• Aucun résultat trouvé

Measurement of W ± and Z -boson production cross sections in pp collisions at √s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Measurement of W ± and Z -boson production cross sections in pp collisions at √s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector"

Copied!
22
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Article

Reference

Measurement of W ± and Z -boson production cross sections in pp collisions at √s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector

ATLAS Collaboration

ANCU, Lucian Stefan (Collab.), et al.

Abstract

Measurements of the W±→ℓ±ν and Z→ℓ+ℓ− production cross sections (where ℓ±=e±,μ± ) in proton–proton collisions at s=13 TeV are presented using data recorded by the ATLAS experiment at the Large Hadron Collider, corresponding to a total integrated luminosity of 81 pb −1 . The total inclusive W± -boson production cross sections times the single-lepton-flavour branching ratios are σW+tot=11.83±0.02 (stat)±0.32 (sys)±0.25 (lumi) nb and σW−tot=8.79±0.02 (stat)±0.24 (sys)±0.18 (lumi) nb for W+ and W− , respectively. The total inclusive Z -boson production cross section times leptonic branching ratio, within the invariant mass window 66

ATLAS Collaboration, ANCU, Lucian Stefan (Collab.), et al . Measurement of W ± and Z -boson production cross sections in pp collisions at √s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector. Physics Letters. B , 2016, vol. 759, p. 601-621

DOI : 10.1016/j.physletb.2016.06.023

Available at:

http://archive-ouverte.unige.ch/unige:84916

Disclaimer: layout of this document may differ from the published version.

1 / 1

(2)

Contents lists available atScienceDirect

Physics Letters B

www.elsevier.com/locate/physletb

Measurement of W

±

and Z -boson production cross sections in pp collisions at √

s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector

.TheATLASCollaboration

a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t ra c t

Articlehistory:

Received31March2016

Receivedinrevisedform6June2016 Accepted10June2016

Availableonline15June2016 Editor:W.-D.Schlatter

Measurements of the W±±ν and Z+ productioncross sections (where ±=e±,μ±) in proton–proton collisions ats

=13 TeV arepresented usingdata recorded bythe ATLASexperiment at the Large Hadron Collider, corresponding to a total integrated luminosity of 81 pb1. The total inclusiveW±-bosonproductioncrosssectionstimesthesingle-lepton-flavourbranchingratiosareσWtot+=

11.83±0.02 (stat)±0.32 (sys)±0.25 (lumi) nb andσWtot=8.79±0.02 (stat)±0.24 (sys)±0.18 (lumi) nb for W+ and W, respectively. The total inclusive Z-boson production cross section times leptonic branchingratio,withintheinvariantmasswindow66<m<116 GeV,isσZtot=1.981±0.007 (stat)± 0.038 (sys)±0.042 (lumi) nb.TheW+,W,and Z-bosonproductioncrosssectionsand cross-section ratioswithinafiducialregiondefinedbythedetectoracceptancearealsomeasured. Thecross-section ratios benefit from significant cancellation of experimental uncertainties, resulting in σWfid+/σWfid= 1.295±0.003 (stat)±0.010 (sys) andσWfid±/σZfid=10.31±0.04 (stat)±0.20 (sys).Theoreticalpredictions, based oncalculations accurateto next-to-next-to-leading orderfor quantum chromodynamics and to next-to-leadingorderforelectroweakprocessesandwhichemploydifferentpartondistributionfunction sets,arecomparedtothesemeasurements.

©2016TheAuthor(s).PublishedbyElsevierB.V.ThisisanopenaccessarticleundertheCCBYlicense (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).FundedbySCOAP3.

1. Introduction

Measurementsofelectroweakvector–bosonproductionathad- ron colliders provide a benchmark for the understanding of quantumchromodynamic(QCD) andelectroweak(EW)processes.

Predictions are available up to next-to-next-to-leading-order (NNLO) accuracy in QCD and includeEW correctionsat next-to- leading-order (NLO) accuracy [1]. The cross-section predictions depend onthe parton distribution functions(PDFs)and are thus sensitive to the underlying dynamics of strongly interacting par- ticles.Therefore,measurements of W± and Z-boson1 production offera unique opportunity to test models ofparton dynamicsat the LargeHadron Collider’s (LHC) [2] newhigher centre-of-mass energyof

s=13 TeV.

Thispaperdescribesmeasurementsoftheinclusiveproduction crosssectionstimesleptonicbranchingratiosforthe W±e±ν, W±μ±ν, Z e+e, and Z μ+μ processes. Measure- mentsofthecross-sectionratiosofW+ toWproductionandof W±toZ productionarealsopresented.Allmeasurementsareper- formedwithproton–proton(pp)collisiondatacorrespondingtoan

E-mailaddress:atlas.publications@cern.ch.

1 Throughoutthispaper, Z/γ-bosonproductionisdenotedsimplybyZ-boson production.

integrated luminosity of 81 pb1, collected at

s=13 TeV with the ATLAS detector [3]. The data were collected during the pe- riodofJune13toJuly16,2015,atwhichpointtheLHCcirculated 6.5 TeV beamswith50 nsbunch spacing. Thepeak delivered in- stantaneousluminositywasL=1.7×1033cm1s1andthemean numberofppinteractionsperbunchcrossing(hardscatteringand pile-upevents)wasμ=19.

2. Methodologyofcross-sectionmeasurementandpredictions

ThetotalproductioncrosssectionfortheW± bosontimesthe branchingratiofordecaysintoasingle-leptonflavour±=e±,μ±

(σWtot±, σWtot+,and σWtot)canbeexpressedasaratioofthenumbers ofbackground-subtracteddataevents N to theproductofthein- tegratedluminosity of thedata L, an acceptancefactor A,anda correctionfactorC:

σtot= N

L·A·C. (1)

The cross sections are defined similarly for the Z boson in the dileptoninvariant massrange66<m<116 GeV (σZtot).The ac- ceptancefactor A isexpressedasthefractionofdecayssatisfying thefiducialacceptance(geometricandkinematicrequirements)at the Monte Carlo generator level. The correction factor C is the ratio of the total number of generated events which pass the http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2016.06.023

0370-2693/©2016TheAuthor(s).PublishedbyElsevierB.V.ThisisanopenaccessarticleundertheCCBYlicense(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).Fundedby SCOAP3.

(3)

final selectionrequirementsafterreconstruction tothetotalnum- ber of generated events within the fiducial acceptance. This fac- tor,defined beforethe decayleptons emit photonsvia final-state radiation (Born-level FSR), includes the efficiencies for triggering on, reconstructing, and identifying the W± and Z-boson decay products within the acceptance, andalso accounts forthe slight difference between the fiducial and reconstructed phase spaces.

Theproductioncrosssectionsdefinedwithouttheacceptancefac- tors (σtot·A) arereferred to asthefiducial crosssections(σWfid±,

σWfid+, σWfid,and σZfid).Forthe W±-bosonmeasurement,the fidu- cial phase space is defined by the lepton transverse momentum pT>25 GeV, the lepton pseudorapidity2 |η|<2.5, the neutrino transversemomentumpν

T>25 GeV,andtheW±-bosontransverse mass3mT>50 GeV.Similarly, Z-bosonproductionismeasuredin the fiducialphase spacedefined by pT>25 GeV, |η|<2.5, and 66<m<116 GeV.

Theoretical predictions of the fiducialand total cross sections are computed using DYNNLO 1.5 [4,5] for the central value and Fewz3.1[1,6–8]forallvariations reflectingsystematicuncertain- ties, thereby providing full NNLO QCD calculations. The NLO EW corrections are calculated with Fewz 3.1 for Z bosons and with theMonte CarloprogramSanc[9,10] for W± bosons.The calcu- lationisdone in the Gμ EW scheme[11].The crosssectionsare calculated for vector–boson decays into leptons at Born level, to matchthedefinitionoftheC factorusedinEq.(1)forthedeter- mination of the measured cross sectionsin the data. Thus, from complete NLO EW corrections the following components are in- cluded: virtual QED and weak corrections, initial-state radiation (ISR)andinterferencebetweenISRandFSR[12].Forthe Z-boson production, all the predictions include the 66<m<116 GeV requirement. The NNLO PDFs CT14nnlo [13], NNPDF3.0 [14], MMHT14nnlo68CL [15], ABM12 [16], HERAPDF2.0nnlo [17], and ATLAS-epWZ12nnlo[18] areused inthe comparisonstodata, al- thoughCT14nnloisusedasthebaselineforthepredictions.

The systematicuncertainties inthe predictions are dominated bytheimperfectknowledgeoftheprotonpartondistributionfunc- tions.Theseuncertaintiesareobtainedfromthesuminquadrature ofthedifferencesbetweenthe centralPDF valuesandthe eigen- vectorsoftherespectivePDFsets.Whereappropriate,asymmetric uncertaintiesaredetermined usingseparate sumsofnegative and positivevariations.TheCT14nnlouncertainties(rescaledfrom90%

to 68% confidence level (CL)) are used in the comparisonto the measured cross sections in Table 3 of Section 7. The QCD scale uncertainties are defined by the symmetrised envelope of vari- ations in which the renormalisation (μR) and factorisation (μF) scalesarechangedbyfactorsoftwowithanadditionalconstraint of 0.5μR/μF2. The dynamic scale m andfixed scale mW are used as the central values for the Z boson and W± boson predictions, respectively. A significant component of these scale uncertainties originates fromthe statisticalprecision ofthe inte- gration method used to evaluate the variations. The other sys- tematic uncertainties under consideration (labelled as “other” in Table 3) are asfollows.The uncertainties dueto the strong cou- plingconstantareestimatedfollowingtheprescriptiongivenwith theCT14nnloPDF, varying αSby±0.001 tocorrespondto68% CL.

The beamenergyisassumedto be knownto 1% (fromRef. [19],

2 ATLASusesaright-handedcoordinatesystemwithitsoriginatthenominalin- teractionpoint(IP)inthecentreofthedetectorandthez-axisalongthebeampipe.

Thex-axispointsfromtheIPtothecentreoftheLHCring,andthey-axispoints upward.Cylindricalcoordinates(r,φ)areusedinthetransverseplane,φbeingthe azimuthalanglearoundthebeampipe.Thepseudorapidityisdefinedintermsof thepolarangleθasη= −ln tan(θ/2).

3 mT=

2pTpνT[1cosφν)] withazimuthalangleofthechargedlepton φandazimuthalangleoftheneutrinoφν.

with an additional uncertainty to take into account the extrapo- lationofthisuncertaintyto13 TeV).The limitationsofthe NNLO calculationsareestimatedbycomparingthepredictionscalculated with DYNNLO 1.5 and with Fewz 3.1. For the total cross-section predictions, thesedifferencesarefound to be <0.2% per process andhencearenegligible.Forthefiducialcross-sectionpredictions, these differences are larger due to a feature of the calculations involving leptons with symmetric pT requirements, resulting in consistentlylargervaluesfromFewz.Thedifferencesarecalculated usingtheCT14nnloPDFasacentralvalueinbothcases,andareup to1.3%fortheW±-bosoncrosssectionsand0.6%forthe Z-boson cross section. These differences are however not included in the predictionuncertaintiesgiveninTable 3ofSection7.

Predictions forthefiducial cross-section ratios σWfid+/σWfid and

σWfid±/σZfidarealsocalculated,withtheircorrespondingPDFuncer- tainties consideredasfullycorrelated,eigenvectorby eigenvector, inthe ratios.TheQCD scalevariations are notconsidered forthe ratiossincethehigher-ordercorrectionsareexpectedtoaffectboth the W± and Z bosons in a similar mannerbut the exactcorre- lation is difficult to evaluate. The differences between Fewzand DYNNLOfor W+/Wand W±/Z are0.4% and0.6%,respectively, andarenotincludedinthepredictionuncertaintiesofTable 3.The remaining theoretical uncertainties evaluatedinthe fiducialcross sectionsmentioned abovelargely cancelintheratioandare also neglected.

The acceptancefactors A arealsocalculatedwithDYNNLO1.5 for the central value and Fewz 3.1 for variations accounting for systematic uncertainties.Their uncertainties are derived from the envelope of the PDF variations of CT14nnlo, NNPDF3.0, MMHT14nnlo68CL,andABM12.Calculationsoftheacceptancefac- tors obtainedfromeitherthesignal MonteCarlosimulationused in this analysis (Powheg + Pythia 8 [20–23], fullydescribed in Section 3) or from Fewz fall within this envelope. In addition, uncertainties due to parton showers and the hadronisation de- scriptionaretakenfromapreviouspublication[24],afterchecking theirvalidityforthe13 TeVresult,andwerederivedasthediffer- enceintheacceptancescalculatedwithPowheg-Box v1butusing differentmodelsforpartonshowerandhadronisationdescriptions, namelytheHerwig[25]orPythia[26]programs.

3. Simulationsamples

MonteCarlosimulationsareusedtoevaluatetheselectioneffi- ciencyforsignaleventsandthecontributionofseveralbackground processestotheanalyseddataset.Allofthesamplesareprocessed withtheGeant4-basedsimulation[27]oftheATLASdetector[28].

Nearlyall oftheprocessesofinterest, specificallyeventscontain- ing W±or Z bosons[29],aregeneratedwiththePowheg-Box v2 MonteCarloprograminterfacedtothePythia8.186partonshower model.The CT10PDF set[30] isused inthematrix elementand the AZNLO [31] setof generator-parameter values(tune)is used, withPDFsetCTEQ6L1[32],forthemodellingofnon-perturbative effects. The EvtGen v.1.2.0 program [33] is used for properties of the bottom and charm hadron decays, and Photos++ version 3.52[34,35] isused forQEDemissionsfromelectroweakvertices and charged leptons. Samples of top-quark pair (tt) and single- top-quarkproductionaregeneratedwiththePowheg-Boxv2gen- erator, which uses the four-flavour scheme for the NLO matrix element calculationstogether withthe fixedfour-flavour PDF set CT10f4. For all top-quark processes, top-quark spin correlations are preserved. The partonshower, fragmentation, andunderlying event are simulated using Pythia 6.428 with the CTEQ6L1 PDF sets andthe corresponding Perugia 2012 tune (P2012) [36]. The top-quark mass is set to 172.5 GeV. The EvtGen v1.2.0 program is used for properties of the bottom and charm hadron decays.

(4)

Diboson processesare simulatedusing the Sherpav2.1.1 genera- tor[37].Multipleoverlaid ppcollisionsaresimulatedwiththesoft QCD processes ofPythia v.8.186 using the A2tune [38] andthe MSTW2008LOPDF[39].TheMonteCarloeventsarereweightedso thattheμdistributionmatchestheobservedpile-updistribution inthe data. For the comparisonto data in the distributions, the single-bosonMonteCarlosimulationsarenormalised tothecross sectionsmeasuredbythisanalysis.Intheevaluationofthesingle- bosonEW backgroundsforthe cross-sectioncalculations, simula- tions are instead normalised to the results of higher-order QCD calculations, withuncertainties of5%. The remaining simulations are also normalised to the predictions of higher-order QCD cal- culations,withuncertaintiesof 6%forthe dibosonandtop-quark processes.

4. Eventselection

Electronandmuoncandidateeventsareselectedusingtriggers whichrequireatleastone electronormuonwithtransversemo- mentumthresholds of pT=24 GeV or 20 GeV,respectively, with looseisolation requirements. Torecover possibleefficiency losses athighmomenta,additionalelectronandmuontriggerswhichdo notmakeanyisolationrequirementsareincludedwiththresholds ofpT=60 GeV and50 GeV,respectively.

Electroncandidates are required to have pT>25 GeV and to pass the “medium” likelihood-based identification requirements [40,41] optimised for the 2015 operating conditions, within the fiducialregionof|η|<2.47,excludingcandidatesinthetransition region betweenthe barreland endcapelectromagnetic calorime- ters,1.37<|η|<1.52.Muonsarereconstructedfor|η|<2.4 with pT>25 GeV andmust passthe “medium”identificationrequire- ments [42] also optimised for the 2015 operating conditions. At leastoneoftheleptoncandidatesisrequiredtomatchthelepton thattriggeredtheevent.Theelectronsandmuonsmustalsosatisfy pT-dependentcone-basedisolationrequirements,usingbothtrack- ing detector andcalorimeter information (described in Refs. [43, 44],respectively).Theisolationrequirementsaretunedsothatthe leptonisolation efficiencyis atleast90% forall pT>25 GeV,in- creasingto99%at60 GeV.

Jetsarereconstructed fromenergydepositsinthe calorimeter using the anti-kt algorithm [45] with radius parameter R=0.4.

Alljets[46],withenergiescalibratedattheelectromagneticscale, musthavepT>20 GeV and|η|<4.5.Themissingtransversemo- mentum(withmagnitudeEmissT ),whichintheW±-bosonanalysis actsasa proxyforthe transversemomentum of theneutrino, is definedasthenegative of theglobalvector sum ofall identified physics objects (electrons, muons, jets) as well as specific “soft terms”accountingforunclassifiedsofttracksandcalorimeteren- ergyclusters.

The event selection for the W±-boson signature requires ex- actly one identified electron or muon. The event is required to have EmissT >25 GeV, and the transverse mass of the W± bo- son calculatedusing themissing transversemomentum vector is requiredto satisfy mT>50 GeV. In order forthe W±-boson se- lectionto be consistent withthe missing transverse momentum reconstruction methodology, an overlap removalalgorithm is ap- plied to the selection for events with jets and leptons found at adistance ofR=

(η)2+(φ)2<0.4 of each other,remov- ing eitherone or the other object. Afterthe full Wν selec- tion,a total of 462,950 W±-boson candidates (256,858 W+ and 206,092 W) pass all requirements in the electronchannel, and 475,208 W±-boson candidates (266,592 W+ and 208,616 W) passtherequirementsinthemuonchannel.

Eventscontaining a Z-bosoncandidate areselected by requir- ing exactly two selected leptons of the same flavour but of op-

posite charge with invariant mass of 66<m <116 GeV. No overlap removal is applied in the Z-boson analysis, as missing transverse momentumis not requiredinthe selection. A totalof 35,009 candidates pass all requirements in the electron channel and44,898 candidatesinthemuonchannel.

5. Evaluationofbackgrounds

Contributionsfromtheelectroweak(single-bosonanddiboson) andtop-quark(single-topandtop-quarkpair) componentsof the backgroundareestimatedfromtheMonteCarlosamplesdescribed earlier.The Wτ ν and Zτ τ processeswiththesubsequent leptonic decayofthe τ are treatedasbackground.The dominant contributions, givenas percentagesof the totalnumber ofsimu- lated events passing the signal selection in each analysis, are as follows: the W τ ν and top-quark production contribute ap- proximately 2% and1%, respectively, in the W±-boson analyses, the Ze+eand Zμ+μ processescontribute1%and5%in WeνandWμν,respectively,whilethetotalbackgroundin Z+isapproximately0.5%,dominatedbyttproduction(the sumofallelectroweakbackgroundsis0.2%).

Eventsinvolvingsemileptonicdecaysofheavy quarks,hadrons misidentified as leptons, and, in the case of the electron chan- nel,electronsfromphotonconversions(allreferredto collectively as “multijet events”) are a sizeable source of background in the W±-bosonanalysis.Themultijetbackgroundinthe Z-bosonanal- ysis is estimated from simulation to be < 0.1% and is therefore neglected.

Themultijetcontributiontotheelectronandmuonchannelsof the W±-bosonanalysisisestimatedwitha data-drivenapproach, performing maximum-likelihood fits on the data with template distributions to exploit the discriminating power between signal and background in certain kinematic distributions. The discrimi- nant variables used in the multijet evaluation are mT, EmissT , pT, and φ betweenthe lepton and transverse missingmomentum.

Twofitregionsareusedtoextractthemultijetnormalisation.The first fit region is defined as the full event selection but remov- ing the mT requirement, and the second one is defined as the full eventselection but removing the EmissT requirement. Several multijet-enricheddatasamples(multijettemplates)arebuiltfrom eventspassingallselectionrequirementsineachfitregionexcept lepton isolation. Mutually exclusive requirements (“intervals”) in eithertracking- orcalorimeter-basedisolationvariablesarechosen to createstatisticallyindependentmultijet templates. Thesesam- plesaredesignedtobeprogressivelyclosertothesignal-candidate selection by fixing one of the isolation criteria to that of the signal region and varying the other one; four such samples are builtforeachisolation type intheelectronchannel andfour(for tracking-basedisolation)orsix(forcalorimeter-basedisolation)in themuonchannel.Templatesaresimilarlyconstructedfromsimu- lationforW±signalandelectroweakandtop-quarkbackgrounds, to account for potential contaminationsin the multijet template.

Foreachisolation interval,the normalisationofthemultijettem- plate is extracted with a maximum-likelihood fit to the data in the two fit regions and separately for each one ofthe discrimi- nantvariables andchargedleptonsamples.Ineachfitregion,the normalisation of the signal template derived from simulation is left free to float while the remaining background templates are normalisedtotheir expectedvalues,basedonthemeasuredinte- grated luminosity and the predictedcross sections (but are per- mittedtovarywithin5%oftheirexpectedvalues,asdescribed in Section3).Itwasverifiedthatthevalueofthesignalnormalisation extractedfromthisfithasnosignificantimpactonthemultijetes- timate.

Références

Documents relatifs

35 (a) Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing; (b) Department of Modern Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Anhui; (c) Department

35 ( a ) Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing; ( b ) Department of Modern Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Anhui; ( c

35 ( a ) Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing; ( b ) Department of Modern Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Anhui; ( c

35 ( a ) Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China; ( b ) Department of Modern Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei,

35 ( a ) Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China; ( b ) Department of Modern Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei,

35 (a) Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing; (b) Department of Modern Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Anhui; (c) Department

35 ( a ) Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China; ( b ) Department of Modern Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei,

35 ( a ) Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing; ( b ) Department of Modern Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Anhui; ( c