• Aucun résultat trouvé

Human-in-the-Loop Feature Selection

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Human-in-the-Loop Feature Selection"

Copied!
9
0
0

Texte intégral

Loading

Figure

Figure 1: Stochastic graph for the score function estimator.
Figure 2: Stochastic graph for the pathwise derivative esti- esti-mator. Here the mask a is no longer a stochastic node.
Table 1 shows the results obtained with both estimators when applying the proposed feature selection method on a cluttered MNIST dataset with a frame of 60x60.
Table 5: Temperatures on Accuracy on PRC (PD & MSE).
+2

Références

Documents relatifs

If a minimum experimentation design was required to validate the hypothesis (proof of the known), additional design activity had to be performed to enable the proof of the

Space has long been studied in relationships with Geography, Economy, and Management. These sectors pay attention to the influence of space in their own analysis and some effort

According to the proposed approaches in literature, we noted the absence of hybridizations between the BQPSO approach and Clonal Selection Algorithm, in the context of

operator faults, but does not provide a full treatment of the human-computer interaction loop (HCIL).. a button), the different subsystems in a human (perceptual, cognitive, or

Roughly two figures are given: first, a basic figure about opinion frequencies and polarity distribu- tions per entity, and second, opinion disagreement among different annotators

spatial scale and multi-stress situations), the connections be- tween different policies (pesticide regulation and Water Framework Directive), the use of models, (2) review integrat-

We consider the problem of fitting and feature selection in MoE models, and propose a regularized maximum likelihood estimation approach that encourages sparse solutions

Our objectives were: first, to explore if interpersonal motor coordination impairments already shown during interactions with a human partner 20,21 also apply to interactions with