On the distance of genetic relationships and the accuracy of genomic prediction in pig breeding

The objectives of our study were to: (1) compare these two grouping methods based on genotyping infor- mation to improve accuracy of selection with group records, when using

3 Predicted versus empirical accuracies of the multi-population, single GRM genomic prediction model (5553 individuals from population B and 476 individuals from population A in

If sires introduced into environment 2 for evaluation are a selected sample from environment 1 and BLUP evaluations are used, grouping strategies and(or) adjustment of

The objec- tives of this study were: (1) to describe genomic prediction models that involve separate steps to estimate SNP variances and to estimate GEBV (genome-enhanced

Thus, although the EBV of the worker group and of a replacement queen are identical (Eq.  ( 8 )), accuracy of the EBV is lower for the replacement queen (Eq.  ( 10 )), because

Reliabilities of genomic estimated breeding values for crossbred performance with (W/) and without (W/O) availability of genotyping data, based on an across-breed SNP genotype

The average difference between the EBV of genotyped birds and all birds as a function of the difference between mean off- diagonal (AvgOff) elements of the genomic (G) and

The impact of genomic evaluation using imputed genotypes was evaluated as the correlation between GEBVs estimated with imputed genotypes and the ones estimated with