• Aucun résultat trouvé

Agile versus MDE - Friend or Foe?

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Agile versus MDE - Friend or Foe?"

Copied!
1
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Keynote

Agile versus MDE - Friend or Foe?

Jon Whittle Lancaster University

Agile methods and MDE are often considered to be polar opposites of each other. Agile methods are fast, adaptive, responsive; MDE is heavyweight, plan- first, and requires high up-front investment. But are agile methods and MDE really so contradictory? Or could they co-exist and even work together to max- imize each other’s benefits? In this talk, I will reflect upon our recent study with two large companies that have both recently introduced agile methods into a model-driven environment. I will describe where they succeeded, and failed.

And discuss how MDE tools do or do not support working in an agile manner.

This is joint work with Hakan Burden and Rogardt Heldal.

Jon Whittleis Full Professor and Chair of Software Engineering at Lancaster Uni- versity’s School of Computing and Communications. He is well known for his work in software modeling, scenario-based requirements engineering, aspect-oriented soft- ware development, and, more recently, empirical studies of model-driven development in practice. He leads two research groups at Lancaster - one on software engineering and one on social computing. He has been on the PC of most major software engineer- ing conferences, including ICSE, ASE, MODELS, AOSD, RE, SPLC. He chaired the MODELS Steering committee from 2006-2008, was PC Chair for MODELS 2011, and Experience Track Chair for MODELS 2006.

Références

Documents relatifs

i) First Study: Survey with privacy experts to validate the concepts found in our SLR. This study results in a conceptual model of privacy related concepts. ii) Second Study:

In particular, in [3] it is shown that due to presence of links between requirements and artifacts, defined with advanced traceability matrix (ATM), it was possible to improve the

Bring Transparency and Democracy to OSS development, by facilitating projects to open up all aspects of the project (and not only its source code) via the

In this paper the author will provide insight in socialization aspect which can support requirement management process and improve knowledge availability,

This research will build on the foundation of related work, which have been gathered and synthesized in relation to RE [7] in the systems agile development environment [16] with

In addition, an evaluation of the metamodel through an international qualitative study (RQ4) in order to assess the metamodel has started. This PhD thesis contributes to the

We evaluated politeness, sentiment and emotions of comments posted by agile developers and studied the communication flow to understand how they interacted in the presence of

Keywords: Specification, Continuous Human-Centered Design, Process Mod- eling, Requirements Engineering, Requirements Models, Agile Development, SCRUM.. 1