wang, X., Greenberg, H.B., et al. (2020).

TMPRSS2 and TMPRSS4 promote SARS-CoV-2 infection of human small in- testinal enterocytes. Sci. Immunol. 5, eabc3582.

Zhang, W., Du, R.H., Li, B., Zheng, X.S., Yang, X.L., Hu, B., Wang, Y.Y., Xiao, G.F., Yan, B., Shi, Z.L., and Zhou, P. (2020). Molecular and serological inves- tigation of 2019-nCoV infected patients: implication of multiple shedding routes. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 9, 386–389.

Zhao, Y., Zhao, Z., Wang, Y., Zhou, Y., Ma, Y., and Zuo, W. (2020). Single-cell RNA expression profiling of ACE2, the putative receptor of Wuhan 2019-nCov.

bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.01.26.919985.

Zhou, P., Yang, X.L., Wang, X.G., Hu, B., Zhang, L., Zhang, W., Si, H.R., Zhu, Y., Li, B., Huang, C.L., et al. (2020a). A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin. Nature 579, 270–273.

Zhou, Z., Zhao, N., Shu, Y., Han, S., Chen, B., and Shu, X. (2020b). Effect of gastrointestinal symptoms in patients with COVID-19. Gastroenterology 158, 2294–2297.

Zhou, J., Li, C., Liu, X., Chiu, M.C., Zhao, X., Wang, D., Wei, Y., Lee, A., Zhang, A.J., Chu, H., et al. (2020c). Infection of bat and human intestinal organoids by SARS-CoV-2. Nat. Med. 2020, 13.

Zhu, N., Zhang, D., Wang, W., Li, X., Yang, B., Song, J., Zhao, X., Huang, B., Shi, W., Lu, R., et al.; China Novel Coronavirus Investigating and Research Team (2020). A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China, 2019. N. Engl. J. Med. 382, 727–733.

Zuo, T., Zhang, F., Lui, G.C.Y., Yeoh, Y.K., Li, A.Y.L., Zhan, H., Wan, Y., Chung,

A., Cheung, C.P., Chen, N., et al. (2020). Alterations in gut microbiota of pa-

tients with COVID-19 during time of hospitalization. Gastroenterology, Pub-

lished online May 19, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2020.05.048.

Références

Documents relatifs

In this study, using either live SARS-CoV-2 particles or retroviruses pseudotyped with the SARS-CoV-2 S viral surface protein (Spike), we studied the neutralizing antibody

Clinical performance of four immunoassays for antibodies to SARS-CoV-2, including a prospective analysis for the diagnosis of COVID-19 in a real-life routine care setting... 2

IL-8 gene expression is often linked to the NFκB pathway, but showed that the toxin B-mediated NFκB signaling response, that is, IκB phosphorylation, degradation, and NFκB

Therefore, despite the susceptibility of some animal species revealed in observational or experimental conditions and making the juvenile cat, in particular, a potential model

In conclusion, the present study offers new data regarding the expression of ORs in peripheral tissues and their co-expression pattern with key mediators of SARS-coV-2 cell entry

IFN = interferon; PAMPs = Pathogen-associated molecular patterns; DAMPs = Damage-associated molecular patterns; SARS-CoV-2 = Severe acute respiratory syndrome Corona- virus 2; AECs

Interestingly, comparing patients with and without headache, for whom data were available at follow-up, and adjusting for age and gender, we observed shorter COVID-19 disease

In this study, these IVIG were tested for neutralization activity against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), SARS- CoV and Middle East respiratory