C AHIERS DE
TOPOLOGIE ET GÉOMÉTRIE DIFFÉRENTIELLE CATÉGORIQUES
J. S ŁOMI ´ NSKA
Some spectral sequences in Bredon cohomology
Cahiers de topologie et géométrie différentielle catégoriques, tome 33, n
o2 (1992), p. 99-133
<http://www.numdam.org/item?id=CTGDC_1992__33_2_99_0>
© Andrée C. Ehresmann et les auteurs, 1992, tous droits réservés.
L’accès aux archives de la revue « Cahiers de topologie et géométrie différentielle catégoriques » implique l’accord avec les conditions générales d’utilisation (http://www.numdam.org/conditions). Toute utilisation commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infraction pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit contenir la présente mention de copyright.
SOME SPECTRAL SEQUENCES IN BREDON COHOMOLOGY by
J.SLOMINSKA
CAHIERS DE TOPOLOGIE ET GÉOMÉTRIE DIFFÉRENTIELLE
CA TÉGORIQUES
VOL. XXXIII-2 (1992)
Resume. Soit G un groupe fini. Nous consid6rons certaines suites
spectrales
dont la limite et lesEP q-groupes
sont les groupes de co-homologie
de Bredon deG-CW-complexes adequats.
Lesexemples
leplus
int6ressants sont relatifs au cas d’unG-CW-complexe
BWqui
est1’espace
classifiant d’un certain G-ensemblepartiellement
ordonn6("G- poset")
W . On étudie enparticulier
le cas o6 W est leG-poset
dessous-groupes de G .
Introduction.
Let G be a finite group. In this paper we
present
someexamples
ofspectral
sequences whose
E2’q-groups
are Bredoncohomology
groups. The limit groups of thesespectral
sequences can be alsoexpressed
in the terms of Bredoncohomology.
In fact we will consider
spectral
sequences of the formwhere
I{, I{"
areG-CW-complexes
and L is a local G-coefficientsystem
on h"determined
by
L andby
anappropriate
G-cellular mapf :
K" ---> K. All of thesespectral
sequences are derived from thespectral
sequence defined in 1.1 which describes a moregeneral
case. We show that thespectral
sequences 7.2 and 7.7 of[3]
which describe Borelcohomology
groups and thespectral
sequence 1.18 of[11]
are also consequences of 1.1.
In Section 1 we assume that h is an
arbitrary G-CW-complex.
Let Sh be theposet
of all cells of Ii and let IK : Sh --> CW be the functor suchthat,
for every open cell s ofIi , IK(s)
is the smallestsubcomplex
of K which contains s. We will consider aG-CW-complex
h" of the form h" = IK x SK U whereis a functor which satisfies additional conditions
concerning
the action of G on 6’7B".In
particular,
for s ESK, U(s)
is aGs-CW-complex.
Letpt
be the constant one-U -->
pt.
In 1.5 we describe aspectral
sequence such thatwhere
L(s)
is the restriction of L toU(s).
In 1.8 and 1.9 weinvestigate
thisspectral
sequence in the case where Ii" is a
G-subcomplex
of theproduct
h x h’ of G-CW-complexes and,
for every s ESK, U(s)
is aGs-subcomplex
of K’. We will alsoinvestigate homotopy properties
of the functorIK X SK (-)
because it is ahomotopy
colimit in the case
where,
for every s ESK, II«s)
is contractible. - In Section 2 we assume that h is aclassifying
space BW of a certainposet
Won which the group G acts
preserving
order. Then SK is thesimplicial
subdivision of W and will be denotedby
S. We show that in this casewhere
Lq ([s])
=Lq (s)
and that there is a functorNu : S/G
- G - CW such thatas
G-spaces.
In 2.5 we define an
"equivariant join"
and discuss aspectral
sequence associated to this construction. In this case W is theposet P(D)
of allnonempty
subsets of afinite G-set D. As an
example,
we consider asphere
of an inducedrepresentation
of G.
From 2.7 to the end of Section 2 we assume that U is a functor from S’°P to the
category P(K’)
of allsubcomplexes
of of agiven G-CW-complex
K’.Example
2.7generalizes
thespectral
sequence described in[3],
Ch.VII.4 andcan be treated as the
equivariant Mayer-Vietoris spectral
sequence. In this caseW =
P(D).
We assume that if s =(Do, ... , Dn) ,
whereDo
C ... CDn
CD ,
isan element of
5’,
thenSuppose
that Ii’ =UdED U((d))
and that M is ageneric
G-coefficientsystem.
Then there exists a
spectral
sequencebecause in this case there exists a
G-homotopy equivalence
K’ ~ K". We obtain thespectral
sequence from[3],
Ch.VII.4 if we assume that G is a trivial group.Example
2.9generalizes
theProposition
12.1 from[3],
Ch.IX. In this case, forevery s =
(wo, ... , wn)
ES, U(s)
=U(wn)
and we have aG-homotopy equivalence
We will use the notation
whenever k’ E h’. If
U(w)
isGw-contractible
whenever w EW,
then K" ~ BWas
G-spaces
and there exists aspectral
sequencesuch
that,
for every cell s’ ofh’,
where k’ is an
arbitrary point
of s’ .If,
for everypoint k’
ofK’ ,
the spaceBW(k’)
is
Gk’-contractible,
then K" ~ h’ and we obtain aspectral
sequenceIf both of the above
assumptions
arefulfilled,
then there is anisomorphism
Thus,
in this case, for every abelian groupA,
there is anisomorphism:
If G is a trivial group then we obtain 12.1 from
Chapter
IX of[3].
In 2.10 we consider the
special
case of 2.9 where W is aG-poset
ofsubgroups
of G and
U(H)
=Ii’H.
Thisexample
is ageneralization
of 11.2 from[3],
Ch.IX(
in the case where r is a finitegroup).
We obtain the result of[3],
if we assumethat W is the set of all nontrivial
subgroups
of G andthat,
for everyH E W, h’H
is
acyclic.
We consider also the set of all nontrivialp-subgroups
of G. From ourconsiderations,
it follows that there is anisomorphism
whenever,
for every nontrivialp-subgroup
H ofG, h’H
isFp-acyclic
and for everypoint k
ofK’,
theSylow p-subgroups
ofGk
are nontrivial. In the case where 1(’ isa realization of a finite dimensional
simplicial complex,
this fact is a consequenceFrom the results of Sections 1 and 2 it follows that some well-known
spectral
sequences have common
origin
which can beexpressed
in terms of Bredon coho-mology
groups. In Section 3 we willapply
the results of Section 2 toinvestigate properties
of functors defined on certaincategories
which were described in[11]
and[12].
Let Sub - G be theG-poset
of allsubgroups
of G. AG-poset
mapwill be called admissible
if,
for every w EW,
dw CGw .
For any admissible mapd,
we define a certain
category W(d).
In the case where W is aG-poset
ofsubgroups
of G and d is the
identity
map,W(d)
is acategory
of orbits of G.Using
the resultsof Section 2 we construct in 3.7 a free
locally
contractibleW(d)°P-CW-complex (in
the sense of
Dror, [6]).
For any functorwe obtain a
spectral
sequence(3.10)
This is a
generalization
of thespectral
sequence 1.2 from[10]. Corollary
3.10 isindependently proved
in[12] using
different methods. This fact is also related to the result 17.18 of[7].
Ascorollary,
one can showusing
3.11 that if F is is aG-poset
ofsubgroups
of G and M is ageneric
G-coefficientsystem
suchthat,
forevery H E
F, M(G/H)
is aprojective NH/H-module,
then there exists a natural number m suchthat,
for all > m,where EF is a
classifying
space of F.1
General results
We need the
following
definitions and notation. Some of them was used in[1]
and
[11].
Assume that K is aG-CW-complex.
This means that Ii is aCW-complex
and that G acts
cellulary
on K in such a waythat,
for everysubgroup H
ofG,
the fixedpoint
sethH
is asubcomplex
of K. The G-set of all open n-cells of h will be denotedby SnK.
For a cell s ofIi ,
leth(s)
be the smallestsubcomplex
of h which contains s. We will use the notation s C s’ in the case whereK(s)
CK(s’).
The
poset
of all open cells of h and thecategory
associated to thisposet
will be denotedby
SK. The group G acts on SK in such a way that the condition s C- s’implies
that gs Cgs’.
It is clear thatS(K/G) = (SK)/G.
By P(K)
we will denote theposet
of allsubcomplexes
of K. The group G actson
P(K)
and SIi can be considered as aG-subposet
ofP(K). By P(K)G
we willdenote the
category
whoseobjects
aresubcomplexes
of h and whosemorphisms
arethe maps h’ -
K" ,
which are thecompositions
of the inclusions h’ Cg-1 K"
and of the maps
[g] : g-1 h"
- K"given by
theoperation by
the elements of G.The full
subcategory
ofP(K)G
whoseobject
set isequal
to 5’7B will be denotedby SKG.
We will consider Sh as asubcategory
ofSKG and P(K)
as asubcategory
of
P(K)G.
Thecategory P(K)G
is contained in thecategory
CW of of all CW-complexes.
It is clear that
SIiG
is a fullsubcategory
of thecategory
IC of all finite CNV-subcomplexes
ofIi ,
definedby
Bredon in[1],
Ch.I.2. and that K is a fullsubcategory of P(K)G.
For any two cells s and s’ ofK,
where
Gs
=19
E G : gs =s}
is theisotropy
group of the action of G on SK at thepoint
s. It follows from the defition of aG-CW-complex that,
if kbelongs
to anopen cell s, then
Gk
=Gs .
By
a local coefficientsystem
on K we will mean a functor L fromSKG
to thecategory
Ab of abelian groups. Letbe the covariant functor from
SIiG
to thecategory Abc
of chaincomplexes
of abeliangroups such
that,
for every cell s ofK , c*(K)(s)
isequal
to theordinary
cellularhomology
chaincomplex C*(K(s), Z)
with coefficients in thering
Z ofintegers. By
Z(X)
we denote the free abelian group with the basisequal
to X . It follows from[11] that,
for every natural number n,so
c*(K)
is a cha.incomplex
ofprojective objects
in theca.tegory (SKG, Ab)
offunctors from
ShG
to Ab. The n-th Bredoncohomology
groupHi (Ii, L)
isequal
to the n-th
cohomology’ group
of the cochaincomplex
of the natural transformation groupsIt follows from the definition that
Assume that H is a
subgroup
of G and that K’ is anH-subcomplex
of K. Letj : ShH
--->ShG
denote the natural inclusion ofcategories.
We will use thenotation
A
G-CW-complex
h will be calledspecial if,
for every cell s ofh,
thesubcomplex K(s)
is contractible. If h isspecial
thenc*(K)
is aprojective
resolution of the constant functorZK
such thatZK(s)
=Z, ZK(s
Cs’)
=idZ .
In this caseLet IK :
SIi G
- CW be the natural inclusion ofcategories
suchthat,
forevery cell s of
h, IIi (s)
=K(s).
It is easy to check that Ih is a freeSKG-CW- complex (
in the sense of Dror[6] )
whose cellscorrespond
to the elements of the setSK/G.
As a functor to thecategory
Set of setsThis also
implies
that IK after the restriction to SIi’ is a freeSK-CW-complex.
Itis obvious that
Let
Top
denote the Steenrodcategory
ofcompactly generated
Hausdorff spaces(k-spaces).
We will consider thecategory
CW ofCW-complexes
as asubcategory
of
Top.
If h and h’ areCW-complexes
then thetopology
of theproduct
h x h’is
equal
to thetopology
of theproduct
ofk-spaces
andS(K
xh’)
= Sh x SK’.We will also need the definition of the
product
of functors over acategory
whichis
described,
forexample,
in[6],
2.16. Let C be a smallcategory
and let T’(T)
bea covariant
(contravariant)
functor from C toTop.
Then theproduct
T’ xc T of T’and T over C is defined to be the
co-equalizer
of the two obvious mapsThis means that T’ Xc T is the coend of
For every
object
c of CLet B : Cat
- Top
be theclassifying
space functor. It is easy to see thatHere
C/c
is thecategory
of allmorphisms
of C of the form c’ ---> c.Assume that G’ is a finite group. Let
G’ -Top
denote thecategory
ofcompactly generated
HausdorffG’-spaces.
There is the naturalunderlying
functor from thecategory
G’ -Top
toTop.
Ifthen we will consider the space IK x SKG T as a
G’-space.
Forany g’ E G’, s E SK,
k E
K(s)
and t ET(s)
we haveg’[k, t]
=[k, g’t].
We will use the notationAssume that H is a
subgroup
of G’. LetTH : SKGop
--->Top
be the functor suchthat,
for every s ES’h, TH(s)
=T(s)H.
ThenA natural
transformation 0 :
T ---> T" induces theG’-space
mapK(ø). If 0
is alocal weak
G’-homotopy equivalence,
i.e. if0(s)
is a weakG’-homotopy equivalence
whenever s E
SK,
then one can prove,using
methods and results of[6], that,
forany
subgroup
H ofG’, K {ø}H
is a weakequivalence.
Thisimplies
thatK {ø}
is aG’-homotopy equivalence.
In the case where T =
pt
is the constant functor suchthat,
for every cell s ofIi, pt(s)
is aone-point G’-space pt,
we have thatK {pt}
=K/G.
If T islocally G’-contractible,
then there is a weakG’-homotopy equivalence
Let
T/G’ : SKG - Top
be the functor suchthat,
for s ESK,
Then
K {T}/G’
=K {T/G’}.
IfT (s)/G’
is contractible whenever s ESK,
then wehave a
homotopy equivalence
If K is a
special G-CW-complex,
then I h is a freelocally
contractibleSKG-CW-
complex
and there is aG’-homotopy equivalence
Assume that T is a contravariant functor from
SKG
to CW . Then theproduct
I h XSK,2 T has the structure of a
CW-complex
such thatThe
category
of allG’-CW-complexes
andG’-cellular
maps will be denotedby
G’ - CW . Let T be a contravariant functor from
SKG
to thecategory
G’ - CW.Then IK XSKc3 T has the structure of a
G’-CW-complex.
Assume that L is a local G’- coefficient
system
on IK x 5KG T. For every open cell s ofh,
letdenote the structural map.
By L,
we will denote the local G’-coefficientsystem
onT(s)
suchthat,
for every open cell s’ ofT(s)
Let
HG, (T, L)
be the local G-coefficientsystem
on K suchthat,
for every cell s ofh,
1.1
Proposition
There exists aspectral
sequenceProof. It is easy to check that
Thus the cochain
complex
is
equal
to the cochaincomplex
associated to thebicomplex
where
L* 0
is the cochaincomplex
of local G-coefficientsystems
on h such thatwhenever s E SK.
Now,
we can take theappropriate spectral
sequence associatedto this
bicomplex.
DProposition
1.1implies that,
inparticular,
if Ii is aspecial G-CyV-complex,
thenthere exists a
spectral
sequenceLet us consider now the case where L is determined
by
ageneric
coefhcient sys- tem. LetOG
be thecategory
of canonical G-orbits. Itsobjects
are the G-setsG/H,
where H is a
subgroup
of G and itsmorphisms
are theG-maps.
For asubgroup
Hof
G, by iH
we will denote the functorOH
-OG
such thatiH(H/H’)
=G/H’.
There exists a functor
such
that,
for every cell s ofK, OK(G)(s) = G/Gs .
Contravariant functors fromOG
to Ab will be calledgeneric
coefficientssystems
for G. Ageneric
G-coefficientsystem
M :06
- Ab defines the local G-coefficientsystem M03B8K(G)
on Ii andBredon
proved
in[1]
thatHG* (K, M)
isequal
to the n-thcohomology
group of the cochaincomplex Homo,3 (c. (K), M),
wherec* (K)
is the chaincomplex
of con-travariant functors from
OG
to Ab suchthat,
for everysubgroup
H ofG,
1.2
Corollary
Let M be aG’-generic coefficient systerri. Then, for
anyfunctor
T :
SKGop
- G’ -CW,
there exists aspectral
sequencewhere
whenever s is a cell
of
h.Proof This result is a consequence of 1.1 because if L -
M03B8K{T}(G’),
thenL, = M03B8T(s)(G’).
0We will now describe the case where T is determined
by
a functorLet
IK : °d
---> CW beequal
to the functorMapG(-, h),
whereMaPG(-, -)
denotes the set of
G-maps.
HenceIK(G/H) = I(H
whenever H is asubgroup
of Gand
1.3
Corollary
Let M be ageneric G’-coefficient system.
Then there exists aspectral
seqencewhere
h q, (To, M)
is thegeneric G-coefficient system
such thatProof. It is easy to check that
In the
following examples
G = G’ .1.4
Examples (i)
Assume thatTo
is the functor suchthat,
for everysubgroup
H of
G, To(G/H)
=GIH
xIio
whereho
is aG-CW-complex.
ThenLet M be the constant coefficient
system
suchthat,
for everysubgr oup H
ofG,
M (G/H)
= Z. ThenIf
Ko
= EG is a universal freeG-CW-complex
thenand 1.3
gives
us thespectral
sequence described in[3],
Ch.VII.7.(ii)
Let h be aG-C’V-colnplex
and letTo(G/H)
beequal
to the fiberproduct
oftwo
projections
7r : Ii -K/G
and 7ro :(G/H
xK)/G
--->K/G.
As atopological
space,
To(G/H)
is asubspace
of theproduct
Ii x(K/H)
in thecategory of k-spaces.
The group G acts on
To (G/H) by
the action on the first coordinate. In this case,we obtain the
spectral
sequence described in[11],
1.18. 0In order to
give
otherexamples
ofspectral
sequences of thetype
described in1.1,
in the case where G’ isequal
toG,
we recall thefollowing
notation andsimple
facts from
[11].
LetSK [G]
be thecategory
whoseobjects
are the same as5’A"G’
andSK and whose
morphism
sets are defined in such a way thatThe
composition of morphisms
ofSK[G]
is determinedby
themultiplication
in G.We have two inclusions of
categories
IG : Sh --->ShG,
andz[G] :
SK --->SK [G]
and the
projection
pG :SK [G]
---->ShG
such that IG =PGz[G].
It is clear thatAssume that Y
(X)
is a covariant(contravariant)
functor fromSK [G]
toTop.
Then there exists a natural action of G on the
topological
spaceFor any s E
SK, y
EY(s)
and x EX(s)
we havewhere
[g-1] : gK (s)
--->K(s)
and[g] : K(s)
--->gK(s)
are the maps determinedby
theoperation by g"1 and g
on K.It is clear that
Let
XG : Slic
--->Top
be the functor such thatXG(s) = X (s)/Gs
whenevers E SK. Assume that Y" is a covariant functor from
ShG
toTop.
ThenIf X =
X"pG ,
where X " is a contravariant functor fromShG
toTop,
thenX G
= X "and
The functor
B(SKI-)
can be extended in a natural way to a functor fromSK [G]op
toTop.
In this case we obtain a natural G-action onAssume now that h is a
special G-CW-complex.
ThenIKIG
is a freelocally
contractible
SK-CW-complex
and there arehomotopy equivalences
Hence,
in this case, theclassifying
spaceBShG
of thecategory ShG
ishomotopy
equivalent
toK/G.
Let us consider now a functor U :
SK[G]op
--->Top.
We will use the notationThen
The functor U defines the functor
Tu : SKGop
- G -Top
such that asG-spaces,
and
By pt
we will denote the constant contravariant functor fromSK [G]
toTop
suchthat
pt(s)
isequal
to aone-point
spacept.
The natural transformation rU : U -pi
induces theG-map
pU :U[K]
--+ K. For everysubgroup
H ofG,
where
UH : (SK H) op
--+Top
is the functor such thatUH(s)
=U(s)H
whenevers E SK H .
If for every cell s of
K, U(s)
isGs-contractible,
then pu is aG-homotopy equi-
valence.
Indeed,
if for everysubgroup
H of G and s ESKH, U(s)H
iscontractible,
then
(pU )H
is ahomotopy equivalence
whenever H is asubgroup
of G and thisimplies
that pU is aG-homotopy equivalence.
If for every cell s of
K, U(s)/Gs
s iscontractible,
then we have ahomotopy equivalence
This is a consequence of the fact that
TU (s)/G
=U(s)/Gs.
If h is a
special G-CW-complex,
thenas
G-spaces
andAssume that U is a contravariant functor from
SK[G]
to CIV suchthat,
forevery cell s of
K , U(s)
is aG,-CW-complex.
ThenU[K]
is aG-CW-complex
suchthat
Let L be a local G-coefficient
system
onU[K].
For every cell s ofAB
letL(s)
be the local
Gs-coefficient system
onU(s)
such thatL(s)(s’)
=L(s’)
and letbe the local G-coefficient
system
on K such that1.5
Proposition.
Let h be aG-CW-complex.
Assume thatis a
functor
such thatU(s)
is aG" - CW-complex
whenever s is a cellof
h.(i)
Let L be a localG-coefficient system
onU[K].
Then there exists aspectral
sequence
In
particular, if
h is aspecial G-CW-complex,
then there exists aspectral
sequence(ii)
Let M be ageneric G-coefficient systeyn.
Then there exists aspectral
sequencewhere
Proof. The statement
(i)
is an immediate consequence of 1.1. The statement(ii)
follows from
(i)
because if L =MOU[K](G),
then for every cell s of Ii and s’ ofU(s), L(s)(.s’) = M(G/(Gs)s,),
soL(s)
=MiGsOu(s)(Gs).
OIf L =
L"pU,
where L" is a local G-coefficientsystem
on7B",
thenL(s)(s’)
isequal
toL"(s)
soL(s)
is a constantGs-coefficient system
onU(s)
andIf, additionally, U(s)IG,
isL"(s)-acyclic
whenever s ESK,
thenIf,
for every s ESK,
theprojection
G XG.U(s)
-G/Gs
induces an isomor-phism M(G/Gs ) = H* (G
x GsU(s), M),
thenAssume now that h and h’ are
G-CW-complexes
and that Y is a G-CW-subcomplex
of h x h’.By UY
we will denote the contravariant functor fromSK[G]
to thecategory P(Ii’)G
suchthat,
for every cell s of7B",
It is clear that
UY(s)
is aGs-CW-subcomplex
of Ii’. If s C so, thenUY(s
Cso)
isequal
to the inclusionUY (so) C UY (s).
For an element g ofG, Uy(gs)
=gUY (s)
and
UY(g)
is anoperation by g-1.
One caneasily
check thatUy [K]
= Y.Similarly,
let
be the functor such
that,
for every cell s’ ofIs’,
Then
Uý[K’] = Y.
If for every cell s of
h, Uy (s)
isGs-contractible,
then there is aG-homotopy equivalence
Y =h.If, additionally,
for every cell s’of K’, UY (s’)
isG s,-contractible,
then h is
G-homotopy equivalent
to K’.Proposition
1.5yields
thefollowing
fact.1.6
Corollary
Let L be alocal G-coefficient system
on Y. Then there exist twospectral
sequences andIt is easy to
check
that in this caseL(s)(s’)
=L(s
xs’).
1.7
Example
Assume that M is ageneric
G-coefficient system. Then there exists aspectral
sequencewhere
H q (Uy, M)
is the local G-coefficientsystem
suchthat,
for every cell s ofIi ,
In
particular,
if for every cell s ofh, UY (s)
isGs-contractible,
thenIn this case there exists a
spectral
sequence1.8
Example
Assume that L’ is a local G’-coefficientsystem
on K’. Let L =L’p
where p denote the restriction of the structural map Ii x K’ --> h’ to Y. Then
and
In
particular,
let A be an abelian group. Then there exists aspectral
sequencewhere Hence
whenever,
for every cell s of h and s’ ofIi’,
theCW-complexes UY (s) /Gs
andU’Y(s’)/Gs,
areA-acyclic.
01.9
Example
Let Ii and Ii’ beG-CW-complexes.
Assume thatis a functor such
that,
for every s E SKand 9
EG, U(gs)
=gU(s), U(g)
is theoperation by g-i
andU(s
Cs’)
is the inclusionU(s’)
gU(s).
Then there is anG-injection l.f : U[K]
- h x Ii’ such thatU[k, k’]
=(k, k’)
whenever k EK(s)
and E
U(s).
Letbe the functor such
that,
for every cell s’ of h’where
is the open cell of Ii which contains k. If Y =U(U[K]),
thenUY
= U’and
UY
= U.Let L be a local G-coefficient
system
on K’. Assumethat,
for every cell s’ ofK’,
the map
U’(s’)/G3,
---+pt,
wherept
is aone-point
space, induces theisomorphism
Then, by 1.8,
there is aspectral
sequencewhere
2
Diagrams
overG-posets
Assume that W is a
poset
and that G acts on Wpreserving
order.By
BIVwe will denote the
classifying
space of thecategory
associated toW,
which is con-structed in the
following
way. Letwhere w
C w’
means that w C w’ andw # w’,
and let W’ _Un=O W(n).
Then W’ can be considered as a
simplicial complex
whose elements are the subsetsf wo,..., wn}
of W such that(wo, ... , wn)
EW(n)
and BW is thepolyhedron
as-sociated to W’. The action of G on W induces the G-action on W’ and BW . It is clear that BT¥ is a
special G-CW-complex
and thatG-poset
of cells of BIV isequal
to W’.In this Section we will
apply
the results of Section 1 to the case where Ii isequal
to BW . Webegin
with a definition of aregular G-CW-complex
and thendescribe some
properties
of suchCW-complexes.
We will use them later because BW is aregular G-CW-complex.
Next wespecialize
the main results of Section 1 to the case h = BW andgive
certainexamples.
Inparticular,
we will consider the case where W is aG-poset
ofsubgroups
of G. Asapplication,
we obtain acertain sufficient condition for a
G-CW-complex
h such that the naturalprojection
EG x G h -i BG induces an
isomorphism
ofcohomology
groups with coefficients in the fieldFp
ofintegers mod p .
We will call a
G-CVV-complex
Ilregular if,
for any two cells s and s’ of h and for anyelement g
ofG,
the conditions s C s’ and s Cgs’ imply
that s = gs. Onecan
easily
check that BW is aregular G-CW-complex.
We will need thefollowing
facts.
2.1 Lemma Assume that h is a
regular G-CW-complex.
Then theprojection
v :
SIiG
--+S(KIG)
such thatv(s) = [s],
is a naturalequivalence of categories.
Proof. In this case, for any cell s of
K,
there is a naturalequivalence
of functorsand this
yields
the result. 02.2
Corollary
Let Ii be aregular G-CW-complex. Then, for
anyfunctor
T : SKGop ---> CW,
where, for
every cell sof h,
In
particular, if h is
aspecial regular G-CW-complex,
thenand
Proof. The result follows from the fact that there exist
isomorphisms
The next result can be
proved using
similararguments.
2.3
Corollary
Let h be aregular G-CW-complex. Then, for
anyfunctor
where
LIC : S(K/G)
- Ab is the localcoefficient system
onK /G
suchtlaat, for
every cell s
of K,
In
particular, if
h isadditionally
aspecial G-CW-corraplex,
thenAssume now that U :
SK[G]P
----+ CW is a functor suchthat,
for every s ESK, U(s)
is aG,-CW-complex.
If Ii is aregular G-CW-complex,
then there is a G-C W-isomorphism
where
NU : S(K/G)°P
- G - CW is the functor suchthat,
for every s Eh,
(The
functorTu
was defined beforeProposition 1.5.)
We will now
apply
the above results to the case where Ii isequal
to BW andW is a
G-poset.
It is clear that BW is aspecial, regular G-CW-complex.
We willuse the notation SW = SBW =
W’, BW/G
=(BW)/G,
andS’W/G
=(SW)/G.
Corollary
2.3implies that,
for every local G-coefficientsystem
L onBW,
From
Corollary
2.2 we obtain thatThe
following
fact is now an immediate consequence of 1.5.2.4
Corollary
Let U :SW[G]°P
- CW be thefunctor
suclatliat, for
everys E
SW, U(s)
is aGs-CW-complex. Then, for
any localG-coefficient system
L onU[BW],
there is aspectral
sequencewhere,
Morever,
there areG-homotopy eq2civalences
By W[G]
we will denote thecategory
whoseobjects
are the elements of YV and whosemorphism
sets are defined in such a way thatLet qW : SW - W be the
G-poset
map such thatThen
qW[G]
will denote the functorSW[G]
---+W[G]
inducedby
qlv.We will now consider the
following example.
Let D be a G-set and letP(D)
bethe
G-poset
of allnon-empty
subsets of D. Then theposet SP(D)/G
isconically
contractible
([9], 1.5).
Thus the space(BP(D))/G
is contractible because it ishomotopy equivalent
toB(SP(D)/G).
We will consider thecategory D[G]
whoseobjects
are the elements of D and whosemorphism
sets are defined as follows2.5
Example
Assume thatis a functor such
that,
forevery d E D, X (d)
is aGd-CW-complex.
We define thefunctor
in such a way
that,
for every subsetDo
ofD,
If and I then ) and
If
Do
gD1,
thenP(.¿Y)(Do g D1)
is the naturalprojection.
It is clear thatP.Y(Do)
is a
G Do-CBV-complex.
Let
Xo - P(X)qP(D). Then,
for every element 6 =(Do, ... , Dn)
ofSP(D),
Gb
=nin=o GD,
andis a
Gb-CW-complex.
LetWe will say that this
G-CW-complex
is theequivariant join
of X over the G-set D.Let M be a
generic
G-coefficient system. Then there exists aspectral
sequenceThe
following exa.mple
describes aspecial
case of 2.5.2.6
Example
Let H be asubgroup
of G and let V be anorthogonal
repre-sentation of H.
By Vo
we will denote theorthogonal representation
of G induced from V. HenceVo
=R(G) Q9R(H)
V where R denote the field of real nurnbers. Let SV= {v E V : |lvll = 1} be
the unitsphere
of V. It is well known that there existsa
H-CW-complex
structure on SV . Assume that D =G/H
and thatX(gH)
isequal
to thesubcomplex gSV
of G x H SV. Then it is easy to check thatSVo
isG-homeomorphic
to theG-CVV-complex
Let
SH
denote theright G-poset
of allnon-empty
left H-subsets of G. It is clear thatSH
=P(G/H).
The elementsof SSH
will be denotedby
a =(Ao, ... , A,).
There exists a
G-homotopy equivalence
For any
generic
G-coefficientsystem M,
there is aspectral
sequenceThe
following example gives
ageneralization
of thespectral
sequence described in[3],
Ch.VII.4.2.7
Example
Let D be a G-set. Assume that h’ is aG-CBiV-colnplex
and thatX :
D[G]’P
- CW is a functor suchthat,
forevery d
ED, X(d)
is aGD-CNV-
subcomplex
of h’and,
for every 9 EG, X(gd)
=gX(d)
and.Y(g)
is theoperation
by g-1.
We define the functorin such a way that
whenever
Do
is a subset of D. LetXi
=X¡qP(D)[G]. Hence,
if 6 =(Do, ... , Dn),
then
Xi(6) = XI(Dn)-
We will nowapply
1.9 to U =Xi,
h -BP(D).
In thiscase, for
any s’
ESK’, U’(s’)
=BP(D,,)
whereIf the set
D,,
is notempty,
thenU’(s’)
isG 3,-contractible.
Assume now
that,
for everypoint k
ofK’,
there is d E D such that k EX(d).
Then,
for every cell s’of Ii’,
the setDs’
isnon-empty.
Hence there is aG-homotopy equivalence
We have a
spectral
sequencewhenever L is a local G-coefficient
system
on Is’’. If M is ageneric
G-coefficientsystem,
then there is aspectral
sequenceIn
particular,
for any abelian groupA,
there is aspectral
sequenceIf
XI(D’)
isGD, -contractible
whenever D’ EP(D),
then h’ is G-contractible.If
XI(D.)IG6
is contractible whenever 6 ESP(D),
thenIi’/G
is contractible. 0 2.8Example
Let us consider the case where D is a G-set ofsubgroups
of G. Forany
nonempty
subsetDo of D, by H (Do )
we will denote thesubgroup
of Ggenerated by
all elements ofDo .
Let X be the functor such thatX(H)
=K’H,
whenever Hbelongs
to D. ThenXI(DO) = K,H(Do) . If,
for anyDo, K’H(Do) /NH(Do)
iscontractible,
thenK’/G
isacyclic.
0The next
example generalizes
thespectral
sequence described in[3],
Ch.IX.12.2.9
Example
Assume that W is aG-poset
and that K’ is aG-CW-complex.
Let
Uo :
wop -->P(K’)
be aG-poset
map. Then we define the functorin such a way
that,
for every w EW, U(w)
=Uo(w),
for every g EG, U(g)
is theoperation by g-1
andU(w
Cw’)
is the inclusionU(w’)
gU(w). By
the same letterU,
we will denote the extension of this functor to thecategory SW[G]
in such a waythat,
for w =(wo, ... , wn), U(w)
=U(wn).
Let K = BW . We will now considerExample
1.9 in this case. We haveG-homotopy equivalences
For any element k’ of
K’,
letIt is clear that
W(k’)
is aGk,-subposet
of W and that if w EW(k’)
and w Cw’,
then w’ EW(k’).
for any cell s’ ofK’,
we will use the notationW(s’)
=W(k’),
where
belongs
to the open cell s’. ThenU’(s’)
=BW(s’).
Thus there is aG-homotopy equivalence
If for every z.v E
W , Uo(w)
isGw-contractible,
then there is aG-homotopy equivalence
In this case, for any
generic
G-coefficientsystem M,
there exists aspectral
sequenceIf for every element w
of ,SW, U( wn)/Gw
iscontractible,
then there exist homo-topy equivalences
Let L be a local G-coefficient
system
on BW suchthat,
for every cv C,SW,
the mapis an
isomorphism.
Then there is aspectral
sequenceAssume now
that,
for everypoint
ofK’, BW(k’)
isGk’-contractible.
Thenwe have a
G-homotopy equivalence
In this case, for any
generic
G-coefficientsystem M,
there exists aspectral
sequenceIf,
for everypoint
k’ ofh’, BW(k’)/Gk,
iscontractible,
then there is ahomotopy equivalence
Assume that L is a local G-coefficient
system
on K’ suchthat,
forevery s’
ESK’,
the map
BW(s’)
----+pt
induces theisomorphism
Then there is a
spectral
sequence2.10
Example
Let W be aG-poset
ofsubgroups
of G and letbe the
G-poset
map suchthat,
for every element H ofW, Uo(H)
=K IH.
If k’ EK’,
then
(i)
Let us consider thefollowing
conditions.(a)
Forevery k’
EGkl
E W .(,3)
Theposet
W has the smallest elementHo
andHo
CGk’ ,
whenever k’ E K’.(y)
Forevery k’
Eh’,
there exists H E W such that H CGk, , and jf H,
H’ EW,
then H n H’ E W .
If one of this conditions holds
then,
forevery k’
Eh’, W (k’)
isGk,-contractible.
We will consider this case in
(ii).
(ii)
Assumethat,
forevery’ k’
Eh’, W(k’)
isGk’-contractible.
Then we haveG-homotopy equivalences
(An example
of such situation is described in[4].
In that case G is a p-group, which is not anelementary
p-group, 1;’ is aG-CW-complex
with nontrivialisotropy
groupsand l’V is the
G-poset
of all nontrivial and propersubgroups
ofG.)
For any
generic
G-coefficient systemA4,
there is aspectral
sequenceIf,
forevery H E W, h’H
isNH-contractible,
then K’ isG-homotopy equivalent
to BW .
If,
for every w ESW , K’Hn/Gw
iscontractible,
thenK’IG
ishomotopy equivalent
toBW/G.
(iii)
Let A be an abelian group. Assumethat,
forevery k’
Eh’,
the mapA -
H*(BW(k’)/Gk’,A)
is anisomorphism.
Then there is aspectral
sequenceIf, additionally,
for every w ESW , (K’Hn)/Gw
isA-acyclic,
then(iv)
Assumethat,
forevery
EK’, BW(k’)IGk,
is contractible. Then there isa
homotopy equivalence
o2.11
Example
The set of all nontrivialp-subgroups
of G will be denotedby
Wp(G).
Assume that h’ is anonempty G-CW-complex
and that(i)
Assumethat,
for every nontrivialp-subgroup
H ofG, K’H
isNH/H-con-
tractible.
Then, by
methods similar to those usedby
R.Oliver in theproofs
ofProposition
3 and Theorem 1of[8],
one can prove thatK’IG
is contractible.Indeed,
letMp(G’)
denote the set of allSylow p-subgroups
ofG’
and letand
Ks’(H)
=1(,H B K’H .
ThenK’s(H)
is aNH/H-sub complex
ofh’H and,
as isproved
in[8],
the naturalprojection
is,
infact,
ahomeomorphism.
Thisimplies
that ifGp
is aSylow p-subgroup
ofG,
then
GK Gp IG
=K Gp INGP
is contractible. We will use the induction onigpl.
If(Gp(
= p, then Ii’ =GK’Gp
and the result isproved.
It follows from the inductiveassumptions that,
for every H ElVp(G) B Jvfp(G), K(H)/NH
is contractible. Nowwe can use the induction on
|UkEK’ Mp( Gk )1.
In
particular, BWP(G)IG
is contractible. If H is asubgroup of G,
thenWp(G)(H)
is