• Aucun résultat trouvé

en fr

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "en fr "

Copied!
22
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: hal-02065960

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02065960

Submitted on 11 Apr 2019

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access

archive for the deposit and dissemination of

sci-entific research documents, whether they are

pub-lished or not. The documents may come from

teaching and research institutions in France or

abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est

destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents

scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,

émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de

recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires

publics ou privés.

Creating innovative composite materials to enhance the

kinetics of CO 2 capture by hydroquinone clathrates

Romuald Coupan, Frédéric Plantier, Jean-Philippe Torré, Christophe

Dicharry, Pascale Senechal, Fabrice Guerton, Peter Moonen, Abdel Khoukh,

Sid Ahmed Kessas, Mehrdji Hemati

To cite this version:

Romuald Coupan, Frédéric Plantier, Jean-Philippe Torré, Christophe Dicharry, Pascale Senechal, et

al.. Creating innovative composite materials to enhance the kinetics of CO 2 capture by hydroquinone

clathrates. Chemical Engineering Journal, Elsevier, 2017, 325, pp.35-48. �10.1016/j.cej.2017.05.038�.

�hal-02065960�

(2)

OATAO is an open access repository that collects the work of Toulouse

researchers and makes it freely available over the web where possible

Any correspondence concerning this service should be sent

to the repository administrator:

tech-oatao@listes-diff.inp-toulouse.fr

This is an author’s version published in: http://oatao.univ-toulouse.fr/21530

To cite this version:

Coupan, Romuald and Plantier, Frédéric and Torré, Jean-Philippe

and Dicharry,

Christophe and Sénéchal, Pascale and Guerton, Fabrice and Moonen, Peter and Khoukh,

Abdel and Kessas, Sid Ahmed

and Hemati, Mehrdji

Creating innovative composite

materials to enhance the kinetics of CO 2 capture by hydroquinone clathrates. (2017)

Chemical Engineering Journal, 325. 35-48. ISSN 1385-8947

Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.05.038

(3)
(4)

with a low molecular weight, such as carbon dioxide (CO2),

methane (CH4) and nitrogen (N2), can be trapped as guest mole

cules in a clathrate structure. A variety of host molecules, such as water, phenol and hydroquinone (HQ), have been studied in recent years and are described in literature[2]. Scientists have been fasci nated by gas clathrates for more than a century, but these solid compounds are now the focus of even greater attention owing to their possible practical applications such as CO2 capture and

sequestration. This new interest arises from their capacity to store large quantities of gases, more or less selectively depending on the clathrates considered and the gas mixture used.

To begin with, the most studied clathrate compounds are ‘‘gas hydrates”[3], which generally form at high pressure (a few MPa) and low temperature (a few K above 273 K) with water and gas. For the past 15 years or more, they have been the focus of many studies [4], which included adding chemical promoters or using different multiphase contactors[5 7]to overcome the many criti cal limitations that prevent hydrate based gas separation pro cesses from being deployed, from pilot to industrial scale. However, the use of gas hydrates to separate CO2from gas mix

tures such as CO2/CH4and CO2/N2is still hindered by the following

main obstacles: (i) the overall cost of the process is not competitive compared to others such as reactive absorption[8], except when the raw gas is already pressurized (as the gas compression costs are prohibitive in most cases); (ii) the difficulties in handling, con tacting and transporting a multiphase mixture composed of at least three phases that have to coexist (water or water/oil mixture, gases and solids) for the reaction to take place; (iii) the necessity to maintain a relatively low temperature in the apparatus for the gas hydrates to form (generally slightly above 273 K); and (iv) the low rate of hydrate formation and insufficient selectivity of gas hydrates toward CO2 in certain gas mixtures, particularly CO2/

CH4[9,10].

Secondly, HQ is a solid hydroxy aromatic compound recently identified in literature as a potential innovative clathrate candidate for gas storage and separation[11 13]. Interestingly, for different gas mixtures such as CO2/N2, CO2/H2 and CO2/CH4 [14,15], the

enclathration reaction with HQ seems to be highly selective to CO2. The thermodynamic pressure temperature conditions (i.e.

the clathrate phase equilibria) in which some HQ clathrates form and dissociate are mentioned in literature[16 19]and the equilib rium data and detailed characterization of CO2HQ clathrates were

recently published[20 21]. But although HQ clathrates seem very interesting for practical applications such as CO2 separation by

direct gas/solid reaction (i.e. without using any solvent), the gas clathrate formation kinetics need to be improved before these compounds can be used on an industrial scale. Previous studies involving tests carried out using powdered HQ have already attempted to do so [14,15,22]. But very fine HQ particles would be difficult to handle in an industrial gas solid contactor (such as a fixed bed reactor) for several reasons: (i) the gas circulating through the HQ powder causes a significant pressure drop that in some cases could be excessive, (ii) the very fine particles can be blown into the process equipment, and (iii) operators must apply stringent safety measures when handling large quantities of a fine pulverulent material such as HQ during loading and unloading of the reactor. Indeed, reactivity is limited by the contact area between the gas and the solid HQ, and depends on the specific area of the reactive medium used. Consequently, in an attempt to enhance the gas solid enclathration reaction, we developed a com posite material made of porous particles impregnated with HQ that can be used as a reactive medium in a clathrate based gas separa tion process.

There are two procedures for impregnation: wet impregnation (abbreviated as WI below) and dry impregnation (abbreviated as DI below) in a fluidized bed. Creation of a composite material by

WI consists of a dip coating method involving several steps: impregnation, filtration and drying[23]. DI in a fluidized bed was previously developed in the Laboratoire de Génie Chimique (chemi cal engineering laboratory) of Toulouse and patented by the INPT and the CNRS in 2001[24]. Unlike WI, creation of a composite material by DI in a fluidized bed is a ‘‘one pot process” in which the stages of impregnation, filtration and drying are carried out in just one apparatus. This technique consists in spraying a solu tion containing the organic precursor onto a warm fluidized bed of porous particles chosen as the support material for the precur sor. This condensed technique was initially used for depositing metal nanoparticles on porous supports (such as silica gel, alumina and activated carbon) and has shown that in operating conditions: (i) the deposition efficiency is close to 100%, (ii) the deposit is quasi uniform, and (iii) the size of the supported metal nanoparticles is controlled by the pore diameter[25 29]. In the present work, the composite materials synthesized by the two procedures (i.e. WI and DI) are evaluated as reactive media for CO2capture. Both the

gas storage capacity of the reactive media and data on the CO2cap

ture kinetics were measured and compared to the results obtained with pure powdered HQ. All experiments were performed at 3.0 MPa and 323 K by means of a gravimetric method using a mag netic suspension balance. These experimental conditions were chosen for two main reasons: (i) CO2HQ clathrates can form under

relatively high temperature (e.g. 323 K) and pressure[20]condi tions, which could be economically very advantageous when the raw gas is already hot and pressurized, the case for example of a production gas containing CO2/CH4; (ii) CO2 HQ clathrates may

reach their maximum capacity when the formation pressure is close to 3.0 MPa[30], justifying the operating pressure chosen for these tests.

2. Experimental section 2.1. Materials

The organic precursor used in this study is HQ (purity of 99.5 mol%) provided by Acros Organics. The solvent used in WI and DI is absolute ethanol (purity greater than 99 mol%). This choice was motivated by the high solubility of HQ in this solvent (e.g. 0.2063 mol% at 308.2 K)[31]and its low boiling temperature of 351 ± 2 K (calculated mean values obtained from the NIST) that facilitates the drying step. The N2, CO2and helium (He) used for the

experiments (minimum mole fraction purity of 99.995%) are pur chased from Linde Gas SA. The porous supports used are silica par ticles provided by SiliCycle. The experiments are conducted with two types of silica particles: high grade irregular silica particles (SiliaFlashÒ, referred to as SF below) and high purity analytical grade spherical silica particles (SiliaSphereÒ, referred to as SS below) with tight particle size distribution. Information concerning native SF and SS particles is given in theSupplementary Material. 2.2. Experimental set up and methods

Prior to impregnation, a saturated solution of HQ in ethanol was prepared at 308 K based on the solubility data and a correlation proposed by Li and coworkers[31]. Before each experiment, the solid particles were dried for 24 h at 423 K in a muffle furnace (from Nabertherm).

2.2.1. Wet impregnation

WI is performed in hermetic glass vessels. An oven (model 800, from Memmert) is used to maintain the temperature at a constant value with an accuracy of ±0.5 K. A vacuum filtration system com posed of a Buchner funnel connected to a vacuum pump is used for

(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)
(14)
(15)
(16)

same way as for the global capture capacity and reaction kinetics by using this type of composite material.

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge the entire work group involved in the ORCHIDS project and the Carnot Institute ISIFoR (Institute for the Sustainable engIneering of Fossil Resources). We extend our thanks to the staff of the Service Analyse et Procédés of the University of Toulouse for their help. We also wish to thank Mathieu Molinier, Victor Cabrol and Sofiane Bekhti for their tech nical assistance and the Total E&P, ‘‘Gas Solutions” department for its financial backing. We would also like to thank Total for pro viding UMS 3360 DMEX with the Zeiss Xradia Versa 510 used to carry out the tomographic acquisitions reported in this article. Appendix A. Supplementary data

Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in the online version, athttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.05.038. References

[1]H.M. Powell, The structure of molecular compounds. Part IV. Clathrate compounds, J. Chem. Soc. (1948) 61–73.

[2]J.L. Atwood, J.W. Steed, Encyclopedia of Supramolecular Chemistry, vol. 1, CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, 2004.

[3]E.D. Sloan, Fundamental principles and applications of natural gas hydrates, Nature 426 (2003) 353–363.

[4]H. Dashti, L. Zhehao Yew, X. Lou, Recent advances in gas hydrate-based CO2

capture, J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 23 (2015) 195–207.

[5]P. Babu, P. Linga, R. Kumar, P. Englezos, A review of the hydrate based gas separation (HBGS) process for carbon dioxide pre-combustion capture, Energy 85 (2015) 261–279.

[6]J.-P. Torré, M. Ricaurte, C. Dicharry, D. Broseta, CO2 Enclathration in the

presence of water-soluble hydrate promoters: hydrate phase equilibria and kinetic studies in quiescent conditions, Chem. Eng. Sci. 82 (2012) 1–13. [7]J.-P. Torré, D. Haillot, S. Rigal, R.W. de Souza Lima, C. Dicharry, J.-P. Bedecarrats,

1,3 dioxolane versus tetrahydrofuran as promoters for CO2-hydrate formation:

thermodynamics properties, and kinetics in presence of sodium dodecyl sulfate, Chem. Eng. Sci. 126 (2015) 688–697.

[8] Herri, J.-M., Kwaterski, M., Galfré, A., Brantuas, P., Cameirão, A., Ouabbas, Y., Bouillot, B., Sinquin, A., Broutin, P., Liebenthal, U., Kather, A., CO2 capture by using hydrates: From experimental evidences to economic impossibility as a post combustion process. Proc. of the 8th Int. Conf. on Gas Hydrates (2014) 28th July to 1st August 2014, BEIJING, China.

[9]M. Ricaurte, C. Dicharry, D. Broseta, X. Renaud, J.-P. Torré, CO2Removal from a

CO2–CH4gas mixture by clathrate hydrate formation using THF and SDS as

water-soluble hydrate promoters, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 52 (2013) 899–910. [10]M. Ricaurte, C. Dicharry, X. Renaud, J.-P. Torré, Combination of surfactants and

organic compounds for boosting CO2separation from natural gas by clathrate

hydrate formation, Fuel 122 (2014) 206–217.

[11]K.W. Han, Y.J. Lee, J.S. Jang, T.I. Jeon, J. Park, T. Kawamura, Y. Yamamoto, T. Sugahara, T. Vogt, J.-W. Lee, Y. Lee, J.-H. Yoon, Fast and reversible hydrogen storage in channel cages of hydroquinone clathrate, Chem. Phys. Lett. 546 (2012) 120–124.

[12]J.-W. Lee, P. Dotel, J. Park, J.-H. Yoon, Separation of CO2from flue gases using

hydroquinone clathrate compounds, Korean J. Chem. Eng. 12 (2015) 2507– 2511.

[13]T.A. Strobel, Y. Kim, G.S. Andrews, J.R. Ferrell III, C.A. Koh, A.M. Herring, E.D. Sloan, Chemicalclathrate hybrid hydrogen storage: storage in both guest and host, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130 (2008) 14975–14977.

[14]J.-W. Lee, J.-H. Yoon, Preferential occupation of CO2 molecules in

hydroquinone clathrates formed from CO2/N2gas mixtures, J. Phys. Chem. C

115 (2011) 22647–22651.

[15]Y.-J. Lee, K.W. Han, J.S. Jang, T.-I. Jeon, J. Park, T. Kawamura, Y. Yamamoto, T. Sugahara, T. Vogt, J.-W. Lee, Y. Lee, J.-H. Yoon, Selective CO2trapping in

guest-free hydroquinone clathrate prepared by gas phase synthesis, Chem. Phys. Chem. 12 (2011) 1056–1059.

[16]Y.N. Kazankin, A.A. Palladiev, A.M. Trofimov, Study of heterogeneous equilibria for noble gas – HQ clathrate systems. Part I: phase diagrams, Zh. Obshch. Khim. 42 (1972) 2607–2611.

[17]Y.N. Kazankin, A.A. Palladiev, A.M. Trofimov, Study of heterogeneous equilibria for noble gas – HQ clathrate systems. Part II: clathration isotherms, Zh. Obshch. Khim. 42 (1972) 2611–2615.

[18]J.H. Van der Waals, J.C. Platteeuw, Thermodynamic properties of quinol clathrates, Recl. Trav. Chim. Pays-Bas 75 (1956) 912–918.

[19] Van der Waals, J.H., Platteeuw, J.C., Clathrate solutions. Adv. Chem. Phys., Vol. 2 (ed I. Prigogine), John Wiley & Sons Inc, 1959.

[20]R. Coupan, M. Chabod, C. Dicharry, J. Diaz, C. Miqueu, J.-P. Torré, Experimental determination of phase equilibria and occupancies for CO2, CH4, and N2

hydroquinone clathrates, J. Chem. Eng. Data 61 (2016) 2565–2572. [21]J.-P. Torré, R. Coupan, M. Chabod, E. Péré, S. Labat, A. Khoukh, R. Brown, J.-M.

Sotiropoulos, H. Gornitzka, CO2–Hydroquinone clathrate: synthesis,

purification, characterization and crystal structure, Cryst. Growth Des. 16 (2016) 5330–5338.

[22]S.A. Allison, R.M. Barrer, Clathration by phenol and quinol. Part. II Kinetics, Trans. Far. Soc. 64 (1968) 557–565.

[23]S.P. Jiang, A review of wet impregnation – an alternative method for the fabrication of high performance and nano-structured electrodes of solid oxide fuel cells, Mater. Sci. Eng., A 418 (2006) 199–210.

[24] Hemati, M., Steinmetz, D., Chaudret, B., Philippot, K., Fabrication de catalyseur d’un nouveau type par imprégnation en lit fluidise, Patent EPI-PCT/FR 02/ 01795, 2001.

[25]L. Barthe, S. Desportes, M. Hemati, K. Philippot, B. Chaudret, Synthesis of supported catalysts by dry impregnation in fluidized bed, Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 85 (2007) 767–777.

[26]L. Barthe, M. Hemati, K. Philippot, B. Chaudret, Dry impregnation in fluidized bed: drying and calcination effect on nanoparticles dispersion and location in a porous support, Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 8 (2008) 349–358.

[27]L. Barthe, S. Desportes, D. Steinmetz, M. Hemati, Metallic salt deposition on porous particles by dry impregnation in fluidized bed: effect of drying conditions on metallic nanoparticles distribution, Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 87 (2009) 915–922.

[28]L. Barthe, M. Hemati, K. Philippot, B. Chaudret, A. Denicourt-nowicki, A. Roucoux, Rhodium colloidal suspension deposition on porous silica particles by dry impregnation: study of the influence of the reaction conditions on nanoparticles location and dispersion and catalytic reactivity, Chem. Eng. J. 151 (2009) 372–379.

[29]S. Desportes, D. Steinmetz, M. Hemati, K. Philippot, B. Chaudret, Production of supported asymmetric catalysis in a fluidized bed, Powder Technol. 157 (2005) 12–19.

[30]G. Peyronel, G. Barbieri, On some new clathrates of hydroquinone, J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 582–585 (1958).

[31]X. Li, Q. Yin, W. Chen, J. Wang, Solubility of hydroquinone in different solvents from 276.65 to 345.10 K, J. Chem. Eng. Data 51 (2006) 127–129.

[32]J.-W. Fulton, Selecting the catalyst configuration, Chem. Eng. 93 (1986) 97– 101.

[33]A. Lekhal, B. Glasser, J.G. Khinast, Impact of drying on catalyst profile of supported impregnation catalysts, Chem. Eng. Sci. 56 (2001) 4473–4487. [34]M. Hemati, R. Cherif, K. Saleh, V. Pont, Fluidized bed coating and granulation:

influence of process-related variables and physicochemical properties on the growth kinetics, Powder Technol. 130 (2003) 18–34.

[35]F. Khaddour, A. Knorst-Fouran, F. Plantier, M.M. Piñeiro, B. Mendiboure, C. Miqueu, A fully consistent experimental and molecular simulation study of methane adsorption on activated carbon, Adsorption 20 (2014) 649–656. [36]R.W. Coutant, Solventless preparation of hydroquinone clathrates, J. Org.

Chem. 39 (1974) 1593–1594.

[37]H.G. McAdie, Thermal decomposition of molecular complexes: II.b-quinol clathrates, Can. J. Chem. 41 (1963) 2137–2143.

[38]H.G. McAdie, Thermal decomposition of molecular complexes: IV. Further studies of theb-quinol clathrates, Can. J. Chem. 44 (1966) 1373–1386. [39]M. Thommes, K. Kaneko, A.V. Neimark, J.P. Olivier, F. Rodriguez-Reinoso, J.

Rouquerol, K.S.W. Sing, Physisorption of gases, with special reference to the evaluation of surface area and pore size distribution (IUPAC Technical Report), Pure Appl. Chem. 87 (2015) 1051–1069.

[40] Chiekh, N.S.-B., Evaporation en milieu poreux en présence de sel dissous. PhD Thesis INP Toulouse, France, 2006.

[41]V.R. Belosludov, Y.A. Dyadin, G.N. Chekhova, B. Kolesov, S.I. Fadeev, Hydroquinone clathrates and the theory of clathrate formation, J. Inclusion Phenom. 3 (1985) 243–260.

[42]M.M. Conde, J.-P. Torré, C. Miqueu, Revisiting the thermodynamic modelling of type I gas-hydroquinone clathrates, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 18 (2016) 10018–10027.

[43]J.N. Helle, D. Kok, J.C. Platteeuw, J.H. Van der Waals, Thermodynamic properties of quinol clathrates III, Recl. Trav. Chim. Pays-Bas 81 (1962) 1068–1074.

[44]J.W. Steed, D.R. Turner, K.J. Wallace, Core Concepts in Supramolecular Chemistry and Nanochemistry, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, England, 2007. [45]D.E. Palin, H.M. Powell, The structure of molecular compounds. Part VI. The

(17)

Creating innovative composite materials to

enhance the kinetics of CO

2

capture by

hydroquinone clathrates

Romuald COUPAN

1

, Frédéric PLANTIER

2

, Jean-Philippe TORRÉ

1,*

,

Christophe

DICHARRY

1

, Pascale SÉNÉCHAL

3

, Fabrice GUERTON

3

, Peter MOONEN

1,3

, Abdel

KHOUKH

4

, Sid Ahmed KESSAS

5

,

Mehrdji HEMATI

5

AUTHOR AFFILIATIONS:

1. CNRS/TOTAL/UNIV PAU & PAYS ADOUR, Laboratoire des Fluides complexes et leurs

Réservoirs-IPRA, UMR5150, 64000, PAU, France

2. CNRS/TOTAL/UNIV PAU & PAYS ADOUR, Laboratoire des Fluides complexes et leurs

Réservoirs-IPRA, UMR5150, 64600, ANGLET, France

3. UNIV PAU & PAYS ADOUR, CNRS, DMEX-IPRA, UMS 3360, 64000, Pau, France

4. UNIV PAU & PAYS ADOUR, CNRS – UMR 5254 – Institut des Sciences Analytiques et de

Physico-Chimie pour l’Environnement et les Matériaux (IPREM), Hélioparc, Avenue du Président Pierre Angot,

Pau F-64000, France.

5. Université de Toulouse – Paul Sabatier, CNRS – UMR 5503 – Laboratoire de Génie Chimique (LGC),

ENSIACET, INPT, 5 rue Paulin Talabot, BP 1301, Toulouse F-31106, France.

* CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Jean-Philippe TORRE. Address: CNRS/TOTAL/UNIV PAU & PAYS

ADOUR, Laboratoire des Fluides complexes et leurs Réservoirs-IPRA, UMR5150, 64000, PAU, France. Tel.

(18)

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL

1. INFORMATION CONCERNING THE NATIVE SUPPORT MATERIALS

The native support materials

− SiliaFlash® (SF) and SiliaSphere® (SS) silica particles − used

in this study underwent particle size characterization and gas porosimetry in order to

experimentally determine their textural parameters. Our experimental data and those provided

by the supplier are given in Table SI1 and Table SI2 respectively. As the batch of SF particles

presented a large size dispersion (i.e. from 200 to 1,000 µm), it had to be separated into two

fractions to allow homogenous fluidization: a low fraction of particles from 200 to 500 µm

(called L-SF below) and a high fraction of SF particles from 500 to 1,000 µm (referred to as

H-SF below).

Note that the SS particles were not evaluated by gas porosimetry, as the PSD was out of the

measurement range of the equipment. For the native SF particles, the PSD analysis revealed

mesopores of about 38 ± 5 nm, in good agreement with supplier data (pore diameter of 33 nm

provided).

Table SI1. Textural parameters of native

SiliaFlash® (SF) and SiliaSphere® (SS)

.

Support material

L-SF

H-SF

SS

d

10

(µm)

127

478

183

d

50

(µm)

326

748

249

d

90

(µm)

587

804

341

Mean particle diameter (µm)

306

710

242

Mean pore diameter (nm)

38

-

Porous volume (cm

3

/g)

0.89

-

(19)

Table SI2. Physical properties of native SiliaFlash® (SF) and SiliaSphere® (SS) given by the

supplier.

Support material

SF

SS

Particle diameter (µm)

200 – 1,000

200 – 500

Mean pore diameter (nm)

33

99

Porous volume (cm

3

/g)

1.28

0.83

Apparent density (g/ cm

3

)

0.583

0.790

Particle density (g/ cm

3

)

2.29

2.29

Porosity fraction

0.75

0.64

Specific area (m

2

/g)

155

57

pH

4.3

7.4

The operating conditions applied for developing the composite materials by Dry Impregnation

(DI), particularly the minimum fluidization velocities of the particles obtained at room

temperature, are listed in Table SI3.

Table SI3. Operating conditions applied for the DI of SiliaFlash® (SF) and SiliaSphere®

(SS).

Support material

H-SF

L-SF

SS

Fluidized bed

temperature (K)

308

308

308

Initial mass of support

material (g)

310

330

345

Minimal fluidization

velocity (m/s)

0.110

0.021

0.017

Fluidization gas

flow-rate (m

3

/h)

7.80

7.80

7.38

Spraying gas flow-rate

(Nm

3

/h)

1.2

1.2

1.2

HQ mass fraction of

solution

0.31

0.31

0.31

Mass of sprayed

solution (g)

383

198

556

Theoretical precursor

content (g

HQ

/ g

support

)

0.38

0.19

0.50

(20)

Figure SI1. SEM images of native silica particles: (a) SS particles; (b) H-SF particles. Images

obtained with a tabletop microscope HITACHI TM3000 equipped with an EDS SwiftED3000

detector from Oxford Instruments.

2. TECHNICAL DETAILS OF ANALYTICAL TECHNIQUES

The mean particle diameter and particle size distribution were evaluated by sieving and by

using a laser diffraction particle size analyzer from Malvern Instruments (model Mastersizer

2000). The laser diffraction particle size analyzer works for particles of about 0.02 µm to

2,000 µm.

The morphology of the particles was obtained using a field emission gun scanning electron

microscope (SEM-FEG) from JEOL (model JSM 7100F TTLS). This SEM is equipped with

an energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) spectrometer. The EDX technique detects X-rays emitted

by the sample while it is being bombarded by an electron beam and is able to characterize the

elemental composition of the surface analyzed.

(21)

The precursor content, defined as the mass of HQ per unit mass of support, was determined

by thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) by measuring the mass loss rate of the sample subjected

to a temperature ramp from ambient temperature to 773 K in an oxidizing atmosphere (air).

The thermal signature of the impregnated compound was verified by differential scanning

calorimetry (DSC). A Model Q600 analyzer from TA Instruments was used to perform both

TGA and DSC.

The attrition resistance was determined by a simple attrition test. A sample of the composite

material was sieved for 3 hours and its precursor content was measured by TGA. The value

obtained was compared with the precursor content of the original sample.

The textural parameters – specific area, total pore volume, and pore size distribution (PSD) –

were estimated from N

2

adsorption–desorption isotherms at 77 K using an automatic

Micromeritics TriStar II 3020 system. This system can be used to evaluate mesoporous

materials (i.e. materials with a pore size of 2 to 50 nm) with a specific area reaching several

thousands of m

2

/g. Before the measurements were taken, samples were purified at 308 K and

10 Pa for 24 hours. Specific areas were determined based on the Brunauer-Emmett-Teller

(BET) method [Brunauer, S., Emmett, P.H., Teller, E., 1938. Adsorption of gases in

multimolecular layers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 60, 309-319]. Both the total pore volume and the

pore size distribution were calculated using the Barrett-Joyner-Halenda (BJH) method

[Barrett, E. P., Joyner, L.G., Halenda, P.P., 1951. The determination of pore volume and area

distributions in porous substances. I. Computations from nitrogen isotherms. J. Am. Chem.

Soc. 73, 373–380] applied to the desorption branch of the N

2

isotherm.

Structural data were obtained by cross-polarization / magic angle spinning (CP/MAS)

solid-state

13

C NMR experiments using a Bruker Avance 400 spectrometer. The sample was placed

in a zirconia rotor of 7 mm and the spectra were collected at ambient temperature at a

resonance frequency of 100.61 MHz and a magic angle spinning rate of 7 kHz. The contact

(22)

time and pulse delay were 3.8 ms and 5 s respectively. Chemical shifts were referenced to

tetramethylsilane at 0 ppm and carbonyl signal of glycine at 176 ppm as external reference.

The three-dimensional microstructure was obtained by X-ray tomography using a Zeiss

Xradia Versa 510. Samples were subjected to the ambient test conditions (28°C) for at least

24h prior to each scan to ensure thermal equilibrium. For each scan, 2001 16 bit radiographs

are acquired, while rotating the sample over 360°. The acquisition settings were selected

based on the recommendations of the manufacturer of the tomograph [Zeiss, 2016. Zeiss

Xradia Versa User’s Guide]. 3D tomographic reconstruction was performed using the filtered

back projection algorithm, as implemented in XMReconstructor [Zeiss, 2016. Zeiss Xradia

Versa User’s Guide], using a Gaussian filter with a unit kernel width. Data analysis and

visualization was performed using Fiji [Schindelin J., Arganda-Carreras I., Frise E., Kaynig

V., Longair M., Pietzsch T., Preibisch S., Rueden C., Saalfeld S., Schmid B., Tinevez J. Y.,

White D. J., Hartenstein V., Eliceiri K., Tomancak P., Cardona A., 2012. Fiji: an open-source

platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods, 9, 676-682].

Figure

Table SI1. Textural parameters of native  SiliaFlash® (SF) and SiliaSphere® (SS) .
Table SI2. Physical properties of native SiliaFlash® (SF) and SiliaSphere® (SS) given by the  supplier
Figure SI1. SEM images of native silica particles: (a) SS particles; (b) H-SF particles

Références

Documents relatifs

Whereas a spherical object steadily moving at low Re through a elasto-viscoplastic material is a rather difficult to use as one needs to numerically solve the full hydrodynamic

NSP antibodies in cattle, pigs or sheep following administration of a double dose 20.. or a

Detection rate: We showed that the detection of a real movement was easier than discrete and continuous motor imageries but we could discuss about the weakness of the

The surface tension model, known as continuum surface force (CSF) model, proposed by Brackbill et al. The results are presented in function of time. For

“negative” (and associated colouring) to the cables ; thus for a “negative beamline” set up for negatively charged particles, the “negative cable” is attached to the

Let (B, ∆, A ) be a given simple affine 3-manifold with singularities. Since both positive and generic singular fibrations have a Lagrangian section, the result follows from

This is a photochromic compound that, when irradiated in the open form with UV light (320–370 nm) undergoes a photocyclization reaction, giving a coloured compound, ther- mally

In this regard, taking a look to neurophysiological measures, in particular to the W EEG index, it highlights an increase in the experienced cognitive workload if the