• Aucun résultat trouvé

How to write a scientific paper

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "How to write a scientific paper"

Copied!
128
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: hal-02942658

https://hal.univ-lorraine.fr/hal-02942658

Submitted on 18 Sep 2020

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access

archive for the deposit and dissemination of

sci-entific research documents, whether they are

pub-lished or not. The documents may come from

teaching and research institutions in France or

abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est

destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents

scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,

émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de

recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires

publics ou privés.

How to write a scientific paper

Nicolas Fressengeas

To cite this version:

(2)

ENLIGHT Z T ME

N. Fressengeas

Laboratoire Mat´

eriaux Optiques, Photonique et Syst`

emes

Unit´

e de Recherche commune `

a l’Universit´

e de Lorraine et `

a CentraleSup´

elec

Download this from http://arche.univ-lorraine.fr under

CC-BY-SA Creative Commons licence

(3)

ENLIGHT Z T ME

(4)

ENLIGHT Z T ME

(5)

ENLIGHT Z T ME

(6)

ENLIGHT Z T ME

(7)

ENLIGHT Z T ME



Learn how to write scientific papers in under 4 minutes



How to Write a Paper in a Weekend (By Prof. Pete Carr)



Judy Swan, Scientific Writing: Beyond Tips and Tricks

(8)

ENLIGHT Z T ME

Nicolae Al. Pop

ISSN 2071-789X

REVIEW

360

Nicolae Al. Pop,

Bucharest University of Economic

Studies,

Bucharest, Romania,

E-mail:

nicolae_al_pop@yahoo.com

A REFERENCE WORK

ON THE SCIENCE AND ART

OF WRITING A SCIENTIFIC PAPER

1

DOI:

10.14254/2071-789X.2016/9-4/23

Introduction

Motto:

„Some think but do not write, others write without thinking;

many think after they write, few write after they think“

Theofil Simenschy

In the modern world, marked by hyper-competition,

globalization and a great explosion of the means of

information and communication among people, dissemination

of scientific research findings takes on a particular

significance. It is closely connected with the access to

information and its speed of propagation, making the current

transmission system look strikingly different from the one of

the previous century.

According to Stiglitz, the marketplace of ideas with all

its imperfections does not guarantee, at least in the short term,

that the best ideas will prevail (Stiglitz, 2010, p. 426).

Identification of the most effective ways and means of making

the most of the scientific research results depends not only on

the mechanisms for conveying information but also on

securing the paternity of problem-solving solutions. Equally

important is the way in which the process of communicating

the research results is conducted. The holistic approach to

communication (Kotler and Keller, 2012, p. 58) interprets this

process as the integration of all means and tools whereby the “product” – in this case, research

findings – is brought to the attention of all its potential beneficiaries. In order for the user to get

the most of scientific research, its concept, writing and dissemination must be entirely

accomplished in a systemic manner. This calls for an interdisciplinary approach in which

natural, technical and social sciences work together (Homburg and Krohmer, 2009, p. 195). As

the abovementioned process is cybernetically-oriented, the reverse connection between

1

Vasile Dinu, Gheorghe Săvoiu, Dan-Cristian Dabija (2016), Conceiving, writing and publishing a scientific

paper, A.S.E. Publishing House, Bucharest, 402 p.

Pop, N. Al. (2016), A Reference Work on the Science and Art of Writing a

Scientific Paper, Economics and Sociology, Vol. 9, No 4, pp. 360-364. DOI:

10.14254/2071-789X.2016/9-4/23

(9)

ENLIGHT Z T ME

Part I

(10)

ENLIGHT Z T ME

I Tools for scientific writing

1 A scientific paper

Papers share the same structure

References, so important references

2 Separation of content and presentation

A concept to ease and enhance writing

L

A

TEX, a scientific writing tool

(11)

ENLIGHT Z T ME

I Tools for scientific writing

1 A scientific paper

Papers share the same structure

References, so important references

2 Separation of content and presentation

A concept to ease and enhance writing

L

A

TEX, a scientific writing tool

(12)

ENLIGHT Z T ME

I Tools for scientific writing

1 A scientific paper

Papers share the same structure

References, so important references

2 Separation of content and presentation

A concept to ease and enhance writing

L

A

TEX, a scientific writing tool

(13)

ENLIGHT Z T ME

The process of publishing a scientific paper

Choose the right journal



Get inspired by your university policy



Choose a journal that is read by your targeted audience



Choose Open Access journal

I

Pay never more 1000$ and target far below

I

If you cannot : publish in free paywalled access journals AND

in open archives such as http://hal.univ-lorraine.fr



Read the editorial guidelines

Write and publish



Write your paper

this class



Send it to journal



Wait for reviewing

(14)

ENLIGHT Z T ME

The process of publishing a scientific paper

Choose the right journal



Get inspired by your university policy



Choose a journal that is read by your targeted audience



Choose Open Access journal

I

Pay never more 1000$ and target far below

I

If you cannot : publish in free paywalled access journals AND

in open archives such as http://hal.univ-lorraine.fr



Read the editorial guidelines

Write and publish



Write your paper

this class



Send it to journal



Wait for reviewing

(15)

ENLIGHT Z T ME

The first page of a scientific paper



Informative short title



Ordered author list



Affiliations



Keywords



Article history



Abstract



Contact information



Article reference

A good title will pop up in web

searches

Researchpaper

Writing

a

scientific

article:

A

step-by-step

guide

for

beginners

F.Ecarnot*,M.-F.Seronde,R.Chopard,F.Schiele,N.Meneveau EA3920,DepartmentofCardiology,UniversityHospitalJean-Minjoz,3,BoulevardFleming,25000Besanc¸on,France

1.Background

Everyresearcherhasbeenfacetofacewithablankpageatsome stageoftheircareer,wonderingwheretostartandwhattowrite first.Describingone’sresearchworkinaformatthatis comprehensibletoothers,andacceptableforpublicationisno easytask.Whenyouinvestalotoftime,energyandoftenmoneyin yourresearch,youbecomeintimatelyandemotionallyinvolved. Naturally,youareconvincedofthevalueofyourresearch,andof itsimportanceforthescientificcommunity.However,the subjectivitythatgoeshandinhandwithdeepinvolvementcan makeitdifficulttotakeastepback,andthinkclearlyabouthow besttopresenttheresearchinaclearandunderstandablefashion, sothatothers–likely,nonexpertsinyourfield–canalso appreciatetheinterestofyourfindings.

Eventoday,theoldadage‘‘publishorperish’’remainsvalid. Manyyoungresearchersfindthemselvesunderpressureto producescientificpublications,inordertoenhancetheircareer prospects,ortosubstantiaterequestsforfunding,ortojustify previousfundingallocations,orasarequirementforuniversity qualificationssuchasaMastersdegreeordoctoralthesis.Yet, often,youngdoctorsdonothavemuchtraining,ifany,intheartof writingascientificarticle.Forclinicians,inparticular,theclinical workloadcanbesuchthatresearchandscientificwritingareseen tobesecondaryactivitiesthatarenotanimmediatepriority,andto

whichonlysmallamountsoftimecanbedevotedonanirregular basis.However,thecompetitionisalreadyquitefierceamongstall thegoodqualitypapersthataresubmittedtojournals,anditis thereforeofparamountimportancetogetthebasicsright,inorder foryourpapertohaveachanceofsucceeding.Don’tyouthinkthat yourworkdeservestobejudgedonitsscientificmerit,ratherthan berejectedforpoorqualitywritingandmessyandconfusing presentationofthedata?

Withthisinmind,wepresenthereastep-by-stepguideto writingascientificarticle,whichisnotspecifictothedisciplineof geriatrics/gerontology,butrather,maybeappliedtothevast majorityofmedicaldisciplines.Wewillstartbyoutliningthemain sectionsofthearticle,andwillthendescribeingreaterdetailthe mainelementsthatshouldfeatureineachsection.Finally,wewill alsogiveafewpointersfortheabstractandthetitleofthearticle. Thisguideaimstohelpyoungresearcherswithlittleexperienceof writingtocreateagoodqualityfirstdraftoftheirwork,whichcan thenbecirculatedtotheirco-authorsandseniormentorsfor furtherrefinement,withtheultimateaimofachievingpublication inascientificjournal.Itisundoubtedlynotexhaustive,andmany excellentresourcescanbefoundintheexistingliterature[1–7]

andonline[8].

2.Gettingstarted:thingstodobeforeyouwriteaword Acertainamountofpreparatoryworkneedstobedonebefore youeverwriteawordofyourarticle.Thisbackgroundworkshould generallyalreadyhavebeenaccomplishedbythetimeyouareat thewritingstage,becauseitalsoservesasbackgroundtothe researchprojectyouarewritingabout.Allthetimeyouinvestin preparingtheprotocolforyourprojectisanadvanceonthewriting

EuropeanGeriatricMedicine6(2015)573–579

ARTICLEINFO Articlehistory: Received22June2015 Accepted18August2015 Availableonline19September2015 Keywords: Scientificpublications Writing Research Article ABSTRACT

Manyyoungresearchersfinditextremelydifficulttowritescientificarticles,andfewreceivespecific trainingintheartofpresentingtheirresearchworkinwrittenformat.Yet,publicationisoftenvitalfor careeradvancement,toobtainfunding,toobtainacademicqualifications,orforallthesereasons.We describeherethebasicstepstofollowinwritingascientificarticle.Weoutlinethemainsectionsthatan averagearticleshouldcontain;theelementsthatshouldappearinthesesections,andsomepointersfor makingtheoverallresultattractiveandacceptableforpublication.

ß2015ElsevierMassonSASandEuropeanUnionGeriatricMedicineSociety.Allrightsreserved.

* Correspondingauthor.Tel.:+33381668539;fax:+33381668582. E-mailaddresses:fiona.ecarnot@univ-fcomte.fr(F.Ecarnot),

mfseronde@chu-besancon.fr(M.-F.Seronde),rchopard@chu-besancon.fr

(R.Chopard),francois.schiele@univ-fcomte.fr(F.Schiele),

nicolas.meneveau@univ-fcomte.fr(N.Meneveau).

Availableonlineat

ScienceDirect

(16)

ENLIGHT Z T ME

The first page of a scientific paper



Informative short title



Ordered author list



Affiliations



Keywords



Article history



Abstract



Contact information



Article reference

Get the author order wrong and

make enemies

Researchpaper

Writing

a

scientific

article:

A

step-by-step

guide

for

beginners

F.Ecarnot*,M.-F.Seronde,R.Chopard,F.Schiele,N.Meneveau EA3920,DepartmentofCardiology,UniversityHospitalJean-Minjoz,3,BoulevardFleming,25000Besanc¸on,France

1.Background

Everyresearcherhasbeenfacetofacewithablankpageatsome stageoftheircareer,wonderingwheretostartandwhattowrite first.Describingone’sresearchworkinaformatthatis comprehensibletoothers,andacceptableforpublicationisno easytask.Whenyouinvestalotoftime,energyandoftenmoneyin yourresearch,youbecomeintimatelyandemotionallyinvolved. Naturally,youareconvincedofthevalueofyourresearch,andof itsimportanceforthescientificcommunity.However,the subjectivitythatgoeshandinhandwithdeepinvolvementcan makeitdifficulttotakeastepback,andthinkclearlyabouthow besttopresenttheresearchinaclearandunderstandablefashion, sothatothers–likely,nonexpertsinyourfield–canalso appreciatetheinterestofyourfindings.

Eventoday,theoldadage‘‘publishorperish’’remainsvalid. Manyyoungresearchersfindthemselvesunderpressureto producescientificpublications,inordertoenhancetheircareer prospects,ortosubstantiaterequestsforfunding,ortojustify previousfundingallocations,orasarequirementforuniversity qualificationssuchasaMastersdegreeordoctoralthesis.Yet, often,youngdoctorsdonothavemuchtraining,ifany,intheartof writingascientificarticle.Forclinicians,inparticular,theclinical workloadcanbesuchthatresearchandscientificwritingareseen tobesecondaryactivitiesthatarenotanimmediatepriority,andto

whichonlysmallamountsoftimecanbedevotedonanirregular basis.However,thecompetitionisalreadyquitefierceamongstall thegoodqualitypapersthataresubmittedtojournals,anditis thereforeofparamountimportancetogetthebasicsright,inorder foryourpapertohaveachanceofsucceeding.Don’tyouthinkthat yourworkdeservestobejudgedonitsscientificmerit,ratherthan berejectedforpoorqualitywritingandmessyandconfusing presentationofthedata?

Withthisinmind,wepresenthereastep-by-stepguideto writingascientificarticle,whichisnotspecifictothedisciplineof geriatrics/gerontology,butrather,maybeappliedtothevast majorityofmedicaldisciplines.Wewillstartbyoutliningthemain sectionsofthearticle,andwillthendescribeingreaterdetailthe mainelementsthatshouldfeatureineachsection.Finally,wewill alsogiveafewpointersfortheabstractandthetitleofthearticle. Thisguideaimstohelpyoungresearcherswithlittleexperienceof writingtocreateagoodqualityfirstdraftoftheirwork,whichcan thenbecirculatedtotheirco-authorsandseniormentorsfor furtherrefinement,withtheultimateaimofachievingpublication inascientificjournal.Itisundoubtedlynotexhaustive,andmany excellentresourcescanbefoundintheexistingliterature[1–7]

andonline[8].

2.Gettingstarted:thingstodobeforeyouwriteaword Acertainamountofpreparatoryworkneedstobedonebefore youeverwriteawordofyourarticle.Thisbackgroundworkshould generallyalreadyhavebeenaccomplishedbythetimeyouareat thewritingstage,becauseitalsoservesasbackgroundtothe researchprojectyouarewritingabout.Allthetimeyouinvestin preparingtheprotocolforyourprojectisanadvanceonthewriting

EuropeanGeriatricMedicine6(2015)573–579

ARTICLEINFO Articlehistory: Received22June2015 Accepted18August2015 Availableonline19September2015 Keywords: Scientificpublications Writing Research Article ABSTRACT

Manyyoungresearchersfinditextremelydifficulttowritescientificarticles,andfewreceivespecific trainingintheartofpresentingtheirresearchworkinwrittenformat.Yet,publicationisoftenvitalfor careeradvancement,toobtainfunding,toobtainacademicqualifications,orforallthesereasons.We describeherethebasicstepstofollowinwritingascientificarticle.Weoutlinethemainsectionsthatan averagearticleshouldcontain;theelementsthatshouldappearinthesesections,andsomepointersfor makingtheoverallresultattractiveandacceptableforpublication.

ß2015ElsevierMassonSASandEuropeanUnionGeriatricMedicineSociety.Allrightsreserved.

* Correspondingauthor.Tel.:+33381668539;fax:+33381668582. E-mailaddresses:fiona.ecarnot@univ-fcomte.fr(F.Ecarnot),

mfseronde@chu-besancon.fr(M.-F.Seronde),rchopard@chu-besancon.fr

(R.Chopard),francois.schiele@univ-fcomte.fr(F.Schiele),

nicolas.meneveau@univ-fcomte.fr(N.Meneveau).

Availableonlineat

ScienceDirect

(17)

ENLIGHT Z T ME

The first page of a scientific paper



Informative short title



Ordered author list



Affiliations



Keywords



Article history



Abstract



Contact information



Article reference

Institutions are touchy on

affiliations

Researchpaper

Writing

a

scientific

article:

A

step-by-step

guide

for

beginners

F.Ecarnot*,M.-F.Seronde,R.Chopard,F.Schiele,N.Meneveau EA3920,DepartmentofCardiology,UniversityHospitalJean-Minjoz,3,BoulevardFleming,25000Besanc¸on,France

1.Background

Everyresearcherhasbeenfacetofacewithablankpageatsome stageoftheircareer,wonderingwheretostartandwhattowrite first.Describingone’sresearchworkinaformatthatis comprehensibletoothers,andacceptableforpublicationisno easytask.Whenyouinvestalotoftime,energyandoftenmoneyin yourresearch,youbecomeintimatelyandemotionallyinvolved. Naturally,youareconvincedofthevalueofyourresearch,andof itsimportanceforthescientificcommunity.However,the subjectivitythatgoeshandinhandwithdeepinvolvementcan makeitdifficulttotakeastepback,andthinkclearlyabouthow besttopresenttheresearchinaclearandunderstandablefashion, sothatothers–likely,nonexpertsinyourfield–canalso appreciatetheinterestofyourfindings.

Eventoday,theoldadage‘‘publishorperish’’remainsvalid. Manyyoungresearchersfindthemselvesunderpressureto producescientificpublications,inordertoenhancetheircareer prospects,ortosubstantiaterequestsforfunding,ortojustify previousfundingallocations,orasarequirementforuniversity qualificationssuchasaMastersdegreeordoctoralthesis.Yet, often,youngdoctorsdonothavemuchtraining,ifany,intheartof writingascientificarticle.Forclinicians,inparticular,theclinical workloadcanbesuchthatresearchandscientificwritingareseen tobesecondaryactivitiesthatarenotanimmediatepriority,andto

whichonlysmallamountsoftimecanbedevotedonanirregular basis.However,thecompetitionisalreadyquitefierceamongstall thegoodqualitypapersthataresubmittedtojournals,anditis thereforeofparamountimportancetogetthebasicsright,inorder foryourpapertohaveachanceofsucceeding.Don’tyouthinkthat yourworkdeservestobejudgedonitsscientificmerit,ratherthan berejectedforpoorqualitywritingandmessyandconfusing presentationofthedata?

Withthisinmind,wepresenthereastep-by-stepguideto writingascientificarticle,whichisnotspecifictothedisciplineof geriatrics/gerontology,butrather,maybeappliedtothevast majorityofmedicaldisciplines.Wewillstartbyoutliningthemain sectionsofthearticle,andwillthendescribeingreaterdetailthe mainelementsthatshouldfeatureineachsection.Finally,wewill alsogiveafewpointersfortheabstractandthetitleofthearticle. Thisguideaimstohelpyoungresearcherswithlittleexperienceof writingtocreateagoodqualityfirstdraftoftheirwork,whichcan thenbecirculatedtotheirco-authorsandseniormentorsfor furtherrefinement,withtheultimateaimofachievingpublication inascientificjournal.Itisundoubtedlynotexhaustive,andmany excellentresourcescanbefoundintheexistingliterature[1–7]

andonline[8].

2.Gettingstarted:thingstodobeforeyouwriteaword Acertainamountofpreparatoryworkneedstobedonebefore youeverwriteawordofyourarticle.Thisbackgroundworkshould generallyalreadyhavebeenaccomplishedbythetimeyouareat thewritingstage,becauseitalsoservesasbackgroundtothe researchprojectyouarewritingabout.Allthetimeyouinvestin preparingtheprotocolforyourprojectisanadvanceonthewriting

EuropeanGeriatricMedicine6(2015)573–579

ARTICLEINFO Articlehistory: Received22June2015 Accepted18August2015 Availableonline19September2015 Keywords: Scientificpublications Writing Research Article ABSTRACT

Manyyoungresearchersfinditextremelydifficulttowritescientificarticles,andfewreceivespecific trainingintheartofpresentingtheirresearchworkinwrittenformat.Yet,publicationisoftenvitalfor careeradvancement,toobtainfunding,toobtainacademicqualifications,orforallthesereasons.We describeherethebasicstepstofollowinwritingascientificarticle.Weoutlinethemainsectionsthatan averagearticleshouldcontain;theelementsthatshouldappearinthesesections,andsomepointersfor makingtheoverallresultattractiveandacceptableforpublication.

ß2015ElsevierMassonSASandEuropeanUnionGeriatricMedicineSociety.Allrightsreserved.

* Correspondingauthor.Tel.:+33381668539;fax:+33381668582. E-mailaddresses:fiona.ecarnot@univ-fcomte.fr(F.Ecarnot),

mfseronde@chu-besancon.fr(M.-F.Seronde),rchopard@chu-besancon.fr

(R.Chopard),francois.schiele@univ-fcomte.fr(F.Schiele),

nicolas.meneveau@univ-fcomte.fr(N.Meneveau).

Availableonlineat

ScienceDirect

(18)

ENLIGHT Z T ME

The first page of a scientific paper



Informative short title



Ordered author list



Affiliations



Keywords



Article history



Abstract



Contact information



Article reference

Keywords index your paper on a

worldwide basis: get them right

Researchpaper

Writing

a

scientific

article:

A

step-by-step

guide

for

beginners

F.Ecarnot*,M.-F.Seronde,R.Chopard,F.Schiele,N.Meneveau EA3920,DepartmentofCardiology,UniversityHospitalJean-Minjoz,3,BoulevardFleming,25000Besanc¸on,France

1.Background

Everyresearcherhasbeenfacetofacewithablankpageatsome stageoftheircareer,wonderingwheretostartandwhattowrite first.Describingone’sresearchworkinaformatthatis comprehensibletoothers,andacceptableforpublicationisno easytask.Whenyouinvestalotoftime,energyandoftenmoneyin yourresearch,youbecomeintimatelyandemotionallyinvolved. Naturally,youareconvincedofthevalueofyourresearch,andof itsimportanceforthescientificcommunity.However,the subjectivitythatgoeshandinhandwithdeepinvolvementcan makeitdifficulttotakeastepback,andthinkclearlyabouthow besttopresenttheresearchinaclearandunderstandablefashion, sothatothers–likely,nonexpertsinyourfield–canalso appreciatetheinterestofyourfindings.

Eventoday,theoldadage‘‘publishorperish’’remainsvalid. Manyyoungresearchersfindthemselvesunderpressureto producescientificpublications,inordertoenhancetheircareer prospects,ortosubstantiaterequestsforfunding,ortojustify previousfundingallocations,orasarequirementforuniversity qualificationssuchasaMastersdegreeordoctoralthesis.Yet, often,youngdoctorsdonothavemuchtraining,ifany,intheartof writingascientificarticle.Forclinicians,inparticular,theclinical workloadcanbesuchthatresearchandscientificwritingareseen tobesecondaryactivitiesthatarenotanimmediatepriority,andto

whichonlysmallamountsoftimecanbedevotedonanirregular basis.However,thecompetitionisalreadyquitefierceamongstall thegoodqualitypapersthataresubmittedtojournals,anditis thereforeofparamountimportancetogetthebasicsright,inorder foryourpapertohaveachanceofsucceeding.Don’tyouthinkthat yourworkdeservestobejudgedonitsscientificmerit,ratherthan berejectedforpoorqualitywritingandmessyandconfusing presentationofthedata?

Withthisinmind,wepresenthereastep-by-stepguideto writingascientificarticle,whichisnotspecifictothedisciplineof geriatrics/gerontology,butrather,maybeappliedtothevast majorityofmedicaldisciplines.Wewillstartbyoutliningthemain sectionsofthearticle,andwillthendescribeingreaterdetailthe mainelementsthatshouldfeatureineachsection.Finally,wewill alsogiveafewpointersfortheabstractandthetitleofthearticle. Thisguideaimstohelpyoungresearcherswithlittleexperienceof writingtocreateagoodqualityfirstdraftoftheirwork,whichcan thenbecirculatedtotheirco-authorsandseniormentorsfor furtherrefinement,withtheultimateaimofachievingpublication inascientificjournal.Itisundoubtedlynotexhaustive,andmany excellentresourcescanbefoundintheexistingliterature[1–7]

andonline[8].

2.Gettingstarted:thingstodobeforeyouwriteaword Acertainamountofpreparatoryworkneedstobedonebefore youeverwriteawordofyourarticle.Thisbackgroundworkshould generallyalreadyhavebeenaccomplishedbythetimeyouareat thewritingstage,becauseitalsoservesasbackgroundtothe researchprojectyouarewritingabout.Allthetimeyouinvestin preparingtheprotocolforyourprojectisanadvanceonthewriting

EuropeanGeriatricMedicine6(2015)573–579

ARTICLEINFO Articlehistory: Received22June2015 Accepted18August2015 Availableonline19September2015 Keywords: Scientificpublications Writing Research Article ABSTRACT

Manyyoungresearchersfinditextremelydifficulttowritescientificarticles,andfewreceivespecific trainingintheartofpresentingtheirresearchworkinwrittenformat.Yet,publicationisoftenvitalfor careeradvancement,toobtainfunding,toobtainacademicqualifications,orforallthesereasons.We describeherethebasicstepstofollowinwritingascientificarticle.Weoutlinethemainsectionsthatan averagearticleshouldcontain;theelementsthatshouldappearinthesesections,andsomepointersfor makingtheoverallresultattractiveandacceptableforpublication.

ß2015ElsevierMassonSASandEuropeanUnionGeriatricMedicineSociety.Allrightsreserved.

* Correspondingauthor.Tel.:+33381668539;fax:+33381668582. E-mailaddresses:fiona.ecarnot@univ-fcomte.fr(F.Ecarnot),

mfseronde@chu-besancon.fr(M.-F.Seronde),rchopard@chu-besancon.fr

(R.Chopard),francois.schiele@univ-fcomte.fr(F.Schiele),

nicolas.meneveau@univ-fcomte.fr(N.Meneveau).

Availableonlineat

ScienceDirect

(19)

ENLIGHT Z T ME

The first page of a scientific paper



Informative short title



Ordered author list



Affiliations



Keywords



Article history



Abstract



Contact information



Article reference

Dates ! Who was the first ? How

long was it reviewed ? Date of

publication ?

Researchpaper

Writing

a

scientific

article:

A

step-by-step

guide

for

beginners

F.Ecarnot*,M.-F.Seronde,R.Chopard,F.Schiele,N.Meneveau EA3920,DepartmentofCardiology,UniversityHospitalJean-Minjoz,3,BoulevardFleming,25000Besanc¸on,France

1.Background

Everyresearcherhasbeenfacetofacewithablankpageatsome stageoftheircareer,wonderingwheretostartandwhattowrite first.Describingone’sresearchworkinaformatthatis comprehensibletoothers,andacceptableforpublicationisno easytask.Whenyouinvestalotoftime,energyandoftenmoneyin yourresearch,youbecomeintimatelyandemotionallyinvolved. Naturally,youareconvincedofthevalueofyourresearch,andof itsimportanceforthescientificcommunity.However,the subjectivitythatgoeshandinhandwithdeepinvolvementcan makeitdifficulttotakeastepback,andthinkclearlyabouthow besttopresenttheresearchinaclearandunderstandablefashion, sothatothers–likely,nonexpertsinyourfield–canalso appreciatetheinterestofyourfindings.

Eventoday,theoldadage‘‘publishorperish’’remainsvalid. Manyyoungresearchersfindthemselvesunderpressureto producescientificpublications,inordertoenhancetheircareer prospects,ortosubstantiaterequestsforfunding,ortojustify previousfundingallocations,orasarequirementforuniversity qualificationssuchasaMastersdegreeordoctoralthesis.Yet, often,youngdoctorsdonothavemuchtraining,ifany,intheartof writingascientificarticle.Forclinicians,inparticular,theclinical workloadcanbesuchthatresearchandscientificwritingareseen tobesecondaryactivitiesthatarenotanimmediatepriority,andto

whichonlysmallamountsoftimecanbedevotedonanirregular basis.However,thecompetitionisalreadyquitefierceamongstall thegoodqualitypapersthataresubmittedtojournals,anditis thereforeofparamountimportancetogetthebasicsright,inorder foryourpapertohaveachanceofsucceeding.Don’tyouthinkthat yourworkdeservestobejudgedonitsscientificmerit,ratherthan berejectedforpoorqualitywritingandmessyandconfusing presentationofthedata?

Withthisinmind,wepresenthereastep-by-stepguideto writingascientificarticle,whichisnotspecifictothedisciplineof geriatrics/gerontology,butrather,maybeappliedtothevast majorityofmedicaldisciplines.Wewillstartbyoutliningthemain sectionsofthearticle,andwillthendescribeingreaterdetailthe mainelementsthatshouldfeatureineachsection.Finally,wewill alsogiveafewpointersfortheabstractandthetitleofthearticle. Thisguideaimstohelpyoungresearcherswithlittleexperienceof writingtocreateagoodqualityfirstdraftoftheirwork,whichcan thenbecirculatedtotheirco-authorsandseniormentorsfor furtherrefinement,withtheultimateaimofachievingpublication inascientificjournal.Itisundoubtedlynotexhaustive,andmany excellentresourcescanbefoundintheexistingliterature[1–7]

andonline[8].

2.Gettingstarted:thingstodobeforeyouwriteaword Acertainamountofpreparatoryworkneedstobedonebefore youeverwriteawordofyourarticle.Thisbackgroundworkshould generallyalreadyhavebeenaccomplishedbythetimeyouareat thewritingstage,becauseitalsoservesasbackgroundtothe researchprojectyouarewritingabout.Allthetimeyouinvestin preparingtheprotocolforyourprojectisanadvanceonthewriting

EuropeanGeriatricMedicine6(2015)573–579

ARTICLEINFO Articlehistory: Received22June2015 Accepted18August2015 Availableonline19September2015 Keywords: Scientificpublications Writing Research Article ABSTRACT

Manyyoungresearchersfinditextremelydifficulttowritescientificarticles,andfewreceivespecific trainingintheartofpresentingtheirresearchworkinwrittenformat.Yet,publicationisoftenvitalfor careeradvancement,toobtainfunding,toobtainacademicqualifications,orforallthesereasons.We describeherethebasicstepstofollowinwritingascientificarticle.Weoutlinethemainsectionsthatan averagearticleshouldcontain;theelementsthatshouldappearinthesesections,andsomepointersfor makingtheoverallresultattractiveandacceptableforpublication.

ß2015ElsevierMassonSASandEuropeanUnionGeriatricMedicineSociety.Allrightsreserved.

* Correspondingauthor.Tel.:+33381668539;fax:+33381668582. E-mailaddresses:fiona.ecarnot@univ-fcomte.fr(F.Ecarnot),

mfseronde@chu-besancon.fr(M.-F.Seronde),rchopard@chu-besancon.fr

(R.Chopard),francois.schiele@univ-fcomte.fr(F.Schiele),

nicolas.meneveau@univ-fcomte.fr(N.Meneveau).

Availableonlineat

ScienceDirect

(20)

ENLIGHT Z T ME

The first page of a scientific paper



Informative short title



Ordered author list



Affiliations



Keywords



Article history



Abstract



Contact information



Article reference

The abstract is an ultra short

summary of the paper emphasizing

new findings

Researchpaper

Writing

a

scientific

article:

A

step-by-step

guide

for

beginners

F.Ecarnot*,M.-F.Seronde,R.Chopard,F.Schiele,N.Meneveau EA3920,DepartmentofCardiology,UniversityHospitalJean-Minjoz,3,BoulevardFleming,25000Besanc¸on,France

1.Background

Everyresearcherhasbeenfacetofacewithablankpageatsome stageoftheircareer,wonderingwheretostartandwhattowrite first.Describingone’sresearchworkinaformatthatis comprehensibletoothers,andacceptableforpublicationisno easytask.Whenyouinvestalotoftime,energyandoftenmoneyin yourresearch,youbecomeintimatelyandemotionallyinvolved. Naturally,youareconvincedofthevalueofyourresearch,andof itsimportanceforthescientificcommunity.However,the subjectivitythatgoeshandinhandwithdeepinvolvementcan makeitdifficulttotakeastepback,andthinkclearlyabouthow besttopresenttheresearchinaclearandunderstandablefashion, sothatothers–likely,nonexpertsinyourfield–canalso appreciatetheinterestofyourfindings.

Eventoday,theoldadage‘‘publishorperish’’remainsvalid. Manyyoungresearchersfindthemselvesunderpressureto producescientificpublications,inordertoenhancetheircareer prospects,ortosubstantiaterequestsforfunding,ortojustify previousfundingallocations,orasarequirementforuniversity qualificationssuchasaMastersdegreeordoctoralthesis.Yet, often,youngdoctorsdonothavemuchtraining,ifany,intheartof writingascientificarticle.Forclinicians,inparticular,theclinical workloadcanbesuchthatresearchandscientificwritingareseen tobesecondaryactivitiesthatarenotanimmediatepriority,andto

whichonlysmallamountsoftimecanbedevotedonanirregular basis.However,thecompetitionisalreadyquitefierceamongstall thegoodqualitypapersthataresubmittedtojournals,anditis thereforeofparamountimportancetogetthebasicsright,inorder foryourpapertohaveachanceofsucceeding.Don’tyouthinkthat yourworkdeservestobejudgedonitsscientificmerit,ratherthan berejectedforpoorqualitywritingandmessyandconfusing presentationofthedata?

Withthisinmind,wepresenthereastep-by-stepguideto writingascientificarticle,whichisnotspecifictothedisciplineof geriatrics/gerontology,butrather,maybeappliedtothevast majorityofmedicaldisciplines.Wewillstartbyoutliningthemain sectionsofthearticle,andwillthendescribeingreaterdetailthe mainelementsthatshouldfeatureineachsection.Finally,wewill alsogiveafewpointersfortheabstractandthetitleofthearticle. Thisguideaimstohelpyoungresearcherswithlittleexperienceof writingtocreateagoodqualityfirstdraftoftheirwork,whichcan thenbecirculatedtotheirco-authorsandseniormentorsfor furtherrefinement,withtheultimateaimofachievingpublication inascientificjournal.Itisundoubtedlynotexhaustive,andmany excellentresourcescanbefoundintheexistingliterature[1–7]

andonline[8].

2.Gettingstarted:thingstodobeforeyouwriteaword Acertainamountofpreparatoryworkneedstobedonebefore youeverwriteawordofyourarticle.Thisbackgroundworkshould generallyalreadyhavebeenaccomplishedbythetimeyouareat thewritingstage,becauseitalsoservesasbackgroundtothe researchprojectyouarewritingabout.Allthetimeyouinvestin preparingtheprotocolforyourprojectisanadvanceonthewriting

EuropeanGeriatricMedicine6(2015)573–579

ARTICLEINFO Articlehistory: Received22June2015 Accepted18August2015 Availableonline19September2015 Keywords: Scientificpublications Writing Research Article ABSTRACT

Manyyoungresearchersfinditextremelydifficulttowritescientificarticles,andfewreceivespecific trainingintheartofpresentingtheirresearchworkinwrittenformat.Yet,publicationisoftenvitalfor careeradvancement,toobtainfunding,toobtainacademicqualifications,orforallthesereasons.We describeherethebasicstepstofollowinwritingascientificarticle.Weoutlinethemainsectionsthatan averagearticleshouldcontain;theelementsthatshouldappearinthesesections,andsomepointersfor makingtheoverallresultattractiveandacceptableforpublication.

ß2015ElsevierMassonSASandEuropeanUnionGeriatricMedicineSociety.Allrightsreserved.

* Correspondingauthor.Tel.:+33381668539;fax:+33381668582. E-mailaddresses:fiona.ecarnot@univ-fcomte.fr(F.Ecarnot),

mfseronde@chu-besancon.fr(M.-F.Seronde),rchopard@chu-besancon.fr

(R.Chopard),francois.schiele@univ-fcomte.fr(F.Schiele),

nicolas.meneveau@univ-fcomte.fr(N.Meneveau).

Availableonlineat

ScienceDirect

(21)

ENLIGHT Z T ME

The first page of a scientific paper



Informative short title



Ordered author list



Affiliations



Keywords



Article history



Abstract



Contact information



Article reference

How you can be contacted for

further information

Researchpaper

Writing

a

scientific

article:

A

step-by-step

guide

for

beginners

F.Ecarnot*,M.-F.Seronde,R.Chopard,F.Schiele,N.Meneveau EA3920,DepartmentofCardiology,UniversityHospitalJean-Minjoz,3,BoulevardFleming,25000Besanc¸on,France

1.Background

Everyresearcherhasbeenfacetofacewithablankpageatsome stageoftheircareer,wonderingwheretostartandwhattowrite first.Describingone’sresearchworkinaformatthatis comprehensibletoothers,andacceptableforpublicationisno easytask.Whenyouinvestalotoftime,energyandoftenmoneyin yourresearch,youbecomeintimatelyandemotionallyinvolved. Naturally,youareconvincedofthevalueofyourresearch,andof itsimportanceforthescientificcommunity.However,the subjectivitythatgoeshandinhandwithdeepinvolvementcan makeitdifficulttotakeastepback,andthinkclearlyabouthow besttopresenttheresearchinaclearandunderstandablefashion, sothatothers–likely,nonexpertsinyourfield–canalso appreciatetheinterestofyourfindings.

Eventoday,theoldadage‘‘publishorperish’’remainsvalid. Manyyoungresearchersfindthemselvesunderpressureto producescientificpublications,inordertoenhancetheircareer prospects,ortosubstantiaterequestsforfunding,ortojustify previousfundingallocations,orasarequirementforuniversity qualificationssuchasaMastersdegreeordoctoralthesis.Yet, often,youngdoctorsdonothavemuchtraining,ifany,intheartof writingascientificarticle.Forclinicians,inparticular,theclinical workloadcanbesuchthatresearchandscientificwritingareseen tobesecondaryactivitiesthatarenotanimmediatepriority,andto

whichonlysmallamountsoftimecanbedevotedonanirregular basis.However,thecompetitionisalreadyquitefierceamongstall thegoodqualitypapersthataresubmittedtojournals,anditis thereforeofparamountimportancetogetthebasicsright,inorder foryourpapertohaveachanceofsucceeding.Don’tyouthinkthat yourworkdeservestobejudgedonitsscientificmerit,ratherthan berejectedforpoorqualitywritingandmessyandconfusing presentationofthedata?

Withthisinmind,wepresenthereastep-by-stepguideto writingascientificarticle,whichisnotspecifictothedisciplineof geriatrics/gerontology,butrather,maybeappliedtothevast majorityofmedicaldisciplines.Wewillstartbyoutliningthemain sectionsofthearticle,andwillthendescribeingreaterdetailthe mainelementsthatshouldfeatureineachsection.Finally,wewill alsogiveafewpointersfortheabstractandthetitleofthearticle. Thisguideaimstohelpyoungresearcherswithlittleexperienceof writingtocreateagoodqualityfirstdraftoftheirwork,whichcan thenbecirculatedtotheirco-authorsandseniormentorsfor furtherrefinement,withtheultimateaimofachievingpublication inascientificjournal.Itisundoubtedlynotexhaustive,andmany excellentresourcescanbefoundintheexistingliterature[1–7]

andonline[8].

2.Gettingstarted:thingstodobeforeyouwriteaword Acertainamountofpreparatoryworkneedstobedonebefore youeverwriteawordofyourarticle.Thisbackgroundworkshould generallyalreadyhavebeenaccomplishedbythetimeyouareat thewritingstage,becauseitalsoservesasbackgroundtothe researchprojectyouarewritingabout.Allthetimeyouinvestin preparingtheprotocolforyourprojectisanadvanceonthewriting

EuropeanGeriatricMedicine6(2015)573–579

ARTICLEINFO Articlehistory: Received22June2015 Accepted18August2015 Availableonline19September2015 Keywords: Scientificpublications Writing Research Article ABSTRACT

Manyyoungresearchersfinditextremelydifficulttowritescientificarticles,andfewreceivespecific trainingintheartofpresentingtheirresearchworkinwrittenformat.Yet,publicationisoftenvitalfor careeradvancement,toobtainfunding,toobtainacademicqualifications,orforallthesereasons.We describeherethebasicstepstofollowinwritingascientificarticle.Weoutlinethemainsectionsthatan averagearticleshouldcontain;theelementsthatshouldappearinthesesections,andsomepointersfor makingtheoverallresultattractiveandacceptableforpublication.

ß2015ElsevierMassonSASandEuropeanUnionGeriatricMedicineSociety.Allrightsreserved.

* Correspondingauthor.Tel.:+33381668539;fax:+33381668582. E-mailaddresses:fiona.ecarnot@univ-fcomte.fr(F.Ecarnot),

mfseronde@chu-besancon.fr(M.-F.Seronde),rchopard@chu-besancon.fr

(R.Chopard),francois.schiele@univ-fcomte.fr(F.Schiele),

nicolas.meneveau@univ-fcomte.fr(N.Meneveau).

Availableonlineat

ScienceDirect

(22)

ENLIGHT Z T ME

The first page of a scientific paper



Informative short title



Ordered author list



Affiliations



Keywords



Article history



Abstract



Contact information



Article reference

journal, volume & page number ;

Digital Object Identifier. . .

Researchpaper

Writing

a

scientific

article:

A

step-by-step

guide

for

beginners

F.Ecarnot*,M.-F.Seronde,R.Chopard,F.Schiele,N.Meneveau EA3920,DepartmentofCardiology,UniversityHospitalJean-Minjoz,3,BoulevardFleming,25000Besanc¸on,France

1.Background

Everyresearcherhasbeenfacetofacewithablankpageatsome stageoftheircareer,wonderingwheretostartandwhattowrite first.Describingone’sresearchworkinaformatthatis comprehensibletoothers,andacceptableforpublicationisno easytask.Whenyouinvestalotoftime,energyandoftenmoneyin yourresearch,youbecomeintimatelyandemotionallyinvolved. Naturally,youareconvincedofthevalueofyourresearch,andof itsimportanceforthescientificcommunity.However,the subjectivitythatgoeshandinhandwithdeepinvolvementcan makeitdifficulttotakeastepback,andthinkclearlyabouthow besttopresenttheresearchinaclearandunderstandablefashion, sothatothers–likely,nonexpertsinyourfield–canalso appreciatetheinterestofyourfindings.

Eventoday,theoldadage‘‘publishorperish’’remainsvalid. Manyyoungresearchersfindthemselvesunderpressureto producescientificpublications,inordertoenhancetheircareer prospects,ortosubstantiaterequestsforfunding,ortojustify previousfundingallocations,orasarequirementforuniversity qualificationssuchasaMastersdegreeordoctoralthesis.Yet, often,youngdoctorsdonothavemuchtraining,ifany,intheartof writingascientificarticle.Forclinicians,inparticular,theclinical workloadcanbesuchthatresearchandscientificwritingareseen tobesecondaryactivitiesthatarenotanimmediatepriority,andto

whichonlysmallamountsoftimecanbedevotedonanirregular basis.However,thecompetitionisalreadyquitefierceamongstall thegoodqualitypapersthataresubmittedtojournals,anditis thereforeofparamountimportancetogetthebasicsright,inorder foryourpapertohaveachanceofsucceeding.Don’tyouthinkthat yourworkdeservestobejudgedonitsscientificmerit,ratherthan berejectedforpoorqualitywritingandmessyandconfusing presentationofthedata?

Withthisinmind,wepresenthereastep-by-stepguideto writingascientificarticle,whichisnotspecifictothedisciplineof geriatrics/gerontology,butrather,maybeappliedtothevast majorityofmedicaldisciplines.Wewillstartbyoutliningthemain sectionsofthearticle,andwillthendescribeingreaterdetailthe mainelementsthatshouldfeatureineachsection.Finally,wewill alsogiveafewpointersfortheabstractandthetitleofthearticle. Thisguideaimstohelpyoungresearcherswithlittleexperienceof writingtocreateagoodqualityfirstdraftoftheirwork,whichcan thenbecirculatedtotheirco-authorsandseniormentorsfor furtherrefinement,withtheultimateaimofachievingpublication inascientificjournal.Itisundoubtedlynotexhaustive,andmany excellentresourcescanbefoundintheexistingliterature[1–7]

andonline[8].

2.Gettingstarted:thingstodobeforeyouwriteaword Acertainamountofpreparatoryworkneedstobedonebefore youeverwriteawordofyourarticle.Thisbackgroundworkshould generallyalreadyhavebeenaccomplishedbythetimeyouareat thewritingstage,becauseitalsoservesasbackgroundtothe researchprojectyouarewritingabout.Allthetimeyouinvestin preparingtheprotocolforyourprojectisanadvanceonthewriting

EuropeanGeriatricMedicine6(2015)573–579

ARTICLEINFO Articlehistory: Received22June2015 Accepted18August2015 Availableonline19September2015 Keywords: Scientificpublications Writing Research Article ABSTRACT

Manyyoungresearchersfinditextremelydifficulttowritescientificarticles,andfewreceivespecific trainingintheartofpresentingtheirresearchworkinwrittenformat.Yet,publicationisoftenvitalfor careeradvancement,toobtainfunding,toobtainacademicqualifications,orforallthesereasons.We describeherethebasicstepstofollowinwritingascientificarticle.Weoutlinethemainsectionsthatan averagearticleshouldcontain;theelementsthatshouldappearinthesesections,andsomepointersfor makingtheoverallresultattractiveandacceptableforpublication.

ß2015ElsevierMassonSASandEuropeanUnionGeriatricMedicineSociety.Allrightsreserved.

* Correspondingauthor.Tel.:+33381668539;fax:+33381668582. E-mailaddresses:fiona.ecarnot@univ-fcomte.fr(F.Ecarnot),

mfseronde@chu-besancon.fr(M.-F.Seronde),rchopard@chu-besancon.fr

(R.Chopard),francois.schiele@univ-fcomte.fr(F.Schiele),

nicolas.meneveau@univ-fcomte.fr(N.Meneveau).

Availableonlineat

ScienceDirect

(23)

ENLIGHT Z T ME

The paper body

Sections, subsections, figures & tables



Introductory section



Sections and subsections



Self-consistent figures



Self-consistent tables

The introductory section sets the

paper background. It can, or not,

have a title.

ofthearticlethatwillcomeoutofyourproject.Thus,youprobably alreadyperformedanextensiveliteraturereviewtoestablishthe currentstateofknowledgeonthetopic,andensuretheoriginality ofyourresearchwhendevelopingtheprotocol,andthiscanserve foryourpaper.Itishelpful,whenyouarereviewingtheliterature, totakenotesofimportantpointsorphrasesthatyouintendto includeinyourarticle,withtherelevantreferences.Asoftware programformanagingreferences(eitherfreeversionsor commerciallyavailableproducts)canbehelpfulformanaging thelargevolumeofreferencesthatyouarelikelytowadethrough beforesiftingoutthemostimportantpoints.

Usually,youwillalsohavethefinalresultsofthestatistical analysisofyourdata.Thiswillformthebasisofyourresults section.Someofthegraphicalrepresentationsofyourresultswill serveasfiguresforthearticle,soitishelpfultohighlightthemost importantfindingsasyoureadthroughtheresultssothatyoudo notforgetanythingimportant.

Beforestartingtowrite,youshouldidentifythetargetjournalin whichyouintendtosubmityourresearch.Thiswillhave consequencesfortheformatting,butmoreimportantly,forthe orientationofyourwritingstyle,sincethewritingmustbe appropriateforthetypeofreaderyouaretargeting.Forexample, areyoutargetingaspecialistjournal,wherereadersareexpected tobeexpertsinyourfield,orageneralmedicinejournal,where readersmaybeexpertsfromotherdisciplines?Thiswillhave implicationsfortheamountandtypeofinformationthatyoumust include.Inaddition,theeditorialpolicyofthetargetjournalshould alsobetakenintoaccount.Forinstance,inagivenareaofexpertise, somejournalsfavourpapersreportingbasicresearch,whereas otherjournalsgiveprecedencetomoreclinicalwork.Thechoiceof thetargetjournaldependsonarangeoffactors,whicharebeyond thescopeofthisarticle.However,attheveryleast,youshould checkthatyourpaperfallswithinthescopeofthejournalyouhave chosen.

3.Whatarethemainsectionsofascientificarticle? Thevastmajorityofscientificjournalsfollowtheso-called ‘‘IMRAD’’format,i.e.introduction,methods,resultsanddiscussion. Naturally,therearesomeexceptionstothisrule,andyoushould alwayschecktheinstructionsforauthorsofthejournalwhereyou plantosubmityourpapertoensurethatthisisindeedthe recommendedformat.Forthepurposesofthisguide,wewillonly discusstheIMRADformat,asitisthemostwidelyused.

Yourarticleshouldthuscontain(inthisorder)anintroduction, amethodssection,aresultssectionandadiscussion.Addedtothis willbetheabstract,whichismoreorlessasummaryofthesemain sections,andofcourse,thetitle.Attheend,theremustbealistof bibliographicreferences,thetables,andthelegendstoanyfigures. Finally,theremayalsobesomeotheroptionalsections,suchas acknowledgements,conflictsofinterestorauthors’contributions.

Below,wewilldiscusseachofthesesectionsindetail,outliningthe mainpointstokeepinmindwhenwritingthem. 3.1.Theintroductionsection

Theintroductionisofprimeimportanceingrabbingthe reader’sattention(Table1).Inparticularduringthereview process,theintroductionmustgetthereviewer‘‘hooked’’,wanting toreadmore,andthinkingtothemselves,‘‘HowcomeInever thoughtofthis?’’.Inthissection,youwillthusexplainwhyyou undertookyourstudy,whatyouaimedtoachievewithit,andhow thisconstitutesausefuladditiontotheexistingbodyofevidence onthistopic.

Inconcreteterms,youshouldstartbyexplainingbriefly,using appropriatereferences,whatisalreadyknownaboutthissubject. Youshouldthennarrowthefielddownsomewhatandidentifythe areaswherethereisstillsomeuncertainty,citing,where appropriate,anyprevious(andpossiblyconflicting)data.This willlogicallyleadtoadescriptionofanexplicitgapinthe knowledgethatyourstudyhopestofill.Thisisanessential elementinjustifyingtheutilityofyourwork.Havingnow explainedhowyourstudyisgoingtocontributesomethingnew anduseful,youshouldclearlystateyourworkinghypothesis, followedbyyourobjective(s),andverybriefly,thestrategy implementedtoachievethesegoals(Table1).

Inthebackground,thereasonsthatpromptedyoutoundertake yourresearchshouldbecleartothereader,andjustifiedbythe stateofscientificknowledgewithappropriatereferences.Itisnot necessarytociteeveryarticleintheliteratureonthetopic;a carefulselectionofthemostpertinentpublicationsissufficient. Similarly,itisnotnecessarytostateuniversaltruthsthatmay seemoversimplisticoreminentlyobvious.Yetyoushouldtryto achieveasuitablebalancebetweenrelevantbackground informa-tion,andexcessivedetail.Inthisregard,youshouldkeepinmind thetargetaudienceyouareaimingfor.Thiswilldependonthe profileofthereadershipofthejournalinwhichyouintendto submityourresearch,asmentionedabove.Ifyouaretargetinga specialtyjournal,thenyourbackgroundcanbemoredetailedand technicalthanifyouareaddressinganaudienceofnon-specialists inyourfield.

Theintroductionshouldlogicallyflowtowardsthe identifica-tionofthegapinknowledgethatyouhopetofill.Thisisyour opportunitytostatetheaddedvalueofyourstudy,orthenew informationthatyourstudywillyield.Willyourresultschange clinicalpractice?Willtheyhelpthescientificcommunityatlarge tomovetowardsconsensusonapreviouslycontroversialtopicby providinghardevidenceinonedirectionortheother?Thisisyour chancetomakeasalespitchforyourarticle,intheappropriate terms,ofcourse.

Asfaraspossible,trytoavoiddivergingfromthesubjectat hand.Everysentenceshouldserveapurpose.Manyjournalshavea limitonthelengthoftheintroduction,withamaximumnumberof

Table1

OutlineofthemainfeaturesoftheIntroductionsection,withexamples.

Feature Example

Backgrounddescribingwhatisknownonthesubject Percutaneouscoronaryinterventionisthecornerstoneoftherapyforacutecoronary syndromes,butmaybeassociatedwithprocedure-relatedcomplications Whatisnotknown?Whatelementsarestillsubject

tocontroversy?Whatistheexactgapinthe knowledgethatyourstudyhopestofill?Cite anyexistingdata,especiallyconflictingdata thatindicateuncertainty

Itremainsunknownwhether... Todate,ithasnotbeenproven... Nostudytodatehasinvestigatedtheeffectof... Therearefewdatatoquantify... Theeffectof...on...remainsunclear Objective(workinghypothesis)

Citetheexactparameteryouplantomeasure Citethetypeofpatientpopulationorclinicalcontext Citeanysecondaryobjectives

Wehypothesizedthattheadministrationof...wouldreduce/increase...inthecontextof... Weaimedtoidentify/assess/evaluate/investigate... Throughaprospective,single-/multicentre,observational/interventional...study F.Ecarnotetal./EuropeanGeriatricMedicine6(2015)573–579 574

(24)

ENLIGHT Z T ME

The paper body

Sections, subsections, figures & tables



Introductory section



Sections and subsections



Self-consistent figures



Self-consistent tables

Sections are compulsory, except in

letters. Subsections are not.

ofthearticlethatwillcomeoutofyourproject.Thus,youprobably alreadyperformedanextensiveliteraturereviewtoestablishthe currentstateofknowledgeonthetopic,andensuretheoriginality ofyourresearchwhendevelopingtheprotocol,andthiscanserve foryourpaper.Itishelpful,whenyouarereviewingtheliterature, totakenotesofimportantpointsorphrasesthatyouintendto includeinyourarticle,withtherelevantreferences.Asoftware programformanagingreferences(eitherfreeversionsor commerciallyavailableproducts)canbehelpfulformanaging thelargevolumeofreferencesthatyouarelikelytowadethrough beforesiftingoutthemostimportantpoints.

Usually,youwillalsohavethefinalresultsofthestatistical analysisofyourdata.Thiswillformthebasisofyourresults section.Someofthegraphicalrepresentationsofyourresultswill serveasfiguresforthearticle,soitishelpfultohighlightthemost importantfindingsasyoureadthroughtheresultssothatyoudo notforgetanythingimportant.

Beforestartingtowrite,youshouldidentifythetargetjournalin whichyouintendtosubmityourresearch.Thiswillhave consequencesfortheformatting,butmoreimportantly,forthe orientationofyourwritingstyle,sincethewritingmustbe appropriateforthetypeofreaderyouaretargeting.Forexample, areyoutargetingaspecialistjournal,wherereadersareexpected tobeexpertsinyourfield,orageneralmedicinejournal,where readersmaybeexpertsfromotherdisciplines?Thiswillhave implicationsfortheamountandtypeofinformationthatyoumust include.Inaddition,theeditorialpolicyofthetargetjournalshould alsobetakenintoaccount.Forinstance,inagivenareaofexpertise, somejournalsfavourpapersreportingbasicresearch,whereas otherjournalsgiveprecedencetomoreclinicalwork.Thechoiceof thetargetjournaldependsonarangeoffactors,whicharebeyond thescopeofthisarticle.However,attheveryleast,youshould checkthatyourpaperfallswithinthescopeofthejournalyouhave chosen.

3.Whatarethemainsectionsofascientificarticle? Thevastmajorityofscientificjournalsfollowtheso-called ‘‘IMRAD’’format,i.e.introduction,methods,resultsanddiscussion. Naturally,therearesomeexceptionstothisrule,andyoushould alwayschecktheinstructionsforauthorsofthejournalwhereyou plantosubmityourpapertoensurethatthisisindeedthe recommendedformat.Forthepurposesofthisguide,wewillonly discusstheIMRADformat,asitisthemostwidelyused.

Yourarticleshouldthuscontain(inthisorder)anintroduction, amethodssection,aresultssectionandadiscussion.Addedtothis willbetheabstract,whichismoreorlessasummaryofthesemain sections,andofcourse,thetitle.Attheend,theremustbealistof bibliographicreferences,thetables,andthelegendstoanyfigures. Finally,theremayalsobesomeotheroptionalsections,suchas acknowledgements,conflictsofinterestorauthors’contributions.

Below,wewilldiscusseachofthesesectionsindetail,outliningthe mainpointstokeepinmindwhenwritingthem. 3.1.Theintroductionsection

Theintroductionisofprimeimportanceingrabbingthe reader’sattention(Table1).Inparticularduringthereview process,theintroductionmustgetthereviewer‘‘hooked’’,wanting toreadmore,andthinkingtothemselves,‘‘HowcomeInever thoughtofthis?’’.Inthissection,youwillthusexplainwhyyou undertookyourstudy,whatyouaimedtoachievewithit,andhow thisconstitutesausefuladditiontotheexistingbodyofevidence onthistopic.

Inconcreteterms,youshouldstartbyexplainingbriefly,using appropriatereferences,whatisalreadyknownaboutthissubject. Youshouldthennarrowthefielddownsomewhatandidentifythe areaswherethereisstillsomeuncertainty,citing,where appropriate,anyprevious(andpossiblyconflicting)data.This willlogicallyleadtoadescriptionofanexplicitgapinthe knowledgethatyourstudyhopestofill.Thisisanessential elementinjustifyingtheutilityofyourwork.Havingnow explainedhowyourstudyisgoingtocontributesomethingnew anduseful,youshouldclearlystateyourworkinghypothesis, followedbyyourobjective(s),andverybriefly,thestrategy implementedtoachievethesegoals(Table1).

Inthebackground,thereasonsthatpromptedyoutoundertake yourresearchshouldbecleartothereader,andjustifiedbythe stateofscientificknowledgewithappropriatereferences.Itisnot necessarytociteeveryarticleintheliteratureonthetopic;a carefulselectionofthemostpertinentpublicationsissufficient. Similarly,itisnotnecessarytostateuniversaltruthsthatmay seemoversimplisticoreminentlyobvious.Yetyoushouldtryto achieveasuitablebalancebetweenrelevantbackground informa-tion,andexcessivedetail.Inthisregard,youshouldkeepinmind thetargetaudienceyouareaimingfor.Thiswilldependonthe profileofthereadershipofthejournalinwhichyouintendto submityourresearch,asmentionedabove.Ifyouaretargetinga specialtyjournal,thenyourbackgroundcanbemoredetailedand technicalthanifyouareaddressinganaudienceofnon-specialists inyourfield.

Theintroductionshouldlogicallyflowtowardsthe identifica-tionofthegapinknowledgethatyouhopetofill.Thisisyour opportunitytostatetheaddedvalueofyourstudy,orthenew informationthatyourstudywillyield.Willyourresultschange clinicalpractice?Willtheyhelpthescientificcommunityatlarge tomovetowardsconsensusonapreviouslycontroversialtopicby providinghardevidenceinonedirectionortheother?Thisisyour chancetomakeasalespitchforyourarticle,intheappropriate terms,ofcourse.

Asfaraspossible,trytoavoiddivergingfromthesubjectat hand.Everysentenceshouldserveapurpose.Manyjournalshavea limitonthelengthoftheintroduction,withamaximumnumberof

Table1

OutlineofthemainfeaturesoftheIntroductionsection,withexamples.

Feature Example

Backgrounddescribingwhatisknownonthesubject Percutaneouscoronaryinterventionisthecornerstoneoftherapyforacutecoronary syndromes,butmaybeassociatedwithprocedure-relatedcomplications Whatisnotknown?Whatelementsarestillsubject

tocontroversy?Whatistheexactgapinthe knowledgethatyourstudyhopestofill?Cite anyexistingdata,especiallyconflictingdata thatindicateuncertainty

Itremainsunknownwhether... Todate,ithasnotbeenproven... Nostudytodatehasinvestigatedtheeffectof... Therearefewdatatoquantify... Theeffectof...on...remainsunclear Objective(workinghypothesis)

Citetheexactparameteryouplantomeasure Citethetypeofpatientpopulationorclinicalcontext Citeanysecondaryobjectives

Wehypothesizedthattheadministrationof...wouldreduce/increase...inthecontextof... Weaimedtoidentify/assess/evaluate/investigate... Throughaprospective,single-/multicentre,observational/interventional...study F.Ecarnotetal./EuropeanGeriatricMedicine6(2015)573–579 574

(25)

ENLIGHT Z T ME

The paper body

Sections, subsections, figures & tables



Introductory section



Sections and subsections



Self-consistent figures



Self-consistent tables

Figures are

self-consistent

and have

numbers and captions

. They are

placed above or below the text.

examplesofwhatconstitutesanefficacioustitle.Bearinmindthat yourtargetjournalmayhavealimit(intermsofnumberofwords orcharacters)onthelengthofthetitle.Hereagain,keepingitshort isharderthancomingupwitha4-linetitle. 3.7.References

Thereferencesectionlistsallthesourcesyouhaveusedasa basistoprepareyourhypothesis,andbuildyourresearch.Itisyour ethicalandprofessionalresponsibilitytodocumentyourwork adequately,andprovidefulltransparencyinidentifyingyour sources.Itisalsoimperativetocitethesourcesonwhichyour hypothesesarebased,toprovethattheyareinfactsound.The referencessupportyourworkandplaceitinthecontextofother studiesonthesametopic,whileatthesametimeproviding guidanceforreaderswhowouldliketoengageinfurtherreading onthetopic.

Manyyoungresearchersfindithardtojudgewhenitis necessarytociteareference.Basically,anyideaorfactthat emanatesfromanothersource(otherthanyourself)needstobe

supportedbyareference.However,universaltruthsorfactsthat arewidelyestablisheddonotneedtobereferenced(e.g. cardiovasculardiseaseisverycommon,orcancerisamajorcause ofdeath).However,ideas,ormoreparticularlyphrasesornames thatwerecoinedbysomeoneelsedoneedtobereferenced(e.g. patientswiththe‘‘McConnellSign’’–ThepaperbyMcConnell describingthesignshouldbecitedhere.Or,patientswere classifiedaccordingtotheBARCcriteria–thepaperdescribingthe BARCcriteriashouldbecitedhere).

Whencitingreferences,apartfromspecificpapersthatgive theirnametoasignorclassificationsystemasintheexamples above,youshouldgiveprecedencetoarticlespublishedin English-language,peer-reviewedjournals.Citingsectionsfrompublished booksisalsoacceptable,butyoumustbeveryspecificandlistthe exactnamesandtitlesofthechapterconcerned,withthepage numbers,andthenamesoftheauthorsand/oreditorsofthebook, withitspublicationdetails.

Internetsitesshouldbeavoidedwherepossible,asshould personalcommunicationsandunpublisheddata.Ifyouhave severalpossiblereferences,youmayprefertochoosethemost

Table5

Themainelementstobeincludedinasuccessfultitle. Pointer Example Citethemainfactorsstudied Statethenameofthedrugorintervention

Citethepopulation/clinicalcontextstudied Inacutemyocardialinfarction/intermediate-riskpulmonaryembolism/earlyphasesepticshock Citethedesign Randomised,double-blind,controlledtrial/registry/cohortstudy/case-controlstudy Citethemainfinding Increases/reduces/prevents...

Putthemostimportantaspectfirst Ifthefocusisontheintervention,becausethisiswhatdistinguishesyourarticlefromothers, thenstartthetitlewiththeinterventionname

Avoidimpreciseformulationsthatservenospecificpurpose Avoidtermssuchas‘‘areportof...’’or‘‘theeffectsof...’’.Ifthereareeffects,statewhattheyare! Useinternationalcommondenominationsfordrugnames Clopidogrel,ticagrelor,prasugrel...

Commercialnamesshouldbeavoided.Theyindicatepropriety(ofthepharmaceuticalcompany), andmaybeconstruedasindirectpreferenceforaparticularcompany.Also,theyarenotalways thesameacrossdifferentcountries

Subtitlesshouldbeusedsparingly Reservesubtitlesfornamesofstudygroups.Specificrecommendationsmayapply,dependingon yourtargetjournal

F.Ecarnotetal./EuropeanGeriatricMedicine6(2015)573–579 578

(26)

ENLIGHT Z T ME

The paper body

Sections, subsections, figures & tables



Introductory section



Sections and subsections



Self-consistent figures



Self-consistent tables

Tables are a special type of figure,

with separate numbers.

examplesofwhatconstitutesanefficacioustitle.Bearinmindthat yourtargetjournalmayhavealimit(intermsofnumberofwords orcharacters)onthelengthofthetitle.Hereagain,keepingitshort isharderthancomingupwitha4-linetitle. 3.7.References

Thereferencesectionlistsallthesourcesyouhaveusedasa basistoprepareyourhypothesis,andbuildyourresearch.Itisyour ethicalandprofessionalresponsibilitytodocumentyourwork adequately,andprovidefulltransparencyinidentifyingyour sources.Itisalsoimperativetocitethesourcesonwhichyour hypothesesarebased,toprovethattheyareinfactsound.The referencessupportyourworkandplaceitinthecontextofother studiesonthesametopic,whileatthesametimeproviding guidanceforreaderswhowouldliketoengageinfurtherreading onthetopic.

Manyyoungresearchersfindithardtojudgewhenitis necessarytociteareference.Basically,anyideaorfactthat emanatesfromanothersource(otherthanyourself)needstobe

supportedbyareference.However,universaltruthsorfactsthat arewidelyestablisheddonotneedtobereferenced(e.g. cardiovasculardiseaseisverycommon,orcancerisamajorcause ofdeath).However,ideas,ormoreparticularlyphrasesornames thatwerecoinedbysomeoneelsedoneedtobereferenced(e.g. patientswiththe‘‘McConnellSign’’–ThepaperbyMcConnell describingthesignshouldbecitedhere.Or,patientswere classifiedaccordingtotheBARCcriteria–thepaperdescribingthe BARCcriteriashouldbecitedhere).

Whencitingreferences,apartfromspecificpapersthatgive theirnametoasignorclassificationsystemasintheexamples above,youshouldgiveprecedencetoarticlespublishedin English-language,peer-reviewedjournals.Citingsectionsfrompublished booksisalsoacceptable,butyoumustbeveryspecificandlistthe exactnamesandtitlesofthechapterconcerned,withthepage numbers,andthenamesoftheauthorsand/oreditorsofthebook, withitspublicationdetails.

Internetsitesshouldbeavoidedwherepossible,asshould personalcommunicationsandunpublisheddata.Ifyouhave severalpossiblereferences,youmayprefertochoosethemost

Table5

Themainelementstobeincludedinasuccessfultitle. Pointer Example Citethemainfactorsstudied Statethenameofthedrugorintervention

Citethepopulation/clinicalcontextstudied Inacutemyocardialinfarction/intermediate-riskpulmonaryembolism/earlyphasesepticshock Citethedesign Randomised,double-blind,controlledtrial/registry/cohortstudy/case-controlstudy Citethemainfinding Increases/reduces/prevents...

Putthemostimportantaspectfirst Ifthefocusisontheintervention,becausethisiswhatdistinguishesyourarticlefromothers, thenstartthetitlewiththeinterventionname

Avoidimpreciseformulationsthatservenospecificpurpose Avoidtermssuchas‘‘areportof...’’or‘‘theeffectsof...’’.Ifthereareeffects,statewhattheyare! Useinternationalcommondenominationsfordrugnames Clopidogrel,ticagrelor,prasugrel...

Commercialnamesshouldbeavoided.Theyindicatepropriety(ofthepharmaceuticalcompany), andmaybeconstruedasindirectpreferenceforaparticularcompany.Also,theyarenotalways thesameacrossdifferentcountries

Subtitlesshouldbeusedsparingly Reservesubtitlesfornamesofstudygroups.Specificrecommendationsmayapply,dependingon yourtargetjournal

F.Ecarnotetal./EuropeanGeriatricMedicine6(2015)573–579 578

(27)

ENLIGHT Z T ME

The paper end

Conclusion, acknowledgments and references



Conclusion



Acknowledgments



Other mandatory sections



References

The conclusion summarizes the

main findings

recentone,ortheonepublishedinthemostreliableandreputed sourcejournal.Trytogiveprioritytooriginalresearcharticles, ratherthanreviews.Ifyouwanttociteanideafromapaperwhere theauthorsalreadyciteanothersourceforthesameidea,thenyou shouldreturntotheoriginalarticleandverifytheexactitudeof whatyouareciting,thencitetheoriginalauthors,notthe intermediatepaper.Itisyourresponsibilitytoensuretheaccuracy ofallthereferencesyoucite,anditisuptoyoutoprovidesufficient detailsothatapotentialreadercanfindthatpaper.Youshould checktheaccuracyofeveryreferenceyourself,eventhosethatyou havetakenfromotherpublishedpapers.Itisnotthejobofyour chosentargetjournaltoformatyourreferencesorverifytheir exactitude.

Asregardstheformatting,thestyleinwhichthereferences shouldbepresentedwillvaryaccordingtoyourtargetjournalfor submission.Youmustfollowthejournal’sinstructionsforauthors onthispoint,attheriskofhavingyourpaperrejectedifyoudonot followthestyleguidelines.Theworkofcollecting,storingand formattingreferenceshasbeenmadeconsiderablyeasierwiththe adventofbibliographicmanagementsoftware,ofwhichthereare manydifferentversionsandtypes,bothfreeandcommercial (fee-paying).Ifyouhavesuchsoftwareatyourdisposal,thenuseit. Whenpreparingyourstudyprotocolandarticleintroduction,you shouldtakenoteofusefulreferencesasyougo,byjottingdownthe phraseorideayouwanttoretain,withtheexactreferencedetails besideit.Youmaythinkyouwillrememberwhereyousawsuch andsuchafinding,butbythetimeyouhavereaddozensofpapers, yourmemorymaystarttoflounder,andyoumaylosesignificant amountsoftimereadingthrougheverythingagaintofindone reference.

4.Conclusion

Overall,whilewritinganarticlefromscratchmayappeara dauntingtaskformanyyoungresearchers,theprocesscanbe largelyfacilitatedbygoodgroundworkwhenpreparingyour researchproject,andasystematicapproachtothewriting,

followingthesesimpleguidelinesforeachsection(seesummary inFig.1).Itisworththeeffortoftakingenoughtimetoprepare yourarticleadequately,becauseseeingitinpublicationisa gratifyingreward.Afterall,sharingyourknowledgetothebenefit ofothers,contributingtothebodyofevidenceonaspecifictopic, andcapitalizingonyourresearchwithprintpublicationsareall componentsthatwillcontributetothesuccessofyourcareer.So getoutyourpenandstartwriting:itiswhatyourworkmerits! Funding

None. Disclosureofinterest

Theauthorsdeclarethattheyhavenoconflictsofinterest concerningthisarticle.

Authors’contributions Draftedthemanuscript:FE.

Reviewedforcriticalcontentandapprovedfinalcontent:all. References

[1]PiersonDJ.Thetop10reasonswhymanuscriptsarenotacceptedfor publica-tion.RespirCare2004;49:1246–52.

[2]GuyattGH,BrianHaynesR.Preparingreportsforpublicationandrespondingto reviewers’comments.JClinEpidemiol2006;59:900–6.

[3]KeenA.Writingforpublication:pressures,barriersandsupportstrategies. NurseEducToday2007;27:382–8.

[4]PowellK.Publishlikeapro.Nature2010;467:873–5.

[5]DriscollJ,AquilinaR.Writingforpublication:apraticalsix-stepapproach.IntJ OrthopTraumaNurs2011;15:41–8.

[6]El-SeragHB.Writingandpublishingscientificpapers.Gastroenterology 2012;142:197–200.

[7]WhitehouseS.Howtowriteforpublicationinmedicaljournals.TranslRes 2013;162:270–3.

[8]Writingforbooksandjournals;https://www.publishingcampus.elsevier.com/ pages/14/Colleges/College-of-Skill-training/Writing-for-books-and-journals. html.

(28)

ENLIGHT Z T ME

The paper end

Conclusion, acknowledgments and references



Conclusion



Acknowledgments



Other mandatory sections



References

The acknowledgments section is

used only when people or

institutions outside the authors

should be acknowlded

recentone,ortheonepublishedinthemostreliableandreputed sourcejournal.Trytogiveprioritytooriginalresearcharticles, ratherthanreviews.Ifyouwanttociteanideafromapaperwhere theauthorsalreadyciteanothersourceforthesameidea,thenyou shouldreturntotheoriginalarticleandverifytheexactitudeof whatyouareciting,thencitetheoriginalauthors,notthe intermediatepaper.Itisyourresponsibilitytoensuretheaccuracy ofallthereferencesyoucite,anditisuptoyoutoprovidesufficient detailsothatapotentialreadercanfindthatpaper.Youshould checktheaccuracyofeveryreferenceyourself,eventhosethatyou havetakenfromotherpublishedpapers.Itisnotthejobofyour chosentargetjournaltoformatyourreferencesorverifytheir exactitude.

Asregardstheformatting,thestyleinwhichthereferences shouldbepresentedwillvaryaccordingtoyourtargetjournalfor submission.Youmustfollowthejournal’sinstructionsforauthors onthispoint,attheriskofhavingyourpaperrejectedifyoudonot followthestyleguidelines.Theworkofcollecting,storingand formattingreferenceshasbeenmadeconsiderablyeasierwiththe adventofbibliographicmanagementsoftware,ofwhichthereare manydifferentversionsandtypes,bothfreeandcommercial (fee-paying).Ifyouhavesuchsoftwareatyourdisposal,thenuseit. Whenpreparingyourstudyprotocolandarticleintroduction,you shouldtakenoteofusefulreferencesasyougo,byjottingdownthe phraseorideayouwanttoretain,withtheexactreferencedetails besideit.Youmaythinkyouwillrememberwhereyousawsuch andsuchafinding,butbythetimeyouhavereaddozensofpapers, yourmemorymaystarttoflounder,andyoumaylosesignificant amountsoftimereadingthrougheverythingagaintofindone reference.

4.Conclusion

Overall,whilewritinganarticlefromscratchmayappeara dauntingtaskformanyyoungresearchers,theprocesscanbe largelyfacilitatedbygoodgroundworkwhenpreparingyour researchproject,andasystematicapproachtothewriting,

followingthesesimpleguidelinesforeachsection(seesummary inFig.1).Itisworththeeffortoftakingenoughtimetoprepare yourarticleadequately,becauseseeingitinpublicationisa gratifyingreward.Afterall,sharingyourknowledgetothebenefit ofothers,contributingtothebodyofevidenceonaspecifictopic, andcapitalizingonyourresearchwithprintpublicationsareall componentsthatwillcontributetothesuccessofyourcareer.So getoutyourpenandstartwriting:itiswhatyourworkmerits! Funding

None. Disclosureofinterest

Theauthorsdeclarethattheyhavenoconflictsofinterest concerningthisarticle.

Authors’contributions Draftedthemanuscript:FE.

Reviewedforcriticalcontentandapprovedfinalcontent:all. References

[1]PiersonDJ.Thetop10reasonswhymanuscriptsarenotacceptedfor publica-tion.RespirCare2004;49:1246–52.

[2]GuyattGH,BrianHaynesR.Preparingreportsforpublicationandrespondingto reviewers’comments.JClinEpidemiol2006;59:900–6.

[3]KeenA.Writingforpublication:pressures,barriersandsupportstrategies. NurseEducToday2007;27:382–8.

[4]PowellK.Publishlikeapro.Nature2010;467:873–5.

[5]DriscollJ,AquilinaR.Writingforpublication:apraticalsix-stepapproach.IntJ OrthopTraumaNurs2011;15:41–8.

[6]El-SeragHB.Writingandpublishingscientificpapers.Gastroenterology 2012;142:197–200.

[7]WhitehouseS.Howtowriteforpublicationinmedicaljournals.TranslRes 2013;162:270–3.

[8]Writingforbooksandjournals;https://www.publishingcampus.elsevier.com/ pages/14/Colleges/College-of-Skill-training/Writing-for-books-and-journals. html.

Figure

Figure and table reference

Références

Documents relatifs

The development system includes the compiler, linker, library source code, editor, post-mortem debugger, Pascal to Modula-2 translator, source code for- matter, symbolic

These linked structures have been fairly peripheral in our programming experiments to date. But there is one class of ordered structure that is central to many of the methods

The mention of specific companies or of certain manufacturers’ products does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by the World Health Organization, the Joint United Nations

the formation and acquisition of language. The authors frame the book within 13 chapters that present key themes that intersect and build throughout the book. Every chapter has a

(Here, by the way, is another clear reason why the spiral plan of writing is necessary: you may think, in Section 2, that you forgot to give as examples in Section 1.) In Section

These structured proofs do not seem ideal for someone who wants to understand the important ideas of a proof without reading any of the details.. Satisfying such readers may

le programme du workshop était très intéressant , je suis très satisfaite par rapport à l'organisation, l’accueil, la ponctualité ainsi que le niveau des formateurs et leur

 Avec un proche, vous pouvez remercier pour les nouvelles et/ou en prendre : Thanks for your letter of + date … It was good to hear from you. I hope everything is going well