• Aucun résultat trouvé

Belgian Prime News N° 85PDF

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Belgian Prime News N° 85PDF"

Copied!
8
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Quarterly publication

N° 85 September 2019 Last update : 30 September 2019 Next issue : January 2020

Participating Primary and Recognised Dealers :

Barclays, Belfius Bank, BNP Paribas Fortis, Citigroup, Crédit Agricole CIB, HSBC, KBC Bank,

Morgan Stanley, Natixis, NatWest (RBS), Nomura, Société Générale Corporate & Investment Banking

BELGIAN

PRIME NEWS

BELGIAN DEBT AGENCY

MACROECONOMIC DEVELOPMENTS : Global downturn in manufacturing industry

SPECIAL TOPIC : Lower interest charges and reduced risks: a balancing act for debt management

FINANCIAL MARKETS AND INTEREST RATES : Falling sovereign bond yields amidst monetary policy accommodation

TREASURY HIGHLIGHTS : The execution of the 2019 funding plan is well on track

CONSENSUS Average of participants’ forecasts

SUCCESSIVE FORECASTS FOR BELGIUM

2018

REAL GDP GROWTH HICP INFLATION

I II III IV I II III IV

0 1 2 3

2018 2019

I II III IV I II III IV

0 1 2 3

2019

For 2019 For 2020

Source : Belgian Prime News.

Belgium Euro area

2018 2019p 2020p 2018 2019p 2020p

Real GDP (1)  1.4 1.1 0.9 1.9 1.1 1.0

Inflation (HICP) (1) 2.3 1.5 1.4 1.8 1.2 1.2

General government balance (2) -0.7 -1.4 -1.7 -0.5 -0.9 -1.0

Public debt (2) 102.0 101.4 100.9 85.1 85.4 84.6

(1) Percentage changes.

(2) EDP definition ; percentages of GDP.

(2)

N0

.

85 September 2019

The world economy is facing ongoing uncertainties that are mostly related to trade. Trade tensions between China and the United States have dragged on in recent months and disrupted global supply chains. While the global manufacturing industry is considered to have slid into a recession, the services industry and domestic demand have so far remained more resilient, backed by a robust labour market, providing some support for GDP growth. However, as US-China trade tensions escalated again in August and overall business sentiment is worsening, it is unlikely that the global economy will regain traction in the near term. The Brexit process also adds to the overall uncertainty.

In the euro area, quarterly GDP growth slowed to 0.2% in the second quarter, which was in line with expectations. While the slowdown was broad-based across the large euro area countries, it was most obvious in the German economy, which even contracted as a result of a sharp drop in exports. Most high-frequency euro area indicators and especially those related to the manufacturing industry have continued to worsen over the last few months and are definitely not indicative of any strong rebound in the near term. All in all, BPN participants have revised their forecasts downwards from the June estimate : they now see the euro area economy growing by 1.1 % in 2019 and 1.0 % in 2020. Euro area inflation is expected to remain moderate, at around 1.2 % in both years.

In Belgium, economic growth also edged down marginally in the second quarter of 2019 as quarterly GDP growth came in at 0.2 %, slightly below the pace recorded at the start of the year.

This slowdown was in line with wider euro area developments and consistent with the weakening of domestic confidence indicators. Belgian producer confidence, for instance, clearly deteriorated in the course of the second quarter and has continued its downward path in the last couple of months. BPN participants currently expect growth in Belgium to reach 1.1 % in 2019 and 0.9 % in 2020. This implies a downward revision of 0.2 percentage point for 2020 compared to the June estimate.

The Belgian labour market has remained surprisingly buoyant as domestic employment continued to expand at a pace that is clearly higher than the quarterly growth rate of GDP. On the other hand, a decline in the volume of temporary agency work has been observed, which could partly be the result of a slowdown in overall labour demand. Meanwhile, on the nominal side, HICP inflation in Belgium has softened considerably in recent months, on account of energy inflation. In August, the overall HICP rate stood at 0.9 %. According to the consensus forecast, inflation in Belgium should come to 1.5 % on average in 2019 and 1.4 % in 2020.

Belgian Prime News participants expect the government deficit to widen substantially from an average of 0.7 % of GDP in 2018 to 1.4 % of GDP in 2019 and 1.7 % of GDP in

2020. In 2019, the tax on labour income is being cut further as part of the phased tax shift programme and corporate income tax revenues are expected to drop because of lower tax assessments, following the shift towards advance payments that has temporarily driven up revenues in the last two years. The rising structural deficit implies that additional fiscal consolidation efforts are required to achieve the medium-term objective of a balanced budget in structural terms by 2021, the target put forward in the 2019 Stability Programme. However, the current federal government is still acting in a caretaker capacity, as a new one is yet to be formed following the general elections held at the end of May. On the basis of their own macro and budgetary forecasts, BPN participants anticipate a further reduction in the Belgian public sector debt, albeit only

MACROECONOMIC

DEVELOPMENTS Global downturn in manufacturing industry

INFLATION (HICP) (annual percentage changes)

2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

-1 0 1 2 3 4 5

Belgium Euro area

Source : EC.

GDP GROWTH AND BUSINESS CYCLE INDICATOR

2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

0 1 2 3 4

Belgium Euro area

-10 0 10 p.c.

Business confidence indicator (right-hand scale) Year-on-year real GDP

(percentage changes, left-hand scale) Smoothed

data

Gross data

Sources : EC, NAI, NBB.

(3)

Belgian Prime News N0

.

85 September 2019

Since the financial crisis, the euro area countries’ debt burden has increased significantly. Belgium is no exception to this trend. Government debt is still very high, running at 102 % of GDP in 2018 and the process of debt reduction is relatively slower than the euro area average. Belgian Prime News participants expect the debt ratio to remain above 100 % of GDP in the coming years, similarly to the Bank’s latest macroeconomic projections at unchanged policy.

Interest rates have declined significantly over the last few years, pursuing their downward path to hit an all-time low recently. In early July this year, the reference rate on 10-year OLOs fell below the symbolic 0 % mark. On July 22, The Belgian Treasury issued 10-year OLOs at a negative interest rate (–0.038 %) for the first time ever on the primary market.

In August, the rate fell to its lowest level ever, –0.28 % on average.

As a result of the trend of declining interest rates, interest charges paid by the government have fallen continuously over the last years. They reached 2.3 % of GDP in 2018, against 6.7 % in 2000 and 11.5 % in 1990. Since the implicit interest rate on the public debt (currently about 2 %) is higher than the market rates, interest charges are expected to decline further in the coming years in the context of a prolonged period of low rates.

Debt management: maturity extension strategy

Against a backdrop of rising public debt and successive unexpected interest rate shocks during and in the aftermath of the financial and the euro area sovereign debt crises, the federal government’s debt management strategy has aimed at continually reducing risks. The average life and duration of the debt have been extended, resulting in a material reduction in the refinancing risk. In fact, each time debt instruments are issued, neither the market rate nor the rate that the Belgian State will have to pay is known in advance and may turn out to be higher than expected.

In this context of low interest rates, the average maturity for the Belgian federal government debt has gone up from 6 years in 2010 to close to 10 years in 2019. In practice, the maturity extension observed over the last few years is essentially the result of issues of very long-term OLOs, some of which will fall due in 2047, 2057 and 2066. The strategy of extending the debt maturity is considered to be near completion. Over the next few years, the average maturity should therefore stay close to the level currently observed.

SINCE THE FINANCIAL CRISIS, THE DECLINE IN INTEREST CHARGES HAS MAINLY BEEN DUE TO FALLING INTEREST RATES RATHER THAN LOWER DEBT

2000 2003 2006 2009 2012 2015 2018 2021e

-0,8 -0,6 -0,4 -0,2 0 0,2 0,4 0,6

Breakdown of changes in interest charges (in percentage points of GDP)

Debt ratio effect

Implicit interest rate effect Change in interest charges Of which:

Euro area Belgium

2000 2003 2006 2009 2012 2015 2018 2021e

50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120

Gross consolidated debt (percentage of GDP)

Source : EC, NBB.

SPECIAL TOPIC Lower interest charges and reduced risks: a balancing act for

debt management

(4)

N0

.

85 September 2019

An extension of public debt maturities has been observed in several other countries as well. Over the last decade, the average maturity for public debt in the OECD has gone up from 6.3 to 7.9 years, while it has increased by about 4 years in Belgium.

The debt maturity extension does of course come at a price in the short term. In a recent NBB study 1, the additional interest charges in 2018 resulting from the extension of the maturity of the debt since 2010 is estimated at about 0.42 % of GDP. However, this cost should be put in a wider context of an overall decline in the cost of debt servicing.

At the same time, the maturity extension offers good protection against a possible rate rise in the future.

Extending the debt maturity brings a significant reduction in the risks (including budgetary risks) associated with refinancing, which may be heavy in countries with a high public debt ratio like Belgium. The Belgian federal State’s gross borrowing requirements have come down from close to 24 % of GDP in the period 2009-2011 to 14 % in 2018. They should stabilise around that level over the next few years.

Lower long-term borrowing requirements help to protect a larger part of the debt in the event of a rate rise. In the absence of any rise in interest rates above their current level, the increase in the residual maturity of the debt can be considered an undeniably costly hedge. However, it would only take a moderate, yet lasting, rise in rates for the maturity extension strategy to become more worthwhile. The higher the rate increase, the quicker this strategy will pay off.

Finally, if the markets and rating agencies considered a longer-term debt to be relatively safer (less financing risk and less sensitive to a rate rise), the maturity extension may help exert a downward effect on the interest rate spread between Belgian government bonds and German Bunds.

Capitalising on the low interest environment to put the debt on a sustained downward path

Since the implicit interest rate on the debt has fallen below nominal GDP growth from 2016 onwards, the risk of a snowball effect from interest charges on the debt ratio is limited. However, the current situation of low – and even negative – interest rates cannot be considered as the benchmark scenario in the medium and long run. It would be reckless for fiscal policy and debt management to rely on the assumption that these conditions will last.

Reducing the government debt must remain the key objective of fiscal policy in Belgium. The fiscal room offered by the current rate environment should be used to support sound public finances, while building up a sufficiently high primary balance in order to reduce the deficit and public debt.

EXTENSION OF THE RESIDUAL MATURITY OF THE BELGIAN FEDERAL GOVERNMENT DEBT FROM 2010 (residual maturity of the federal debt, in years)

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18

Average residual maturity of the entire federal public debt Average initial maturity of debt issues in the current year

Sources : Belgian Debt Agency.

¹ Figures as at 24 June for the year 2019.

(5)

Belgian Prime News N0

.

85 September 2019

While long-term sovereign bond yields continued to fall in the US and the euro area in July and August, they rebounded in September, partially offsetting the downward trend observed over the preceding two months. German and Belgian 10-year yields dropped by 28 and 39 basis points respectively over the third quarter, to settle at –0.59 % and –0.24 %. A similar fall occurred in the US, where the 10-year yield dropped by 37 basis points to 1.70%. The higher bond yields in the US than in the euro area mainly reflects the different position of the US economy in the business cycle.

The fall in global long-term yields has coincided with expectations of monetary policy easing by the ECB and the Federal Reserve System. In September, the ECB cut its deposit facility rate from –0.4 to –0.5 % and decided to resume net purchases under the Governing Council’s asset purchase programme, while the Federal Reserve lowered its target range for the federal funds rate by 25 basis points to between 1.75 and 2 %. Sovereign bond yields also reflected, to a certain extent, investors’

‘flight-to-safety’ behaviour as a result of the uncertainties surrounding trade disputes and Brexit. They were also affected by the release of various macroeconomic data indicating decelerating growth, a contraction in global trade and lower inflation expectations. It is also worth noting that the yield curve has remained inverted in the US since the second quarter of 2019, a pattern usually associated with upcoming recessions.

Against a backdrop of monetary easing and the more negative economic outlook, the euro depreciated against safe-haven currencies such as the US dollar, the Japanese yen and the Swiss franc in July and August. Uncertainty surrounding trade and Brexit caused episodes of high volatility for the British pound and the Chinese renminbi. Share prices also stumbled in August, before recovering in September. Despite these ups and downs, financial market volatility has remained relatively low throughout the period considered, with the VIX and VSTOXX standing at respectively 16% and 17 % at the end of September (with values below 20 % generally associated with stable periods).

The relative tranquillity on the stock market is also reflected in sovereign bond spreads in the euro area, which tended to shrink during the third quarter. In Belgium, the 10-year spread vis-à-vis Germany narrowed by 10 basis points. Most notably, the Italian spread contracted by 110 basis points between June and September but remains relatively high at 1.49 %.

FINANCIAL MARKETS AND INTEREST RATES

10-YEAR INTEREST RATES (percentage points, monthly averages)

2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

-1 0 1 2 3 4

2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

0 1 2 3 4

DE

BE US Euro interest rate swaps

BE

IT ES NL FR

GOVERNMENT BONDS SPREADS VIS-À-VIS GERMAN BUND

Sources : BIS, Thomson Reuters.

Average over the first 25 days for September 2019.

Falling sovereign bond yields amidst monetary

policy accommodation

(6)

N0

.

85 September 2019

PRIMARY MARKET (billions of euros)

2017 2018

Treasury bills

NET ISSUES GROSS ISSUES

OLOs 2019

A S O N D J F MA M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J -10

-8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 10

A S O N D J F MA M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J -10

-8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 10

2017 2018 2019

TREASURY HIGHLIGHTS The execution of the 2019 funding plan is well on track

Two OLO auctions were held in July and September resulting in a total of € 5.915 billion worth of funding.

OLO AUCTIONS

Date OLO NR Issued

(€ Billion) Yield Bid to cover July 22

Non-competitive subscriptions Total July

OLO 0.90 % 22/06/2029

OLO 1.25 % 22/04/2033 OLO87 OLO86

1.208 0.779 0.669 2.656

-0.038%

0.255% 1.42

2.14

September 23

Non-competitive subscriptions Total September

OLO 1.00 % 22/06/2026 OLO 0.90 % 22/06/2029 OLO 1.90 % 22/06/2038

OLO77 OLO87 OLO76

0.588 1.210 1.011 0.450 3.259

-0.469 % -0.262 % 0.237 %

2.16 1.85 1.86

Total issuance now amounts to € 28.43 billion, corresponding to 94 % of its € 30.25 billion funding target.

In terms of portfolio structure, the average life of the portfolio was 9.97 years (end of August). The implicit yield on the portfolio has further declined to 2.04 % (end of August).

With respect to the green OLO, the Belgian Debt Agency has published the Allocation Report for 2018. The Impact Report will be published by the end of the year.

GOVERNMENT SECURITIES STATISTICS

(7)

Belgian Prime News N0

.

85 September 2019 SECONDARY MARKET TURNOVER

(as reported by primary and recognised dealers to the Treasury, billions of euros)

TREASURY BILLS OLOs

2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40

Customer Inter-dealer

2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45

Source : Belgian Debt Agency.

BEST BID/OFFER SPREADS(1)

TREASURY BILLS

(basis points)

OLOs

(ticks)

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14

Best spread

Average spread on all T-bills 2018

Average spread on assigned T-bills

0 20 40 60 80 100

5-year benchmark (OLO68 - OLO79 as of 14/01/2019 - OLO82 as of 11/02/2019)

2019

30-year benchmark (OLO78 - OLO 88 as of 05/02/2019) 10-year benchmark (OLO81 - OLO85 as of

17/01/2018 - OLO87 as of 14/01/2019)

2019 2018

J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S

Source : Treasury.

(1) As reported by three electronic platforms (MTS, Broker Tec and BGC eSpeed).

HOLDERSHIP BELGIAN SECURITIES (in %)

TREASURY BILLS OLOs

Belgium

EA19 (excl. Belgium)

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Outside the euro area

Belgium (incl. central bank) EA19 (excl. Belgium)

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Outside the euro area

Source : NBB.

(8)

N0

.

85 September 2019

LIST OF CONTACT PERSONS

PARTICIPATING INSTITUTIONS TECHNICAL EDITORS TELEPHONE E-MAIL

Belgian Debt Agency Mr Jean Deboutte +32 2 574 72 79 [email protected]

Barclays Mr François Cabau +44 20 3134 3592 [email protected]

Belfius Bank Ms Catherine Danse +32 2 222 71 13 [email protected]

BNP Paribas Fortis Mr Philippe Gijsels +32 2 565 16 37 [email protected] Mr Arne Maes +32 2 312 12 10 [email protected]

Citigroup Mr Guillaume Menuet +44 20 7986 3281 [email protected]

Crédit Agricole CIB Mr Louis Harreau [email protected]

Mr Ludovic Martin +33 1 43 23 39 37 [email protected]

HSBC Mr Olivier Vigna +33 1 40 70 32 66 [email protected]

KBC Bank Mr Peter Wuyts +32 2 417 32 35 [email protected]

Mr Jan Van Hove +32 2 429 59 50 [email protected]

Morgan Stanley Mr Daniele Antonucci +44 20 7425 8943 [email protected]

Natixis Mr Jean-Christophe Machado [email protected]

NatWest (RBS) Ms Oriane Parmentier +44 20 3361 1743 [email protected]

Nomura Mr Marco Brancolini +44 20 7102 0724 [email protected]

Société Générale Corp. & Inv. Banking Mr Michel Martinez +33 1 42 13 34 21 [email protected] Mr Yvan Mamalet +44 20 7762 5665 [email protected] GENERAL INFORMATION

National Bank of Belgium Mr Luc Dresse +32 2 221 20 39 [email protected]

Published by :National Bank of Belgium (NBB).

Sources : NBB, unless otherwise stated.

OUTSTANDING AMOUNTS AND TURNOVER (billions of euros)

TREASURY BILLS

Nominal outstanding amounts at the end of August 2019

0 5 10 15 20 25

6.2 2.6

18.4 12-Month

6-Month 3-Month

OLOs

Outstanding amounts at 30 September 2019 Outright turnover in August 2019

0 5 10 15 20 25

16.919.5 14.116.2 9.5 13.7

10.8 15.9 10.7 16.5

13.715.1 14.7 19.3 11.213.2 5.8 8.2

7.8 19.6

4.9 8.6 9.7 17.3 6.1 11.1

4.95.3 OLO80 2018/2066OLO83 2018/2057OLO88 2019/2050OLO78 2018/2047OLO71 2013/2045OLO60 2010/2041OLO76 2015/2038OLO84 2017/2037OLO44 2004/2035OLO73 2014/2034OLO86 2018/2033OLO66 2012/2032OLO75 2015/2031OLO87 2019/2029OLO85 2018/2028OLO31 1998/2028OLO81 2017/2027OLO77 2016/2026OLO64 2011/2026OLO74 2014/2025OLO82 2017/2024OLO72 2014/2024OLO79 2016/2023OLO68 2013/2023OLO65 2012/2022OLO48 2006/2022OLO61 2011/2021OLO58 2010/2020

0 1 2 3 4 5

0.9 1.4 0.50.8

0.7 1.3

0.6 1.9

0.2 1.0 0.91.1

0.8 2.3

4.0 0.2 0.8

0.6 1.1 0.70.7 0.60.7

0.4 1.6

0.5 1.1 0.6

Source : Belgian Debt Agency.

Références

Documents relatifs

While the Belgian public debt ratio has been on a downward path in the last few years, it remains at a high level and clearly above the euro area average.. In view of dealing with

The Belgian labour market has continued to perform very well throughout the first nine months of 2018, with a harmonised unemployment rate of 5.8 % in the third quarter according

In the decade that followed the failure of Lehman Brothers, the Belgian insurance sector had to deal with periods of major stress in global financial markets but also with an

and Wauters (2018), “Are inflation and economic activity out of sync in the euro area ?”, National Bank of Belgium, Economic review, June.. (2) See also Belgian Prime News

However, long-term sovereign bond yields in the euro area and the US increased over the first quarter of 2018, reflecting improving market expectations of economic growth

Asian investors showed great interest in the deal, taking up 71.98 % of the issue, as well as non-euro investors taking 16.82 %. Taking into account the € 2.7 million worth of

In particular, the analysis conducted by the FPS Economy (Price Observatory and Directorate General Statistics – Statistics Belgium), the National Bank of Belgium and the

As in neighbouring countries, exports of Belgium were hit by the weakness of foreign demand and by the appreciation of the euro until mid 2003.. In particular, it suffered from