• Aucun résultat trouvé

L.Jaulin,B.DesrochersCoProd2016,Uppsala Thickseparators

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "L.Jaulin,B.DesrochersCoProd2016,Uppsala Thickseparators"

Copied!
43
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Thick separators Test-case

Thick separators

L. Jaulin, B. Desrochers CoProd 2016, Uppsala

Thick separators

(2)

Thick sets

Thick separators

(3)

Thick separators Test-case

A thin set is a subset of R n .

A thick set JXK of R n is an interval of ( P ( R n ),⊂).

JXK = JX , X K = { X ∈ P ( R n )| X ⊂ X ⊂ X }.

A thickset JXK is also the partition

X in , X ? , X out , where X in = X

X ? = X \ X X out = Z . The subset X ? is called the penumbra.

Thick separators

(4)

Redermor DGA-TN, Brest

Thick separators

(5)

Thick separators Test-case

Penumbra

Thick separators

(6)

Contractors

Thick separators

(7)

Thick separators Test-case

C ([x]) ⊂ [x] (contractance)

[x] ⊂ [y] ⇒ C ([x]) ⊂ C ([y]) (monotonicity)

Thick separators

(8)

Thick separators

(9)

Thick separators Test-case

Thick separators

(10)

Properties

Thick separators

(11)

Thick separators Test-case

Inclusion

C 1 ⊂ C 2 ⇔ ∀ [x] ∈ IR n , C 1 ([x]) ⊂ C 2 ([x]).

Thick separators

(12)

A set S is consistent with C (we write S ∼ C ) if C ([x]) ∩ S = [x] ∩ S.

Thick separators

(13)

Thick separators Test-case

C is minimal if

S ∼ C S ∼ C 1

⇒ C ⊂ C 1 .

Thick separators

(14)

Separators

Thick separators

(15)

Thick separators Test-case

A separator S is pair of contractors

S in , S out such that S in ([x]) ∪ S out ([x]) = [x] (complementarity).

Thick separators

(16)

A set S is consistent with S (we write S ∼ S ), if S ∼ S out and S ∼ S in .

Thick separators

(17)

Thick separators Test-case

Thick separators

(18)

Properties

Thick separators

(19)

Thick separators Test-case

Inclusion

S 1 ⊂ S 2 ⇔ S 1 in ⊂ S 2 in and S 1 out ⊂ S 2 out . Here ⊂ means more accurate.

Thick separators

(20)

S is minimal if

S 1 ⊂ S ⇒ S 1 = S . i.e., if S in and S out are both minimal.

Thick separators

(21)

Thick separators Test-case

Algebra

Thick separators

(22)

If S i =

S i in , S i out ,i ≥ 1, are separators, we define S 1 ∩ S 2 =

S 1 in ∪ S 2 in , S 1 out ∩ S 2 out (intersection) S 1 ∪ S 2 =

S 1 in ∩ S 2 in , S 1 out ∪ S 2 out (union) S 1 \ S 2 = S 1 ∩ S 2 . (difference)

Thick separators

(23)

Thick separators Test-case

Theorem. If S i are subsets of R n , we have (i) S 1 ∩ S 2 ∼ S 1 ∩ S 2

(ii) S 1 ∪ S 2 ∼ S 1 ∪ S 2

(iii) S i ∼ S i

(iv) S i ∼ S i k , k ≥ 0 (vi) S 1 \ S 2 ∼ S 1 \ S 2 .

Thick separators

(24)

Set M

Thick separators

(25)

Thick separators Test-case

Rot( M )

Thick separators

(26)

Rot( M ) ∪ M

Thick separators

(27)

Thick separators Test-case

Thick separators

Thick separators

(28)

A thick separator JS K for JXK is a 3-uple of contractors S in , S ? , S out such that, for all [x] ∈ IR n

S in ([x]) ∩ X in = [x] ∩ X in S ? ([x]) ∩ X ? = [x] ∩ X ? S out ([x]) ∩ X out = [x] ∩ X out

Thick separators

(29)

Thick separators Test-case

Algebra

Thick separators

(30)

Intersection. Consider two thick separators JS X K =

S X in , S X ? , S X out and JS Y K =

S Y in , S Y ? , S Y out . A thick separator JS Z K =

S Z in ,S Z ? , S Z out for

JZK = JZ , Z K = JXK ∩ JYK

is

S X in ∩ S Y in , S X ? ∩ S Y in

t S X ? ∩ S Y ?

t S X in ∩ S Y ?

, S X out t S Y out .

Thick separators

(31)

Thick separators Test-case

Intersection of two thick sets

Thick separators

(32)

Illustration. Take one box [x] .

Thick separators

(33)

Thick separators Test-case

We have

JS X K ([x]) = n

S X in , S X ? , S X out o

([x]) = {[a],[x], /0}

where [a] the white box. Moreover, JS Y K ([x]) = n

S Y in , S Y ? , S Y out o

([x]) = { /0,[x], /0 } .

Thick separators

(34)

JS Z K =

S Z in , S Z ? , S Z out ([x])

= { S X in ∩ S Y in ([x]),

= S X ? ∩ S Y in

t S X ? ∩ S Y ?

t S X in ∩ S Y ? ([x]),

= S X out t S Y out ([x]) }

= { [a] ∩ /0,([x] ∩ /0) t ([x] ∩ [x]) t ([a] ∩ [x]) , /0 t /0 }

= { /0, [x], /0}

We conclude that [x] ⊂ Z in .

Thick separators

(35)

Thick separators Test-case

Using Karnaugh maps

Thick separators

(36)

Thick separators

(37)

Thick separators Test-case

Union. For

JZK = JXK ∪ JYK , we read from the Karnaugh map

Z in = X in ∪ Y in Z ? = X ? ∩ Y out

∪ X ? ∩ Y ?

∪ X out ∩ Y ? Z out = X out ∩ Y out .

A thick separator JS Z K =

S Z in ,S Z ? , S Z out for JZK is S X in t S Y in , S X ? ∩ S Y out

t S X ? ∩ S Y ?

t S X out ∩ S Y ?

, S X out ∩ S Y out

Thick separators

(38)

XOR. For

JZK = JXK ⊕ JYK = JXK \ JYK ∪ JYK \ JXK ,

we read

Z in = X in ∩ Y out

∪ X out ∩ Y in Z ? = X ? ∪ Y ?

Z out = X in ∩ Y in

∪ ( X out ∩ Y out ) .

Thick separators

(39)

Thick separators Test-case

Thick separators

(40)

Therefore a thick separator for the thick set JZK = JXK ⊕ JYK is S X in t S Y in , S X ? ∩ S Y out

t S X ? ∩ S Y ?

t S X out ∩ S Y ?

,S X out ∩ S Y out .

Thick separators

(41)

Thick separators Test-case

Test-case

Thick separators

(42)

Example from [Kreinovich, Shary, 2016]:

[2,4] · x 1 + [−2,0] · x 2 ∈ [−1, 1]

[−1,1] ·x 1 + [2,4] ·x 2 ∈ [0,2]

Thick separators

(43)

Thick separators Test-case

Thick separators

Références

Documents relatifs

On  apprend  de  chaque  implantation  et  on  intègre  ces  connaissances  pour  développer  ensuite  une  nouvelle  implantation.  C’est  par  exemple 

souligne aussi les limites. Un survey ne peut pas remplacer une fouille. Outre leur conservation différenciée qui crée d’inévitable biais, beaucoup de catégories de matériel

For some particular properties and for invariant system (i.e., f does not depend on t), it has been shown [1] that the V-stability approach combined interval analysis [3] can solve

If the intruder is in the visibility zone of one robot, it is detectedL. Zerr Secure a zone

Computing Minkowski sum and difference can be seen as a registation problem... Registration problem

Guaranteed characterization of the explored space of a mobile robot by using subpavingsL.

Guaranteed integration is a set of tech- niques, which make it possible to compute a tube that encloses the solution of a state equation or to enclose all solutions of a

Pretraining To account for the limited in- domain data, we use pre-existing MT models trained for the WMT’19 news task (Barrault et al., 2019) and then continue training on