• Aucun résultat trouvé

Associative string functions

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Associative string functions"

Copied!
20
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Associative string functions

Erkko Lehtonen(∗) Jean-Luc Marichal(∗∗) Bruno Teheux(∗∗)

(2)

Associative functions

Let X be a nonempty set F : X2 → X isassociativeif

F (F (x , y ), z) = F (x , F (y , z))

(3)

Associative functions

(4)

Notation

We regard n-tuples x in Xn asn-stringsover X 0-string: ε 1-strings: x , y , z, . . . n-strings: x, y, z, . . . X∗ = [ n∈N Xn X∗ is endowed with concatenation

(5)
(6)

Associative functions with indefinite arity

Binary associativity F (F (xy )z) = F (x F (yz)) Induction formula F (xy ) = F (F (x)y ) |x| > 2 Proposition

Binary associativity + induction formula m

(7)

Associative functions with indefinite arity

F : X∗ → X isassociativeif

F (xyz) = F (xF (y)z) ∀ xyz ∈ X∗

Theorem

F : X∗ → X is associative if and only if

(i) Binary associativity + induction formula

(ii) F1◦ F1 = F1

(iii) F1◦ F2 = F2

(iv) F2(xy ) = F2(F1(x ) y ) = F2(x F1(y ))

(8)
(9)

Preassociative functions

Let Y be a nonempty set

Definition. We say that F : X∗ → Y ispreassociativeif F (y) = F (y0) ⇒ F (xyz) = F (xy0z)

Examples: Fn(x) = x12+ · · · + xn2 (X = Y = R) Fn(x) = |x| (X arbitrary, Y = N)

Proposition

(10)

Preassociative functions

Preassociative functions Preassociative functions ran(F1) = ran(F )

(11)

Preassociative functions

Theorem

Let F : X∗ → Y . The following assertions are equivalent:

(i) F is preassociative and satisfies ran(F1) = ran(F )

(ii) F can be factorized into

F = f ◦ H where H : X∗ → X is associative

(12)

Axiomatizations of function classes

Theorem (Acz´el 1949)

H : R2 → R is continuous

one-to-one in each argument associative

if and only if

H(xy ) = ϕ−1(ϕ(x ) + ϕ(y )) where ϕ : R → R is continuous and strictly monotone

(13)

Axiomatizations of function classes

Theorem

Let F : R∗ → R. The following assertions are equivalent:

(i) F is preassociative and satisfies ran(F1) = ran(F ),

F1 and F2 are continuous and one-to-one in each argument

(ii) we have

Fn(x1· · · xn) = ψ ϕ(x1) + · · · + ϕ(xn) 

(14)

Preassociative functions

Preassociative functions Preassociative functions ran(F1) = ran(F )

(15)

String functions

Astring function if a function

F : X∗ → X∗

F : X∗ → X∗ is associativeif

(16)

Associative string functions

F : X∗ → X∗ is associativeif

F (xyz) = F (xF (y)z) ∀ xyz ∈ X∗

Examples F = id

F = sorting data in alphabetic order

F = transforming a string of letters into upper case F = removing a given letter, say ‘a’

(17)

Preassociative functions

Theorem

Let F : X∗ → Y . The following assertions are equivalent:

(i) F is preassociative

(ii) F can be factorized into

F = f ◦ H where H : X∗ → X∗ is associative

(18)

Preassociative functions

Preassociative functions

Associative string functions

Open question:

(19)
(20)

A very short proof

Recall that F : X∗→ X is

-associative if F (xyz) = F (xF (y)z)

-preassociative if F (y) = F (y0) implies F (xyz) = F (xy0z)

Proposition

F is associative ⇐⇒ F is preassociative and F (x) = F (F (x))

(⇒) If F is associative, then F (y) = F (F (y)) (just take xz = ε) Now if F (y) = F (y0), then

F (xyz) = F (xF (y)z) = F (xF (y0)z) = F (xy0z) (⇐) We have F (y) = F (F (y)) and therefore

Références

Documents relatifs

They are involved in monotone dynamical systems, uniform persistence and coexistence states, basic reproduction ratios for compartmental epidemic models in periodic

We also characterize the recently introduced preassociative functions as compositions of associative string functions with injective

We will also show with concrete examples (Acz´ elian semigroups, t-norms, Ling’s class) how to derive axiomatizations of classes of preassociative functions from certain

We also provide necessary and sufficient conditions on F for the existence of continuous solutions and we show how to construct such a solution. We finally discuss a few applications

Proposition 11 (Left composition). As we will now show, this special class of functions has interesting properties. First of all, just as for as- sociative functions, preassociative

Applied Mathematics Unit Department of Biomathematics and Informatics University of Luxembourg Faculty of Veterinary Science.. 162A, avenue de la Faiencerie Szent

This generalization follows if, cross- linguistically, lexemes are or can be verbal (that is, underpecified, and giving rise to verb words and a mixed category like English gerunds

The main objective of this thesis is to enhance the reliability of decisions made using results obtained from quantitative analytical methods during different steps of their