• Aucun résultat trouvé

Relational Reasoning via Probabilistic Coupling

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Relational Reasoning via Probabilistic Coupling"

Copied!
17
0
0

Texte intégral

Loading

Figure

Fig. 1: Two-sided proof rules (selection)
Fig. 3: Structural and program transformation rules (selection)
Fig. 5: Coupling for biased coin flips
Fig. 9: Lazy random walk on a two dimensional torus

Références

Documents relatifs

The output of the Perception module is a description of the robot’s situation, which is specified by a conjunction of active predicates (with truth value true ) such as: seeDoor()

The Relational Database Model (RDBM) [3, 4] is one of the most relevant database models that are being currently used to manage data.. Although some alternative models are also

The two-level logic approach, as implemented in the Abella theorem prover, embeds the HH specification logic within a rich reasoning logic that supports inductive and

The force behind developing a two-level logic approach to reasoning about logic specifications is the necessity to treat both induction (and co-induction) and higher-order

– Probabilty theory as calculus of uncertainty – Learning probabilistic models form data. Events,

Here again, we can see that Euler diagrams associated with sentential premises play a dual role in the process of checking the invalidity of a syllogism: first, they make explicit

All the cited systems, although often allow an expressiveness greater than the one enabled by the engine proposed here, are only able to return either exact matches (i.e.,

Whereas binary and secant ternary items can be solved using cell-based strategies, nonsecant ternary and quaternary items require shape-based strategies, as can be seen in