• Aucun résultat trouvé

Exercises

N/A
N/A
Info
Télécharger
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Exercises"

Copied!
1
0
0

Chargement.... (Voir le texte intégral maintenant)

Texte intégral

(1)

Logic for AI Master 1 IFI Class Assignment #8: Argumentation

Andrea G. B. Tettamanzi Université côte d'Azur

[email protected] Academic Year 2019/2020

1 Extensions

Determine the complete, grounded, and preferred extensions for the following argumentation frameworks (here, →denotes the attack relation):

1. a→b,b→a 2. a→b,b→a,b→c

3. a→b,b→a,b→c,c→d,d→c

4. a→b,b→c,c→d,d→e,e→f,f →e 5. a→b,b→c,c→d,d→c

2 Labelings

Determine the complete labelings for the same argumentation frameworks as in the previous exercice.

1

Références

Télécharger maintenant ( PDF - 1 Page - 49.54 KB )

Documents relatifs

On the Aggregation of Argumentation Frameworks

[2012] propose some rationality properties for characterizing aggregation of sets of argumentation frame- works, based on translations of properties coming from social choice theory

On the bipolarity in argumentation frameworks

the abstract bipolar argumentation framework (in particu- lar, the definition of acceptability in this framework), the links between bipolarity in argumentation and other kinds

On the Input/Output behavior of argumentation frameworks

Note that Λ L 2 is nonempty, as it includes the labelling that assigns undec to all arguments, and since AF is finite there is at least a maximal (w.r.t. Suppose by contradiction that

Please complete the following PDQ-39 QUESTIONNAIRE

Page 5 of 12 Questionnaires for patient completion Due to having Parkinson’s disease,. how often during the

3) Circle the word to complete the following sentence :( 1mark)

Task 1:Complete the sentences using the simple past form of the verbs in brackets (3.5 marks):.. Yesterday was

On the Aggregation of Argumentation Frameworks

[2012] propose some rationality properties for characterizing aggregation of sets of argumentation frame- works, based on translations of properties coming from social choice theory

Computing Extensions' Probabilities over Probabilistic Bipolar Abstract Argumentation Frameworks

Probabilistic Bipolar Abstract Argumentation Frameworks (prBAFs), combining the possibility of specifying supports between arguments with a prob- abilistic modeling of the

On the Incremental Computation of Argumentation Frameworks

We first pro- posed a technique for incrementally computing extensions of dynamic abstract argu- mentation frameworks (AFs): given an initial extension and a set of updates, our